RFK Jr.'s error-filled MAHA report sparks speculation it was written by AI
Last week, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. proudly boasted about the findings of a 73-page report from the Presidential Commission to Make America Healthy Again that took what was supposed to be an unvarnished look at the health of the nation's children.
'We will end the childhood chronic disease crisis by attacking its root causes head-on—not just managing its symptoms,' Kennedy said in a statement.
'We will follow the truth wherever it leads, uphold rigorous science, and drive bold policies that put the health, development, and future of every child first,' he continued. 'I'm grateful to President [Donald] Trump for his leadership—and for trusting me to lead this fight to root out corruption, restore scientific integrity, and reclaim the health of our children.'
But new reporting suggests that the document misinterprets some of the studies that underpin it, and cites others that don't even exist, the authors told NOTUS, a nonprofit news website that covers national politics and government.
For instance, epidemiologist Katherien Keyes is listed in the report as the first author of a study on how anxiety affects adolescents. When NOTUS contacted her for comment, she was 'surprised' to hear about the citation, the website reported.
Whiley Keyes does study mental health and substance use, she didn't write the paper, according to NOTUS.
'The paper cited is not a real paper that I or my colleagues were involved with,' Keyes told NOTUS via email. 'We've certainly done research on this topic, but did not publish a paper in JAMA Pediatrics on this topic with that co-author group, or with that title.'
Separate reporting by USA TODAY found that the report had misinterpreted a cited article written by Mariana Figueiro, a professor at Mount Sinai's Icahn School of Medicine.
The government's report had cited Figuerio's study as evidence of the harmful effects that electronic devices can have on children's sleep, NYMag's Intelligencer reported.
But according to Figueiro herself, the study had focused on college students. And it measured 'melatonin suppression,' according to USA TODAY.
'The study is ours, but unfortunately, the conclusions in the report are not accurate and the journal reference is incorrect,' Figueiro told USA TODAY in an email. 'We have other papers on the topic… but again, none of them were performed with children.'
During a Thursday news conference, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reportedly downplayed NOTUS's findings on the MAHA report and stood behind it.
Still, The New York Times reported that the original version of the report had been taken down and replaced with an updated one, according to NYMag's Intelligencer.
The pratfalls, in turn, sparked speculation that RFK Jr.'s team at HHS had used AI to compile the document.
New York University expert Ivan Oransky told the Times that he couldn't say for sure that AI had been used for the report, but it did remind him of instances where it had been employed elsewhere.
'We've seen this particular movie before, and it's unfortunately much more common in scientific literature than people would like or than really it should be,' he told the newspaper.
Leavitt punted to RFK Jr. when she was asked whether AI had been used to compile the report.
'I can't speak to that,' she said, according to NYMag.
Supreme Court lets Trump admin. strip protections for people from 4 countries
Tainted by state's drug lab scandal, seized property hangs in balance as US high court weighs taking up case
Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too
The piece of the Mass. budget that passes all understanding | John L. Micek
Quincy residents sue mayor over controversial statues for new public safety building
Read the original article on MassLive.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Snowflake retools data cloud to fuel AI agents, expand integrations
This story was originally published on CIO Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CIO Dive newsletter. Snowflake retooled its data cloud platform through a sweeping set of product updates targeting enterprise agentic AI adoption, the company said Tuesday during its annual Snowflake Summit event. The series of announcements came on the heels of Snowflake's Monday agreement to purchase PostgreSQL startup Crunchy Data. The AI data cloud company rolled out a hybrid multicloud data ingestion service called Snowflake Openflow, the Cortex Knowledge Extensions third-party data mining pipeline and AI-powered natural-language analytics and data science assistants under the Snowflake Intelligence and Data Science Agent rubrics. Snowflake also trumpeted the general availability of its Cortex AISQL agentic querying tool and the SnowConvert AI data modernization copilot designed to help enterprises migrate from legacy warehouses. 'We are making it easy to tap into structured data. We are making it easy to tap into unstructured data as well. And we're helping our customers build a strong foundation to lead in the era of agentic AI,' CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy said last month during the company's Q1 earnings call for the 2026 fiscal year. As enterprises seek business value from generative AI-powered agentic automation, major vendors are racing to deploy the data integrations, modernization tools and pipelines organizations need to fuel the technology. The Crunchy Data acquisition brought AI compliance and scaling capabilities in-house for Snowflake, less than a month after Databricks, a competitor in the AI data cloud space, announced its intent to purchase PostgreSQL startup Neon. 