logo
Parents of kids with cancer fear GOP budget cuts could slash Medicaid

Parents of kids with cancer fear GOP budget cuts could slash Medicaid

NBC News25-04-2025

By Elizabeth Cohen
Tony, an energetic 7-year-old who loves playing football and roughhousing with his brothers wasn't all that excited when his parents took the family to see Santa in December. Instead, he was tired and lethargic.
His parents were surprised because Tony would usually be bouncing off the walls at the prospect of seeing Santa.
Tony had been feeling under the weather for a few weeks, and his pediatrician diagnosed him with a virus and bronchitis. But after the visit to Santa near their home in Wesley Chapel, Florida, Pauline McLaurin says, her mother's intuition told it was something more serious.
She took her son directly to the emergency room, and her gut instinct was right: Tony had leukemia. From there, things got worse.
Tony has been in and out of the hospital, his body weakened by chemotherapy. Pauline McLaurin quit her job as a fifth-grade teacher to care for him, and they struggle to pay their bills on the salary her husband, Ronnie McLaurin, makes as an electrician.
As if that weren't enough, the McLaurins have a new worry. They lost their private insurance when Pauline McLaurin left her job, and now they fear losing their Medicaid, the government health insurance program that pays for Tony's care.
Medicaid insures 1 out of 3 children diagnosed with cancer in the United States, according to the American Cancer Society's Cancer Action Network.
President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers have called for dramatic government budget cuts that many nonpartisan experts say are unfeasible without significant cuts to Medicaid.
A House Republican budget plan instructs the Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, to identify at least $880 billion in mandatory spending cuts over the next 10 years. While the plan doesn't specifically mention Medicaid, the experts say it would be unfeasible for Republicans to hit that target without significant cuts to the health program, since it's one of the largest sources of federal spending, costing more than $600 billion per year, according to government data.
Pauline McLaurin said she is 'terrified' and 'hopeless' at the prospect of losing Medicaid.
'It's a very scary, uneasy feeling,' she said.
The McLaurins are not alone.
Mary Ann Massolio runs 1Voice Academy, a school for children with cancer, which Tony attends. She says over the past few months, many parents have expressed distress about possibly losing Medicaid.
'It's anxiety on steroids,' she said.
In February, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other groups wrote a letter to lawmakers expressing their 'grave concerns' about potential Medicaid cuts and 'the devastating consequences for millions of children across the country.'
If these Republican budget cuts go through, some children with cancer could die, said Dr. Sharon Castellino, who studies Medicaid as a pediatric oncologist at the Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, and a professor of pediatrics at the Emory University School of Medicine.
'This is a bipartisan issue,' she said. 'We're incredibly worried.'
Trump: Medicaid won't be 'touched'
As of November 2024, Medicaid covers more than 70 million people in the U.S., according to the federal government's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It's the largest single source of health coverage in the U.S., covering nearly half of all children and more than 40% of births, according to the American Hospital Association.
A 2024 study, conducted by Emory's Castellino and other researchers found that children who experienced interruptions in Medicaid coverage before or during their cancer diagnosis and treatment were less likely to survive the disease, compared to those with continuous coverage.
Republicans say budget cuts can be made without hurting Medicaid.
'Medicare, Medicaid, none of that stuff is going to be touched,' Trump said in February.
'The president has said repeatedly, we're not going to hurt Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid recipients who are eligible for it. And that is our guiding north, our true north,' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told Punchbowl News last month.
In his rural Louisiana district, nearly 25% of adults under age 65 rely on Medicaid, according to an NBC News analysis.
'I understand this acutely — it directly affects my people. We're going to be very careful not to cut a benefit for anyone who is eligible to receive it and relies upon it,' Johnson told Punchbowl.
But last month, the Congressional Budget Office, which is nonpartisan, said House Republicans can't meet their budget target without making significant cuts to Medicaid or Medicare, the nation's health insurance program for seniors.
