Iowa's job challenges mount as trade risks loom, economists say
Economists warn that Iowa's labor market is continuing to stagnate.
Why it matters: That general trend adds to a looming threat to agriculture from disruptions in international trade.
State of play: The state shed another 1,500 non-farm jobs in March, losing nearly 12,000 jobs over the past year, according to the latest seasonally adjusted data from Iowa Workforce Development.
The state's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 3.4%, up slightly from 3.3% in February but below the national rate of 4.2% in March.
Zoom in: Trade and transportation, education and health care are the only major sectors posting increases in the state so far in 2025.
Modest gains in those areas have been offset by losses in professional services and manufacturing, per a review by Nationwide senior economist Ben Ayers provided to Axios.
What they're saying: The specter of tariff disruptions hangs over the Iowa economy in the coming months, with the agriculture sector likely to be challenged by reduced international demand for U.S. exports of grains and meats, Ayers said.
Retaliatory measures from other countries would likely involve reducing imports of agricultural commodities, potentially leading Iowa to face "very large" problems, Iowa State University economist Peter Orazem tells Axios.
The other side: The "Liberation Day" tariffs — a term President Trump used to describe his efforts to create more favorable trading terms for the U.S. — will force trading partners to the table and put farmers first, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds said in an April 2 statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sector-Specific Tariffs a Bull Case for Markets: JPM's Yoder
Abby Yoder, US equity strategist at JPMorgan Global Wealth Management, says the market tail risk from tariffs after "Liberation Day" is "kind of off the table." Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Port Traffic Plummets for Full Month Following Trump Tariff Announcement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Port traffic has plummeted significantly since President Donald Trump announced his widespread tariffs on imports, with the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma recording lower numbers over the past month. For the last week in May, volumes were down for the fourth consecutive week, according to the Northwest Seaport Alliance. International imports had decreased 27.7 percent from the week before and 41 percent from the 2024 weekly average. Why It Matters Trump issued a "Liberation Day" order months ago for a 10 percent minimum tariff on all imports and up to 145 percent on Chinese goods. Following this, the Treasury Department brought in $15.9 billion from tariffs for April, compared to $9.6 billion the previous month, according to official data reviewed by Newsweek. As the tariffs influence international trade, many countries and companies may pull out of the U.S., impacting port traffic and the larger economy. Container ships and gantry cranes are pictured in Seattle, Washington, on November 16, 2014. Container ships and gantry cranes are pictured in Seattle, Washington, on November 16, 2014. Lonnie Kishiyama What To Know The Northwest Seaport Alliance reported that truck trips were also down 26 percent from the week before and 35.4 percent from the May 2024 weekly average. These drops were attributed largely to ships skipping their regularly scheduled stops at the port due to the higher tariffs in effect. "The Northwest ports had a surge earlier in the year as shipments were sped up to beat the tariffs, and now we are seeing the shipping industry crash," Drew Powers, founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "It is not just a problem with imports; the number of cancelled shipments out of the port have increased by 33 percent, and I believe will only get worse before it gets better." While Trump paused some of his tariffs in the last few months, the 10 percent baseline tariff remains in effect, hurting the bottom line for many small businesses. "In retail, margins are everything, and while we've seen a pause on some of the higher tariffs proposed during the administration's initial proposal, they're still higher than they were just a few months ago," Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "Businesses are going to be more selective on the items and the amount they import, and that's already being reflected in slower port traffic." What People Are Saying Powers also told Newsweek: "This is a perfect example of the economic adage 'there is no such thing as a free lunch.' Placing a tariff on steel, for example, will certainly help the domestic steel producers, but at the same time will hurt the port workers who now do not have a shipment to unload. This will ripple down the line to the port's vendors and suppliers and their suppliers and vendors and so on and so on." Beene also told Newsweek: "Tariffs are going to have a tremendous effect on some imports because businesses - particularly smaller ones that specialize in a specific industry - are going to have a harder time turning a profit on items while having to pay an additional 10 percent or more to bring it into the United States." Michael Ryan, finance expert and founder of told Newsweek: "The collapse in port traffic is a textbook case of tariffs doing exactly what economists warned about. When you make imports more expensive, demand falls off a cliff—and the pain doesn't stop at the docks." Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The larger implications can be summed up into one word: JOBS. Truckers, doc workers, shippers will all be impacted by the slowing economics of tariffs. People will lose their jobs, no question about it. It just depends how far downstream the tentacles stretch." What Happens Next As international ports navigate the new tariffs, employees and small businesses will experience the fallout, experts say. "The individual workers and the small business owners cannot fund a dramatic downturn," Powers said. "Businesses will go under, retail spaces will go vacant, houses will be foreclosed on, and kids will delay going to college. The major corporations with deep pockets will survive and grab more market share and power at the expense of every small business owner and hard working American. This is not a good thing." Ryan called the reduced port traffic a "blinking red light" for the economy. "The math is simple: tariffs raise costs, demand drops, and the whole economic engine slows down," Ryan said. "This is no longer a game of chicken, or 'cards.' The tariffs are real, the losses are mounting, and the economic fallout is hitting home."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: Trumpcession odds are fading
