
Why Trump's military 'birthday' parade is so controversial
For the first time in more than 30 years, tanks will roll through the capital of the United States.
The 250th anniversary of the United States Army could see hundreds of thousands descend on Washington DC to watch as 60-ton M1 Abrams battle tanks and Paladin self-propelled howitzers rumble along the streets.
But, like almost everything Donald Trump is involved in, it has not come without controversy or criticism.
It wasn't originally planned as a birthday celebration - the event had been in the works since before Trump was elected - but earlier this year the President announced his intention add a massive military parade to the event, which would coincide with his own 79th birthday.
Speaking earlier this week, Trump said it is going to be a "big day", adding: "We want to show off a little bit."
Officials have estimated around 200,000 people could turn out, including protesters, plus 6,600 soldiers, 150 vehicles and 50 aircraft.
More than 1,500 'No Kings' demonstrations have also been planned across the US, but the group has said it will not be holding events in Washington DC, in part to avoid a direct confrontation.
It comes as the president warned that any protesters who rain on his military parade "will be met with very big force".
Does the US typical hold military parades?
Unlike other countries, military parades in the United States are fairly rare, but Trump has made no secret of his desire for one.
The last time such a major display took place in the US it was in 1991, when tanks and thousands of troops paraded through Washington to celebrate the ousting of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's army from Kuwait.
During Trump's first administration, he ordered the Pentagon to look into holding a display after a visit to France in 2017.
He was seemingly inspired after witnessing the country's Bastille Day parade, and attempted to plan a Veteran's Day parade for 2018. However, this was cancelled due to "ridiculously high" cost estimates.
Trump ultimately settled for a display of tanks and other armoured vehicles during a fourth of July celebration, named Salute to America, two years later.
What is happening on the day?
Saturday will start with a wreath-laying ceremony in the morning at Arlington National Cemetery, followed by an army birthday festival on the National Mall in DC. The festival will include equipment displays and military demonstrations.
The day will conclude with a military parade throughout the city, overseen by Trump.
After the parade, the US Army Golden Knights team will parachute in and present the president with a flag.
How much will it cost?
All the celebrations will cost the US Army between $25 million (£18.51m) and $45 million (£33.33m), officials told Reuters.
These estimates include costs that will be born by the city of Washington, include litter clean up. The event will involve 18 miles of fencing and 175 metal detectors being installed in the capital.
The military has also begun taking steps to protect the streets from damage caused by heavy tanks, including laying down metal plates in some areas.
The Army said it will pay for any unexpected repairs if needed and has set aside several million dollars in case of damage.
Why is it controversial?
President Trump's critics have called the parade an authoritarian display of power, that is particularly wasteful as his administration seeks to slash federal spending.
The cost of the Army's celebration is several million dollars more than it would have been without a parade, officials said.
Among the critics is California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has been trading barbs with Trump since the outbreak of riots in LA.
"And we all know, this Saturday, he's ordering our American heroes - the United States military - forcing them to put on a vulgar display to celebrate his birthday, just as other failed dictators have done in the past," he said.
"This is his ego and making everything about 'him'," Senator Jack Reed, the top democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, has also said.
But other officials have pointed out plans for the Army's 250th birthday began before Trump won the presidential election, and it is not officially an event to mark his birthday - the dates just happen to be the same.
How will it compare to military parades around the world?
One of the criticisms of the parade is that it is a show of military might more often seen in authoritarian countries, such as North Korea, Russia, Iran and China.
This is because tanks in the streets are symbolically associated with these regimes, where they are designed to inspire nationalism and fear, whilst also promoting obedience - they often take place under the watchful eye of their country's leader.
Russia holds its annual Victory Day parade on 9 May to commemorate the country's Soviet victory over Nazi Germany. In recent years, it has been used to protect military strength during the Ukraine war.
China holds a National Day parade on 1 October every ten years, or on key anniversaries, to celebrate the founding of the People's Republic in 1949.
In Iran, an Army Day Parade takes place in April, a month after the country's Revolution Day celebrations.
North Korea holds parades on key dates like Kim Il-sung's birthday, or the ruling party's foundation day. Taking place in the country's capital of Pyongyang, the display will often feature new weapons, closely watched by leader Kim Jong-un.
But not every country that holds a military parade is necessarily authoritarian.