In the House, the Medicaid budget falls under the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and the Republican budget plan instructs that committee to cut spending.
In February, Johnson said that 'we're going to cut the fraud, waste and abuse and that's where we're going to get the savings to accomplish this mission.'
It would be very difficult to make the proposed Republican cuts just by targeting fraud, waste and abuse, said Megan Cole Brahim, an associate professor at the Boston University School of Public Health and co-director of the school's Medicaid Policy Lab.
'This on the surface seems like a reasonable idea — nobody likes fraud, waste or abuse,' she said. 'But there is a misalignment between the proposed cuts the Republicans are trying to make [and] the actual scope of fraud and waste.'
Johnson identified another way he intends to save Medicaid dollars.
'You've got a lot of able-bodied workers, young men who could be out working, who are choosing not to because they're on the government wagon,' he told Punchbowl. 'I think that's wrong, and I think if you get those people out of the program — and there's a large number of them — then you preserve it for the people who actually need it and deserve it.'
Cole Brahim called this a 'false narrative,' pointing to a KFF study that shows in 2023, nearly two-thirds of adults ages 19-64 covered by Medicaid were working and nearly 3 in 10 were not working because of caregiving responsibilities, illness or disability, or school attendance.
In the McLaurins' case, Ronnie McLaurin doesn't have health insurance through his work as a self-employed electrician.
'T his is not a done deal yet'
At this point, the Republican budget proposals are just that — proposals. The House and the Senate each have their own plans, and nothing has been written into law yet. The House Energy and Commerce Committee could meet as early as the week of May 5 to identify the spending cuts that could slash into Medicaid.
That's why Massolio at the 1Voice Foundation — the group that runs the school Tony attends in Florida — joined a trip to Capitol Hill earlier this year with other advocates to urge lawmakers to keep Medicaid intact.
She says one of her big fears is that even if Medicaid funds for hospital services and doctor visits remain stable, other critical support services might be slashed, such as transportation to doctor's appointments or in-home nursing visits for very sick children.
On her trip to Washington, one of Massolio's first stops was the office of Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., a familiar face. Massolio's 9-year-old son, Jay, died from lymphoma in 1997, and she's often turned to Castor, who is co-chair of the congressional Childhood Cancer Caucus, for help advancing legislation to support children with cancer.
Castor's message to the group was to keep fighting. She reminded them that in Trump's first term, he vowed to eliminate the Affordable Care Act — also known as Obamacare — but in the end, after widespread public opposition, it didn't happen.
There are already tensions within the Republican Party over Medicaid, with some in the party expressing concern that the proposed budget cuts could hurt families on Medicaid.
'Advocacy really matters. This is not a done deal yet,' Castor told NBC. 'As they craft policy behind the scenes, I'm really hoping some of these Republican members go and say, 'I can't do this. This hurts families. This goes too far.''
Back in Florida, the McLaurins worry every day that Tony won't survive, as they struggle to pay their bills and care for their other five children without any family nearby to help.
They don't know what they'll do if Tony can't get Medicaid for the rest of his cancer treatment, which is expected to last another two years.
'I feel hopeless right now, because it's not like I have a second option,' Pauline McLaurin said.
She hopes Castor is right, and that advocacy will help protect Medicaid.
'I'm trying to just look at that and pray that's the truth,' Pauline McLaurin said. 'What else can I do?'
Elizabeth Cohen
Elizabeth Cohen is an award-winning health journalist and author of The Empowered Patient. Previously, she was senior medical correspondent at CNN and reported on the scene from global health crises including the Ebola outbreak in Liberia and the earthquake in Haiti. Her work has been recognized by the Sigma Delta Chi/Society of Professional Journalists, the National Association of Black Journalists, and the Association of Health Care Journalists. She holds a master's degree in public health.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump finds victories at the Supreme Court in rush of emergency cases
Trump finds victories at the Supreme Court in rush of emergency cases

