
Trial for Freedom Convoy Organizer Continues as Defence Argues for Stay of Proceedings
OTTAWA—The lawyer for Freedom Convoy organizer Chris Barber is continuing to argue in court for a stay of proceedings on the basis of an 'officially induced error of law,' claiming that he was given erroneous legal advice on the legality of the trucker protest.
Barber and Tamara Lich were already found guilty of mischief, while Barber was also found guilty of counselling others to disobey a court order, for their role in the 2022 trucker protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates and other pandemic restrictions.
Justice Heather Perkins-McVey ruled on April 3 that the pair were not guilty of the other charges of intimidation, obstructing police, and counselling others to do the same. Both were also found guilty of counselling others to commit mischief, but that finding was stayed at the request of Crown lawyers.
Crown prosecutors are seeking two years of prison time for Lich and Barber, as well as to auction off Barber's iconic truck 'Big Red,' which he used to travel from Saskatchewan to Ottawa and parked in the downtown core for three weeks. The sentencing for the two organizers has not happened yet.
In the meantime, Barber's lawyers are requesting that the proceedings be stayed because he sought legal advice from his previous lawyers, police officers, and a Superior Court judge on the legality of the protest. A stay of proceedings would lead to Barber's case being put on hold, and he would likely not face any charges.
Defence lawyer Diane Magas has said that the Ottawa Police Service was aware of the protest ahead of its arrival and directed Barber where to park his truck. At two injunction hearings around silencing the honking of truck horns, Barber was also told by his lawyer at the time that he could continue protesting as long as it was done peacefully and safely, and that he could honk his horn in situations of emergency, and that breaching this injunction against honking would not be a criminal offence.
Related Stories
10/28/2023
4/3/2025
Barber was charged with counselling others to disobey a court order for a Feb. 7, 2022, TikTok video where he encouraged protesters to honk their vehicle horns if they saw police arriving. This violated the court injunction that had come into force the same day, Perkins-McVey ruled.
Arguments Over Officially Induced Error of Law
On May 23, defence lawyer Magas said Ottawa Police Service officers suggested that Barber could remain at the protest. She said that since Barber coordinated with the police to move trucks out of the downtown core on Feb. 14, 'from that conduct and words, he was induced into believing that what he was doing was lawful.'
Magas also said Barber had asked his lawyer at the time to seek guidance from the lawyer imposing the injunction about whether they could continue protesting. She added that during this injunction hearing, the justice also said it was a civil process and not a criminal one.
Justice Perkins-McVey pushed back and said Barber had not specifically asked the police officers whether what he was doing was legal, and said the injunction hearing was only ruling on the issue of horn honking.
Crown attorney Siobhain Wetscher said that while Barber had received 'bad legal representation' from his lawyer, that was not an error on the part of an agent of the state. She said that in order for an 'officially induced error of law' to apply, the erroneous legal advice needed to come from a government official responsible for administering the law.
Wetscher also said that Barber had confirmed during cross-examination on May 22 that nobody from the office of the mayor of Ottawa told him that the Freedom Convoy was lawful, peaceful, or safe.
Justice Perkins-McVey said if Barber or the other Freedom Convoy organizers had sought specific advice on where they were or were not acting unlawfully, then 'we wouldn't be here.'