'We're doubling down on the momentum behind Postgres and investing in its future while preserving the openness, the extensibility and developer-first ethos that make it great,' Ramaswamy said during a Monday keynote. As part of its integration strategy, Snowflake connected its data cloud to The Associated Press, USA Today and several other publishers through Cortex Knowledge Extensions that let enterprises feed news and other timely data to AI apps and agents, the company said in a Tuesday announcement. The pipeline creates a marketplace for enterprises to source third-party data while ensuring publishers are compensated. Snowflake Intelligence unifies raw and structured data from spreadsheets, documents, images and databases, using Anthropic and OpenAI large language models. The integration connects the company's data cloud to Google Drive, Salesforce Data Cloud via Zero Copy, Workday and other enterprise vendor platforms, aligning security controls, data masking and governance policies. It will be in public preview soon, the company said. 'There's so much that we take for granted about how things used to work that just aren't true anymore,' Ramaswamy said, pointing to the impact of AI on the enterprise in a keynote conversation with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. 'We'll be at a point next year where you can not only use a system to automate business processes or build these new products and services, but you can really say, 'I have this hugely important problem in my business, I will throw a ton of compute at it'… and the models will be able to go figure out things that teams of people on their own can't do,' Altman said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump pushes forward on tariffs despite court challenges: What to know
Donald Trump pushes forward on tariffs despite court challenges: What to know President Donald Trump is hiking tariffs on aluminum and steel as his administration presses countries to speed up trade talks, amid legal battles. Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel President Trump, during a visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania, announced he will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%. WASHINGTON —President Donald Trump's trade agenda is about to enter a new phase, as the Republican moves forward − for now − with tariff hikes. In the face of mockery for repeatedly backing down from previous big tariff announcements, Trump is increasing tariffs on aluminum and steel imports to 50%. And he told nations in a letter this week that they have until June 4 to provide an update on the status of negotiations. The tariffs are expected to be a major topic of discussion during Trump's meeting on June 5 with Germany's new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, and in an as-of-yet unscheduled phone call that the White House says the United States president will be holding this week with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. At the same time, court challenges threaten to keep his administration from enforcing county-specific tariffs. The legal challenges to Trump's tariffs in court have only been a minor setback, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a June 1 appearance on "Fox News Sunday." "Rest assured, tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said, adding that even if higher courts upheld rulings that the law Trump cited to impose tariffs didn't grant him that power, the administration would find another legal power to use. Countries quickly came back to the table to negotiate deals after an appeals court allowed Trump's tariffs to remain in place while the administration makes its case. Trump increases tariffs on aluminum and steel Trump has already started to pull some of those levers, announcing plans last Friday to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Trump said a previously imposed tariff of 25% would increase to 50% on June 4. He signed an order formalizing the hike on June 3. The tariffs were expected to affect Canada, which is the largest supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States, and Mexico among other nations. The European Union promptly warned that it could expand a list of countermeasures it is preparing to go into effect in mid-July if a trade agreement with the United States is not reached. Canadian ambassador to the United States Kirsten Hillman told USA TODAY in an interview that the increase was "unideal" but Canada's steel and aluminum exports have other markets that producers have already started to pivot to where they remain in demand. The higher tariffs will be "very negative for the U.S. economy" and for trade between the two countries, Hillman said. She predicted that the hike would lead to "a wall" being erected between the countries for the two metals, prompting shortages and increased costs for Americans. "Those are really costs that are going to be borne by Americans