Geology And How Bunker Busting Bombs Work
FILE - In this photo released by the U.S. Air Force on May 2, 2023, airmen look at a GBU-57, or the ... More Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, at Whiteman Air Base in Missouri.(U.S. Air Force via AP, File)
The U.S. has conducted aerial strikes on three Iranian Nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan, using massive bunker busting bombs.
Experts (and internet communities) have long debated if such a strike would be successful. Experts agreed that bunker busting bombs or missiles previously deployed by Israeli forces would not be sufficient to reach the heavily fortified underground facilities. Only the GBU-57, exclusively operated and deployed by the U.S. Air Force, is large enough
The GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) is a bomb designed to penetrate as deep as possible into soil, rock and concrete before detonating. It "digs" itself into the ground thanks to its reinforced hull, its 30,000 pound (over 13 tons) mass and high kinetic energy at the moment of surface contact.
The GBU-57 has never been used in combat and the only experience origins from testing it in the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, where the geology consists of alluvial sediments — a relatively soft material. Based on released information the warhead is able to reach depths of 250 feet (60 meters), with the geological composition and strength of the ground determining how far it will penetrate before detonating and how effectively it will transmit the force of the explosion to damage the target.
The facility of Fordow, hosting the centrifuges needed for uranium enrichment, is buried deep underground in the Zagros Mountains. The facility's cover was estimated to be around 260 to 290 feet (80 to 90 meters) thick, consisting of limestone and dolostone layers. Depending on the exact composition, grain structure and tectonic deformation, this type of bedrock can surpass the strength of reinforced concrete.
Infographic explaining the characteristics of the GBU-57 bomb, also known as the Massive Ordnance ... More Penetrator (MOP), developed by the United States to attack underground structures (Graphic by AFP) (Graphic by IOANA PLESEA,PAZ PIZARRO,VALENTINA BRESCHI/AFP via Getty Images)
Sources differ on the number of bombs dropped on Fordow. Based on the thick cover, the expected rock types and likely reinforced materials used to build the bunker, it was clear that even if deploying the GBU-57, repeated hits were necessary to ensure maximal damage. Allegedly 4 to 12 "bunker busters" were dropped directly on the facility, with an unspecified number of missiles striking the surroundings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Colbert grills Dem socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani on Israel, antisemitism
Print Close By Joseph Wulfsohn Published June 24, 2025 "Late Show" host Stephen Colbert pressed New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani about his stance on Israel and how he'd combat rising antisemitism in the Big Apple. Mamdani, the Democratic Socialist member of the state assembly who has seen a surge in the polls ahead of Tuesday's rank-choice primary, appeared on the CBS late night show alongside his fellow Democratic rival Brad Lander, who've both made headlines for giving each other their endorsements for second ranking in an effort to block ex-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo from clinching the Democratic nomination. Colbert pointed to the ongoing war between Israel and Iran to ask both candidates whether Israel has "the right to exist" as a nation. SANDERS ENDORSES SOCIALIST MAMDANI IN MOVE TO BLOCK CUOMO IN NYC MAYORAL RACE "I support the vision of Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State," Lander responded. "Mr. Mamdani, same question," Colbert turned to the 33-year-old hopeful. "Does the State of Israel have the right to exist?" "Yes," Mamdani responded. "Like all nations, I believe it has the right to exist and a responsibility also to uphold international law." The liberal late-night host, who repeatedly stressed he wasn't offering any endorsement in the mayoral race, then pivoted to acknowledge the "elephant in the room," noting the "fear" within the Jewish community about the rise in antisemitism and what would happen if New York City elected Mamdani, a far-left Muslim and an outspoken critic of Israel. "They're very upset by some of the things that you've said in the past, and they're afraid that your mayorship would actually lead to increased antisemitism, that they believe that would be more dangerous for them," Colbert said to Mamdani. "What do you say to those New Yorkers who are afraid that you wouldn't be their mayor, that you wouldn't protect them?" 