logo
Parklea correctional centre to return to public hands as NSW reverses ‘failed prison for profit model'

Parklea correctional centre to return to public hands as NSW reverses ‘failed prison for profit model'

The Guardian02-03-2025

One of New South Wales's largest prisons will return to public hands as Labor continues to reverse what the union representing guards has dubbed 'the failed prison for profit model'.
The Minns government announced on Sunday its contract with MTC Australia – a subsidiary of a controversial American private prison operator – to run Parklea correctional centre would end in October 2026.
The Sydney prison is the second of three privately run prisons in the state to begin a transition back to public hands, with the 16-month transition for Junee correctional centre to return to public hands to be finalised in April.
Guardian Australia understands the Minns government has no plan to return NSW's third and soon to be final privately-run prison – Clarence correctional centre – to state hands due to the cost of exiting the current contract.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
In 2020, the then Coalition government signed a 20-year contract with Serco, which operates the prison in Grafton.
The state minister for corrections, Anoulack Chanthivong, said the move to transition Parklea and Junee was part of the Minns government's election promise to reverse the privatisation of public assets.
'Unlike private management, the Corrective Services NSW's operating model is not based on a profit motive, it's based on the objective to reduce reoffending following release from prison, which focuses on rehabilitation, education and safe reintegration into the community,' Chanthivong said.
'By bringing Junee and Parklea correctional centres back into public hands, we're delivering better value for NSW taxpayers and improving outcomes for workers, inmates and the community.'
Early last year, two inmates at Parklea – which was privatised in 2009 – died in a suspected suicide within two months. This led the Greens' justice spokesperson, Sue Higginson, to say there could be more deaths at Parklea if there wasn't urgent reform.
The union for prison staff, the Public Service Association (PSA), said the return of Junee and now Parklea to public hands showed NSW Labor was 'listening to our voice' that 'privatisation hurts everyone'.
'From the moment Parklea correctional centre was privatised in 2009, our union has campaigned for what is right: the return of the jail to the people of NSW and away from the failed prison for profit model that fails staff and taxpayers,' the PSA general secretary, Stewart Little, said.
'It's good news for the taxpayer, who will no longer be propping up outsourcing giants such as MTC that operate to benefit overseas shareholders rather than the people of NSW.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
In 2023, when Labor announced it would de-privatise Junee correctional centre, a source with knowledge of the prison and not authorised to speak publicly said: 'The American model of prisons for profit – I don't think that works well in Australia.'
They said that 'actively working towards rehabilitation' of prisoners was 'hard to do privately'.
In December, Guardian Australia revealed the Albanese government would end a longstanding deal with Serco and pay $2.3bn to a local subsidiary of MTC, Secure Journeys, to run Australia's onshore immigration detention network.
The NSW premier, Chris Minns, said the decision to de-privatise Parklea was a win for workers 'as we rebuild essential services for NSW'.
'Frontline staff who work at Parklea correctional centre today will have a job at Parklea – regardless of the changes,' Minns said.
MTC Australia was contacted for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California professor sues university over suspension for online comments on Gaza
California professor sues university over suspension for online comments on Gaza

NBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • NBC News

California professor sues university over suspension for online comments on Gaza

A professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco filed a lawsuit Wednesday, alleging that the university violated her freedom of speech by suspending her for her online comments on Israel's war in Gaza, according to court documents. Rupa Marya's social media posts included expressing 'solidarity with the hospitals and healthcare workers that Israel was attacking in Gaza,' according to court documents. The complaint stated that Marya 'felt an obligation to speak out and did so using her X account.' Israel's war in Gaza has left more than 52,000 people dead since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants killed 1,200 people in Israel and took 251 people hostage. Israel has received intense criticism from around the world, including from the United Nations, for its actions in Gaza. 'Firing Dr. Marya doesn't only violate her right to free speech, it threatens all of us,' attorney Mark Kleiman said in a statement. 'We all need to urgently speak up against these kinds of attacks on our basic rights to advocate for justice, and we expect the Court will agree with us that Dr. Marya's rights have been violated and must be remedied.' Marya was placed on leave in September 2024 and her clinical privileges were suspended by the UCSF Executive Medical Board on Oct. 1. The board called her a 'possible imminent danger' and cited social media posts, according to court documents. Her privileges were reinstated on Oct. 15. According to court documents, Marya received 'rape and death threats' as well as 'repeated harassment and threats' because of her posts, according to court documents. Before her suspension, Marya had several interactions with the university regarding her online activity. In November 2023, the dean of UCSF's School of Medicine notified Marya that the school would be assessing whether her social media activity violated university policies. In response to one of Marya's social media threads that went viral in January 2024, UCSF posted a statement regarding a circulating 'conspiracy theory.' 'Although the statement did not name Dr. Marya, Dr. Robert Wachter acknowledged in an email that it was in direct response referring to Dr. Marya's social media thread from January 2,' the complaint claimed. 'UCSF's January 6 statement accused Dr. Marya of promoting a 'racist' and 'antisemitic' 'conspiracy theory.'' According to court documents, Marya's posts "never impeded the performance of her duties as a physician or faculty member, or the regular operation of the University.' 'As a medical doctor, American citizen and as a person of South Asian descent raised in the Sikh religious tradition, Dr. Marya has long been concerned about American foreign policy, including in the Middle East and the issues surrounding the conflict between Israel and Palestine,' the complaint reads. 'Her posts take aim at state policy and supremacist political ideologies, not at any religious or ethnic group.' A spokesperson for the University of California, San Francisco said that because of privacy laws, the school is unable to comment on the lawsuit. Marya completed her residency in internal medicine at the University of California at San Francisco in 2007, was subsequently offered employment and joined the faculty. For the past five years, however, Marya had no teaching duties and focused exclusively on patient care in the non-teaching hospital medicine services, according to court documents. Marya was also appointed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom to the Healthy California for All Commission in 2021, an initiative to advance a system for universal healthcare in the state.

Man wrongly deported to El Salvador back in US to face human trafficking charges
Man wrongly deported to El Salvador back in US to face human trafficking charges

ITV News

time6 hours ago

  • ITV News

Man wrongly deported to El Salvador back in US to face human trafficking charges

A man wrongly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration has been brought back to the US to face federal charges for human trafficking, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Friday. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported in March due to an 'administrative error,' according to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official. He was one of hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members sent to El Salvador's mega-prison, where he was held for weeks before being moved to another jail. For months, the US president's administration has been locked in a tense standoff with federal courts over orders to return Abrego Garcia from El Salvador - a dispute one judge warned could trigger a 'incipient crisis' between the two. Abrego Garcia has now been charged in Tennessee with conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal immigrants for financial gain and unlawful transportation of illegal immigrants for financial gain. Officials said on Friday that he will be prosecuted in the US and, if convicted, will be sent back to El Salvador once the case is over. 'This is what American justice looks like,' Attorney General Bondi said on Friday in announcing the return of Abrego Garcia and the criminal charges. "This defendant trafficked firearms and narcotics throughout our country on multiple occasions. They were using vehicles, SUVs, with added seats in the back, floors that had been ripped out, guns, narcotics, children, women, MS-13 members. That is what the grand jury found. "A co-conspirator alleged that the defendant solicited nude photographs and videos of a minor. A co-conspirator also alleges the defendant played a role in the murder of a rival gang member's mother. These facts demonstrate Abrego Garcia is a danger to our community." The charges also allege that Abrego Garcia took part in a years-long conspiracy to illegally transport thousands of undocumented migrants, including alleged MS-13 members. He and his family deny any links to the gang, saying he fled violence in El Salvador. What compelled authorities to press charges? The case began with a 2022 vehicle stop by the Tennessee Highway Patrol, who suspected Abrego Garcia of human trafficking. Last month, Tennessee authorities released bodycam footage of a 2022 traffic stop showing Abrego Garcia having a calm and friendly exchange with officers. A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report from April noted that none of the passengers had luggage, but all gave the same address as Abrego Garcia. Abrego Garcia was never charged and was only given a warning for an expired driver's licence, the DHS report said. The report said he was travelling from Texas to Maryland via Missouri to transport workers for construction jobs. In April, his wife said in response to the report that he sometimes moved groups of workers between sites, making the stop 'entirely plausible,' and insisted he was never charged or cited. The Trump administration publicised Abrego Garcia's past police encounters, despite a lack of corresponding criminal charges, as it faced federal court orders and congressional calls to bring him back to the US. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said after the footage's release that it showed no evidence of a crime. 'But the point is not the traffic stop — it's that Mr Abrego Garcia deserves his day in court,' he said in May. Abrego Garcia illegally arrived in the US in 2012 at the age of 16. Seven years later, he was arrested and handed over to immigration authorities, fearing he could be sent back to El Salvador. An immigration judge later ruled in his favour, blocking his removal to his home country.