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Trump finds victories at the Supreme Court in rush of emergency cases

June 13 (Reuters) - Since President Donald Trump returned to office in January, his administration has bombarded the U.S. Supreme Court with emergency requests seeking immediate intervention to free up his initiatives stymied by lower courts. The strategy is paying off. Once a rarely used pathway to the nation's top judicial body, its emergency docket now bulges with an unprecedented volume of requests for rapid attention by the justices in clashes over Trump's far-reaching executive actions. As the Republican president tests the limits of executive power under the U.S. Constitution, Trump's administration has made 19 emergency applications to the court in less than five months, with one other such application filed by lawyers for migrants held in Texas who were on the verge of deportation. The court already has acted in 13 of these cases. It has ruled in Trump's favor nine times, partially in his favor once, against him twice and postponed action in one case that ultimately was declared moot. Trump's wins have given him the green light to implement contentious policies while litigation challenging their legality continues in lower courts. The court, for instance, let Trump revoke the temporary legal status granted for humanitarian reasons to hundreds of thousands of migrants, implement his ban on transgender people in the U.S. military and take actions to downsize the federal workforce, among other policies. The court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three justice who Trump appointed during his 2017-2021 first presidential term. Six more emergency requests by the administration remain pending at the court and one other emergency request was withdrawn. Among the requests still to be acted upon are Trump's bid to broadly enforce his order to restrict birthright citizenship, to deport migrants to countries other than their own including politically unstable South Sudan and to proceed with mass federal layoffs called "reductions in force." Emergency applications to the court involving Trump policies have averaged about one per week since he began his second term. His administration's applications this year match the total brought during Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden's four years as president. "The Trump administration uses every legal basis at its disposal to implement the agenda the American people voted for," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told Reuters. "The Supreme Court will continue to have to step in to correct erroneous legal rulings that district court judges enter solely to block the president's policies." The administration has "not sought Supreme Court review in all the cases it could, and part of the story may be that the government is appealing what it thinks are strong cases for it," said Sarah Konsky, director of the University of Chicago Law School's Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic. Georgetown University law professor Stephen Vladeck, who wrote a book about the court's emergency docket, said in a blog post on Thursday that the results favoring Trump should not be attributed only to the court's ideological makeup. At a time when Trump and his allies have verbally attacked judges who have impeded aspects of his sweeping agenda, there is a "very real possibility that at least some of the justices ... are worried about how much capital they have to expend in confrontations with President Trump," Vladeck wrote. The onslaught of emergency applications has diverted the attention of the justices as they near the end of the court's current term. June is usually their busiest month as they rush to finish writing opinions in major cases. For instance, they have yet to decide the fate of Tennessee's Republican-backed ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors. Among the emergency-docket cases, the court most recently on June 6 allowed Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in his drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal data on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration systems and blocked a watchdog group from receiving records on DOGE operations. The court also has allowed Trump to cut millions of dollars in teacher training grants and to fire thousands of probationary federal employees. On the other side of the ledger, the court has expressed reservations about whether the administration is treating migrants fairly, as required under the Constitution's guarantee of due process. On May 16, it said procedures used by the administration to deport migrants from a Texas detention center under Trump's invocation of a 1798 law historically used only in wartime failed basic constitutional requirements. The justices also declined to let the administration withhold payment to foreign aid organizations for work already performed for the government. Trump turned to the emergency docket during his first term as well. His prior administration filed 41 such applications to the court. During the 16 years prior, the presidential administrations of Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Barack Obama filed just eight combined, according to Vladeck. The court has quickly decided weighty matters using the emergency docket in a way often at odds with its traditional practice of considering full case records from lower courts, receiving at least two rounds of written briefings and then holding oral arguments before rendering a detailed written ruling. It is sometimes called the "shadow docket" because cases often are acted upon without the usual level of transparency or consideration. Some recent decisions on the emergency docket have come with brief opinions explaining the court's reasoning. But typically they are issued as bare and unsigned orders offering no rationale. Konsky noted that the justices sometimes designate emergency cases for regular review with arguments and full briefing. "But in any event, the emergency docket raises complicated questions that are likely to continue to play out in the coming years," Konsky said. Among Trump's emergency applications this year, oral arguments were held only in the birthright citizenship dispute. The liberal justices, often findings themselves on the losing side, have expressed dismay. Once again "this court dons its emergency-responder gear, rushes to the scene and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a dissent in the Social Security data case. "The risk of error increases when this court decides cases -as here - with barebones briefing, no argument and scarce time for reflection," Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the teacher grants case. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito defended the emergency docket in 2021, saying there is "nothing new or shadowy" about the process and that it has wrongly been portrayed as sinister.