'GLOBALIZE THE INTIFADA' PHRASE STIRS TENSIONS ON NYC CAMPAIGN TRAIL AS MIDDLE EAST CONFLICT RAGES "You know, I know where that fear is coming from," Mamdani responded. "It's a fear that is based upon the horrific attacks we've seen in Washington, DC, in Boulder, Colorado… and it's a fear that I hear also from New Yorkers themselves." "You know, just a few days after the horrific war crime of October 7, a friend of mine told me about how he went to his synagogue for Shabbat services and he heard the door open behind him, and a tremor went up his spine as he turned around not knowing who was there and what they meant for him," he continued. "I spoke to a Jewish man in Williamsburg just months ago who told me that the door he left unlocked for decades is now one that he locks. And ultimately, this is because we're seeing a crisis of antisemitism." Mamdani then touted his proposal committing an "800%" increase in funding for the Department of Community Safety's anti-hate crime programming. "Because to your point, antisemitism is not simply something that we should talk about. It's something that we have to tackle," Mamdani told Colbert. "We have to make clear there's no room for it in this city, in this country, in this world and-" "And no justification for violence of any kind?" Colbert interjected. "No," Mamdani quickly responded. "There's no room for violence in this city, in this country, in this world. And what I have found also, for many New Yorkers, is an ability to navigate disagreement." NYC MAYORAL CANDIDATE ZOHRAN MAMDANI DEFENDS BDS SUPPORT AMID ISRAEL CONTROVERSY Mamdani, who migrated to New York City when he was seven after living in Uganda and South Africa, recalled an exchange he had with an "older Jewish woman" following the Democratic Club forum who whispered to him, "I disagree with you on one issue. I'm pretty sure you know which one it is, and I agree with you on the others, and I'm going to be ranking you on my ballot." "And I say this because I know there are many New Yorkers with whom I have a disagreement about the Israeli government's policies, and also there are many who understand that that's a disagreement still rooted in shared humanity, because the conclusions I've come to, they are the conclusions of Israeli historians like Amos Goldberg. They are echoing the words of an Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, who said just recently what we are doing in Gaza is a war of devastation. It is cruel, it is indiscriminate, it is limitless, it is criminal killing of civilians. These are the conclusions I've come to," Mamdani said. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Colbert later asked Mamdani how he could "build a bridge of understanding" between the Jewish and Muslim communities as New York City mayor. He responded "by foregrounding that humanity." "For so many of us who've grown up in this city, difference is something that we celebrate. It's something that we know is actually a part of the fabric of this place that we call home," Mamdani said. "And you know, many years ago, I was the campaign manager of a Jewish candidate for State Senate, and I took him to a mosque in Bay Ridge, and after he gave his speech at Friday prayers, an older Palestinian man came over to him, and he looked at him and he said, 'Cousins.' And I think that there is this possibility of building a shared life in our city, because ultimately, that is the story of New York City. It's a shared life of people from across the world, and it's one that we know, even in the language of the hostage families themselves, everyone for everyone. We are tied together as one." Print Close URL
News24
29 minutes ago
- News24
Oil slumps, rand climbs as Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire
• For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page. Global shares rallied and the dollar extended declines on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump said Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, sending oil prices into a deep dive as concerns over supply disruptions ebbed. Writing on his Truth Social site, Trump implied a ceasefire would go into effect in 12 hours, after which the war would be considered "ended". There was no immediate comment yet from Israel. While an Iranian official earlier confirmed that Tehran had agreed to a ceasefire, the country's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks. Oil prices fell over 3%, having already slid 9% on Monday when Iran made a token retaliation against a U.S. base, which came to nothing and signalled it was done for now. With the immediate threat to the vital Strait of Hormuz shipping lane seemingly over, US crude futures fell another 3.4% to $66.15 per barrel, the lowest since June 11. "With markets now viewing the escalation risk as over, market attention is likely to shift towards the looming tariff deadline in two weeks time," said Prashant Newnaha, senior Asia-Pacific rates strategist at TD Securities. "Our sense is that the quicker than expected resolution to the Middle East conflict leads to expectations for a swifter resolution on tariffs and trade deals." On Tuesday morning, the risk-sensitive rand was trading at R17.77/$ - its best level in more than a week. The Aussie got a lift and last traded 0.3% higher at $0.6480 as did the kiwi, which rose 0.3% to $0.5994. Israel's shekel rallied sharply too, as it jumped 1% against the dollar to its strongest level since February 2023. 'It's obviously positive news for risk sentiment,' said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank. 'We need to obviously have a bit more detail in terms of exactly what all this means... I suppose it will be the conditions of the ceasefire, and what are the conditions for a more longer-lasting peace deal.' The dollar, which last week drew support from safe-haven demand, fell broadly in the wake of the news. Adding to headwinds for the dollar were dovish comments from Federal Reserve policymaker Michelle Bowman, who said the US central bank should consider interest rate cuts soon. Bowman's openness to cutting rates soon is supported by Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who said in a television interview last week he'd also consider a rate cut at next month's meeting. 