logo
[Exclusive] North Korea distancing from South Korea since martial law: NIS chief nominee

[Exclusive] North Korea distancing from South Korea since martial law: NIS chief nominee

Korea Herald4 hours ago

South Korea's spy chief nominee Lee Jong-seok said Tuesday that North Korea appears to be keeping a strategic distance from the South since the martial law debacle last December.
Lee said in a written response submitted to the National Assembly that the pause in North Korea's trash balloon offensives and political commentaries aimed at Seoul seems to be part of its distancing policy.
"North Korea has been thoroughly keeping its distance from and ignoring South Korea since the martial law declaration at the end of last year," Lee said. "North Korea has not shown a reaction to the recent anti-Pyongyang leafleting by South Korean civilian organizations, for instance, which is rare."
Lee noted that North Korea has also refrained from commenting on South Korea's political situation.
"On the South Korean political situation, North Korea is opting for fact-based, brief statements rather than commentaries. North Korean reports have refrained from reacting to announcements of the new South Korean administration's nominations of foreign and security officials," Lee said.
North Korea's shift in stance after the short-lived declaration of martial law contrasts with its series of offensives throughout the previous year.
After declaring the inter-Korean relationship one of "two hostile countries" in late 2023, North Korea blew up roads and railways connecting to the South and sent trash-filled balloons toward the South.
Lee said North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's daughter Ju-ae is his likely successor, but noted that she doesn't appear to have been formally nominated yet.
"There are many variables at play including Ju-ae's young age, Kim Jong-un's other children and the North's patriarchal culture," Lee said.
Lee has to go through the National Assembly's confirmation hearing on Thursday before he is appointed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

At 60, Seoul, Tokyo toast to what's next — not what was
At 60, Seoul, Tokyo toast to what's next — not what was

Korea Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

At 60, Seoul, Tokyo toast to what's next — not what was

Anchored by the slogan 'Joining Hands for a Better Future,' the reception commemorating 60 years of diplomatic normalization between Korea and Japan spotlighted a clear shared commitment to transform the two countries' relationship into a forward-looking, strategic partnership fit for today's turbulent world. Beneath the chandeliers of a ballroom brimming with guests from all walks of life — from diplomats and business leaders to young students — the air buzzed with optimism and the clinking of glasses at a reception hosted by the Japanese Embassy at the Lotte Hotel in Seoul on Monday evening. South Korea and Japan signed the Treaty on Basic Relations on June 22, 1965, and exchanged instruments of ratification on December 18 of that year, formally normalizing diplomatic ties. The year 2025 marks the 60th anniversary of that milestone. "The fact that Japan-Korea relations are becoming closer and developing is something no one can deny,' Japanese Ambassador to South Korea Koichi Mizushima told participants during the reception on Monday. "Amid today's shifting strategic environment, the importance of Korea-Japan relations continues to grow — and the relationship has now reached an irreversible stage." Back in 1965, annual travel between the two countries stood at just around 10,000. In 2024, it surpassed 12 million, averaging more than triple the 1965 total in a single day. Japan's investment in Korea has also soared, from $500,000 in 1965 to $6.12 billion in 2024, making it Korea's largest investor, Mizushima said. "Sixty years corresponds to a full cycle — a hwangap — in the East Asian cultural sphere where Japan and Korea are both located. In other words, one full cycle has passed since the normalization of Japan-Korea diplomatic ties,' Mizushima said. 'This signifies that Japan-Korea relations now stand at a new starting point. We must not remain complacent with the present, but instead support the next generation who will carry the future of both nations, and begin the next cycle to dramatically advance Japan-Korea relations with full momentum.' The evening vividly illustrated how far the two countries have come since the 1965 treaty, as relations evolved from government-to-government dialogue into a broad web of economic, cultural and people-to-people exchanges. The ballroom was filled with music as students at the Seoul Japanese School choir performed, including a Korean rendition of Spring in My Hometown. Arirang, a beloved Korean folk song, was also performed, sung and arranged by Japan's Mikage Project, a group dedicated to composing and reinterpreting traditional Japanese folk music. Korean pianist Lee Kyung-mi, who spent seven years in Japan from the age of nine and made her musical debut there, performed at the event, continuing her long-standing role as a cultural bridge between Korea and Japan through friendship concerts — even during strained diplomatic times. The event also featured a joint performance by Korean trot singer Kim Da-hyun and Japanese artist Azuma Aki. Both appeared on Korea-Japan King of Singers, the first-ever joint Korean-Japanese music competition show, co-produced by Korea's MBN and Japan's Fuji TV to promote friendship through music. "I hope that Korea-Japan relations will continue to develop in a stable and future-oriented manner based on the achievements and progress made thus far,' South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said in his congratulatory video message, adding that 'the two countries are important partners who must seek responses together amid rapidly changing international circumstances.' 'Joining hands for a better future — let us move forward together!' Akihisa Nagashima, special advisor to Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, underscored that "close communication and expanding the scope of cooperation between the two countries is not a choice but a necessity in light of today's grave international environment." Ryu Jin, chair of the Federation of Korean Industries and chair of Poongsan Corp., offered a toast on behalf of the Korean side, following a kagami-biraki ceremony — a traditional Japanese ritual that involves breaking open a sake barrel to symbolize harmony and new beginnings. 'The Korean business community is fully committed to supporting President Lee Jae-myung's new pragmatic administration in further developing future-oriented cooperation between our two countries,' Ryu said. 'Today, Korea-Japan relations stand at a new starting point for the next 60 years.' dagyumji@

