Carney meets Trump, stresses Canada won't be for sale
US President Donald Trump has begun his first talks with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and vowed to bring up "tough points" that are dividing the two countries since Trump imposed tariffs.
Their meeting started with smiles and a handshake despite Trump's desire to eradicate the US-Canada border, a prospect that has chilled bilateral relations.
The subject quickly came up as they took questions from reporters.
"We're not going to be discussing that unless somebody wants to discuss it," Trump said.
"It would really be a wonderful marriage."
Carney put down the idea firmly.
"It's not for sale, it won't be for sale - ever," he told Trump in the Oval Office.
"Never say never, never say never," Trump said.
Pres. Trump on Canada becoming 51st state: We're not going to be discussing that, unless somebody wants to discuss that...it really would be a wonderful marriage.Canadian PM Carney: There are some places that are never for sale...it's not for sale. It won't be for sale, ever. pic.twitter.com/axZSwbeO9C— CSPAN (@cspan) May 6, 2025
Trump, whose tariff policy has rattled world markets, said he and Carney would discuss "tough points," an allusion to the president's belief that the United States can do without Canadian products.
"Regardless of anything, we're going to be friends with Canada," he said.
Carney's Liberal Party won the April 28 election on promises to tackle Trump and create a new bilateral economic and security relationship with the United States.
Shortly before Carney arrived, Trump posted a message on social media.
"I very much want to work with him, but cannot understand one simple TRUTH — Why is America subsidising Canada by $200 Billion Dollars a year, in addition to giving them FREE Military Protection, and many other things? We don't need their Cars, we don't need their Energy, we don't need their Lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have, other than their friendship, which hopefully we will always maintain. They, on the other hand, need EVERYTHING from us!"
Trump appeared to be referring to the trade deficit the US has with Canada due mostly to US imports of Canadian oil, although Canada's merchandise trade surplus was C$102.3 billion ($A115.21 billion) in 2024.
Carney, a 60-year-old ex-central banker with no previous political experience, was elected Liberal leader in March to replace Justin Trudeau, who had a poor relationship with Trump.
Canada is the US' second-largest individual trading partner after Mexico, and the largest export market for US goods.
More than $US760 billion ($A1.2 trillion) in goods flowed between the two countries last year.
.@POTUS: "It's a great honor to have Prime Minister @MarkJCarney with us. As you know, just a few days ago, he won a very big election in Canada." pic.twitter.com/pWasbUwLlR— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) May 6, 2025
Ahead of the meeting, the US Commerce Department reported on Tuesday Canada's goods trade surplus with the US narrowed to a five-month low in March, the month when Trump's hefty tariffs on imported steel and aluminium took effect.
Canadian exports to the US plunged by $US3.7 billion, the second-largest drop on record.
Canadian data showed the drop in US exports was almost compensated by an increase to the rest of the world, as Canadian companies sought new markets.
Trump in March imposed a 25 per cent tariff on all steel and aluminium imports and then slapped another 25 per cent tariff on cars and parts that did not comply with a North American free trade agreement.
Trump showered his counterpart with compliments and radiated warmth at the start of the press conference, saying that "Canada chose a very talented person, a very good person".
with AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
AUKUS review: Pentagon's Elbridge Colby orders inquiry to ensure defence agreement aligns with ‘America First'
The Trump Administration's biggest AUKUS sceptic has ordered a review into whether the US should pull out of the submarine deal with Australia, just days after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese refused America's request to lift defence spending. The inquiry was directed by AUKUS-sceptic Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's Deputy Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, the Financial Times reported . A US Defence official said the review was 'part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous Administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda.' 'As Secretary Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our servicemembers, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs,' the official said in a statement. 'This review will ensure the initiative meets these common-sense, America First criteria.' Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Beijing would be cheering at the news. 'News that the Trump Administration is considering backing away from AUKUS will be met with cheers in Beijing, which is already celebrating America's global pullback and our strained ties with allies under President Trump,' Senator Shaheen said. 'Scrapping this partnership would further tarnish America's reputation and raise more questions among our closest defence partners and our reliability.' Mr Colby is one of the America First movement's fiercest critics of what he views as shirker allies. He was also the first in US President Donald Trump's orbit to voice concerns about AUKUS. When asked by The Nightly, at a speaking engagement in London, he said he would have been quite sceptical about the deal if it were put to him to sign off on. 'My concern is why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it?' he said 12 months ago. 'AUKUS is only going to lead to more submarines collectively in 10, 15, 20 years, which is way beyond the window of maximum danger, which is really in this decade. 