Commissioners 'not in favor' of proposed solar farm
CUMBERLAND — While county officials don't have the power to stop a proposed solar farm in their own jurisdiction, they plan to voice concerns and encourage area residents to do the same.
The issue was discussed at Thursday's Allegany County Board of Commissioners meeting.
LaVale resident Gregg Donaldson said installation of 15,000 solar panels are planned for farmland in his neighborhood in the area of Helmstetter's Curve on Cash Valley Road.
'I recently attended an informational meeting by the company who has a signed contract with the current farm owner,' he said. 'There is the potential that only a few residents of Allegany County would benefit.'
Donaldson said many other areas of the county would be more suitable for a solar farm.
The proposed location on Cash Valley Road would negatively impact 'the iconic farm scene that for years has been enjoyed and photographed by many (people) biking and hiking the Great Allegheny Passage trail or riding the scenic railroad train from Cumberland to Frostburg.'
Board of Commissioners President Dave Caporale said the solar farm proposal did not include input from county officials.
'I think everybody is in agreement with you,' he told Donaldson.
'There are a lot of places in our large county that may be more suitable for something like this.'
County attorney T. Lee Beeman said state, rather than local, officials control location for such projects.
'Essentially the state takes away our ability to choose — under our own zoning regulations — where we can place solar projects,' he said.
However, county officials and impacted residents can offer input about the proposal during the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity process, Beeman said.
'We'll get notice when the developer applies for that CPCN and we'll have the opportunity to submit comments,' he said. 'While we don't have the ability to talk about zoning location, we do have the ability to talk about and provide input on development standards.'
Cash Valley Road resident Susan Mallozzi said the project would cause the Helmstetter's Curve area to become an eyesore for tourists who pass through scenic Mountain Maryland.
'We are against the proposed solar farm,' she said.
'We live directly across from the site.'
Green fields that could be lost to the project have in past years 'produced rows and rows of corn and the best Timothy hay around,' Mallozzi said.
'We feel our property values will be at great risk,' she said. 'Citizens are at the hands of big companies who search for land to make a profit in the name of green energy with no regard to our land preservation.'
Commissioner Bill Atkinson said the GAP is one of the best recreational trails in the country.
'That is one of the most scenic parts of the whole trail,' he said of the area proposed for the solar farm.
'We hear your concerns and we're definitely letting people know that we're not in favor of that in any way, shape or form.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Emmitsburg focuses on residents' costs and maintaining staff with FY26 budget
Emmitsburg approved a town budget on Monday that included a water-rate increase less than earlier planned, as well as above-the-norm salary increases for some town employees. The town expects to receive and spend $2.7 million in FY 2026, according to town documents. That represents a 6% increase compared to FY 2025. The municipal property tax rate will remain 34.64 cents per $100 in assessed value. The Board of Commissioners passed the budget 4-1. Commissioners Amy Boehman-Pollitt, Jim Hoover, Valerie Turnquist and Kevin Hagan voted in favor. Commissioner Cliff Sweeney voted against. In an interview, Sweeney said he was concerned the water-rate changes would not leave enough money in the budget for repairs and anything unexpected. Earlier in Monday's meeting, the commissioners voted to increase water rates by 15% in FY 2026, rather than 36%, which would have been in line with a previous ordinance. The previous ordinance stated that beginning July 1, 2023, water rates in town would increase 36% annually, and continue to increase that rate each year for five years, according to town records. Starting July 1, 2028, rates would increase 3% annually. 'I didn't think the water rates should be adjusted until next year,' Sweeney said. 'I wasn't for the 15%' He was also the lone dissenting vote in the water-rate increase change, saying the need for a 36% increase was 'partly my fault' for all of the years he served on the board and did not increase rates incrementally. Hoover said in an interview that he felt the municipal property tax rate staying flat and a reduction in the expected water rates were the most important items to residents. The tax rate is based on assessed value, so while the rate may be unchanged, individual tax bills might rise and as property assessments rise. As such, the town projects to receive almost $73,000 in FY 2026 than it did in FY 2025 due to this increase in assessed values. Hoover said the annual 36% increases were a 'thorn' in his and others' sides and represented an increase that was 'substantially more than I felt was justifiable.' Hoover added that he felt that the new approach to managing water rates will be more responsive to the needs of the town, since the board will have to be more vigilant by reviewing rates annually and adjusting it as needed. 