Scientists Reveal What Antarctica Would Look Like With No Ice
Antarctica was once a lush and thriving land, teeming with prehistoric life. It's hard to believe now, but tucked away, hidden underneath a layer of ice kilometers thick, that ancient landscape still lies buried, never seen by human eyes.
Never seen, perhaps, but that doesn't mean forever to remain unknown. For years, the British Antarctic Survey has been flying planes over the frozen southern continent, using radar, sound waves, and gravity mapping to ascertain the shape of the bedrock sequestered below.
Their new map of Antarctica as it lies under the ice is the most detailed yet – revealing mountain ranges, ancient riverbeds, deep basins, and low, sweeping plains.
This, according to a team led by glaciologist Hamish Pritchard of the British Antarctic Survey, will provide crucial information to scientists looking to understand the complex interplay between land and ice as Antarctica continues to transform under a changing climate.
"This is the fundamental information that underpins the computer models we use to investigate how the ice will flow across the continent as temperatures rise," Pritchard says.
"Imagine pouring syrup over a rock cake – all the lumps, all the bumps, will determine where the syrup goes and how fast. And so it is with Antarctica: some ridges will hold up the flowing ice; the hollows and smooth bits are where that ice could accelerate."
It's a fascinating question, really. If you removed the 27 million cubic kilometers (6.5 million cubic miles) of ice that covers Antarctica, what would the continent look like? What ancient geology is hidden thereunder; what history remains undiscovered?
It wasn't so long ago that we'd have little way of finding out. Now, we can fly planes and satellites carrying the sensitive tools of metrology to measure what we can't see. This is the work the British Antarctic Survey has been carrying out, incrementally adding more data over the course of six decades to fill in their map of what lies beneath.
The latest map, known as Bedmap3, comprises data collected from planes, satellites, ships, and dog sled teams on the ground to catalog the hidden landscape of Antarctica. The 277 ice thickness surveys used to compile the map contributed 82 million data points, filling in huge gaps in the previous map.
One of those gaps is the point at which the ice that covers Antarctica is at its thickest. Previous surveys had placed it in Adélie Land's Astrolabe Basin.
The new map, however, reveals that the true position is at 76.052 degrees South, 118.378 degrees East, where an unnamed canyon produces an ice thickness of 4,757 meters (15,607 feet).
Ice thickness surveys were particularly lacking around mountains, coastlines, and nunataks (isolated mountains sticking out of the ice). Bedmap3 clarified the regions around the South Pole itself, along the coastlines of the Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctica, and the Transantarctic Mountains.
We know how high the top of the ice that covers Antarctica reaches from sea level. Mapping the topography of a mass that is open to the sky is relatively straightforward. By forging a more accurate map of the shape of the bottom of the ice, Pritchard and his colleagues could more accurately calculate how much ice is there.
The total volume of ice is 27.17 million cubic kilometers, covering an area of 13.63 square kilometers. The mean thickness of the ice, including the ice shelves, is 1,948 meters; excluding the ice shelves, it's 2,148 meters.
If all the ice in Antarctica was to melt, this means sea levels would rise by 58 meters. That's consistent with previous surveys, but with a couple of tweaks.
"In general, it's become clear the Antarctic Ice Sheet is thicker than we originally realised and has a larger volume of ice that is grounded on a rock bed sitting below sea-level," explains cartographer Peter Fretwell of the British Antarctic Survey.
"This puts the ice at greater risk of melting due to the incursion of warm ocean water that's occurring at the fringes of the continent. What Bedmap3 is showing us is that we have got a slightly more vulnerable Antarctica than we previously thought."
But hey, at least we might finally be able to find the Mountains of Madness…?
The team's research has been published in Scientific Data.