'So the benefits are questionable and the viability is also questionable.' However, Mr Colby retreated from some of his criticisms and directed most of his ire toward European NATO allies, who have subsequently begun to pledge massive defence spending increases prompting his praise. By contrast, in the last few days he has been issuing statements on X about the need for Indo-Pacific allies to heed Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's call for more defence funding. Mr Hegseth asked Defence Minister Richard Marles to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP at a meeting on the sidelines of the Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore. Currently, Labor plans to spend 2.3 per cent of GDP on defence by the middle of the next decade. Mr Marles responded by saying he was 'totally up for a conversation' but refused to confirm the figure Mr Hegseth requested. The Defence Secretary released the figure in a statement three days later. Since then, Labor has become more strident in its opposition and said the decision is for Australia, not the US to make. Mr Albanese told the Press Club this week he had not been provided with any capabilities that need funding and was not going to commit to a blind yardstick method of government spending. Australia has already paid the first US$500 million ($760 million) to buy up to three nuclear-powered submarines from the United States, under a deal first struck with the Biden Administration by former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Mr Marles paid the cheque in Feburary when he first met Mr Hegseth after President Trump's inauguration. At the time, Mr Hegseth said Mr Trump was aware and supportive of AUKUS and this was recently further backed by comments the President's personally appointed Ambassador to the UK, Warren Stephens, made at an event in London, alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. It is unclear if Mr Colby's review is the act of a lone operator or represents a change in the stance of the Administration, which is often ideologically split on key policy areas. AUKUS is the most expensive and ambitious defence acquisition project in Australia's history and aims to buy and then build nuclear-powered submarines at a cost of $368 billion. But because Australia cannot build nuclear-propelled submarines and faces an urgent capability gap with the Collins Class boats reaching their end of life, it is reliant on purchasing off-the-shelf Virginia-class boats from the Americans and then co-building an SSN AUKUS version of submarine with the British. The UK government put on a brave face. A government spokesperson said the review was 'understandable.' 'It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year,' the spokesperson said. 'The UK will continue to work closely with the US and Australia at all levels to maximise the benefits and opportunities which AUKUS presents for our three nations.'
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
ASX set to rise as Wall Street advances on inflation boost; $A weaker
US stocks are drifting near their record after a report suggested President Donald Trump's tariffs are not pushing inflation much higher, at least not yet. The S&P 500 was up 0.2 per cent in afternoon trading and is just 1.6 per cent below its all-time high set in February. The Dow Jones was up 204 points, or 0.5 per cent, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.1 per cent higher. The Australian sharemarket is set to rise, with futures at 5am AEST pointing to a gain of 15 points, or 0.2 per cent, at the open. The ASX edged higher by 0.1 per cent on Wednesday. The Australian dollar weakened. It was 0.3 per cent lower at 65.02 US cents at 5.18am AEST. The action was a bit stronger in the bond market, where Treasury yields eased after a report showed inflation ticked up by less last month than economists expected. US consumers had to pay prices that were 2.4 per cent higher overall in May than a year earlier. That was up from April's 2.3 per cent inflation rate, but it wasn't as bad as the 2.5 per cent that Wall Street was expecting. A fear has been that Trump's wide-ranging tariffs could ignite another acceleration in inflation, just when it had seemed to get nearly all the way back to the Federal Reserve's 2 per cent target from more than 9 per cent at its peak three summers ago. Loading It hasn't happened, though economists warn it may take months more to feel the full effect of Trump's tariffs. For the time being, many businesses may be pulling products they already had in their inventories rather than passing along higher costs from fresh imports. 'Another month goes by with little evidence of tariffs, but the longer-term inflation challenge they pose remain,' according to Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Financial markets also had only modest reactions to the conclusion of two days of trade talks between the United States and China in London.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
ASX set to rise as Wall Street advances on inflation boost; $A weaker
US stocks are drifting near their record after a report suggested President Donald Trump's tariffs are not pushing inflation much higher, at least not yet. The S&P 500 was up 0.2 per cent in afternoon trading and is just 1.6 per cent below its all-time high set in February. The Dow Jones was up 204 points, or 0.5 per cent, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.1 per cent higher. The Australian sharemarket is set to rise, with futures at 5am AEST pointing to a gain of 15 points, or 0.2 per cent, at the open. The ASX edged higher by 0.1 per cent on Wednesday. The Australian dollar weakened. It was 0.3 per cent lower at 65.02 US cents at 5.18am AEST. The action was a bit stronger in the bond market, where Treasury yields eased after a report showed inflation ticked up by less last month than economists expected. US consumers had to pay prices that were 2.4 per cent higher overall in May than a year earlier. That was up from April's 2.3 per cent inflation rate, but it wasn't as bad as the 2.5 per cent that Wall Street was expecting. A fear has been that Trump's wide-ranging tariffs could ignite another acceleration in inflation, just when it had seemed to get nearly all the way back to the Federal Reserve's 2 per cent target from more than 9 per cent at its peak three summers ago. Loading It hasn't happened, though economists warn it may take months more to feel the full effect of Trump's tariffs. For the time being, many businesses may be pulling products they already had in their inventories rather than passing along higher costs from fresh imports. 'Another month goes by with little evidence of tariffs, but the longer-term inflation challenge they pose remain,' according to Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Financial markets also had only modest reactions to the conclusion of two days of trade talks between the United States and China in London.