'There appears to be increasing division among the ranks of the Fed board ahead of Fed Chair Powell's testimony,' said Tony Sycamore, a market analyst at IG. 'The chance of a July rate cut... is still underpriced. I think it should be higher than that.' Markets are now pricing in more than a 20% chance the Fed could ease rates in July, up from 14.5% a day ago, according to the CME FedWatch tool. Powell is due to testify before the US Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday, where focus will be on the outlook for U.S. rates. Risk assets rallied, with S&P 500 futures up 0.6% and Nasdaq futures 0.9% higher. EUROSTOXX 50 futures jumped 1.3% and FTSE futures rose 0.4%. The MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan jumped 1.8% while Japan's Nikkei rallied 1.4%. Two sources told Reuters that Japan's tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is arranging his seventh visit to the United States for as early as June 26, aiming to end tariffs that are hurting Japan's economy. China's blue chips rose 1%, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng index gained 1.7%. In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin rose more than 1% to $104,939.26, while ether jumped 2.1% to $2,397.65, in a reflection of the positive risk sentiment. The risk-on mood saw gold prices ease 0.6% to $3,346 an ounce.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump claims a ‘forever' peace in the land of forever wars — but is it all one big illusion?
So much for the quagmire. Donald Trump seems to have emerged from the worst crisis in America's estrangement with Iran's Islamic Republic with a win. The president leaped on Tehran's modest missile response Monday to the US pounding of its nuclear sites as a sign it wants to end escalations. 'CONGRATULATIONS WORLD, ITS TIME FOR PEACE!' he posted on Truth Social. Trump's exuberance was a sign that he sees the US involvement in the conflict as over, at least for now. And he followed up by announcing a ceasefire between Iran and Israel due to come into force later Tuesday. Ceasefires in the Middle East are often fragile and fleeting, as was underscored by attacks by both Israel and Iran in the hours before the truce was due to be established. But the president was already trumpeting his chosen image as a peacemaker and consummate deal maker, only 48 hours after US stealth bombers slammed Iran. 'I think the ceasefire is unlimited. It's going to go forever,' Trump told NBC News on Monday night, predicting that Israel and Iran will never 'be shooting at each other again.' That's a bold claim given the Middle East's reputation as a graveyard of American presidencies. And for all Trump's marketing skills, events will decide whether his breakthrough is for real or just another illusion. Has the United States, as Trump claimed, really ensured the 'obliteration' of Iran's nuclear program, an existential threat to Israel? Or is it all a classic Trump mirage, and does the glaring unfinished business of this conflict — an apparently missing stockpile of highly enriched uranium that can be quickly made into a bomb — mean a deeper crisis looms? A quick end to the fighting would shape Trump's presidency and legacy and boost a foreign policy previously marked by failures like the stalled peace effort in Ukraine. But will the world change its mind about the master of chaos if he really does help ease tensions in a blood-soaked region? What is next for Israel? Does Trump trust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to halt his attacks on Iran? And will Israel finally take steps to relieve the agony of Palestinian civilians, starving and dying by the thousands in the onslaught in Gaza? And in Tehran, will the humiliation of Iran's clerical regime and the splintering of its Middle East network of fear promote a political spring that many of its citizens crave? The president can claim the most significant foreign policy and military success of his time in the Oval Office. Trump made a bet that many skeptics saw as irresponsible — that he could hammer Iran's nuclear plants without plunging the US into a new Middle East quagmire to mirror Iraq. So far, he's been proved right. While Trump might have initially been uneasy about Israel's assault on Iran, which seemed calculated to draw him in, he asserted control and exploited an opening to severely degrade Iran's nuclear program with little cost to the US. After days of public teases, his approach looked like a risky hunch. For sure he got lucky. But he also demonstrated strategic acumen and decisiveness and will always bask in the daring mission by B-2 bombers carrying bunker-buster bombs on a marathon flight from Missouri. If the conflict cools now, Trump may get a domestic political boost, at least in the GOP, and be able to heal rifts in his MAGA base, where some supporters felt he has broken his promise to start no new wars. The crisis also gave important insights into Trump's second presidency. It revealed that he's neither a tool of the remnant Republican hawks nor the 'America First' populists. And a core circle of trust emerged around Trump, including Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, according to CNN reporting. The futures of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth seem less assured, however. The president is also determined to try again to get a deal with Iran to end its nuclear program through negotiations. But he's also shown he's willing to wield overwhelming