logo
U.K. raises alarm on Chinese drones used to survey sensitive sites

U.K. raises alarm on Chinese drones used to survey sensitive sites

Japan Times17-04-2025

U.K. government officials have raised private concerns that Chinese-manufactured drones are being used to take high resolution images of critical national infrastructure sites in the U.K., going against guidance from the country's security services.
National Grid PLC, which operates the nation's electricity and gas networks, uses drones made by Shenzhen-based SZ DJI Technology to take videos, photographs and thermal images of its electricity substations, according to information posted on its website as recently as September. DJI drones have also been used to survey the construction of Electricite de France SA's Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant, to inspect solar farms, and by Thames Water to monitor reservoirs and the water supply.
Deployment of the drones comes despite a warning in 2023 by the U.K.'s National Protective Security Authority (NPSA), part of the domestic security service MI5, that British organizations managing sensitive sites should be wary of using drones "manufactured in countries with coercive data sharing practices,' a reference to China. Moreover, in 2022, the U.S. Department of Defense included DJI on a blacklist of Chinese firms with military ties.
National Grid said it follows government guidance, while Thames Water said it takes security "seriously.' DJI and EDF didn't respond to requests for comment.
"It is reasonable to be concerned around the alleged widespread use of Chinese drones to map and track the performance of critical U.K. national infrastructure,' said Sam Goodman, senior director of policy at the China Strategic Risks Institute in London. "At the very least, without British companies undertaking modification of these drones, including software patches, this could pose a significant data security and national security risk to the U.K., as DJI is legally required to provide data and cooperation with China's Ministry of State Security under the PRC's National Intelligence Law.'
The role of Chinese companies and equipment in critical national infrastructure has been in focus in the U.K. after the government this weekend took control of British Steel from its Chinese owner, Jingye Group, to prevent it from closing blast furnaces at the country's last virgin steelmaking site.
One British official said the drones issue is challenging as the government tries to balance its public pursuit of closer economic ties with Beijing with its private frustrations that companies working in sensitive areas are not taking seriously the potential security threat posed by China.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is pursuing closer economic ties with China, even amid those security concerns and President Donald Trump's trade war with the Asian nation. Last year, Bloomberg reported that British officials were concerned Chinese state actors had made widespread — and likely successful — efforts to access British critical infrastructure networks, underscoring fears of vulnerabilities to increasingly sophisticated efforts by foreign powers to compromise security.
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation has warned that Chinese-made drones "pose a significant risk to critical infrastructure' as they "could have vulnerabilities that enable data theft or facilitate network compromises.' Meanwhile, the U.K.'S NPSA's advice to British companies states: "the first line of defense for organizations wishing to use unmanned aerial systems (UAS) may be to restrict UAS and associated component procurement from countries which pose a risk to security.'
Using Chinese-made drones at key sites in Britain poses a risk because Chinese national security laws can compel its companies to share data with the state, according to a U.K. government official who requested anonymity discussing a sensitive issue.
Despite those warnings, Chinese-made products appear to be the go-to drone technology for companies in charge of much of Britain's critical infrastructure. That's in part because DJI is the world's largest maker of commercial drones, leaving firms with limited choice when it comes to procuring low-cost unmanned aerial systems.
The revelation about DJI comes after Bloomberg reported last year that drones used by a second Chinese manufacturer, Autel Robotics had been used by the U.K. military and police, despite the firm being sanctioned by the British government for arming Russia in its war against Ukraine.
The National Grid's website says it uses DJI's Mavic2 drone in its substations, as well as to create models to help plan its "great grid upgrade,' a major program to improve U.K. grid connections. They also use DJI's M350, M300 RTK and Mini 3 Pro drones. A National Grid spokesperson said it has "security measures in place across all our operations which follow the guidance set out by government and the security agencies.'
DJI drones were able to capture "incredibly valuable, accurate data' at the Hinkley Point nuclear power plant, according to Skymatics, a surveying company which ran the project at the site. The site is part-owned by China General Nuclear Power Group. Representatives for EDF did and Skymatics did not respond to requests for comment.
The U.K. government also declined to comment on security matters, while stating that "our energy sector is subject to the highest levels of scrutiny and protection.'
A Thames Water spokesperson said that "as providers of critical national infrastructure, we take the security of our networks and systems very seriously and are focused on protecting them.'
While the dangers of data leaks from drone technology can be mitigated by using an "off-line mode' disconnected from internet networks, security risks remain, and the best course of action is to "prevent high risk vendors from progressing through the procurement process,' according to the NPSA guidance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top U.S. universities raced to become global campuses. Under Trump, it's becoming a liability
Top U.S. universities raced to become global campuses. Under Trump, it's becoming a liability

Japan Today

timean hour ago

  • Japan Today

Top U.S. universities raced to become global campuses. Under Trump, it's becoming a liability

