Incumbent Superintendent Jill Underly says she'll remain ‘No. 1 advocate for public education'
State Superintendent Jill Underly with Madison La Follette High School Principal Mathew Thompson and Madison Public School District Superintendent Joe Gothard in the hallway at La Follette | Photo by Ruth Conniff
Incumbent State Superintendent Jill Underly says that Wisconsin has made some 'incredible progress' in the last four years when it comes to education, but there is still more work to be done that she wants to see through in a second term leading the Department of Public Instruction (DPI).
Underly faces two challengers — education consultant Brittany Kinser, a self-described moderate and school choice proponent, and Sauk Prairie Schools Superintendent Jeff Wright, a Democrat — in the race for the nonpartisan office. The primary for the state superintendent election is Feb. 18., and the top two vote getters will advance to the general election.
'This position is about being the No. 1 advocate for public education, and I feel like I'm doing that,' Underly said in an interview with the Wisconsin Examiner.
Underly, a Democrat, ran for her first term in 2021 and defeated her opponent with nearly 58% of the vote. She said entering office during the COVID-19 pandemic was 'unprecedented' and presented a bit of a 'learning curve,' but she said she feels like DPI has 'gotten our arms around what are the most important issues that the state of Wisconsin citizens want us to work on.'
Underly said some of her work has included calls for increased investment in education throughout the budget process, and pointed to securing investments and starting certain initiatives for career and technical education, school mental health, teacher recruitment and retention efforts. She also said that she has worked hard to help elect people in the Legislature who will be 'pro-public school advocates' and will help pass initiatives in the future.
Underly said 2025 is 'equally unprecedented' compared to last year and her experience makes her the right person to lead DPI.
'You need somebody in this role who can [offer] stability, who has the relationships, who can be consistent in this time of chaos and we need someone who's going to stand up for public schools — for all kids, for teachers and families — and someone who has already proven that she can do it,' Underly said.
Underly said her work on literacy is one of her proudest accomplishments in her first term.
The agency was instrumental in negotiating 2023 Wisconsin Act 20, which sought to move the state towards a 'science of reading' based approach and banned 'three-cueing' — a way of teaching reading that relies on context, structure and letters to identify words.
'I think what it proved is that we really do want the same thing. When we put politics aside, we can get some really good stuff done on behalf of kids,' Underly said. 'The flip side of that is politics still is involved. I mean, we're still waiting on that $50 million so that we can reimburse school districts for curriculum and hire some reading coaches, but I'm really proud of that.'
Lawmakers had dedicated the money to supporting literacy changes in the last budget, but it is being withheld by Republican lawmakers.
While Underly is proud of her accomplishments, Underly's opponents in the race have been critical of her leadership.
Recent changes to the way DPI measures the state's standardized reading and math test scores is at the center of criticisms from her challengers, who said the changes 'lowered standards' and that the decision to make the change wasn't transparent or well communicated. The changes included new terms to describe student achievement and new cut scores, which are the minimum scores needed to qualify for certain achievement labels.
Underly said it's 'absolutely false' that DPI lowered standards and that 'it wouldn't be an issue' if the election weren't happening.
Her opponent Kinser has said the changes were the reason she is running, and that she supports restoring 'high standards.'
'The critics are wrong, and I think, by Brittany saying that this is the reason she entered the race, it just gives me this feeling that she just doesn't understand what this job is about,' Underly said.
'We didn't lower standards. We raised standards in math and science. We added standards in career and tech ed. We added a literacy score for all kids. We were very transparent. This is something that DPI has done periodically since testing began in state law,' Underly added. 'We had to change the scoring system to match the test, and you do that any time you change a test.'
Underly said she also thinks that the focus on testing is a distraction from other consequential challenges that school districts are facing. If student achievement is a major priority for the state, Underly said, it should look towards investing in mental health, literacy and math, teachers, school meals and early childhood education, including full-day 4-year-old kindergarten.
'Where you see low test scores is in communities that have high poverty. You don't see low test scores in the schools that have the best facilities or the most veteran teachers or strong and robust school nutrition and mental health programs,' Underly said. 'It's just a way to misdirect or to take the eye off of what really matters, and also then disguise the fact that our Legislature has underfunded schools and undermined public schools, specifically, for the past 15 years.'