'I believe wholeheartedly that this will accomplish that,' he said. Boehman-Pollitt said in an interview that she was happy to implement the smaller increase that would 'still put us in the black,' but also 'not be shocking to our residents.' She said a proposal by Mayor Frank Davis in May sought to shift how the town paid out benefits to employees. Currently, the town attaches the benefits to the employee rather than to the departments of their work if their work impacts multiple departments. Boehman-Pollitt said the mayor's proposal reflected best practices, but would also lead to around an $80,000 increase in cost of the water fund. She said the commissioners are open to phasing that accounting strategy over time, but the added financial strain on the water fund 'just didn't seem prudent.' Davis said the was disappointed that cuts to the water fund will lead to downstream impacts to the general fund, ultimately preventing road improvement and other projects. 'But other than that, I am happy with the budget,' Davis said. Merit increases One item he fought for at Monday's meeting and previous meetings was salary raises above the standard 3% merit increase for Najila Ahsan, the town planner, and Jared Brantner, the superintendent of water and sewer. All other town employees will receive a 3% cost-of-living increase in salary, as well as between a 1% and 3% merit increase. Ahsan and Brantner will receive additional salary increases — not counted as merit-based increases due to town code — of 4% and .2%. The second figure was due to a lack of money in the water fund, according to town staff. Davis said both town employees performed above expectations and he worried that without salary increases, they could be recruited by other municipalities. 'What made me realize that we needed to do something was when the state of Maryland came and reviewed our comprehensive plan, they asked me what contractor we used to write that plan because it was so well written,' the mayor said. 'That would have been a very costly contract if we had to bring someone in. 'Our town planner was able to go above and beyond what was expected of her and we need to compensate our employees for that.' Hagan participated in the committee that worked with the town staff and community input to create the comprehensive plan prior to being elected to the Board of Commissioners. He said at the meeting that Ahsan performed 'a lot of detailed work' for the project that was 'all done at a pretty extraordinary level.' 'I agree,' Hoover said. Boehman-Pollitt said the increases represented 'a big jump,' but she supports the mayor's recommendations. Davis said Brantner has certifications and experiences to run large-scale water and sewage plants that were hard to find. Additionally, the mayor said Brantner runs a team of five or six and manages both the water and sewage plants. 'So we're getting quite the bang for the buck,' Davis said. 'We have good people and we just can't afford to lose them.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Donaldson's Q3 Earnings Beat Estimates, Sales Increase Y/Y
Donaldson Company, Inc. DCI reported third-quarter fiscal 2025 (ended April 30, 2025) adjusted earnings of 99 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 95 cents. The bottom line increased 7.6% year over year. Total revenues of $940.1 million beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $939 million. The top line increased 1.3% year over year (up 1.6% at constant currency). (Find the latest EPS estimates and surprises on Zacks Earnings Calendar.)Region-wise, Donaldson's net sales in the United States/Canada increased 0.9% year over year. The metric decreased 0.6% year over year in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and increased 2.3% in Latin America. Also, net sales in the Asia Pacific improved 5.2%.Donaldson reports revenues under three segments, namely Mobile Solutions, Industrial Solutions and Life Sciences.A brief snapshot of segmental sales is provided Mobile Solutions segment's (accounting for 62% of net sales) sales were $582.6 million, indicating a year-over-year decline of 0.4%. Sales fell 8.3% in Off-Road and 24.5% in On-Road businesses during the quarter. Aftermarket sales improved 3.3% year over generated from the Industrial Solutions segment (30.1%) were $283.3 million, up 5.3% year over year. Industrial Filtration Solutions' sales increased 1.4% year over year. Sales growth of 27.1% in the Aerospace and Defense businesses also aided the generated from the Life Sciences segment (7.9%) were $74.2 million, up 0.7% year over year. The results benefited from continued volume growth in the Disk Drive business. Donaldson Company, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Donaldson Company, Inc. Quote In the fiscal third quarter, Donaldson's cost of sales increased 3.4% year over year to $618.2 million. Gross profit declined 2.5% to $321.9 million. The gross margin of 34.2% declined 140 basis points, due to higher manufacturing expenses rose 25.7% year over year to $234.5 million. Operating profit decreased 39.1% to $87.4 million. The operating margin was 9.3%, down 620 bps year over effective tax rate was 33.6% compared with 21.2% in the year-ago quarter. Exiting the fiscal third quarter, Donaldson's cash and cash equivalents were $178.5 million compared with $232.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Long-term debt was $638.8 million compared with $483.