Crown attorney Wetscher also said that while Barber was told by a police officer that parts of the demonstration were unlawful, but was told by his lawyer that it was not illegal, 'there were no steps taken by [Barber] to get clarity on those two very divergent positions.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
34 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more
VATICAN CITY (AP) — The world's smallest country has a big budget problem. The Vatican doesn't tax its residents or issue bonds. It primarily finances the Catholic Church's central government through donations that have been plunging, ticket sales for the Vatican Museums, as well as income from investments and an underperforming real estate portfolio. The last year the Holy See published a consolidated budget, in 2022, it projected 770 million euros ($878 million), with the bulk paying for embassies around the world and Vatican media operations. In recent years, it hasn't been able to cover costs. That leaves Pope Leo XIV facing challenges to drum up the funds needed to pull his city-state out of the red. Withering donations Anyone can donate money to the Vatican, but the regular sources come in two main forms. Canon law requires bishops around the world to pay an annual fee, with amounts varying and at bishops' discretion 'according to the resources of their dioceses.' U.S. bishops contributed over one-third of the $22 million (19.3 million euros) collected annually under the provision from 2021-2023, according to Vatican data. The other main source of annual donations is more well-known to ordinary Catholics: Peter's Pence, a special collection usually taken on the last Sunday of June. From 2021-2023, individual Catholics in the U.S. gave an average $27 million (23.7 million euros) to Peter's Pence, more than half the global total. American generosity hasn't prevented overall Peter's Pence contributions from cratering. After hitting a high of $101 million (88.6 million euros) in 2006, contributions hovered around $75 million (66.8 million euros) during the 2010's then tanked to $47 million (41.2 million euros) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, when many churches were closed. Donations remained low in the following years, amid revelations of the Vatican's bungled investment in a London property, a former Harrod's warehouse that it hoped to develop into luxury apartments. The scandal and ensuing trial confirmed that the vast majority of Peter's Pence contributions had funded the Holy See's budgetary shortfalls, not papal charity initiatives as many parishioners had been led to believe. Peter's Pence donations rose slightly in 2023 and Vatican officials expect more growth going forward, in part because there has traditionally been a bump immediately after papal elections. New donors The Vatican bank and the city state's governorate, which controls the museums, also make annual contributions to the pope. As recently as a decade ago, the bank gave the pope around 55 million euros ($62.7 million) a year to help with the budget. But the amounts have dwindled; the bank gave nothing specifically to the pope in 2023, despite registering a net profit of 30 million euros ($34.2 million), according to its financial statements. The governorate's giving has likewise dropped off. Some Vatican officials ask how the Holy See can credibly ask donors to be more generous when its own institutions are holding back. Leo will need to attract donations from outside the U.S., no small task given the different culture of philanthropy, said the Rev. Robert Gahl, director of the Church Management Program at Catholic University of America's business school. He noted that in Europe there is much less of a tradition (and tax advantage) of individual philanthropy, with corporations and government entities doing most of the donating or allocating designated tax dollars. Even more important is leaving behind the 'mendicant mentality' of fundraising to address a particular problem, and instead encouraging Catholics to invest in the church as a project, he said. Speaking right after Leo's installation ceremony in St. Peter's Square, which drew around 200,000 people, Gahl asked: 'Don't you think there were a lot of people there that would have loved to contribute to that and to the pontificate?' In the U.S., donation baskets are passed around at every Sunday Mass. Not so at the Vatican. Untapped real estate The Vatican has 4,249 properties in Italy and 1,200 more in London, Paris, Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. Only about one-fifth are rented at fair market value, according to the annual report from the APSA patrimony office, which manages them. Some 70% generate no income because they house Vatican or other church offices; the remaining 10% are rented at reduced rents to Vatican employees. In 2023, these properties only generated 35 million euros ($39.9 million) in profit. Financial analysts have long identified such undervalued real estate as a source of potential revenue. But Ward Fitzgerald, the president of the U.S.-based Papal Foundation, which finances papal charities, said the Vatican should also be willing to sell properties, especially those too expensive to maintain. Many bishops are wrestling with similar downsizing questions as the number of church-going Catholics in parts of the U.S. and Europe shrinks and once-full churches stand empty. Toward that end, the Vatican recently sold the property housing its embassy in Tokyo's high-end Sanbancho neighborhood, near the Imperial Palace, to a developer building a 13-story apartment complex, according to the Kensetsu News trade journal. Yet there has long been institutional reluctance to part with even money-losing properties. Witness the Vatican announcement in 2021 that the cash-strapped Fatebenefratelli Catholic hospital in Rome, run by a religious order, would not be sold. Pope Francis simultaneously created a Vatican fundraising foundation to keep it and other Catholic hospitals afloat. 'They have to come to grips with the fact that they own so much real estate that is not serving the mission of the church,' said Fitzgerald, who built a career in real estate private equity. ___ AP reporter Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why NYC mayoral candidate Ramos says she endorsed opponent Cuomo