Prime Minister nominee faces calls to withdraw over slush fund scandals
Prime Minister nominee faces calls to withdraw over slush fund scandals

Korea Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Prime Minister nominee faces calls to withdraw over slush fund scandals

Prime Minister nominee Kim Min-seok is facing growing calls from the main opposition party to withdraw his nomination over political slush fund scandals that occurred in the 2000s. The four-term liberal lawmaker, who was nominated for prime minister by President Lee Jae Myung on June 4, was convicted by the country's top court in 2005 of violating the Political Funds Act by receiving illegal political funds worth 200 million won ($146,900) from SK Group in 2002. He received the funds during his campaign for Seoul mayor as the candidate for the Millennium Democratic Party, the main liberal bloc at the time. The Supreme Court in 2005 sentenced Kim to eight months in prison, two years of probation and the forfeiture of 200 million won, finding him guilty of violating the Political Funds Act. Additionally, the Supreme Court in 2010 found him guilty in a separate political slush fund case, in which he received illegal funds worth a combined 720 million won from three of his aides in 2007. He was fined 6 million won and forfeited 720 million won. The main opposition People Power Party in recent days has ramped up its calls for Kim to withdraw his nomination. People Power Party spokesperson Ho Jun-seok even proposed launching a special counsel investigation into the charges in a Monday commentary. Kim has repeatedly brushed off his court convictions as mere 'allegations.' "The Political Funds Act case is essentially a targeted investigation of me by a political prosecution," Kim wrote in a Facebook post Monday. "It is a targeted investigation that does not even make clear who demanded the political funding and why." Kim said that his party at the time asked for corporate donations without his knowledge. President Lee, meanwhile, downplayed the scandal surrounding Kim, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One en route to Canada for the Group of 7 summit. Kim will be able to "sufficiently explain" himself at his upcoming confirmation hearing, Lee said. As of Tuesday, the rival parties were struggling to set a date for Kim's confirmation hearing. The Democratic Party of Korea suggested the hearing take place from June 23 to 24 -- for two days -- while the People Power Party pushed for a three-day hearing from June 23 to 25.

Can South Korea afford a 4.5-day workweek?
Can South Korea afford a 4.5-day workweek?

Korea Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Can South Korea afford a 4.5-day workweek?