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal the first nine months of fiscal 2025, the company generated net cash of $251.0 million from operating activities, indicating a decrease of 31.5% year over year. Capital expenditure (net) totaled $58.6 million compared with $65.8 million in the year-ago fiscal period. Free cash flow decreased 36% to $192.4 million. In the same time frame, management repaid a long-term debt of $65 used $272.2 million to repurchase stocks and $96.9 million to pay out dividends during the first nine months of fiscal 2025. For fiscal 2025 (ending July 2025), Donaldson expects adjusted earnings per share to be in the range of $3.64-$3.70 compared with $3.42 in fiscal 2024. Sales are anticipated to increase 1- 3% from the fiscal 2024 level. Positive pricing is projected to have an accretive impact of 1%.On a segmental basis, Mobile Solutions' sales are expected to be flat to increase 2% from the fiscal 2024 level. Industrial Solutions' sales are envisioned to jump in the range of 2-4% from the year-ago figure. The company forecasts its Life Sciences segment's sales to increase in the high single-digit expenses are predicted to be approximately $23 million, while other income is projected to be in the range of $18-$20 million. The effective tax rate is anticipated to be between 23% and 24%.Capital expenditure is expected to be between $75 million and $90 million. Free cash flow conversion is anticipated to be in the range of 80-90%. The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. AZZ Inc. AZZ came out with quarterly earnings of 98 cents per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2025 (ended February 2025), beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 95 cents. This compares with earnings of 93 cents per share a year reported revenues of $351.9 million, missing the consensus estimate by 3.8%. This compares with year-ago revenues of $366.5 million. Valmont Industries VMI reported revenues of $969.3 million in the first quarter of 2025, declining 0.9% on a year-over-year basis. Earnings per share of $4.32 remained flat year over reported revenues compare with the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $975.6 million. The company delivered an earnings surprise of 1.89%, with the consensus estimate being $4.24 per plc PNR came out with quarterly earnings of $1.11 per share in the first quarter of 2025, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.01. This compares with earnings of 94 cents per share a year reported revenues of $1.01 billion for the quarter, surpassing the consensus estimate by 2.7%. This compares with year-ago revenues of $1.02 billion. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Valmont Industries, Inc. (VMI) : Free Stock Analysis Report AZZ Inc. (AZZ) : Free Stock Analysis Report Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI) : Free Stock Analysis Report Pentair plc (PNR) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Emmitsburg to reduce water rate increases for residents
The town of Emmitsburg modified a previous ordinance to increase water rates by 15%, rather than 36%, in fiscal year 2026. Water rates will also increase annually by 3% or the Consumer Price Index, whichever is greater. Additionally, the Board of Commissioners will review water overage charges annually and change the rate by other than the set increase as needed, according to the ordinance. The previous ordinance stated that beginning July 1, 2023, water rates in town would increase 36% annually, and continue to increase that rate each year for five years, according to town records. Starting July 1, 2028, rates would increase 3% annually. For instance, the maximum charge for 3/4-inch meter for the first 6,000 gallons used was $64.74 in FY25. That was supposed to increase to $88.04 under the previous ordinance, but will instead be $74.45 under the new policy. The increase came as a result of the town operating its water system at a deficit since at least 2015, according to town records. Commissioner Amy Boehman-Pollitt said at a meeting in April that the continual increases could drive businesses out of town, deter new businesses from entering and burden residents already facing increasing financial hardships. 'I don't think it's ethical to put that on the backs of our residents,' Boehman-Pollitt said of continuing the increase. Commissioner Valerie Turnquist said at the April meeting that water-rate increases impact families with different needs in different ways, 'because, as we know, it was only 36% if you used less than 6,000 gallons.' The ordinance passed 4-1, with Commissioners Turnquist, Boehman-Pollitt, Jim Hoover and Kevin Hagan voting in favor. Commissioner Cliff Sweeney voted against the ordinance. He said in an interview Tuesday that the measure would prolong the problems created by years of neglect. Sweeney said the issues were 'partly my fault' for all of the years he voted against raising water rates over fears of burdening residents with the cost. He said that had the commission raised rates slowly over many years, 'we'd have been where we needed to be.' Mayor Frank Davis said in an interview that the lesser increases would 'bring some challenges' and prevent the town from getting the water fund out of the red by the end of FY26. Davis said he people in the community he spoke with were sympathetic to the reasons why the town needed to continue the 36% increases to the water rates in order to get out from the hole of years of neglect. 'Nobody wanted the 36%, but they understood,' he said. He added that the new lower-than-expected rate will prevent the town from replacing water lines along West Main Street and might lead to the need to dip into the general fund. That would mean less money to fix roads and provide other services. 'I'm concerned,' Davis said. 'We're walking a tightrope in a windstorm.'