Common Habit Could Be a Source of Plastic Pollution We Never Considered
Microplastics Are Disrupting Photosynthesis, And The Impact Could Be Huge
NASA Reports Sea Levels Rose by 'Unexpected' Amount in Earth's Hottest Year
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists make chilling discovery hidden deep within centuries-old ice cores: 'We need to raise the alarm'
A group of scientists is in a race against time in the Arctic. Valuable climate data is at risk of disappearing as our overheating planet melts glacier ice. Our warming world is melting glaciers and ice sheets, and crucial climate data is vanishing along with them, reported Carbon Brief. A team of scientists is studying the Blombstrandbreen glacier, located approximately halfway between mainland Norway and the North Pole, to determine the degree of damage caused by meltwater penetrating deep into the ice. "If you imagine an ice core like a book containing important information, what is happening is almost like someone has spilled a cup of tea all over the pages," Dorothea Moser, a British Antarctic Survey scientist, told Carbon Brief. "The melting of ice cores is a big issue and we need to raise the alarm — but we also can't give up on them completely yet." The ice cores that are extracted from glaciers such as Blombstrandbreen hold vital information that helps scientists reconstruct past climate conditions. Air bubbles trapped inside the ice can provide scientists with a glimpse into the past, as the gases present when the ice formed are stored within them. Scientists can glean valuable information from this type of "proxy data." "Paleoclimatologists gather proxy data from natural recorders of climate variability such as corals, pollen, ice cores, tree rings, caves, pack rat middens, ocean and lake sediments, and historical data," according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "By analyzing records taken from these and other proxy sources, scientists can extend our understanding of climate far beyond the instrumental record." The Arctic is warming at a rate nearly four times faster than Earth's average. "Arctic amplification" means the region's ice is rapidly melting and putting crucial climate data at risk of being lost forever. On the opposite side of the Earth, scientists say some of Antarctica's glaciers may have entered a phase of irreversible melting. Arctic ice melt is a danger to our communities for a number of reasons. It can contribute to higher tides during extreme weather events, increase the spread of disease, and disrupt food chains and marine ecosystems. Moving away from dirty energy sources that release heat-trapping gases into our atmosphere is crucial to cooling our planet. There have been some promising breakthroughs in cleaner, renewable energy sources such as solar energy. Japanese researchers have developed the world's highest-efficiency solar cells, which offer the added benefit of being more eco-friendly. Going solar with a battery system not only strengthens your home's resilience to extreme weather and outages; it also drastically cuts your reliance on dirty energy and can bring your energy costs down to at or near $0. With EnergySage, you can easily compare quotes from vetted installers and save up to $10,000 in the process. Learning about critical climate issues and sharing that information with friends and family can help bring attention to things such as vanishing glaciers and ice sheets. It could inspire them to take action and fight for the future of our planet. Do you think America has a plastic waste problem? Definitely Only in some areas Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Newsweek
21-05-2025
- Newsweek
Scientist Who Discovered Hole in Ozone Layer Reveals 'Fear For Coming Generations'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. One of the scientists who discovered the hole in the ozone layer 40 years ago is proud of his work, but he now has major concerns about a new existential crisis: the looming threat of climate change. Jonathan Shanklin, a meteorologist and an emeritus fellow for the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), helped discover the hole in the ozone layer in 1985 along with Joe Farman and Brian G. Gardiner. In a statement released May 13, Dominic Hodgson, director of science at the BAS, dubbed it "one of the most important environmental discoveries of the 20th century". Stock image of smoke billowing out of an industrial chimney. Stock image of smoke billowing out of an industrial chimney. Photo by Алексей Филатов / Getty Images In an email to Newsweek, Shanklin said that 40 years after the discovery, he was most proud "that the observations were correct and did indicate that the ozone layer above Antarctica was in trouble". The scientists' discovery led to quick international action, and according to the World Economic Forum, the ozone layer is "on a path to recovery". That recovery is in large part due to the Montreal Protocol, an agreement signed by a record number of countries in 1987 banning the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Banning CFCs, however, was straightforward compared to the looming crisis of climate change. 'Blighted by the consequences' "Stopping the release of chemicals harmful to the ozone layer was relatively straightforward—manufacturers had (or could design) alternatives that they could supply and there was no requirement for a change in personal lifestyle," Shanklin told Newsweek. The problem with climate change, according to Shanklin, is "an economic model that does not stand up to scientific scrutiny". "I personally fear for coming generations whose lives are going to be blighted by the consequences of climate change," Shanklin added. "The evidence is very strong and politicians need to act upon it." Shanklin said that our current economic model makes two incorrect assumptions. The first is that resources are infinite, and the second is that using them has no consequences. "It is blindingly obvious that natural resources are not infinite, and is becoming increasingly obvious in the form of all the crises that affect us (ozone, climate, biodiversity, plastic pollution etc.) that using natural resources does have consequences and that the cost of these needs to be included in the model," Shanklin noted. 'Essentially a story of personal greed' Having once inspired international action with a scientific discovery, Shanklin said he believes that one important lesson was the importance of what a potential crisis is called. "An ozone hole was clearly a problem, whereas climate change or greenhouse warming can sound quite attractive to some," he said. He added, "Another lesson is that it is important to have political leaders who understand science," noting that former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher had trained as a chemist. Finally, he stressed the importance of seeing how each crisis is interconnected—that fixing each one in isolation is impossible. "The underlying linkage is essentially a story of personal greed and a lack of altruism," he said. "Collectively, we need to think of others and future generations."
