Turkey, Pakistan, Azerbaijan…, this country deeply worried about Zangezur Corridor due to…, will India back its ally?
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday met with Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev and thanked him for supporting Pakistan against India. This meeting took place in Baku, Azerbaijan's capital. Sharif's visit was mainly to express gratitude because during India's anti-terror campaign called 'Operation Sindoor,' Azerbaijan had openly supported Pakistan right after Turkey and China did the same.
While this was happening, something important but less noticed took place in India. Last week, the Secretary of Armenia's Security Council quietly visited Delhi and met India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. Their talks included discussions about Operation Sindoor, but there was another key concern during the visit i.e. the Zangezur Corridor.
Advertisement ===
The Zangezur Corridor is a strategic region that could impact several countries. Experts say that by backing Armenia here, India could make things difficult for all three, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Pakistan all at once. That's because Pakistan and Turkey openly support Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia, while India has always stood by Armenia.
Also, during times of tension between India and Pakistan, Iran (after Saudi Arabia) has tried to play peacemaker. In fact, Iran's Foreign Minister visited Delhi during Operation Sindoor too.
Advertisement ===
So now, analysts believe it's the right time for India, Iran, and Armenia to work more closely together. If India strongly backs Armenia over the Zangezur Corridor, it could block Azerbaijan's land access to Europe, dealing a major blow to the Turkey-Azerbaijan-Pakistan alliance.
What is the Zangezur Corridor Dispute?
The Zangezur Corridor is a proposed transport route that Azerbaijan strongly wants to build. Its goal is to connect mainland Azerbaijan to a small, separated region called Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic — which is also a part of Azerbaijan but not physically linked to the rest of the country.
Why is it controversial?
To make this corridor, the road and railway would need to pass through Armenia's Syunik Province, which is not just any region as it is the only land route that connects Armenia to Iran. So, building the corridor would have big strategic consequences.
If completed, this route would also give Azerbaijan and Turkey direct land access to each other — something they don't currently have. That's why Turkey fully supports the project.
In fact, Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has long dreamed of reconnecting Turkic and Islamic regions through land, and this corridor fits right into his vision. Many experts believe he sees this as part of a larger goal of restoring Turkish influence across Asia.
The 2020 conflict and its aftermath
Back in 2020, Azerbaijan and Armenia fought a war over the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Azerbaijan, with strong support from Turkey, won that war. As part of a Russia-brokered peace deal, Armenia had to agree to provide some form of access to Nakhchivan but the exact nature of that access is still unclear.
Since then, Azerbaijan has frequently pressured or threatened Armenia to allow the Zangezur Corridor, sometimes even suggesting they'll force it through military means.
Why does this matter to the world?
This isn't just a local issue between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Zangezur Corridor could shift regional power balances:
It would weaken Armenia's control over its southern region.
It could cut off Armenia's access to Iran, one of its key allies.
It would strengthen the Turkey-Azerbaijan alliance — and their broader plans in the region.
In short, the Zangezur Corridor is not just about transportation it's about geopolitical control, influence, and future alliances in a very sensitive part of the world.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Chopper makes emergency landing on highway in Uttarakhand, damages parked car
26:19 On this special edition of Battle Cry, the focus is on India's BrahMos supersonic cruise missile. The program discusses the missile's crucial role in Operation Sindoor, where it targeted multiple Pakistani airbases and terror facilities. Former BrahMos Aerospace CMD Dr. A. Shivdhanu Pillai shares insights on the missile's development and future variants. The show explores the missile's precision, range, and its potential as a deterrent against Pakistan and China.
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
Operation Sindoor giving Pakistan sleepless nights as fear of India's tactical drones lingers on, it is capable of...
After Operation Sindoor, India showed Pakistan and the rest of the world that it is not just able to defend itself but also to strike back decisively against its enemies. Just like Israel, India now retaliates instantly to any threats. India now has sophisticated killer drones that can carry out precise attacks on enemy targets. Furthermore, India has also invented tactical drones, which were also utilized recently to attack terrorist hideouts within Pakistan. But just what are tactical drones—and how does India stack up against countries such as Israel or Turkey in this regard? Warfare has come a long way in recent history. Military drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), are now making a big contribution to the battlefields. These unmanned aircraft have proven to be very useful in warfare today. They can be used for real-time reconnaissance, detecting targets, and delivering accurate attacks. India, Turkey, and Israel are the top countries in tactical drone development. All these nations have developed their own technology and come up with distinct battle approaches. Their local drones are fitted not only to spy and make attacks but also to carry out electronic warfare when needed. But what are tactical drones? They are medium-range UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles). They are used in battlefields for scouting, surveillance, target identification, and launching attacks. It is different from strategic or MALE (Medium Altitude Long Endurance) drones in terms of range, payload capacity, and mission duration. Tactical drones are designed for quicker, more flexible operations in limited or short-term combat situations. Israel is a world leader in UAV (drone) technology. Israel's defense industry is robust, and its drones have been rigorously tested in actual combat. Therefore, Israeli drones are highly sought after across the globe. Israel has had a strong impact on contemporary warfare due to its employment of drones. Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Elbit Systems, and Aeronautics Defense Systems are among the top companies leading the production of drones within the country. IAI Searcher and Heron (Mk I and II) are one of Israel's well-known drones, which are primarily used for intelligence gathering, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. The Elbit Hermes 450 and 900 are versatile, multi-role drones capable of conducting electronic warfare and executing precision strikes on targets. Another lethal Israeli drone is the SkyStriker. It is a loitering munition, meaning it can hover over an area and autonomously strike once it identifies a target. This makes it highly effective in modern, fast-paced combat scenarios. Israeli drones are extensively used by countries like India, Azerbaijan, Germany, and Singapore, where they play a vital role in military operations. Their popularity stems from being combat-proven, highly reliable, and equipped with cutting-edge technology, making them a preferred choice for modern armed forces around the world. At the same time, Turkey has swiftly risen as a major force in the global drone industry, driven by strong government backing, a focus on defense self-reliance, and growing regional security needs. Two key companies behind Turkey's drone success are Baykar Defense and Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI). The three main manufacturers powering Turkey's drone sector are: Baykar, known for its Bayraktar series, TAI, which builds the ANKA series. Among them, the Bayraktar TB2 stands out as Turkey's most prominent drone. It has seen action in Syria, Libya, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Ukraine, and is used for ISTAR missions—Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance—with additional limited strike capability. Another key system is the ANKA-S, a larger tactical MALE-class drone equipped with satellite communication and electronic warfare capabilities, making it suitable for long-range operations. Turkey has also developed the Kargu-2, a loitering munition drone designed to target enemy soldiers and light vehicles, further strengthening its edge in modern drone warfare. India's tactical drone program used to depend heavily on Israel imports at the beginning. The nation used to acquire drones such as the IAI Searcher, Heron, and Harop from Israel for surveillance and precision missions. But in the last decade, with the initiatives of Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India), there has been a shift towards indigenous development. Now, India is actively developing its own drone technology, and some of the players are: DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation) HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited) TATA Advanced Systems IdeaForge, a prominent private drone company All these organizations are now making various UAVs customized for Indian defence requirements, easing dependence on external suppliers and augmenting the nation's strategic autonomy in drone warfare. Indian tactical drones play a crucial role in counter-terrorism missions, border monitoring, and disaster response. While they have made significant progress, challenges still exist when it comes to fully autonomous target identification, sustained loitering, and seamless real-time data integration. India is rapidly advancing in this field and is actively working towards developing armed tactical drones to boost its combat capabilities. As part of a strategic partnership, India plans to create a hybrid drone model that combines the best features of the American MQ-9B SeaGuardian and the Israeli Heron TP, aiming to build a more powerful and versatile UAV fleet for the future.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Congress leader Rajesh Soni arrested for Facebook posts on Operation Sindoor, booked under new BNS law
Rajesh Soni, general secretary of Gujarat Congress, was arrested for Facebook posts allegedly undermining India's military morale during Operation Sindoor. The posts featured Prime Minister Modi in a pilot's uniform and claimed the government had surrendered, prompting charges under newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws. The police argue the content risked India's sovereignty and soldier morale. Congress leaders strongly opposed the arrest, stating Soni intended to highlight the need for proper recognition of soldiers, not criticise their efforts. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the police say sparked the arrest Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the charges actually mean Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Rajesh Soni, a senior Congress leader in Gujarat, was arrested early Friday by the state's Cyber Crime Cell over a pair of Facebook posts that police allege endangered national morale and spread misinformation about a major military posts were related to Operation Sindoor, an ongoing mission by the Indian armed forces targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK). Soni now faces charges under two sections of the recently enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)—sections 152 and 353(1)(a).The FIR, filed by the CID Cyber Crime team on Thursday, cited two Facebook posts made by of them depicted Prime Minister Narendra Modi wearing a fighter pilot uniform in a poster-like image. In another, Soni allegedly claimed that 'the Indian government surrendered during the operation,' an accusation the police say could undermine both the mission and the morale of troops deployed on the of Police (CID-Cyber Crime), Bharatsinh Tank, said, 'Soni was accused of breaking defence personnel's morale and putting India's sovereignty in danger through misleading posts on Facebook.'Tank went on to say, 'We arrested Soni for his posts which could break the armed forces' morale and send a wrong message to soldiers that their contribution and sacrifice on the battlefield will go in vain.'Soni has been charged under Section 152 of the BNS, which deals with acts that endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India. This section carries serious consequences, including up to life imprisonment or a minimum of seven years' jail, plus a second charge—Section 353(1)(a)—relates to statements that could incite public mischief. This legal provision, too, has teeth and signals the government's intent to regulate what it views as provocative or destabilising online behaviour, especially during military arrest did not go unnoticed by Soni's party after news broke, several Congress leaders gathered at the CID's office in Gandhinagar in protest. Leading the charge was Gujarat Congress president Shaktisinh Gohil, who described the police action as disproportionate and politically said, 'He only tried to highlight that soldiers need to get their due credit instead of the govt spending taxpayers' money on publicity.'He also accused the authorities of cracking down on free expression at a time when the nation should be focusing on supporting its armed forces, not silencing Sindoor has become a national talking point in recent weeks. The Indian military launched the mission with the stated goal of eliminating terror infrastructure in Pakistani territory and PoK. It has been projected by the government as a demonstration of India's zero-tolerance policy towards cross-border the operation has also sparked debates over public narrative management. As the conflict plays out on the ground, its portrayal in digital spaces has become sensitive—especially with a politically charged environment and general elections in government's actions suggest it sees misinformation as a direct threat to the morale of soldiers and the success of such operations. At the same time, critics argue that there is a thin line between national interest and political convenience when it comes to controlling arrest under the new BNS framework could mark a pivotal moment in how India enforces online accountability. It raises difficult questions: Where does one draw the line between political critique and disinformation? Who decides whether a post is morale-breaking or simply provocative?For now, Rajesh Soni remains in custody, his party defiant, and the legal system gearing up for what may become a high-profile case on digital speech and national security.(With inputs from TOI)
