logo
Abortion ban, repeal of paid sick leave top agenda for Missouri legislature's final week

Abortion ban, repeal of paid sick leave top agenda for Missouri legislature's final week

Yahoo12-05-2025

Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O'Laughlin, a Republican Shelbina, talks with reporters May 2024 (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).
Will the Missouri Senate actually make it to 6 p.m. Friday?
That's the constitutional deadline for the legislative session to adjourn for the year. And the Senate — thanks to Republican infighting — has failed to reach the finish line three years in a row.
But this year the GOP supermajority is finally getting along. And as lawmakers enter the final week of the 2025 legislative session, Senate Republicans hope that unity will allow them to roll back abortion rights and a new paid sick leave law over the vehement resistance of Democrats.
Whether or not the session goes off the rails again this year — and kills a litany of largely bipartisan bills in the process — will largely be determined by whether Republicans and Democrats can strike a deal on two issues that touch on key ideological differences. .
'My philosophy has always been, if you just sit down together, you can figure it out,' said Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O'Laughlin, a Shelbina Republican. 'So that's what I'm doing. I have a really good relationship with the Democrats, and everyone is negotiating in good faith.'
If those negotiations fall apart, the GOP could turn to the nuclear option.
Republicans hold 24 seats in the 34-member Senate. It takes only a simple majority of 18 votes to end a filibuster using a procedural maneuver known as 'calling the previous question,' or PQ.
But Senate leaders have historically been hesitant to utilize the PQ because it generates lasting bitterness — and sparks retaliation. If past is prologue, Democrats would respond by turning to procedural maneuvers of their own to grind the chamber to a halt and make any progress all but impossible.
That scenario would also kill any bills still pending in the Senate with the bad blood and gridlock generated possibly spilling into the next legislative session.
That's why since 1970, the Senate has only used PQ 18 times. The last time was in 2020.
'The last thing either side wants is a PQ,' said Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck, an Affton Democrat.
In November, both issues at the heart of the Senate's final week won approval on the statewide ballot.
Proposition A, which won 58% of the vote, mandated employers with business receipts greater than $500,000 a year to provide at least one hour of paid leave for every 30 hours worked. Employers with fewer than 15 workers must allow workers to earn at least 40 hours per year, with larger employers mandated to allow at least 56 hours.
That law went into effect May 1.
Amendment 3, which won with 52% of the vote, legalized abortion up until the point of fetal viability — generally seen as the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb on its own, or around 24 weeks. It also protects access to other reproductive health care, like birth control.
Since it passed, a judge blocked a litany of Missouri abortion regulations, opening the door for access to the procedure for the first time in years.
Senate negotiations on both issues have persisted for weeks. And despite some public discord, both sides enter the waning days before adjournment confident a deal can be reached.
'I know that there's a lot of ideology going around and lots of things being thrown at each other, but actually the vast majority of people are somewhere in the middle,' O'Laughlin said. 'And if you listen to everyone in their perspective, you can figure it out.'
While the possibility of a PQ is the biggest minefield lawmakers are trying to navigate in the final week, disharmony between the House and Senate could also prove explosive.
On Friday, lawmakers completed work on the state's $53 billion budget. But in a stunning move, the House refused to allow a vote on a $530 million construction package approved by the Senate earlier in the day.
Senate leaders were not told of the House's decision in advance, and the move sparked outrage and accusations of betrayal.
'The phone calls I've been receiving from my Senate counterparts do not lead me to believe that next week is going to be productive if you have a House bill in the Senate,' Senate Appropriations Chairman Lincoln Hough, a Springfield Republican, told the Kansas City Star soon after the House vote on Friday.
House Speaker Jon Patterson, a Lee's Summit Republican, downplayed the possibility of the move causing friction between the two chambers in the final week, telling reporters that he doesn't expect the Senate to upend a session that has been marked by GOP unity.
'I have nothing but great things to say about how the Senate has been working this year,' he said. 'I think they'll continue to work like that.'
His Democratic colleagues aren't convinced Patterson's prediction will prove accurate.
House Minority Leader Ashley Aune, a Kansas City Democrat, said she would not be surprised to see 'an even greater battle emerge between the chambers in the last few days of session over this particular situation.'
Another possible stumbling block: with only five days left before adjournment, the governor's office and House leaders are pondering a push to provide $300 million in state funding to help build a new baseball stadium in Clay County.
The aim is to keep the Kansas City Royals from moving across the state line, where Kansas lawmakers created an incentive packaging to convince the team to leave Missouri when the lease on its current stadium expires in 2030.
But the plan has never been presented as a formal bill and never had a public hearing or debate — a reality that could cause real problems in the Senate, where any resistance could prove fatal.
State Sen. Joe Nicola, an Independence Republican whose district includes the Royal's current stadium in Jackson County, said he would have serious concerns about any plan that would move the team to another county.
But Nicola hasn't been consulted on the stadium funding plan percolating in the House, so he didn't want to comment until he had a chance to study it closely.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's deportation efforts get high marks from voters: poll
Trump's deportation efforts get high marks from voters: poll