Democrats make a mark in their rowdy pushback to Trump
Democrats make a mark in their rowdy pushback to Trump

NBC News

time4 hours ago

  • NBC News

Democrats make a mark in their rowdy pushback to Trump

All week, officials in the Trump administration hailed the images of protests against their deportation campaign in Los Angeles, saying their opponents were playing right into their hands. But on Thursday, the administration was put on the defensive. A video of Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., forced to the ground and handcuffed after he interrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a news conference in Los Angeles on Thursday, immediately ricocheted across social media platforms and cable news, shifting the narrative to warnings about overreach by the White House. It capped a week when the Democratic Party seemed to finally find its voice, in ways big and small, to push back against the administration. From California Gov. Gavin Newsom's questioning President Donald Trump's acuity to Padilla's move to interrupt Noem to mini-rebellions playing out at the nation's capital, Democrats began to break the hold Trump usually has on the news cycle. It comes after months of Democratic intraparty squabbling over how to move forward after a bitter loss in the presidential election. In that time, Democrats have been unable to come up with coherent, unified messaging to rebut Trump and instead have been mired in fighting about issues like whether activist David Hogg should remain part of the Democratic National Committee and who was to blame for Joe Biden's refusal to walk away from the Democratic presidential nomination earlier amid concerns of his mental decline. Last week, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., told NBC News he was employing a flood-the-zone strategy with messaging and urging other members to do the same. And this week, the DNC voted overwhelmingly to hold a new election for Hogg's vice chair post, prompting him to quickly announce he would walk away from the position. A strategist said the resistance to Trump was a necessity after the events in Los Angeles, which Democrats say are overreach by the administration. 'Voters have been looking for this, and the circumstances have arrived,' said Mary Anne Marsh, a Democratic strategist. 'And while many people will say it should have happened sooner, given the series of events — this week alone — everyone had to step up. There was no choice.' Nationwide protests planned for Saturday also threaten to overshadow Trump's upcoming military parade in Washington. On Thursday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., demanded a bipartisan investigation into the Padilla incident as Democratic senators took turns sounding off about what they called overbearing tactics by the Trump administration that undermined democracy. When House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., stood before cameras in the Capitol to call Padilla's actions 'wildly inappropriate,' shouting could be heard interrupting him: 'That's a lie!' At a hearing Thursday of the House Oversight Committee, where three Democratic governors of so-called sanctuary states were hauled before the panel, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul got salty at one point with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. 'You stated that you're a proud registered Democrat?' Greene asked. 'Yes, I did," Hochul shot back. "Is that illegal now, too, in your country?' At another point in the hearing, Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., interrupted and repeatedly asked whether Republicans would subpoena Noem. He irritated committee chair James Comer, R-Ky. to the point that Comer snapped: 'Just shut up!' That all followed relentless pushback from Newsom since last week. Newsom went on his own messaging campaign to rebut a barrage of insults that Trump and his deputy chief of staff and key immigration official Stephen Miller have fired at him and his California. Trump federalized the National Guard and deployed Marines to California after protests broke out in response to arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The White House repeatedly pointed to burning cars and protesters' throwing rocks as the impetus for sending troops to the state, with Trump proclaiming that if he had he not, Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground." Most of the protests, however, have taken place only in a few blocks downtown. The Los Angeles police chief said this week that the force was equipped and experienced enough to handle the events in the city on its own and did not ask for assistance from the National Guard. Democrats have pointed to Trump's deployments as a vast overreach of presidential powers and an attempt to militarize blue cities. Amid the upheaval, Newsom delivered remarks this week saying Trump was trying to install an authoritarian regime. He has taken to podcasts and sat for countless news interviews while he and his office regularly rebut Trump administration statements on X. On Thursday, he went further, raising concerns about Trump's mental acuity. In an interview on The New York Times' podcast 'The Daily,' Newsom charged that Trump 'starts making up all these things he claimed he told me about, which honestly starts to disturb me on a different level." He was referring to Trump's comments that he had a phone call Monday with Newsom that Newsom said did not happen. 'Maybe he actually believed he said those things and he's not all there. I mean that," Newsom added. White House spokesman Steven Cheung shot back in a statement: 'The attacks on President Trump are rich, coming from Gavin Newsom, who in this past election tried to gaslight and lied to the American public about Joe Biden's decline. Gavin Newsom will never be president, even as he tries to peddle these lies.' Noem and others in the administration said they did not know who Padilla was during the news conference and thought a stranger was lunging at her as she spoke. Noem contended that Padilla did not identify himself, but video showed otherwise. ' I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla called out, interrupting Noem. Padilla was forcibly removed from the room, and video showed him being forced onto his stomach and cuffed. 'If this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country,' Padilla told reporters. 'We will hold this administration accountable.' From the Senate floor, Warren tried to make a larger point about the incident. 'Every day, DHS agents are throwing people to the ground while they are not resisting," Warren said. "Every day Donald Trump is making this nation look more and more like a fascist state. ... We all have to ask: How far will they go? How violent will they get?'

