
Wisconsin parents claim school punished daughters for refusing to change in front of trans student
FIRST ON FOX– Two Wisconsin parents have filed a civil rights complaint after they claimed their daughters were forced to share a locker room with a biological male transgender student and faced academic penalties for attempting to avoid undressing in front of the student.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) filed a Title IX complaint on behalf of the parents with the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights (OCR) and with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi against Westosha Central High School for "endangering the safety and privacy of multiple female students."
The complaint, shared first with Fox News Digital, claims that Westosha Central High allowed a male student to share a locker room for gym class with female students and allegedly punished students who attempted to avoid changing in front of the male student.
The complaint was brought by two parents of female students in the class. One of the parents said he ended up pulling his daughter out of the school because of the situation.
"Parents send their kids to school so they can learn in a safe environment, but that's not what happened here. My daughter was punished for standing up for her own privacy and safety. The district's misplaced priorities left us no choice but to leave the school," former Westosha parent Nicholas Puchter said.
The complaint states that at the beginning of the second semester last December, two female students, "Jane Doe 1" and "Jane Doe 2," began a new physical education class where they became aware that a male transgender student would be allowed to change in the girls' locker room.
"While some girls could use the few available toilet stalls to change in privacy and away from the gaze of the male student, others could not because of the limited time offered for changing. The result was a crowded and uncomfortable environment where many girls felt pressured into an inadequate choice between exposure and tardiness," the complaint states.
After Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 expressed "discomfort and embarrassment" at being required to undress in front of a male student to their gym teacher, the complaint claims they were told "not to worry about it" and that it would be considered "bullying," to not allow the transgender student to use the girls' locker room.
The complaint says the parents of the two girls also called the school's administration office to demand they address the issue. However, the transgender student was still allowed to change in the same locker room, the complaint claims.
During the winter break, Westosha also sent a letter to families, claiming that "no reports of inappropriate locker room behaviors were made to school personnel or law enforcement" but regardless, the school said it had "taken steps to ensure all students feel safe and comfortable in the locker room."
The complaint says that Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 faced academic penalties when they attempted to avoid changing in front of the transgender student.
Jane Doe 1 allegedly "received multiple unexcused absences attempting to avoid the leering gaze of a male student in the locker room."
In one instance, Jane Doe 1 tried to sit in the girls' bathroom outside the locker room to avoid the male student when a teacher "yelled" at her for skipping class and forced her to return to PE class, the complaint says.
Jane Doe 2 was also marked absent on multiple occasions because she would wait for an empty stall to change clothes for class. Although her absences were excused after her father called the school, she still received a failing grade in the class, the complaint says. Her family ultimately chose to pull her out of Westosha, which is located in Paddock Lake, a village in Kenosha County bordering Illinois.
WILL accuses the school of violating Title IX protections by failing to "take meaningful action to accommodate" or address the students' concerns and creating an environment where female students' participation in gym class was hindered.
WILL is asking the Department of Justice and Department of Education to investigate these claims and "act swiftly to remedy unlawful policies and practices, and order appropriate relief."
WILL Associate Counsel Lauren Greuel provided the following statement:
"When schools like Westosha force girls into an inadequate choice between exposing themselves to a male student or academic penalties, they abandon all common-sense and their core mission. The law requires protections for girls to have the same educational opportunities as their male peers. The decision to punish these girls for protecting themselves must be promptly investigated by the Department of Education. We ask the department to consider the allegations in our complaint and quickly remedy these unlawful policies and practices."
In response to the complaint, the Department of Justice told Fox News Digital, "Forcing girls to compete against and share locker rooms with boys is demeaning, unfair, and dangerous. The Department of Justice will protect women and continue to vigorously defend President Trump's executive actions, including the Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports executive order."