The UK holds its annual Trooping of the Colour every summer to celebrate the birthday of the British Monarch.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Federal judge blocks Trump from deploying National Guard to California
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard to California in the midst of the anti-ICE protests. The judge has also paused his order to give both sides time to appeal. June 13, 2025


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration seeks to distance US from Israeli strikes on Iran
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration sought to distance the United States on Thursday from Israel's strikes on Iran, attacks that are likely to complicate Trump's drive for a nuclear deal with Tehran. Israel said it had struck Iranian nuclear targets to block Tehran from developing atomic weapons, even as the Trump administration was preparing to hold a sixth round of talks on Sunday on Tehran's escalating uranium enrichment program. Marco Rubio, Trump's secretary of state and national security adviser, stressed that Israel's strikes were unilateral, while saying the U.S. had known attacks would occur. "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense." Just hours before the strikes, Trump had urged a diplomatic solution to the tensions, while saying a strike on Iran "could very well happen." Iran says its nuclear energy program is only for peaceful purposes, although the International Atomic Energy Agency on Thursday declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Rubio had a stark warning for Iran, a day after the United States ordered some U.S. personnel to leave the Middle East in response to tensions in the area. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel," he said. His statement did not mention whether Washington would support Israel if it faces retaliatory strikes, a standard line in the past. Trump has been increasingly at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over both Iran and his handling of the Israel's war in Gaza, wanting to seal a deal with Tehran and accelerate food aid into Gaza. Trump and Netanyahu spoke on Monday, and Trump told reporters the main topic was Iran. Speaking to reporters on Thursday, he suggested an Israeli attack was imminent. "Well, I'd love to avoid conflict. Iran's going to have to negotiate a little tougher, meaning they're going to have to give us some things that they're not willing to give us right now," he said. Retaliation by Iran for Israel's strikes could put U.S. troops and diplomats around the region at risk, given that the United States is Israel's main backer. Security concerns had risen since Trump said on Wednesday that U.S. personnel were being moved out of the region because "it could be a dangerous place" and that Tehran would not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. Washington and Tehran on Thursday had announced plans for another round of talks on Sunday in Oman between U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi. Whether that meeting will take place is now unclear. A Witkoff spokesperson did not immediately respond to a query.


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel's strikes on Iran show Trump is unable to restrain Netanyahu as Middle East slips closer to chaos
As Israeli jets struck targets in Iran on Friday morning, the US moved quickly to distance itself from Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to target Tehran in an escalation that threatens an all-out war in the Middle East. The unilateral strikes indicated a collapse of Donald Trump's efforts to restrain the Israeli prime minister and almost certainly scuttled Trump's efforts to negotiate a deal with Iran that would prevent the country from seeking a nuclear weapon. It also will likely lead to an Iranian retaliation that could develop into a full-scale war between Israel and Iran, a new conflict that Trump has publicly sought to avoid. As the dust was still settling from the strikes in Tehran, senior US officials were reduced to calling the Israeli strike a 'unilateral' action and warned Tehran away from retaliating against US embassies and bases in the region. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' said secretary of state Marco Rubio in a statement. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence,' he continued. 'President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel.' Washington officials and analysts had expected that Israel would hold off on launching strikes until after the US exhausted attempts to negotiate a deal with Iran. During a phone call on Monday, Trump asked Netanyahu not to attack Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported. But by Wednesday, Trump began to pull non-essential personnel out of embassies and bases in the Middle East within striking distance of Iran. Still, Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, was expected to travel to Muscat in Oman in order to conduct a sixth round of talks with Iran on Sunday in what was seen as a last chance for diplomacy. And the strikes took place just hours after Trump had publicly urged the Netanyahu government not to attack Iran, with the US president saying that he believed an Israeli offensive would 'blow' up the negotiations. 'I'd love to avoid a conflict,' Trump said in remarks from the White House on Thursday. 'We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement … I'd much prefer an agreement. As long as I think there is an agreement I don't want them going in because I think that would blow it.' But, in a nod to speculation that the US was intentionally signaling an imminent attack against Iran, he noted that a strike could also compel Iran to make a deal that would limit its efforts to seek a nuclear weapon. 'It might help it actually but it also could blow it,' he said. That is now a reality. Critics have said the US decision to retreat from the region, stemming from Trump's decision to abandon the Iranian nuclear deal called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action under the first Trump administration has led to a greater likelihood of conflict in the region. The attack was 'clearly intended to scuttle the Trump administration's negotiations with Iran,' said Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, and is 'further evidence of how little respect world powers – including our own allies – have for President Trump'. 'This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict,' he added. 'Iran would not be this close to possessing a nuclear weapon if Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu had not forced America out of the nuclear agreement with Iran that had brought Europe, Russia and China together behind the United States to successfully contain Iran's nuclear ambitions.'