By COLLIN BINKLEY Three decades ago, foreign students at Harvard University accounted for just 11% of the total student body. Today, they account for 26%. Like other prestigious U.S. universities, Harvard for years has been cashing in on its global cache to recruit the world's best students. Now, the booming international enrollment has left colleges vulnerable to a new line of attack from President Donald Trump. The president has begun to use his control over the nation's borders as leverage in his fight to reshape American higher education. Trump's latest salvo against Harvard uses a broad federal law to bar foreign students from entering the country to attend the campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. His order applies only to Harvard, but it poses a threat to other universities his administration has targeted as hotbeds of liberalism in need of reform. It's rattling campuses under federal scrutiny, including Columbia University, where foreign students make up 40% of the campus. As the Trump administration stepped up reviews of new student visas last week, a group of Columbia faculty and alumni raised concerns over Trump's gatekeeping powers. 'Columbia's exposure to this 'stroke of pen' risk is uniquely high,' the Stand Columbia Society wrote in a newsletter. People from other countries made up about 6% of all college students in the U.S. in 2023, but they accounted for 27% of the eight schools in the Ivy League, according to an Associated Press analysis of Education Department data. Columbia's 40% was the largest concentration, followed by Harvard and Cornell at about 25%. Brown University had the smallest share at 20%. Other highly selective private universities have seen similar trends, including at Northeastern University and New York University, which each saw foreign enrollment double between 2013 and 2023. Growth at public universities has been more muted. Even at the 50 most selective public schools, foreign students account for about 11% of the student body. America's universities have been widening their doors to foreign students for decades, but the numbers shot upward starting around 2008, as Chinese students came to U.S. universities in rising numbers. It was part of a 'gold rush' in higher education, said William Brustein, who orchestrated the international expansion of several universities. 'Whether you were private or you were public, you had to be out in front in terms of being able to claim you were the most global university," said Brustein, who led efforts at Ohio State University and West Virginia University. The race was driven in part by economics, he said. Foreign students typically aren't eligible for financial aid, and at some schools they pay two or three times the tuition rate charged to U.S. students. Colleges also were eyeing global rankings that gave schools a boost if they recruited larger numbers of foreign students and scholars, he said. But the expansion wasn't equal across all types of colleges — public universities often face pressure from state lawmakers to limit foreign enrollment and keep more seats open for state residents. Private universities don't face that pressure, and many aggressively recruited foreign students as their numbers of U.S. students stayed flat. The college-going rate among American students has changed little for decades, and some have been turned off on college by the rising costs and student debt loads. Proponents of international exchange say foreign students pour billions of dollars into the U.S. economy, and many go on to support the nation's tech industry and other fields in need of skilled workers. Most international students study the STEM fields of science, technology, engineering and math. In the Ivy League, most international growth has been at the graduate level, while undergraduate numbers have seen more modest increases. Foreign graduate students make up more than half the students at Harvard's government and design schools, along with five of Columbia's schools. The Ivy League has been able to outpace other schools in large part because of its reputation, Brustein said. He recalls trips to China and India, where he spoke with families that could recite where each Ivy League school sat in world rankings. 'That was the golden calf for these families. They really thought, 'If we could just get into these schools, the rest of our lives would be on easy street,'' he said. Last week, Trump said he thought Harvard should cap its foreign students to about 15%. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump said at a news conference. The university called Trump's latest action banning entry into the country to attend Harvard 'yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights.' In a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's previous attempt to block international students at Harvard, the university said its foreign student population was the result of 'a painstaking, decades-long project' to attract the most qualified international students. Losing access to student visas would immediately harm the school's mission and reputation, it said. 'In our interconnected global economy," the school said, 'a university that cannot welcome students from all corners of the world is at a competitive disadvantage.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

The U.S. and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump's phone call with Xi
The U.S. and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump's phone call with Xi

Asahi Shimbun

time2 hours ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

The U.S. and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump's phone call with Xi

Stacked containers are seen at the Yangluo Port on the Yangtze River in Wuhan, central China's Hubei Province, May 23, 2025. (AP Photo) LONDON--High-level delegations from the United States and China met in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng held talks with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at Lancaster House, an ornate 200-year-old mansion near Buckingham Palace. Wang Wentao, China's commerce minister, also was part of Beijing's delegation. The talks, which may continue Tuesday, follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. The U.S. and China are the world's biggest and second-biggest economies. Chinese trade data shows that exports to the United States fell 35% in May from a year earlier. Since the Geneva talks, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, visas for Chinese students at American universities and 'rare earth' minerals that are vital to carmakers and other industries. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the following day that the trade talks would resume in London. Rare earths were expected to be a focus of the talks. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Beijing indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well as U.S. firms. Kevin Hassett, a U.S. economic adviser, told CNBC on Monday that he expected a short meeting with 'a big, strong handshake' on rare earths. The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks, though British Treasury chief Rachel Reeves met with both Bessent and He on Sunday, and U.K. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet Wang. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' the British government said in a statement.

US and China talk rare earths and chip controls in London
US and China talk rare earths and chip controls in London

Nikkei Asia

time3 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

US and China talk rare earths and chip controls in London

WASHINGTON/BEIJING -- Top officials from the U.S. and China met in London on Monday for a second round of trade talks, reportedly discussing Beijing's curbs on rare earths and Washington's semiconductor export restrictions. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer participated in the meeting, along with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who was not at the first round of talks last month in Switzerland. The Chinese side was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng, who is in charge of economic policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store