NEW YORK - In a surprising political twist, mayoral candidate and state Senator Jessica Ramos endorsed former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, despite her previous criticisms of him, including his handling of the COVID pandemic and sexual harassment allegations. Cuomo, however, declined to endorse Ramos in return. What they're saying Ramos, who has been critical of Cuomo's record and even compared his mental acuity to that of former President Joe Biden, now sees the race as primarily between two candidates: Cuomo and State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. LIST: Meet the candidates running for NYC mayor She says that Mamdani does not have the experience to run the city and that Cuomo is better suited to take on President Donald Trump. "Andrew Cuomo and I definitely don't have the same style in governing, and I am hoping that we are focused on tackling the very serious threat of Donald Trump upon our city," she said. Ramos will remain on the ballot, but her endorsement acknowledges the fact that she sees no path to victory. Since entering the race, Ramos' campaign struggled to get off the ground. She never raised enough small-dollar contributions for public matching funds and never gained any meaningful support among the city's labor unions. The Working Families Party also did not initially include her in their slate of candidates, and Ramos made it clear that she felt spurned by the organization. Cuomo brushed off Ramos' past criticisms on Friday, stating that campaign rhetoric often leads to strong statements about opponents. He acknowledged her endorsement but clarified he is not endorsing her in return. "She is endorsing me. I'm not endorsing her," he said. The other side Mamdani said he is disappointed that Ramos chose to endorse Cuomo. "To see him continue to be legitimized is something that will always trouble me, especially given the fact that we have run this campaign," he said. "Many of us as candidates being crystal clear that while each of us thinks we will make the best next mayor of New York, we all share the agreement it should not be Andrew Cuomo." Meanwhile, protesters interrupted a housing rally being held by Mamdani in Lower Manhattan that ended with a man, Raul Rivera, allegedly biting one of the tenant organizers. The NYPD said Rivera was arrested for assault, and the woman who was bitten was treated on the scene. Mamdani and others have called on Cuomo to condemn the violence. What's next New York City's primary elections are on Tuesday, June 24. The Source This article uses candidate statements


Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Doug Ford calls out municipalities as housing money goes unspent
Ontario is having trouble giving money away for housing, but challenging times are making it hard to get. As Premier Doug Ford presented Toronto with a $67.2 million cheque to help build new homes amid a shortage that has pushed prices higher, his housing minister lamented more municipalities aren't meeting the housing targets entitling them to cash. 'We're going to hand out some nice 'building faster fund' cheques, not as many and for as much this year as we did last year,' Rob Flack said Friday at city hall with Mayor Olivia Chow. Toronto broke ground on 21,000 new homes last year, 88 per cent of its target. 'That's why we have the big cheque,' said Chow, who noted 'building is slowing' because of high interest rates, and higher costs that mean 'builders just can't afford to build.' The $1.2 billion housing fund was established in 2023 to provide financial incentives for municipalities over three years to build homes. It's intended to pay for infrastructure like water lines, sewers, roads and sidewalks. Money is paid as a reward to municipalities reaching 80 per cent of the target set out by the province. Ford promised in 2022 to build 1.5 million new homes by 2031 but the province is at half the pace needed to reach that number in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the challenging business conditions that followed. While an average of 150,000 new homes a year is needed over the decade, the Progressive Conservative government's spring budget projected housing starts will fall this year to 71,800 — down from 74,600 in 2024. To spur construction, Ford's PCs passed Bill 17, the Protect Ontario By Building Faster and Smarter Act, which streamlines the approval process and fees for homebuilders, allows municipalities to reduce development charges on developers and delays payment until new homes are occupied instead of when a building permit is issued. As well, the legislation given royal assent this week extends the power to grant minister's zoning orders that override municipal bylaws, raising concerns among critics about preferential treatment for some builders. Ford repeated his calls for the Bank of Canada to lower interest rates and said economic uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs isn't helping the housing business. 'People are nervous if they're going to have a job or not.' Ford also pointed the finger at mayors of some municipalities he did not name, but who he said 'absolutely refuse to build.' 'We are going to work with the ones that want to build,' the premier added. 'They're going to get the money. The other ones aren't.' The premier reiterated that he would like to axe the provincial portion of the 13 per cent HST on new homes and has asked Prime Minister Mark Carney to scrap the federal portion. 'We just have to get everyone on the same page,' Ford said.