logo
Shopify must face data privacy lawsuit in US

Shopify must face data privacy lawsuit in US

Time of India21-04-2025

Live Events
A US appeals court on Monday revived a proposed data privacy class action against Shopify , in a decision that could make it easier for American courts to assert jurisdiction over internet-based platforms.In a 10-1 decision, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said the Canadian ecommerce company can be sued in California for collecting personal identifying data from people who buy things on websites of retailers from that state.Brandon Briskin, a California resident, said Shopify installed tracking software known as cookies on his iPhone without his consent when he bought athletic wear from the retailer I Am Becoming, and used his data to create a profile it could sell to other merchants.Shopify said it should not be sued in California because it operates nationwide and did not aim its conduct toward that state. The Ottawa-based company said Briskin could sue in Delaware, New York or Canada.A lower court judge and a three-judge 9th Circuit panel had agreed the case should be dismissed, but the full appeals court said Shopify "expressly aimed" its conduct toward California."Shopify deliberately reached out ... by knowingly installing tracking software onto unsuspecting Californians' phones so that it could later sell the data it obtained, in a manner that was neither random, isolated, or fortuitous," Circuit Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw wrote for the majority.Lawyers for Shopify and Briskin did not immediately respond to requests for comment.A bipartisan group of 30 states plus Washington, DC sided with Briskin. They said they needed an ability to enforce their own consumer protection laws against companies that avail themselves of local marketplaces through the internet.The US Chamber of Commerce supported Shopify, saying a broad grant of jurisdiction would harm back-end service providers whose software is used worldwide.Circuit Judge Consuelo Callahan dissented, criticizing the majority's "traveling cookie rule" because it "impermissibly manufactures jurisdiction wherever the plaintiff goes."The 9th Circuit includes nine western US states, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.The case is Briskin v Shopify, Inc. et al, 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-15815. \

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US Rethink on Australia Submarines Is China's Win
The US Rethink on Australia Submarines Is China's Win

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

The US Rethink on Australia Submarines Is China's Win

The White House's review of the Aukus pact — a security arrangement between the US, UK and Australia — is rattling one of Washington's closest alliances, and playing right into China's hands. It sends yet another signal that America First might just mean everyone else alone. First announced by former President Joe Biden in 2021, the multibillion-dollar deal commits Washington and London to help Canberra develop a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines over a 30-year period. It was designed to help counter Beijing's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. Donald Trump's administration has just put those plans in limbo. The review will determine whether Aukus is 'aligned with the president's America First agenda,' the Defense Department said, adding that it's also aimed at making sure allies contribute more to collective security and that the US's defense industrial base can meet domestic needs. These are valid concerns. American submarine production has been plagued by persistent delays and ballooning costs. Elbridge Colby, a top policy adviser who is expected to play a central role in the study, has long warned that the US could end up short on submarines at a critical moment in its deterrence strategy against China. In particular, Colby is worried about a hypothetical conflict around Taiwan. This is yet another example of the White House's pay-to-play approach to global partnerships, and how allies left out in the cold will have to navigate the new environment. 'Regardless of how this review goes, Australia should be reducing its dependence on US weapons and technology,' Michael Shoebridge, founder and director of Strategic Analysis, a Canberra-based political consultancy, told me. 'We are probably slower than others in realizing that America remains our most powerful partner, but we have to do more for ourselves.' European nations have already had a taste of what it means to be a US ally in Trump's world. At the Munich Security Conference earlier this year, Vice President JD Vance chastised participants for not doing enough to bolster collective security. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a similar message to Asian partners at the Shangri-La conference, a regional security summit in Singapore. Countries like Australia, Japan, and South Korea have long relied on America as a security guarantor, but now Washington wants them to carry more of the load and increase military budgets. Meeting with Australia's Defense Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines, Hegseth told him that Canberra needs to up its military spending target to 3.5% of GDP. Currently, Australia is on track for about 2.4% by the mid 2030s, and has already committed to additional investment. For Beijing, each move that reduces the Trump administration's influence in the region is welcomed as a sign of disengagement. When Aukus was first announced, China expressed outrage at what it viewed as evidence of Washington's attempts at containment. On Thursday, the foreign ministry repeated its resistance to the pact, adding that it opposes 'anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates arms race.' A retooling of the treaty will reinforce the narrative Beijing has been pushing that the US is an untrustworthy partner. In all likelihood, Aukus will survive, but perhaps not in its current form. Canberra may be forced to make compromises, and offer concessions to Washington, including raising its defense capabilities. But even if the public rhetoric is one of long-term cooperation, Australia should begin weighing its options carefully. It could work more closely with other partners. In May, Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, raised the prospect of a formal defense agreement between the trading bloc and Australia. While in reality this would be challenging given the number of countries involved, partnerships like this are worth exploring and should be pursued. The country has already begun strengthening defense ties with Japan through reciprocal access agreements, and worked with India under the Quad framework on maritime security and military exercises. These steps offer a foundation for a more multipolar security strategy, one that doesn't always lean so heavily on Washington's shifting priorities. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Trump on Tuesday on the sidelines of the Group of Seven meeting in Canada, where they're likely to tackle trade and defense spending. This is a golden opportunity to impress upon the American president the benefits of committing to Aukus — chief among them, maintaining American influence in the Indo-Pacific. Whether the US leader reaffirms the pact or reshapes it, this review should serve as a wake-up call. For Australia, it's a reminder that even the closest alliances are only as stable as the political moment that defines them. More From Bloomberg Opinion: America will sell Australia between three and five Virginia-class, conventionally armed nuclear-powered submarines, with the first deliveries expected as soon as the early 2030s. In the longer term, Australia plans to build its own next-generation submarines in partnership with the UK, using American technology, to be completed in the 2040s. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC's lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Bluarmor C20 Mesh Helmet Intercom launched at Rs 9,999: Details
Bluarmor C20 Mesh Helmet Intercom launched at Rs 9,999: Details