13 House Republicans urge Senate to scale back clean energy cuts in bill they voted for
13 House Republicans urge Senate to scale back clean energy cuts in bill they voted for

NBC News

time6 hours ago

  • NBC News

13 House Republicans urge Senate to scale back clean energy cuts in bill they voted for

WASHINGTON — Thirteen House Republicans who voted for President Donald Trump's " big, beautiful bill" sent a letter Friday urging Senate GOP leaders to scale back some of its clean energy cuts, sparking pushback from conservative hardliners. The unusual criticism of their own bill indicates a modicum of regret by the GOP lawmakers, whose votes were critical to the bill passing the House by a narrow margin last month. 'While we were proud to have worked to ensure that the bill did not include a full repeal of the clean energy tax credits, we remain deeply concerned by several provisions,' said the Republicans in the letter, led by Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Va. They cited provisions that 'abruptly terminate several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction,' and 'restrictions to transferability.' 'This approach jeopardizes ongoing development, discourages long-term investment, and could significantly delay or cancel energy infrastructure projects across the country,' the group of House Republicans said in criticizing the legislation they voted for, while suggesting some changes to 'mitigate' the harm it could cause. Kiggans, like most of the signatories, represents a competitive district that Democrats are targeting in the 2026 election. Other politically vulnerable members include: Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.; Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz.; Mike Lawler, R-N.Y.; Don Bacon, R-Neb.; Gabe Evans, R-Colo.; Young Kim, R-Calif.; David Valadao, R-Calif.; Rob Bresnahan, R-Pa.; and Tom Kean, R-N.J. The remaining three, who sit comparably safer seats, are Reps. Mark Amodei, R-Nev.; Andrew Garbarino, R-N.Y.; and Nick LaLota, R-N.Y. The 13 Republicans warned that 'the House-passed bill includes a phase out schedule for credits that would cause significant disruption to projects under development and stop investments needed to win the global energy race.' The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee mocked the letter and said the lawmakers will own their votes for the bill. 'These 13 Republicans promised not to support cuts to clean energy tax credits, then cast the deciding votes to raise energy costs on American families, kill tens of thousands of jobs, and undermine our nation's energy security. They are responsible for this Big, Ugly Bill and all the harm it will cause,' DCCC spokesperson Viet Shelton said. 'This toothless letter is the worst kind of political hypocrisy and voters will see it for what it is, a lie perpetrated by endangered House Republicans who caved to their D.C. party bosses at the expense of the American people.' Kiggans' office did not immediately return a request for comment on whether she was aware of the provisions when supporting the bill, or if she'd vote for one that falls short of her new demands. Senate Republicans are eying changes to the House bill to ease some of the negative impacts of the funding cuts. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, told NBC News her version of the bill will probably relax some of the deadlines to cut off funding. But she said Thursday that there probably won't be massive changes to the House-passed bill. 'I imagine it's going to track fairly similarly, but I think some of the deadlines are pretty tight in terms of when you have to have construction and those things,' Capito said. 'We've been approached by several employers who need some of those tax.' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he's willing to undo some of the clean energy funding, but he wants to make sure that existing business investments aren't harmed by the bill. 'What we're trying to focus on is to make sure that if businesses have invested and have projects in progress, that we do everything we can to hold them harmless,' he said. 'Whether or not we continue some of these programs out into the future — that's a separate question that I'm willing to entertain.' Meanwhile, the conservative group Club For Growth is running ads targeting Sens. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., John Curtis, R-Utah, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, for backing more modest rollbacks of the clean energy funding, which carries benefits for their states. There's another reason changing the bill is easier said than done: The speedy cuts to clean energy funding under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act were part of an House agreement to win the votes of conservative hardliners who want to reduce the bill's red ink. House Republicans have a majority of 220 to 212, meaning they can only spare three 'no' votes in their ranks to pass the bill when the Senate sends back their revised version. 'You backslide one inch on those IRA subsidies and I'm voting against this bill,' Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said Friday on the House floor. 'So you do what you want to do in the Senate, House of Lords, have your fun. But if you mess up the Inflation Reduction Act, Green New Scam subsidies, I ain't voting for that bill.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store