A little before polls close in Wisconsin next Tuesday, Gov. Tony Evers will deliver his budget address at the State Capitol and unveil his complete state budget proposal. As a part of the process, state agencies submitted requests to Evers late last year. Underly and DPI submitted one that would dedicate an additional $4 billion — about the same amount as the current budget surplus — towards K-12 education.
The sweeping proposal includes increasing funding for mental health supports, special education costs, literacy and math education, teachers and staff pay, free school breakfast and lunch and early childhood education, including full-day 4-year-old kindergarten. Underly said she proposed it because 'it's what our schools need.'
'They need, probably, more than that, but that's what they need right now,' Underly said.
Underly noted school districts haven't been receiving inflationary increases in funding from the state Legislature over the last 15 years. She also noted that last year a record number of school districts went to referendum to ask taxpayers to raise their property taxes to help cover operational and building costs.
There was a 'fiscal cliff because the COVID dollars were temporary, one-time, and they couldn't make ends meet and we had record high inflation,' Underly said. '[Schools] still have to pay staff. They still have to put gas in their buses, and they have to pay utilities and all these other things to keep their operations going, but they haven't been able to get any increase really that's been sustainable from our state Legislature.'
Underly said investing could help address an array of issues.
For example, Underly said teacher retention could be helped with more resources and by reestablishing the 'respect and rapport that teachers deserve.' Recent DPI data found that four out of every 10 first-year teachers either leave the state or the profession altogether after just six years. She said the agency has been doing some work to help, including securing a federal grant aimed at supporting special education teachers, but that more investment would be beneficial.
Underly said enough people are being prepared for the job and by getting 'more revenue in our schools, they have a feeling we can get more staff, either to lower class sizes, which will help with working conditions, and they can also pay their staff more.'
Instead of adequately addressing the financial challenges, Underly said Republicans have been blaming schools 'so that people will not send their kids to public school, and they can take that money and they can put it in private vouchers.'
Wisconsin's school voucher programs, which use state money to subsidize families' tuition at private schools, have been growing since the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program was created in 1990. The caps on Wisconsin's school voucher program, which limits the number of students who can participate, are slated to be lifted in the 2026-27 school year and could have a big effect on the future of education in Wisconsin.
Underly said the state needs to ensure the program doesn't expand any further. She noted that the programs aren't held to the same accountability, testing, reporting or licensing requirements as the state's public schools.
'If you have somebody in the seat who is indifferent to vouchers, or is going to be supportive of vouchers, it's really — that's the end of public education in Wisconsin, and that's what the federal government wants. They want to privatize public schools,' Underly said. 'They want to take the money that they no longer have to spend in the Department of Ed and just give it to parents so that they could put it in a voucher.'
'If you have somebody in the seat who is indifferent to vouchers, or is going to be supportive of vouchers, it's really — that's the end of public education in Wisconsin, and that's what the federal government wants. They want to privatize public schools,'
– State Superintendent Jill Underly
Underly's approach to advocating for public schools is part of what has won her the endorsement of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin and American Federation of Teachers-Wisconsin, a union of professionals working in the University of Wisconsin System, the Wisconsin Technical College System, public schools and state agencies.
Jon Shelton, AFT-Wisconsin vice president for higher education and a UW-Green Bay professor, said that Underly's incumbent status and accomplishments in office set her apart in the endorsement process. The organization, which has a constitutional process for endorsements, interviewed Underly and Wright.
'[Underly] has always shown a commitment to ensuring that the voices of educators have a seat at the table and in the decision-making processes, both with the Department of Public Instruction, but also modeling that for local school districts,' Shelton said.
In addition to overseeing the state's 421 public school districts, the state superintendent also has a seat on the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents. Shelton said Underly's outspokenness for educators was an asset in her position there as well. He pointed out that she was the only regent to vote against a plan to fire 35 tenured faculty members at UW-Milwaukee and to give a speech about the negative consequences of the decision.
Shelton also called Underly's budget proposal 'visionary.' He said that K-12 education and higher education, while separate systems in Wisconsin, are connected since younger students eventually become college students and the higher education system is responsible for preparing their future education, which is why it's important to see both supported by the state.
Shelton said the proposal is important because there is a budget surplus in Wisconsin and educators shouldn't allow 'our expectations to be lowered.' He noted that under new legislative maps, 14 Democrats flipped seats in the state Legislature and the impact could continue in the future.