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Yahoo
What happened to the hole in the ozone layer? What is the status of the hole?
It's been 40 years since groundbreaking research announced the discovery of a hole in the ozone layer, a revelation that launched a rapid and successful effort to ban chemicals in hairspray, deodorant cans and refrigerators that were imperiling the planet. The 1985 discovery by scientists at the British Antarctic Survey identified a dramatic thinning of the ozone layer over our southernmost continent, triggering immediate global concern about potential harm to human health and ecosystems worldwide. Located in the stratosphere, the ozone layer acts like sunscreen, blocking potentially harmful ultraviolet energy from reaching our planet's surface. Without it, humans and animals could experience increased rates of skin cancer, DNA damage, cataracts and other ailments. It also affects the physiological and developmental processes of plants. Scientists determined the production of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which were widely used in refrigeration, aerosols, solvents, and fire extinguishers caused the problem. When chlorine and bromine atoms from CFCs rise and come into contact with ozone in the stratosphere, they destroy ozone molecules, the Environmental Protection Agency says in an online report. Ozone can be destroyed more quickly than it is naturally created, the EPA said. A large and deep ozone hole still forms every Antarctic spring, being deepest and largest toward the end of September, Shanklin told USA TODAY in a May 15 e-mail. "There is a very slow recovery, but we'll still have ozone holes for another 50 years or more." Indeed, though the Antarctic ozone hole shows signs of recovery, the healing process is very slow. CFCs have atmospheric lifetimes of more than 50 years, so even without further emissions, a full recovery might not occur until after 2070, the BAS said. "The current rate of recovery is a bit slower than might be expected, so there could be feedbacks with climate change taking place," Jon Shanklin, now an emeritus fellow at the British Antarctic Survey, told USA TODAY. The discovery of the ozone hole led directly to the Montreal Protocol just two years later – an agreement that froze the production and use of ozone-depleting substances at 1986 levels and set the groundwork for phasing them out entirely. Today, the protocol stands as one of the most successful international environmental treaties ever implemented. By preventing harmful UV radiation from reaching the Earth's surface, the agreement has saved thousands of lives, the BAS said. "The Montreal Protocol is a very successful treaty that all the world's governments have signed. It is working, with the amount of ozone depleting chemicals in the atmosphere declining as expected," Shanklin said in an e-mail to USA TODAY. USA TODAY asked Shanklin if there is a regret that we haven't made similar progress in reducing the human-caused greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. "Very much so," Shanklin answered. "The Montreal Protocol shows what can be done, but with most other environmental issues (climate, biodiversity loss, sewage pollution, soil degradation, etc.) there is mostly talk and small-scale action." "It is largely because the economic model is flawed and perverse – it assumes that resources are infinite and that there is no cost in using them," Shanklin said. "This perversely then creates all the crises that we could be avoiding." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 40 years later: What happened to the hole in the ozone layer?