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's deportation efforts get high marks from voters: poll

The Trump administration's efforts to hunt down and deport illegal immigrants are broadly popular with the general public, though Americans are split over how far they want the feds to go, a new poll shows. Overall, 54% of US adults approve of the deportation effort compared to 46% who disapprove of it, according to the CBS News/YouGov survey. The poll was conducted just before Los Angeles plunged into riots over the weekend in response to the feds' immigration enforcement activity. President Trump ended up sending in the National Guard and ramped up pressure on local leaders to tame the unrest. New York City also was hit by by a mob trying to prevent authorities from conducting immigration raids. 3 Border czar Tom Homan has led the nation's illegal-immigration crackdown. AP Polling has long indicated that immigration is a top issue for Trump and Americans, which has complicated Democratic efforts to fight back against his deportation push. The poll found that Americans currently have a dismal view of Democrats. A whopping 78% of all respondents called Dem leaders 'ineffective' — including 71% of Democrats. Still, despite generally favoring Trump's immigration policies, Americans are torn over some of the nuances in his initiatives, the survey showed. 3 President Trump's immigration policies are among his most popular initiatives so far in his second term. REUTERS About 42% said they believe his deportation policies are making Americans feel safer, compared to 30% who said less safe and 27% who said there was no change, according to the survey. Roughly half of respondents said they believe that Trump has been deporting more people than they would have expected, even given his 2024 campaign rhetoric. Of that bloc, 42% said they approve of the number while 58% disapprove. Of the other chunk of voters who felt that Trump was deporting about the same or fewer people than expected, 66% approved, compared to 34% who disapproved. A solid 63% want illegal immigrants to get a hearing before being deported. Also, about 39% of voters feel Trump's deportation policies are harming the US economy, compared to 32% of feel its strengthening it. Trump has been pushing Congress to send him more resources to expand the deportation effort and adequately secure the US-Mexico border. 3 The Trump administration has been cracking down hard on illegal immigration into the US. Getty Images On the issue of immigration broadly, Trump notched a 50% approval rating, which tops his scorecard on the economy (42%) and overall approval rating (45%). Historically, the economy had been a strong suit for Trump, both during his first term and in the 2024 campaign cycle/ The recent public cooling to his performance seemingly dovetails with unease over his tariff policy. Only 41% of those polled said they favor new tariffs on imported goods, compared to 59% who oppose them. Perhaps more troubling for Trump, 75% felt that the tariffs would help the wealthy. A similar dynamic took place when voters were questioned about Trump's proposed One Big Beautiful Bill Act. A firm 60% felt it would help the rich, 31% said the middle class and 26% said the lower class. A third of voters weren't aware of what was in the megabill, and 23% said they only had a minimal sense of it. The megabill features an extension of much of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enhanced border security, bolstered defense spending, energy reform and a bevy of other conservative wish-list items. The CBS News/YouGov survey sampled 2,428 adults between June 4-6, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.4 percentage points.

Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations
Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office downplayed the riots gripping Los Angeles, likening them to sports celebrations that notoriously break out in Philadelphia after an Eagles' victory. "LA riots? Have these geniuses ever seen what happens when the Eagles win a playoff game?" Izzy Gardon, Newsom's communications director, told Fox News Digital on Sunday morning. Philadelphia notoriously sees sports revelers flood the city after beloved teams such as the Eagles or Phillies win championships, sometimes setting cars ablaze and causing property damage. The city even greases city light poles to dissuade partiers from scaling them and deploys additional police to the streets while often wearing riot gear. Fox News Digital reached out to the governor's office to ask about claims by California Republicans and natives that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass bore some of the blame for the riots. They and other local Democrats issued messages defending illegal immigrants and condemning federal agents for carrying out deportation raids in the left-wing city. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz "Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass have a real habit of letting Los Angeles burn," Republican California Rep. Darell Issa posted to X on Saturday evening. Read On The Fox News App "If only Karen Bass fought against the Los Angeles fires like she fights for illegal aliens," Issa added in another post, referring to the Palisades fire that tore through Southern California in January. Federal Officials Slam Democrats For 'Dangerous' Rhetoric As Ice Agents Face Violent Mobs In La, Nyc "Gavin Newsom is unqualified for a plethora of reasons, the least of which is his support of illegal alien insurrectionists. He is an all purpose, all around loser," Hollywood actor and California resident James Woods posted to X. Federal officials have also pinned blame for the violence on Democratic elected officials who have "villainized and demonized" ICE law enforcement, Fox Digital previously reported. "This is on you, Governor. It is a shame that California openly defies federal law and sides with illegal aliens, including hardened criminals, against its own citizens," Harmeet Dhillon, former vice chair of the California Republican Party and current assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Justice, posted to X. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.… From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." Social Media, Trump Admin Erupts Over La Mayor's Reaction To Ice Raids: 'You're A Criminal Too' Newsom on Friday described the Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles as "chaotic and reckless." "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel. Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy," Newsom's statement read. The press office doubled down in support of shielding illegal immigrants from deportation in a response X post to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Saturday. "In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California. These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens," Leavitt posted to X. Newsom's office responded: "These are anything but basic. Your indiscriminate sweeps are terrifying entire communities and detaining hardworking, tax-paying Californians. It's cruel escalation and must end." When asked about the riots, and California Republicans condemning the violence and Newsom's stance on immigration on Sunday morning, the governor's office compared the lawlessness to street parties after an Eagles win. Patel Promises Fbi Coming For Anyone Assaulting Cops As Los Angeles Erupts Over Ice Raids The riots in Los Angeles, however, have included targeted attacks on federal law enforcement officials, including violent protesters lobbing rocks and other items at immigration officials. U.S. Border Patrol Chief Michael W. Banks, for example, shared a photo of a Border Patrol agent's bloody hand that was injured by a rock flying through the windshield. Trump signed a presidential memorandum on Saturday to deploy 2,000 National Guardsmen to Paramount, California, to help quell the violence, and has also slammed the local leaders for the chaos. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump posted to Truth Social on Saturday article source: Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations

Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters
Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters

The U.S. secretary of defense has threatened to send active-duty Marines into the streets of Los Angeles to confront protesters opposing the administration's detention and deportation of immigrants. At least three prominent Republicans don't seem concerned about potential overreach. 'The [Department of Defense] is mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,' Hegseth wrote late Saturday on X, formerly Twitter, on his personal account. This prompted ABC's Jonathan Karl to ask House Speaker Mike Johnson: 'Could we really see active duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?' 'One of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength,' Johnson said during an interview on Sunday's episode of This Week. 'We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy handed. I think that's an important signal.' 'You don't think sending Marines into the streets of an American city is heavy-handed?' Karl asked. 'We have to be prepared to do what is necessary, and I think the notice that that might happen might have the deterring effect,' Johnson said. Active-duty military troops have not been sent in to suppress unrest since the 1992 Los Angeles protests after a jury acquitted four white police officers in the beating of Rodney King, a Black man who was pulled over for a traffic violation. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement unless there is a clear legal or constitutional basis for doing so. It was created to restrict the president's ability to use the military against civilians. The exception to Posse Comitatus is the Insurrection Act, which Trump has not invoked. Instead, Trump invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which limits the troops' actions to protecting federal officials rather than enforcing laws. Title 10 gives Trump authority to deploy the National Guard during 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' and two other specific circumstances. Chris Mirasola of Lawfare wrote that Trump's justification for using this authority is 'factually contestable and, even on the face of the memorandum, unusually weak.' Republican Sen. James Lankford on NBC's Meet the Press argued that by deploying the National Guard, Trump is 'trying to deescalate all the tensions that are there.' Newsom has said that Trump activating National Guard troops is 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions' 'This is an American city, and to be able to have an American city where we have people literally flying Mexican flags and saying, 'You cannot arrest us,' cannot be allowed,' Lankford said on Sunday. 'If someone violates the law, no matter what state that they're in, they're in violation of a federal law. They should face consequences for that.' Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin also criticized protesters for carrying Mexican flags. 'They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They are not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals,' he said Sunday on State of the Union. 'Carrying a flag is not illegal, as you know,' CNN's Dana Bash responded. 'Foreign flag while you're attacking law enforcement, it's pretty bad,' Mullin said. Carrying a Mexican flag and saying 'You cannot arrest us' is not a prosecutable offense. It is free speech protected by the First Amendment. And the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) has been clear that anyone found destructing property will be arrested. 'Everyone has the right to peacefully assemble and voice their opinions,' LAPD posted on X. 'However, vandalizing property and attempting to seriously injure officers, whether Federal or LAPD, is not peaceful.' When Meet the Press host Kristen Welker pointed out to Lankford that 'Governor Newsom says there is no unmet law enforcement need. The LAPD says the protests were peaceful,' the senator claimed that it is 'clear' that the LAPD is 'being overwhelmed.' (LAPD has not said they are overwhelmed.) 'This wouldn't be an issue if California didn't promote sanctuary city policies to be able to tell people literally, 'You can violate federal law and live in our state, and no one will arrest you for this,'' Lankford said. 'Now suddenly when they are arrested for federal crimes then suddenly they go into this kind of protest saying, 'No, you can't arrest us here. We're immune from federal law.' That's not true.' Here, Lankford is being misleading. Sanctuary city policies do not grant anyone immunity, they only limit how state and local resources are allocated to aid federal immigration enforcement. Under the Tenth Amendment, states have the right to allocate resources as they see fit, and states have used that amendment in court to justify not assisting with federal immigration raids. It's disturbing that prominent GOP lawmakers are signing on to the president's use of authority to activate the National Guard — against a governor's wishes — and signaling their agreement that deploying active duty Marines against civilians would be fine with them should Trump choose to do so. 'Don't kid yourself they know they are absolutely getting cooked politically [with] their terrible bill and rising prices, and they want to create a violent spectacle to feed their content machine,' Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz posted on X late Saturday. 'It's time for the mainstream media to describe this authoritarian madness accurately.' More from Rolling Stone Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store