'In 2026, Democrats could have control of either one or both houses of the Legislature. This idea that we have to basically just adhere to the low expectations of Republican priorities, it's not the reality anymore,' Shelton said. 'So it's really important that we have people who are in a position like Dr. Underly, who have that platform to be able to vocally and forcefully advocate for these priorities, so that they're on the agenda in 2026.'
Shelton said having an advocate willing to engage in certain battles is more important than having a candidate that prioritizes working across the aisle due to the actions being taken at the federal level right now.
'Our nation, our state, is under threat from authoritarian Republicans. Right now, the Trump administration is intentionally trying to sow chaos and intentionally trying to set working people against each other. This is why you have this, this executive order, which is meant to prevent even teaching about things like race and racism. This is not like the West Wing… where you have Republicans and Democrats having good faith differences of opinion. This is a party at the national level that is connected to [Assembly Speaker] Robin Vos and the Republicans at the state level, who, frankly, don't want certain parts of our education system to exist,' Shelton said.
'We've tried to find common ground with Republicans, and they just keep cutting our budgets and keep coming at us for more, and frankly, our administrators continue to accommodate this,' Shelton continued. 'We're not going to let our students and the people of the state have the public higher education system, that's been so good for such a long time, just taken from us, and so we're going to be the ones on the front lines of fighting it, just like we're going to be the ones on the front line of fighting authoritarianism from the national level.'
The Wisconsin Democratic Party endorsed Underly for a second term at the end of November. Party Chair Ben Wikler called her a 'steadfast advocate' for students, parents and schools in a statement and said she is a 'proven leader' who is 'championing our kids in the Department of Public Instruction.'
During her term in office, Underly and the agency have regularly come into contention with the Republican-led Legislature on a variety of issues. Just last week, representatives from the agency testified against several Republican bills, including one to reverse test score changes and limit how schools can spend their money.
Despite the disagreements, Underly said that she's been able to work with lawmakers during her term. She said the literacy law is one example.
However, Wright cited the communication challenges that the agency has had with lawmakers, school districts and others. He said he would try to minimize partisanship, so that more conversations can be had between the agency and lawmakers.
Underly said communication with lawmakers is an issue that the agency has been working on, and brushed back some of Wright's critique.
'It's entirely comical that the male candidate in this race thinks that he's going to have better luck with the Legislature…,' Underly said. 'It's really insulting that this, you know, this male candidate, thinks he can come in and undermine my leadership and call me a bad communicator.'
Underly said that when she speaks with lawmakers individually and when people on her team speak with them it's clear that they agree on a lot, but that politics and polarization can get in the way. She noted that most lawmakers want healthy kids, high quality public schools and communities in rural and urban areas.
Underly said in a second term she would continue to work on improving the relationships and is hopeful that new faces in the Legislatures will help.
'We need people in the Legislature who will fight for public schools, too. That's really what it comes down to,' Underly said. 'I think we have to understand that it doesn't matter who's in the seat, if you're a public school advocate, it's always gonna be a struggle.'
In discussing the politicization of education, Underly called attention to the recent actions being taken by the federal government at the instruction of President Donald Trump. She said the actions are 'chaotic' and 'cruel.'
'The things that they're axing and cutting and slashing are programs that are meant to help kids,' Underly said. She pointed to Head Start programs and the freeze on payments that have been affecting child care centers across the country, including in Wisconsin. 'We look at the programs that they're cutting like these that are helping the most vulnerable kids so that they can be successful, healthy adults.'
The administration is also considering eliminating the Department of Education, and Underly warned that people need to be prepared.
'If he says that's what he's going to do, we have to believe them… I don't think people realize all the different things the Department of Education administers,' Underly said. She noted many programs work to ensure certain people have equal access to education, including kids and families in poverty, students with disabilities, English language learners, Native American students, kids in rural areas and girls.
'There's so many protections in place… I think of the funding that our schools get, our state gets money from the Department of Ed. I don't know if the state Legislature would be willing to fill those gaps,' Underly said. 'There's a lot to be concerned about.'
Trump has also signed executive orders that attempt to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion in government, the private sector and schools. He has also eliminated a policy that stopped Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from going to 'sensitive areas' — a decision that opens schools up to immigration raids.