military force, putting a dent in the caricature of his TACO ('Trump always chickens out') diplomacy. Still, the crisis also highlighted more troubling sides of Trump's leadership. He committed the US to military action without preparing the nation ahead of time and politicized the mission by keeping top Democrats out of the loop. This was only the latest occasion when Trump has shown contempt for Congress's constitutional role and any sense he's the president of all Americans. And he's still not shown Americans intelligence that he used to justify the attacks on the grounds that Iran was weeks away from a weapon. He ignored US spy agencies that found Tehran had taken no such decision to build a bomb. Trump also snubbed US allies and mocked their peace efforts. This was the clearest sign yet of a volatile new global age when the US has decoupled from its alliances and will ruthlessly pursue its own national interests. The president is already writing his preferred version of history of what he calls the '12-Day War.' His claims to have eradicated the Iranian nuclear program already look like a feint to neuter any contrary evidence that emerges. It will be a brave US official who contradicts the president's great victory. The critical question arising from the conflict is unanswered. But in his late-night national address on Saturday, Trump said the objective of the mission was 'the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed to the world's number one state sponsor of terror.' Early estimates suggest that the Iranian facilities at Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow were severely damaged. But it's far too early for Trump's bravado. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, for instance, told CNN's Fareed Zakaria Sunday that Iran had 'protected' a stock of 400 kg of uranium enriched to 60% — just short of the 90% grade needed to make a nuclear bomb. Trump, meanwhile, is convinced that his strategy will bomb Iran back to the negotiating table to talk about a replacement for President Barack Obama's nuclear deal, which Trump trashed in his first term. But Iran's military leaders might take an opposite lesson from the conflict — that the only way for the revolution to survive is to acquire a nuclear bomb that will deter future attacks. There's no sign yet that Trump's condition for a deal — a verifiable end to Iranian uranium enrichment — will be acceptable to Tehran. 'From a nonproliferation perspective, Trump's decision to strike Iran was a reckless, irresponsible escalation that is likely to push Iran closer to nuclear weapons in the long term,' said Kelsey Davenport of the Arms Control Association. 'The strikes did damage key Iranian nuclear facilities, like the underground Fordow enrichment site. But Tehran had ample time prior to the strikes to remove its stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium to a covert location, and it's likely that they did so.' Nonproliferation expert Joseph Cirincione told CNN's Phil Mattingly on 'The Lead' that it was impossible to bomb away Iran's knowledge or enriched uranium and that it could build back its facilities. He warned that the missing uranium could be inserted by Iran into any new centrifuges it has to create the core of a bomb within five days and 10 bombs within three weeks. 'That is my greatest concern. Are they racing to develop that weapon before the US or Israel can find the gas or destroy it?' If those fears are realized, Trump's victory lap and Republican adulation will be remembered as pure political negligence and the catalyst for an even worse global crisis in future. Iran's lobbing of missiles toward a vast US base in Qatar, easily thwarted by US and Qatari counter-measures, revealed weakness after it ceded control of its own airspace to Israeli jets. Tehran's grip has also weakened outside its borders. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' regional network — Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and the Houthis in Yemen — was once seen as Iran's insurance policy against Israeli attacks on its nuclear program. But 20 months of Israeli attacks devastated its proxies and left their sponsor exposed. Israel is now a dominant regional power. And US allies like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are ascendent in a transformed Middle East. Uncertainty meanwhile clouds Iran's domestic politics. An already difficult transition as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's rule enters its twilight is now even more fraught. Outsiders will watch to see whether the regime's grip is loosened when the next of Iran's periodic uprisings erupts. But despite calls for regime change in Washington and Israel, more repression seems likely. Politics are also turbulent in Israel. Netanyahu's unwillingness to reach a ceasefire with Hamas and this zeal to take the fight to Iranian soil are widely seen as a ruse to stay in power amid personal scandals and to forestall an accounting of the October 7, 2023, attacks on his watch. Still, if relative peace returns, Netanyahu may get a political bounce for taking on Iran's nuclear program — a personal calling after decades in power. The Trump-Netanyahu dynamic will also be intriguing. The US president never stops looking for leverage. If he has the inclination, he could exploit the huge debt Israel now owes him to push for a peace agreement in Gaza. This latest scary episode of the Trump show may be about to wrap up. But tune in next week for something equally extreme.