6 wild and unexpected Donald Trump moments as judge rules he acted illegally
6 wild and unexpected Donald Trump moments as judge rules he acted illegally

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

6 wild and unexpected Donald Trump moments as judge rules he acted illegally

The Trump administration was last night scrambling to come up with a position in response to Israel's pre-emptive strikes on Iran. The attack is likely to be problematic for Trump, who has been seeking a deal with Iran to prevent them working on a nuclear weapon. Whether it was part of the calculus that led to the strikes or not, it's likely Israel's action will scupper those talks for now. Trump plans to meet with top security officials in the Situation Room at the White House at around 4pm UK time. Which means it will have been 15 hours since the attack took place by the time the President is fully briefed on it. Where is he? Meanwhile, a judge has predictably ruled Trump overstepped by sending the National Guard to LA. And Pete Hegseth basically confirmed plans have been drawn up to invade Greenland. Everything is fine. Here's what you need to know. Late last night a federal judge ruled Trump had acted improperly in deploying the National Guard to try and quell largely peaceful protests in Los Angeles. Following a request from Governor Gavin Newsom, Judge Charles R Breyer agreed to block the deployment, ruling he had both exceeded the scope of his authority and violated the Tenth Amendment - which guarantees rights not reserved by the Federal Government revert to the States. "He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith," the judge wrote. He added: "We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George." Oh yeah he went there. The White House immediately appealed, and was granted a stay of Judge Breyer's order until Tuesday. Trump's weird World War II riff took a bizarre additional swerve. "Russia fought with us in World War II," he said. "And everybody hates them. "And Germany and Japan, they're fine, someday somebody will explain a strange world." I'm not sure it's going to take all that much explaining to be honest, Mr President. Mike Turner, a Republican Congressman, tried to be helpful to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, giving him an easy out on the question of whether the United States was planning to invade the sovereign territory of a NATO ally by force, in breach of all manner of international laws. "I just want to help you out," he said at a congressional committee hearing. "Because people will try to twist your words. You are not confirming in your testimony today that at the Pentagon there are plans for invading and taking by force Greenland, correct? That is not your testimony today..." Hegseth replied, and didn't grab hold of the lifeline he was being offered. "All my testimony is is that the Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies," he said. Turner tried again: "It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force Because I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony." Hegseth replied: "We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats." That, readers, is not a no. Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat from California, was forcibly removed from a press conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in his home state. Footage of the incident shows security pushing him out of the room, ordering him to put his hands up. And further video posted online show officers manhandling him to the floor and handcuffed in the corridor outside. (For UK readers, even in America it's almost unheard of for a sitting, elected Senator to be physically detained, and presumably arrested). Senator Padilla told onlookers he had "questions" for Noem - presumably related to the deployment of military personnel to his state. Noem later claimed he'd "lunged" toward the podium, that he didn't identify himself, and that nobody knew who he was. The first words he said to her, as captured on video, were: "I'm Senator Alex Padilla". As tension between the White House and Europe heats up, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is , select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our . It seems someone has finally got through to Trump, and explained that if he deports every undocumented person in the US, Americans will starve and Las Vegas will collapse into the desert. In a spectacular u-turn, one which will cause Stephen Miller real physical pain, Trump indicated he might make exceptions to his mass deportations for nice undocumented people who work in farms and hotels. "You go into a farm and you look at people -- they've been there for 20, 25, years, and they've worked great, and the owner of the farm loves them, and everything else and then you're supposed to throw them out," he said. "We're going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think," he added. "We can't do that to our farmers and leisure too, hotels." Trump said on his Truth Social site that the waiting list is open for his $5m 'Trump card'. The card, it's claimed, will grant the buyer legal permanent residency in the US. The gold-colored card prominently features a drawing of the president with a bald eagle in front of him and the Statue of Liberty behind. It reads "United States of America" across the top, "The Trump Card" on the right side in bolder letters with stars around it, and Trump's signature above the $5 million figure. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store