Underly said her 'North Star' is focused on 'creating safe, welcoming environments where every child feels valued and respected, where every child feels they belong so they can thrive.' She said DPI trusts schools and educators to work closely with families and communities to support all students, though the agency is also providing guidance.
'I'm going to always stand up for kids, especially your most vulnerable kids, and just remind people to stay focused on what matters,' Underly said. 'We're going to follow the law, and we gave them the guidance that will help them.'
The primary election is Tuesday, Feb. 18, and the general election is on Tuesday, April 1.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take job with conservative nonprofit
Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen, a Monument Republican, listens to opening day proceedings on the first day of the 2025 session of the Colorado Legislature on Jan. 8, 2025, at the Colorado Capitol. (Lindsey Toomer/Colorado Newsline) Senate Minority Paul Lundeen announced Monday that he is resigning from the Legislature to join the leadership of a conservative nonprofit. His resignation is effective immediately. 'Serving Colorado has been an honor and blessing,' the Monument Republican said in a statement. 'I am grateful to the people of Senate District 9 for the opportunity to fight for policies that empower individuals, protect our communities, and promote prosperity. As I transition to a national platform, I am eager to continue advocating for personal freedom, economic opportunity, and common-sense conservative values.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX He will lead the American Excellence Foundation, an organization that awards grants to advance conservative public policy. Lundeen served as a state representative from 2015 to 2018 and as a senator since 2019. He is term-limited and could not seek re-election in 2026. Before his time in the Legislature, he served on the State Board of Education, including as chair for two years. He worked on an array of education-related policies while in office. The Senate Republican caucus will meet on Thursday evening to select a new minority leader. A vacancy committee of Republicans from Senate District 9 will also need to meet to select a replacement for Lundeen. In a statement, Gov. Jared Polis thanked Lundeen for his public service. 'Paul has always found ways to work across the aisle, and do what is best for the people he has served,' the Democrat wrote. 'We've often found common ground on the issues that matter most to Coloradans, like education, public safety and growing our economy. Senator Lundeen has spent decades in public service, in addition to his time leading small businesses, and his presence and leadership will be missed at the Capitol.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty
Oklahoma's top prosecutor said Monday that the state intends to pursue a new murder trial against Richard Glossip but without the death penalty after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated his capital conviction in a rare victory for a death row prisoner. State Attorney General Gentner Drummond's decision to retry Glossip, 62, on a first-degree murder charge came out of a status conference hearing. Drummond said in a news release that the evidence still implicates Glossip in the 1997 murder of Oklahoma City motel owner Barry Van Treese. Glossip, a motel manager working for Van Treese, has maintained his innocence while on death row for almost three decades. While Drummond, a Republican, has not agreed with Glossip's innocence claims, he was supportive of the Supreme Court's ruling in February, when the majority of justices agreed, as Drummond put it, that "it is now an undeniable fact that he did not receive a fair trial." Drummond said Monday that he would ensure Glossip now receives an impartial trial. "While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence," Drummond said in a statement. "After the high court remanded the matter back to district court, my office thoroughly reviewed the merits of the case against Richard Glossip and concluded that sufficient evidence exists to secure a murder conviction." Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna, a Democrat, had previously indicated that Glossip would not be eligible for the death penalty now if he were to be retried. Drummond said he would seek a life sentence for Glossip at his next trial. "While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today," he added. The continuation of the state's prosecution against Glossip resumes a twisting case that saw him dodge death several times with nine separate execution dates that had to be postponed. Various courts delayed the executions as he appealed, while state corrections officials also came under scrutiny a decade ago for botched execution attempts. But Glossip's case had been championed in recent years by a bipartisan group of Oklahoma legislators after an independent report they commissioned in 2022 found that "no reasonable jury hearing the complete record would convict Glossip of first-degree murder." The report centered on the state's primary witness, Justin Sneed, who had confirmed to the report's investigators that he had discussions with multiple family members about "recanting" his testimony over an 11-year period. Investigators also said the district attorney's case file included documentation describing how the state provided Sneed information "so he could conform his testimony to match the evidence" from other witnesses. Glossip's original 1998 conviction was overturned in 2001, when a state appeals court found that the evidence against him was weak. But the state took him to trial again, and a second jury found him guilty in 2004. At Glossip's trial, Sneed, a motel handyman, admitted that he had killed Van Treese, but said that it was at Glossip's direction and that he had been promised $10,000. In exchange for testifying against Glossip, Sneed received a life sentence while Glossip was given the death penalty. Prosecutors said Glossip orchestrated the plot because he was embezzling from the motel and feared being fired. The Supreme Court on Monday tossed out Glossip's capital conviction in a 5-3 ruling. Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate, presumably because he was involved in the case when he was on a federal appeals court that includes Oklahoma. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the majority's ruling that prosecutors "knew Sneed's statements were false" and that "because Sneed's testimony was the only direct evidence of Glossip's guilt of capital murder, the jury's assessment of Sneed's credibility was necessarily determinative here." "Hence, there is a reasonable likelihood that correcting Sneed's testimony would have affected the judgment of the jury," she added. After the Supreme Court's decision, Glossip was moved off death row, but was held without bail in the Oklahoma County Detention Center on a first-degree murder charge. A next court date in Glossip's case is scheduled for June 17. Glossip's attorney, Don Knight, did not immediately comment about the prosecutors' decision, but he welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling in February that spared his longtime client from the death chamber. "He had nine execution dates, three last meals, and obviously, to finally get relief has been huge for him," Knight said, "and he's thrilled beyond words." This article was originally published on

Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Suggests Arresting Gavin Newsom
Donald Trump on Monday suggested that California Governor Gavin Newsom should be arrested over his handling of unrest in Los Angeles, escalating tensions after the President mobilized the National Guard to quell anti-ICE protests over the weekend. "I would do it, if I were Tom. I think it is great,' Trump said when asked by a reporter if he supported a threat from his border czar Tom Homan to arrest state officials who obstruct federal immigration raids. 'Gavin likes the publicity but I think it would be a great thing. He's done a terrible job… Look, I like Gavin Newsom, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent.' Trump's comment comes as Los Angeles entered its fourth consecutive day of protests following large-scale immigration enforcement actions by federal agents across the city. Demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement in downtown streets, where barricades have been toppled, cars torched, and over 150 people arrested since Friday. Read More: What the National Guard Crackdown in LA Made Us See The unrest has been fueled in part by the Trump Administration's decision to unilaterally deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to the city under federal authority, bypassing the governor. Newsom, a Democrat many view as a 2028 presidential contender, has called the move 'unlawful' and vowed to file suit to block the federalization of the National Guard. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles,' he wrote in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' Tensions expanded after Homan warned that officials like Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could be arrested if they interfered with federal operations. 'It's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job,' Homan told NBC News on Saturday. Though he conceded neither official had 'crossed the line yet,' he issued the warning nonetheless. Newsom called Homan's bluff in an interview with MSNBC on Sunday, urging Homan to 'just get it over with' and arrest him. 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom said. 'That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go." Homan appeared to walk back his earlier remarks during a Monday appearance on 'Fox & Friends,' saying he was responding hypothetically to a reporter's question. 'There was no discussion about arresting Newsom,' he said. Even so, Trump's public backing of the idea marks a dramatic escalation in his second-term approach to political opposition—one increasingly defined by threats of criminal prosecution. It echoes his Justice Department's controversial arrest of Newark's Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka after a clash outside an ICE detention facility in New Jersey last month, though the charges were ultimately dropped. The Trump Administration has also charged Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver with two counts of assaulting, resisting and impeding an officer from the same skirmish. The deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Los Angeles further strained the relationship between the White House and California. Legal scholars note that Trump's order to take command of the Guard—without invoking the Insurrection Act—treads into murky constitutional territory. The directive cited federal authority to ensure the continuity of government functions, a justification reminiscent of Cold War-era civil unrest crackdowns, but without clear precedent in a non-insurrection context. 'If we had not done so,' Trump wrote on Truth Social about his National Guard order, 'Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated.' He added, sarcastically, that Newsom and Bass 'should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL.'' Protests have also spread to other cities, including San Francisco, Sacramento, Chicago, and New York, where demonstrators are rallying in opposition to the raids and the arrest of a prominent labor leader. The Service Employees International Union is staging protests in more than two dozen cities on Monday, accusing the Administration of targeting immigrant communities and organized labor. Write to Nik Popli at