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Bluarmor C20 Mesh Helmet Intercom launched at Rs 9,999: Details

Bengaluru-based startup Bluarmor has launched the Bluarmor C20 helmet intercom system priced at Rs 9,999. The company has introduced a limited-time price of Rs 6,999 for customers who purchase the device before 22 June. Interested customers can book the intercom at Bluarmor's official website and deliveries are scheduled to commence on 18 June. The new C20 is developed using the same platform as BluArmor's premium Mesh Intercom lineup, the C50. It carries over many of the essential features, with certain components adjusted or omitted to offer a more budget-friendly alternative. The C20 also shares its dimensions and design with the C50, placing it among the most lightweight and compact mesh intercom systems currently available. Feature-wise, it includes HD voice and audio, Bluetooth 5.3, crash detection, dual-level noise filtering, interchangeable microphones , and cross-brand connectivity. This interoperability feature enables pairing with Bluetooth devices from other manufacturers. Other features include over-the-air firmware updates, music-sharing capabilities, Ride Grid Lite advanced mesh intercom technology , and eRide Grid Mesh Over Cloud connectivity. The C20 is compatible with the same enhancement accessories offered for the C50. These include the Magdock magnetic mount, Ride Aura feature, and the Wireless T-Stick handlebar controller, which enables riders to operate the device using joystick-style inputs. Discover everything about the automotive world at Times of India .

Rare earth magnet crisis may be too good to waste for India's EV ambitions
Rare earth magnet crisis may be too good to waste for India's EV ambitions

Business Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Rare earth magnet crisis may be too good to waste for India's EV ambitions

China's near monopoly on rare earths has rattled Indian automakers, triggering a diplomatic push and renewed urgency for local processing capacity Shine Jacob Archis Mohan Listen to This Article When Beijing announced in April that it would tighten its grip on exports of rare earth-related items, the reverberations were swift — and worldwide. The move, enforced by China's Ministry of Commerce and the General Administration of Customs, has sent tremors through global automobile industry, including India's electric vehicle (EV) sector. At the G7 Summit that opened on Sunday in Canada, rare earth supplies are high on the agenda. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, laying out the priorities for his country's G7 presidency, spoke of 'fortifying critical mineral supply chains' as one of three core missions to shore up economic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store