Something important didn't happen after President Trump said he planned to double import taxes on steel and aluminum on May 30: Markets didn't tank. Traders took it in stride and a modest rally in stocks continued for the next several days. Markets may finally be finding solid footing as the halfway point of Trump's first year in office nears. Stocks have recovered nearly all of the losses incurred as Trump rolled out wide-ranging tariffs in March and April that were far more severe than most investors expected. In early April, the S&P 500 (^GSPC) index was down 16% for the year. It's now up 2% for the year. Another gain of 2.3 percentage points would put the S&P at a new record high. The underlying real economy is looking better too. Recession odds as measured by the Polymarket prediction site peaked at 66% on April 9 and again on May 1. They've now fallen all the way back to 26%, almost exactly where they were when Trump took office on Jan. 20. 'Trump's tariff turmoil caused lots of uncertainty for workers and their employers, particularly during April and May,' economist Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research wrote in a June 9 analysis. 'It was widely expected that consumers might cut back their spending because of the uncertainty, especially if businesses responded to Trump's tariffs by reducing their payrolls. So far, the evidence shows that consumers are still spending, and businesses are still expanding their payrolls. The most widely anticipated recession of all times remains a no-show.' Yardeni has dropped his own recession odds from 45% in early May to 25% now. Trump himself has helped lower the odds of a recession. It wouldn't be right to credit Trump with juicing the economy. His own policies, mainly tariffs, have been the biggest problem for markets and the economy in 2025. But Trump has backed down from the worst of his threats and shown, whether deliberately or not, that he is sensitive to market outcomes. The most damaging move Trump has made so far was the severe tariffs he announced on April 2, which he called 'Liberation Day' and cynical traders dubbed 'Annihilation Day.' Those tariffs would have raised the average tax on imports from about 2.5% when Trump took office to roughly 28%. The steepest stock sell-off of the year occurred during the week following Annihilation April 9, Trump said he'd postpone the tariffs for three months, until July 9, while working on individual trade deals with dozens of countries that might avert them. At the same time, he raised the total tax on Chinese imports to 145%. But a month later, Trump lowered that to 30%. The average tax on imports is now around 16%. That's the highest level since 1937, and still an impediment to growth. But it's a big improvement over 28% and investors seem to have renewed faith that Trump will bow to markets. The 'TACO trade'— premised on the idea that Trump Always Chickens Out on tariffs — is the latest expression of market hopium, even if it isn't completely true. Another unrealized fear is that Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration would lead to widespread deportations of people who are an important source of labor. Unauthorized migrants may hold as many as 6 million jobs in sectors such as agriculture, construction, hospitality, and manufacturing. There are few Americans standing in line to take those jobs if the migrants suddenly disappear. In fact, the nation needs more legal immigration to offset a declining birth rate and an aging society, or else growth and productivity will trend permanently downward. That's not a defense of illegal immigration. It's just economic reality that unauthorized laborers push job and economic growth higher. Losing those workers would have the opposite effect. Trump has sharply reduced the inflow of unauthorized migrants and undertaken some high-visiblity, TV-ready crackdowns. But he hasn't conducted widespread raids to root out migrants already here. 'Tighter immigration policies have reduced net immigrant inflows but appear to have had a limited impact on immigrant workers already in the US,' Goldman Sachs noted in a June 9 report. 'The immigration crackdown appears to have had less impact on the ability of recent immigrants already in the US to keep working.' None of this translates into a coming Trump boom. Instead, it's a slowdown that might be less dramatic than the full-Trump worst-case scenario. Corporate profits seem likely to hold up through 2025 and into 2026. Inflation caused by tariffs might be noticeable in some categories, such as clothing, electronics, and toys, but offset by lower gasoline prices. The post-COVID hiring boom is likely to be over, but that doesn't mean mass layoffs or soaring unemployment are coming next. Trump still has a lot of control over how the rest of 2025 goes. If the July 9 deadline for trade deals arrives and Trump reimposes many of the tariffs, markets will reel anew. If the big tax-cut bill Trump is pushing adds too much to the deficit, bond-market wobbles could send interest rates uncomfortably high. The tax cuts might not have the stimulative effect Trump is hoping for, since many of them aren't new tax cuts, just extensions of ones enacted in 2017. Avoiding a recession is obviously better than causing one, but it isn't necessarily a win for an incumbent president. There was no recession during Joe Biden's presidency, yet he left office with a weak approval rating and a loss to the opposition party in the 2024 presidential election. Inflation was the scourge of Biden's presidency, and it could yet haunt Trump if he persists with tariffs. Many Americans are also stuck in go-nowhere mode, left behind by a tech and service economy that increasingly funnels more wealth to the top and less to the bottom. Trump's 'America first' narrative pays heed to that, and attacks on elite institutions such as Harvard and a collection of blue-blood law firms give downtrodden Americans a few villains to root against. But Trump has few plans to actually help the disaffected. His tariffs aren't likely to create many jobs, and his tax cuts will favor the wealthy even more. The Trump economy might not end up ruinous, but that doesn't make much of a bumper sticker. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