through price increases in everything from cars to home goods, anything that's manufactured with those two metals, which is an awful lot of what we use in our everyday lives," Hillman said. White House downplays trade letter to countries In a separate escalation against America's trading partners, the office of the United States Trade Representative pressed countries to respond by June 4 with their best offers to avoid higher country-specific tariffs. Trump had previously told countries they had until July 8 to cut deals with the United States as part of a 90-day pause on so-called "reciprocal" tariffs he imposed and then halted earlier this year. A universal tariff of 10% that Trump put on most nations at the same time remains in place, as do the tariffs he put on Mexico, Canada and China that were tied to his efforts to combat illegal immigration to the United States and the flow of fentanyl. After a draft of the letter leaked to Reuters, two senior administration officials told USA TODAY that it was not a final notice. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also sought to downplay the significance of the correspondence at a June 3 press briefing, where she told reporters, "This letter was simply to remind these countries that the deadline is approaching, and the president expects good deals, and we are on track for that." Canada, China, EU in the crosshairs It was not immediately clear which nations received the letter. Hillman told USA TODAY that Canada, whose minister for trade with the United States Dominic LeBlanc is currently in Washington for talks, was not among them. The meeting is a continuation of the conversation that took place between Trump and Canadian prime minister Mark Carney, the ambassador said, and was not expected to immediately produce a major announcement. Trump currently has a higher tariff of 25% on products not covered by a trade deal between the United States, Canada and Mexico, and a 10% tariff on potash (a kind of fertilizer) and Canadian energy products that are not exempted under the agreement. The administration has said it is talking about deals with more than a dozen countries but none have emerged so far outside of a framework agreement with the UK. The president last month threatened, and then backed off, a threat to impose a 50% tariff on the European Union, as trade talks with the bloc continue. The EU declined on June 2 to comment on the reported USTR letter. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is currently in Paris negotiating with trading partners, the White House said on June 3. Trump will also speak to Merz of Germany on June 5 when the leader visits White House for the first time since his May election. Leavitt told reporters that Trump has been "very direct" in his talks with foreign leaders and had told them "they need to cut deals" with his administration. "He's unafraid to use tariffs to protect our industries and protect our workers, but he wants to see these tailor-made deals be signed," Leavitt added. Trump is also expecting to speak with Xi of China this week, the White House has said. The president last week accused China of violating an agreement between the two nations to deescalate their trade war. China fired back that it was the United States undermining the deal that saw the U.S. reduce a 145% tariff to 30% while negotiations take place. Leavitt affirmed to reporters on June 3 that call between the leaders was likely to take place this week but declined to provide additional details during her briefing. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington declined to comment on the possibility of a call, the status of negotiations and whether Beijing had received the letter from the United States' trade representative. Trump tariffs hit legal snags The tariffs have faced numerous legal challenges since Trump began rolling them out shortly after taking office. Most recently, the U.S. Court of International Trade paused tariffs that Trump imposed without congressional approval only to have the ruling temporarily blocked by a federal appeals court. A U.S. district court also blocked Trump tariffs from hitting two toy manufacturers at the end of May. The Trump administration appealed that decision on June 2. In another case, a judge on June 2 dismissed a challenge from the state California, saying the filing belongs in the international trade court that is based in New York. The decision will allow California to bring its case to another appeals court. In a series of TV appearances on June 1, administration officials said they were confident courts would ultimately side with Trump. But if a judge rules against the administration, there are "other alternatives that we can pursue as well," the president's National Economic Council director, Kevin Hassett, said in an interview on ABC News' "This Week." He offered provisions of U.S. trade law that give the executive branch the power impose tariffs on imports Trump deems a national security threat or in response to unreasonable or discriminatory trade imbalances as potential options. "This is something we've been studying from 2017 on," he said. "We picked the best way. It's going to be upheld in court."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will new nuclear energy deals generate FOMO mentality in Big Tech?