Wetosha Central High and the Department of Education did not respond to Fox News Digital's requests for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New requirements begin July 1 for Colorado concealed carry permits
DENVER (KDVR) — A law changing the requirements for concealed firearm carry permits will go into effect on July 1, and gun owners should be aware of what is changing. In just under a month, anyone who wants to renew or apply for a concealed weapons permit must complete further steps, due to HB-24-1174. The new law drew criticism from gun rights groups, which said the law could deter gun owners who would otherwise carry their firearms. Education Department investigating Jeffco schools for Title IX concerns on 2023 school trip If you're renewing your concealed carry permit, the law requires that the applicant 'demonstrate competence with a handgun,' which can be done through participating in organized shooting competitions, current military service, or current certifications as a peace officer. You can also show competence by being a verified instructor for firearms safety courses, showing an honorable discharge from a branch of the U.S. armed forces or retirement from a Colorado law enforcement agency with pistol qualifications within 10 years before submitting a renewal form. Concealed carry renewal applicants can also complete an initial concealed handgun training or a concealed handgun refresher class within 6 months before submitting the renewal form, according to the law's text. New applicants are required to complete an in-person handgun training within the year before applying for a permit. The training must be conducted by a sheriff-verified instructor and cover: Knowledge and safe handling of firearms and ammunition Safe storage of firearms and child safety Safe shooting fundamentals Information on federal and state laws on lawful purchase, ownership, transportation, use and possession Information on state laws regarding use of deadly force for self-defense Best practices for interacting with law enforcement responding to an emergency Techniques for avoiding a criminal attack and managing a violent confrontation The class must be at least eight hours of instruction and requires course takers to complete a live-shooting task and achieve a standardized test score of at least 80% for gun owners to be awarded a concealed carry permit. Governor signs bill requiring training for semiautomatic guns, banning rapid-fire conversion devices New applicants for concealed carry permits, for the purpose of the permit, can also show competence with a handgun by holding a current peace officer certification. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
DOJ finds no violations of Title II at Waterbury Public Schools
WATERBURY, Conn. (WTNH) — After nearly three years, the Department of Justice concluded its evaluation with 'no findings against the district' at Waterbury Public Schools. This comes after allegations of discrimination against students with disabilities. The evaluation began on June 17, 2022, with reports that Waterbury Public Schools might have violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Trump administration probes Cromwell Public Schools on Title IX 'The conclusion of this evaluation marks an important moment for Waterbury Public Schools,' Mayor Paul Pernerewski said in a written statement. 'The appointment of Dr. Darren Schwartz as Superintendent reflects our commitment to strong, student-centered leadership. While the Department of Justice found no wrongdoing, this process prompted a close examination of our practices and policies, ensuring that we not only meet the standards of the law but also hold ourselves to even higher standards. Our focus remains on providing a safe, inclusive, and equitable education for every student in Waterbury.' In the letter, the DOJ acknowledged Waterbury Public School's cooperation and confirmed the conclusion of its evaluation with 'no findings against the District.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
As a Christian teacher, Biden's Title IX rule made my job nearly impossible
It may be hard for government officials to believe that rewriting the 52-year-old Title IX law to include "gender identity" as a protected category could seriously impact one teacher in one small county of south-central Tennessee. It's difficult enough convincing those officials that doing so is causing irreparable harm to countless girls and young women all over the damage to all of us is no less real for the fact that the Biden administration deliberately turned a blind eye to it and a deaf ear to a growing chorus of response, 26 states, represented in multiple lawsuits, sued and won injunctions temporarily blocking the administration's Title IX rule in some parts of the country. More: Judge axes Biden Title IX rule against transgender discrimination after Tenn., other states sue But now, a ruling issued by a federal district court in Kentucky, in a case involving Tennessee, blocks enforcement of that rule nationwide, permanently wiping away every part of it across the entire country. And since then, the Trump administration has issued a letter agreeing with that court decision and declaring it would not try to enforce the rule anywhere across the ruling, bolstered by the recent Trump administration letter, now protects school districts, teachers, and students across the country from a brutal government overreach that tried to redefine 'sex' in federal law. The Biden Title IX rule violated biological reality, science, and common sense; threatened women's advancements in education and athletics; callously dismissed the rights of parents and their children; and posed a potent threat to the privacy and safety of young women. As a teacher, not all of those particular dangers and humiliations impact me directly. But I'm a member of Christian Educators Association International, an organization represented by Alliance Defending Freedom in one of those federal lawsuits (State of Tennessee v. Cardona) because the Biden administration's Title IX rule did threaten my work and freedom. Opinion: Riley Gaines: I'm in Nashville to protest Biden's Title IX changes and fight for women's sports I just finished my 11th year as a public high school teacher. My current classes include statistics, geometry, and the Bible as literature. I'm also moderator for a Christian club on our campus. My statistics classes often involve comparing results of studies between men and women. How could I discuss those comparisons in a way that didn't violate some student's notions of gender identity?How could I lead a discussion of the biblical story of creation, sex and marriage without contradicting the administration's regulations on those subjects?How could I participate in any casual conversation on these subjects with my colleagues without potentially provoking the outrage of someone who disagrees with me?If the Biden rule went into effect, my district's policy on these issues would require faculty, staff and students to report any conduct they consider a violation to the district's official Title IX coordinator. That means anyone taking offense at anything I say (or don't say) could have gotten me into a great deal of trouble — career-ending trouble. Obviously, my best bet is to just not 'go there.' Don't compare statistics on men and women. Don't teach gender-related passages of the Bible. Drop out of my role with the Christian club. But that would mean compromising my work and surrendering my freedom of speech, as surely as so many young women are surrendering their privacy, safety, and dreams of athletic achievement — and as surely as so many of us are being asked to ignore biological an incredibly high price for all of us to pay for changing — to gain political capital — a federal law that, as is, has reaped enormous benefits for women across America for 52 benefit of teaching geometry is that I've learned where to draw the line. Now a federal court has confirmed what most people can plainly see: The Biden administration illegally stepped over the line when it tried to write gender ideology into Title IX. I just hope — for all our sakes — that common sense continues to make progress like this across the Taylor teaches high school in Coffee County, Tennessee. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: I'm a teacher who's glad Biden couldn't redefine sex | Opinion