Workers cheer shorter week, but employers warn of hidden costs With President Lee Jae Myung now in office, one of his most eye-catching campaign pledges — introducing a 4.5-day workweek — is facing questions over whether it can really work. For many workers, the proposal is a welcome one. 'I can't even describe how much I hope this happens,' said Kim Ji-eun, a 39-year-old office worker in Seoul. 'Right now, I leave work exhausted every Friday evening and have barely enough time to rest, let alone enjoy life or take care of my kids. Just half a day more would mean a real chance at balance.' Kim's view is widely shared. According to a recent survey by business networking platform Remember, 7 in 10 salaried workers out of more than 11,000 surveyed said they would prefer a four-day workweek. In a different survey by Saramin, 86.7 percent of employees said they prefer a four-day workweek, and of those more than 60 percent said they would take the shorter hours even if it meant a lower salary. But the reality is more complicated. South Korea is widely known for its grueling work culture. In 2022, South Koreans worked an average of 1,901 hours annually — 149 hours more than the OECD average. The country's job market is also notoriously rigid, largely due to labor laws that make it difficult for employers to dismiss regular workers, contributing to a stark divide between secure, permanent jobs and unstable, non-regular employment. "Shaped by decades of regulations that prioritize employment stability over labor market agility, rigid legal frameworks and cultural norms make it difficult for companies to reward excellence or address underperformance. This makes it risky for businesses to experiment with reduced work hours," Kim Seong-hee, a labor professor at Korea University, told The Korea Herald. At the same time, the country ranks low in terms of labor productivity. According to the Korea Labor Institute, South Korea placed 33rd out of 38 OECD countries in 2023, with hourly productivity at $44.4 — just 57 percent of the United States' output at $77.9 and 65 percent of Germany's. Employers worry that without a significant leap in productivity, a reduced workweek would only add to their burden. 'Some pioneering firms might adopt a four-day or 4.5-day workweek to attract talent,' said Sohn Kyung-shik, chairman of the Korea Employers Federation, at a presidential forum last month. 'But for many companies, this change would be a serious strain.' Mixed signals from labor and business South Korea's largest labor union, the Federation of Korean Trade Unions, has taken the opposite stance. At a press conference in April ahead of the presidential election, the union pushed for the introduction of a four-day workweek. 'Seventeen percent of Korean workers still put in more than 48 hours per week — more than twice the EU average of 7.3 percent,' the group said, citing long work hours as a pressing national issue. Pointing to successful pilot programs in countries like Iceland, France, the UK and the US, the union argues that advances in automation, AI and platform labor models demand an overhaul in how working time is structured. 'If work is changing, then the standard of what we consider acceptable labor hours must also evolve,' the federation stated. If implemented, the 4.5-day week would reduce the legal workweek from 40 to 36 hours. Coupled with another Lee campaign pledge to abolish the fixed-salary overtime system known as the 'inclusive wage system,' business groups say they fear a compounded cost burden. Law firm Lee & Ko warned that just as the adoption of the five-day workweek in 2003 imposed added costs without wage cuts, the proposed shift — especially with inclusive wage reform — could significantly impact corporate operating costs. Still, labor law experts say shorter work hours may be inevitable. 'A reduction in working hours aligns with global trends, and no major political party in Korea is actively opposing the idea,' the firm noted in its report after the election. The firm expects phased implementation alongside flexible work arrangements. Addressing structural gaps The road ahead is not without conditions. Law firm Yulchon emphasized in a recent report that labor productivity must improve first. With Korea's low hourly labor productivity, the firm argued that 'reducing working hours without lowering wages is only socially sustainable if accompanied by productivity growth.' Park, a labor expert at a law firm, advised that companies prepare for the change by adopting practical measures, such as encouraging the use of annual leave, offering more flexible working hours, and updating existing legal frameworks to maximize the use of flexible work arrangements. 'From redesigning work environments and staffing plans to ensuring fair compensation levels, the private sector must begin preparing for structural transformation," Park said. However, labor experts warn that without careful planning, a reduced workweek could exacerbate inequality in Korea's dual labor market — one dominated by secure jobs in big corporations and the public sector, and another filled with low-paid, unstable work in small businesses and services. The service sector's low productivity adds to the challenge. According to the Korea Productivity Center, the value-added productivity per service worker is only 64 percent of the OECD average, while manufacturing productivity exceeds the OECD average — illustrating Korea's dichotomy of 'developed manufacturing, underdeveloped services." This imbalance means shorter workweeks could result in reduced income and job insecurity for the vast majority of workers in the service sector if reforms do not also address deeper structural issues. Experts agree that any meaningful attempt to adopt a 4.5-day workweek must go hand-in-hand with comprehensive labor reform — one that considers the realities of small businesses, non-regular workers and platform-based labor. 'In today's changing work environment, the old formula of 'more hours equal more productivity' doesn't hold up, especially in manufacturing,' said Kwon Hyuk, a labor professor at Korea University. 'What matters now is when and how effectively the work is done.' Kwon warned that implementing a shorter workweek only at large firms or government offices could deepen inequality. 'We need to strengthen the competitiveness of small businesses and fix the labor market's dual structure before we move forward with such a policy,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store