Exclusive-Kretinsky's EPH, Itochu among expected bidders for Energia, sources say
LONDON :Daniel Kretinsky-backed Czech energy group EPH and Japanese trading house Itochu are expected to make preliminary bids for Irish utility Energia Group, according to two sources with knowledge of the situation.
Other expected bidders include investors Ardian, Asterion and CPP Investments, the people said. Itochu is expected to form a consortium and CPP Investments may team up with Britain's Octopus Energy, which it is an investor in, one of the people said.
After being acquired by private equity firm I Squared for about $1 billion in 2016, a new sale could value Energia Group at more than 2 billion euros ($2.27 billion) including debt, the sources and a third one said.
Non-binding offers are due this week, the sources and a fourth one said. All four sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is private.
I Squared, CPP Investments, Itochu, EPH, Ardian, Asterion all declined to comment. Energia Group referred questions to I Squared and Octopus Energy did not reply immediately to a request for comment.
Energia Group, which supplies approximately 17 per cent of Ireland's total electricity requirements, is the latest power company to draw investor interest following the acquisition of Electricity North West by Iberdrola last year.
The company is an integrated utility with investments in renewables, power distribution, data centres and gas turbines.
Energia Group recently secured permission from Irish authorities to build a data centre in Dublin allowing its sale process to go ahead, three of the sources said.
($1 = 0.8814 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
30 minutes ago
- CNA
Microsoft to invest $400 million in Switzerland on AI, cloud computing
ZURICH :Microsoft will invest $400 million in Switzerland, the company said on Monday, with the money going towards developing its cloud computing and artificial intelligence infrastructure. The U.S. tech company will announce the investment at a meeting of Swiss Economy Minister Guy Parmelin and its vice chair Brad Smith, Microsoft said.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Dior picks Jonathan Anderson as creative director
Northern Irish designer Jonathan Anderson has been named creative director of women's, men's and haute couture collections of Dior, replacing Maria Grazia Chiuri who held the role for almost a decade. The expanded role for Anderson, who was made menswear designer in April, cements his status as a star of the business after his decade-long rise at Dior's parent company LVMH. Bernard Arnault, chair and chief executive of LVMH, described Anderson — son of former Irish rugby captain Willie Anderson — as 'one of the greatest creative talents' of his generation. 'His incomparable artistic signature will be a crucial asset in writing the next chapter of the history of the House of Dior,' he added. LVMH took a minority stake in Anderson's eponymous label in 2013, the same year that he was named creative director of the LVMH-owned Loewe. He transformed the reputable but staid Spanish label into one of the industry's most acclaimed fashion houses. Under Chiuri, Dior's first female creative director, sales grew quickly to nearly €8.7 billion (US$9.91 billion; S$12.77 billion) , according to HSBC estimates. In the past year, however, sales have fallen from record highs during an industry-wide slowdown. Sales at LVMH's bellwether fashion and leather goods division, which houses Dior, fell 5 per cent in the first quarter. Rising prices have contributed to consumer fatigue, as well as a sense that Dior needed some new creative impetus after the highly successful run under Chiuri and former chief executive Pietro Beccari, now in charge of luxury brand Louis Vuitton. Chiuri's departure was announced last week. 'Greedflation and lack of creativity have hit [Dior], but we believe the brand could recover with the second half of 2025 being flattish and 2026 growing again,' analysts at HSBC wrote, adding that excitement over Anderson's arrival was unlikely to help performance in the current fiscal year. Anderson grew up in Magherafelt, Northern Ireland and got his first break in fashion while working as a window dresser in Dublin's Brown Thomas department store. Considered a disrupter in the design world, his 2008 debut show for his own label JW Anderson, in which he showed a gender-fluid menswear collection of ruffled hot pants and leather dresses, was deemed a critical disaster and he considered giving up. More recent collections have demonstrated a sophisticated commercial instinct. Anderson has also taken on high-profile projects such as designing Rihanna's outfit for her 2023 Super Bowl appearance and costumes for recent Luca Guadagnino film Challengers. 'A point of view is essential in order to shape the output of a House,' said Anderson. 'I have mine, of course, regarding what Dior can be, but I am convinced that a House like this calls for an empathetic exchange.' The changes at Dior and Loewe are part of a wider reshuffle of top creative talent, as brands from Gucci to Valentino, Chanel and Balenciaga seek renewal in a tougher luxury market. Anderson left Loewe earlier this year when former Proenza Schouler designers Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez were named creative directors. While the LVMH group counts Sarah Burton — formerly of Alexander McQueen — at Givenchy and Camille Miceli at Pucci among its ranks, Chiuri's departure has emphasised the lack of women in creative leadership roles across the fashion industry. Anderson will present his first collection in Paris on Jun 27. Delphine Arnault, chair and chief executive of Christian Dior Couture, said: 'I am convinced that he will bring a creative and modern vision to our House, inspired by the fabulous story of Monsieur Dior and the codes he created.'
Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Trump's brain drain is America's loss, but could be the world's biggest win
INTERNATIONAL: There was a time when Danielle Beckman viewed the United States as the apex of opportunity for researchers and experts. A neuroscientist from Brazil, Beckman accomplished her ultimate desire in 2017 when she joined the California National Primate Research Centre at UC Davis. 'Coming to the US was always the dream,' Beckman said. 'It was always the place to be, where there's the biggest investment in science.' But just a few years later, according to a recent CNN report, that dream has disintegrated. Amid comprehensive slashes to research subsidies, government meddling in academia, and anti-immigrant pomposity, Beckman is now prepared to leave the U.S. Her laboratory has already lost $2.5 million in revoked endowments, and she's now exploring prospects in Germany and France. 'It's the first time since I moved here that I don't feel so welcome anymore,' she said. Beckman is not alone. A rising migration of academics and field experts is in progress, as top inventors and professors in different disciplines are searching for new homes for their work, and their families in nations where science is still guarded and treasured. Countries rush to recruit U.S. scientists As America's academic setting becomes increasingly antagonistic, other countries are making the most of the opportunity. The European Union has guaranteed €500 million ($562 million) to turn Europe into a centre for banished researchers. France is initiating a 'Safe Place for Science' package in Marseille to admit targeted or repressed researchers. In the meantime, Canada, Norway, Singapore, and Australia all have activated parallel endeavours to entice superior talent from the U.S. 'We know these individuals are highly trained, talented, and have much to offer,' said Anna-Maria Arabia, CEO of the Australian Academy of Science. Her group is one of the many tapping into what she calls a 'global hunger' for scientific proficiency, now bolting away from the U.S. in hordes. These worldwide initiatives mark a dramatic setback to the established brain gain America has relished for a long time. The damage, experts caution, could change the global scenario of innovation and research direction. Funding slashed, freedoms threatened, and the toll of Trump's policies. As he entered his second term, President Donald Trump has overturned the connection between the federal government and America's primary research institutions. Federal backing for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF)—once pillars of worldwide systematic management—has been reduced by billions. Nearly 700 NIH endowments totalling $1.8 billion were lost in just a few weeks earlier this year. The Trump government has also planned a 40% decrease in the NIH's 2026 budget. Simultaneously, leading academies like Harvard are embattled for their refusal to pull apart diversity and inclusion agendas. The administration immobilised billions in federal financing and barred Harvard from registering transnational students, a verdict which was swiftly reversed by a federal judge. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt justified the government's rerouting of resources, saying they will coddle 'trade schools and state programs promoting American values,' while disparaging 'LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University.' The message is clear: The U.S. government is becoming increasingly unreceptive and antagonistic to independent science, global students, and the type of academic autonomy that once demarcated its universal standing. The collapse of U.S. scientific leadership? For many decades, the U.S. has long been the world's research steamroller, behind more than 400 Nobel Prizes, many earned by émigrés, and boosted by approximately a trillion dollars in yearly public and private R&D investment. Today, that reputation is now in jeopardy. China, with more than $780 billion in yearly R&D outlay, is quickly closing the innovation gap. The European Union's R&D investments have increased by 50% over the past decade and a half. These nations are now better positioned to engage the world's superior minds. See also Speaker of the House seat up for grabs again The consequence is a flashpoint. Based on a Nature survey from March, 75% of U.S. researchers said they're contemplating exiting the country due to the Trump administration's guidelines. Others, like Yale professors Jason Stanley, Marci Shore, and Timothy Snyder, distinguished academics of fascism, have already transferred to Canada. 'What we are losing is this whole cadre of highly productive, young, energetic, well-trained, knowledgeable, advanced researchers,' cautioned Kenneth Wong, an expert education policy professional at Brown University. 'It's a complete reset of the collaborative relationship between the federal government and our leading research institutions.' For Beckman, whose study centres on how diseases like COVID-19 impact the brain, the choice is now less about politics and more about endurance and survival. 'There is interest in virology everywhere in the world except the U.S. right now,' she said. As the world welcomes U.S.-trained scientists, the question is: will America mend from the impairment, or relinquish its scientific advantage for good?