Constellation Energy (CEG) has inked a 20-year deal to provide tech giant Meta Platforms (META) with power from its clean nuclear energy plant starting in 2027. Mizuho Americas managing director and senior analyst of utilities Anthony Crowdell discusses the Constellation-Meta deal, as well as other energy agreements as grid demand soars to power AI data centers, and the regulation around nuclear plants after President Trump signed an executive order in May to ease restrictions around nuclear reactor development. Catch Yahoo Finance's interview with Nano Nuclear Energy founder, executive chairman, and president Jay Yu on the nuclear energy landscape. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Constellation and Meta inked a 20-year power deal, and as part of it, the output from the Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois will support Meta's clean energy goals. The agreement comes as the social media giant's energy demand soared due to its AI data center expansion. Mizuho Americas Managing Director and Senior Analyst Anthony Crowdell joins us now to discuss. Anthony, this is just the latest. We've had these deals coming, um, sort of trickling out now. Um, what is your best estimate of the sort of terms of this deal, how it compares to what we've heard thus far and sort of what it could tell us about future deals? Sure. So, so lots to unpack there. Good afternoon. And I think, you know, when you think of the existing deals we've seen, maybe it's two. We saw the Talon Amazon deal, which was pricing around $70 a megawatt hour. That deal's still being challenged at the federal energy regulatory commission, but we'll include that deal and include the pricing of $70. The only other deal we really saw was the Microsoft Three Mile Island. And what was unique about that deal, that was about bringing new nuclear power on. It was the Three Mile Island plant, now called the Train Energy Center, bringing that back online. And when you look at the pricing there, it's probably about 90, 95 adding tax credits, clean energy credits. You're probably at a whopping like $145, but again, Microsoft paying that. So, there's been deals. This may be the third deal, or a third deal with nuclear plants, but each very unique. And so this is kind of the first deal, that's what we're going to use the term, in front of the meter, where we call it just like kind of a virtual PPA. And it takes the output of the Clinton Energy or Clinton nuclear plant in Illinois. And best we could do with pricing is maybe somewhere around $75 to $80 a megawatt hour. Um, very good price. Forward curve for power in that part of Illinois, around the clock, maybe somewhere $40ish dollars, $45. So there's a very nice contract, relative to where the forward curve is. Um, but it's the first contract we've really seen with existing nuclear plant, that's in front of the meter. Your question of what this means for additional contracts, I mean, that'll be interesting. Obviously, this is now the mark. Let's just call it $80. Uh, this will be the mark of where they're going to be judged at. But does this create a scarcity or FOMO mentality where other large tech now jump in to get that? That's what we want to see. But I think, seeing the stock price today, and you put a great chart on there, I think news it really spiked up, but maybe as people were maybe over their skis, thinking we saw $100 or referenced the Microsoft price earlier, $100 or north of $100. As that trickled down to maybe it's an $80 price, which is still attractive, but clearly fully priced in, I think we're looking at it right now, the stock is down a dollar. Anthony, I'm curious. The Trump administration, fans of nuclear. You saw the president signed that executive order late last month. What do you think the impact of that EO could be on the industry long term, Anthony? With, with the exception, if you think big tech comes in and tells a IPP, independent power producer or a utility, you could use our balance sheet to build a nuclear plant. Meaning any cost overruns you have with construction, supply chain issues, Google is going to underwrite all of that and said, we got you covered, bud. We're going to pay for any cost overruns. Aside from that, the executive order will mean absolutely nothing. I do not see, I mean, Constellation is the best operator in the space. They have the deepest nuclear bench. They are, if anyone's going to build a nuclear plant, it would be Constellation. And right now, Constellation said we are not building it on their balance sheet. Again, if Meta made a deal with them tomorrow that said, let's build the plant together and we will take all the risk and cost overruns, I think that's all you will see. So I'm not expecting you're going to see any real change in how many nuclear plants are being developed in this country right now. And it, so far, it's zero. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data