Trump says he wants foreign students who don't 'cause trouble,' slams Harvard for being 'a big shot'
President Donald Trump during a news conference in the Oval Office on Friday, said he is in favor of allowing international students on U.S. college campuses, clarifying he is against welcoming students who are "causing trouble."
Singling out Harvard University, which has come under fire in both public opinion and the courts, Trump noted nearly 30% of its students are foreign.
"Our country has given $5 billion plus to Harvard over a short period of time," he said. "Nobody knew that. We found that out. I wouldn't say that was a [Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)] thing, but we found that out over a period of time, that was sort of a Trump thing."
Trump Is Down But Not Out In Court Battle Over Harvard's Foreign Student Visas
During ongoing litigation, which the president attributed to the university being "very anti-semitic," he said the administration found out that the government gave them more than $5 billion in funding.
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs on Thursday upheld a court order blocking the Trump administration from revoking Harvard's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which allows the university to sponsor international students for U.S. visas.
Read On The Fox News App
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem cited Harvard's alleged pattern of "fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus," in calls for the repeal of Harvard's SEVP certification.
"We're having it out with them, and let's see what happens," Trump said. "I think we have a very good, well, it's a very sad case. It's a case we win. We can't lose that case because we have the right to make grants. We're not going to make any grants like that."
He went on to say Harvard has not "been acting very nicely," and argued other institutions like Columbia University in New York City "want to get to the bottom of the problem."
"They've acted very well, and there are other institutions, too, that are acting, but Harvard's trying to be a big shot," Trump said. "And all that happens is every three days, we find another $100 million that was given."
Two days ago, the president said his administration had found an additional $200 million in grants given to Harvard.
"The money's given to them like gravy," he said.
State Department Now Scrutinizing All Visa Holders Associated With Harvard
Offering an alternative, Trump said he would like to see the money go toward creating the world's best trade school system.
"I'd like to see the money go to trade schools where people learn how to fix motors and engines, where people learn how to build rocket ships," he said. "Because, you know, somebody has to build those rocket ships."
"Yep," Elon Musk, who departed DOGE on Friday, chimed in from beside the president's desk.
"I'd like to see trade schools set up, because you could take $5 billion plus hundreds of billions more, which is what's spent, and you could have the greatest trade school system anywhere in the world," Trump continued. "That's what we need to build his rockets and robots and things that he's doing, and to build lots of other things."
Trump Admin Working To Fly Back Guatemalan Migrant Erroneously Deported From Us
He added he went to school with peers who could "fix the engine of a car better than anybody I've ever seen" and "take it apart blindfolded."
Jarod Coffman, owner of the Colorado-based business Coffman Construction, told "Fox & Friends First" on Tuesday that houses built in the U.S. are the most expensive they have ever been, yet the contractors building the homes are the least educated they have ever been.
"We are at a little bit of a turning point where there are schools starting to re-implement trade programs into them, which is good, but a lot of them are facing budget issues, so actually I could really see this being a beneficial thing," Coffman said.
He added it would address the housing deficit, while decreasing costs and providing education.
"It's a very skilled job," Trump said. "I'd like to see a lot of money going into trade schools. I've always felt that, and we probably found our pot of gold, and that's what's been wasted at places like Harvard."
Harvard did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Fox News Digital's Breanne Deppisch and Taylor Penley contributed to this report.Original article source: Trump says he wants foreign students who don't 'cause trouble,' slams Harvard for being 'a big shot'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Department of Education investigates UW over admittance of KKG transgender member
CHEYENNE – The University of Wyoming is under investigation by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights over the admittance of a transgender sorority sister at Kappa Kappa Gamma in 2022, according to a Monday news release. The U.S. Department of Education declared June as 'Title IX Month' on Monday, in recognition of the 53rd anniversary of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. 'June will now be dedicated to commemorating women and celebrating their struggle for, and achievement of, equal educational opportunity,' states U.S. Department of Education news release. In light of this recognition, the department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) launched investigations into UW and Jefferson County Public Schools in Colorado. The latter is currently being sued by Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal advocacy group, over a policy implemented by JeffCo that assigns overnight school trip sleeping arrangements based on gender identity, not biological sex, according to Denver7. 'The Department is recognizing June as 'Title IX Month' to honor women's hard-earned civil rights and demonstrate the Trump Administration's unwavering commitment to restoring them to the fullest extent of the law,' U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in the news release. 'This Administration will fight on every front to protect women's and girls' sports, intimate spaces, dormitories and living quarters, and fraternal and panhellenic organizations.' The former grabbed nationwide attention after six sorority sisters launched a federal lawsuit against their parent organization over the admittance of its first transgender sorority member, Artemis Langford. In response to the federal investigation, the university stated it 'doesn't control decisions about sorority and fraternity membership,' a UW spokesperson told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle in an emailed statement. 'Appropriately, the university has not been a participant in litigation in federal court regarding the legality of the sorority's decision to admit the transgender student,' UW spokesperson Chad Baldwin said in an email. 'The Office for Civil Rights' initiation of an investigation is not itself evidence of a violation of federal civil rights laws and regulations.' Baldwin referred to University Regulation 11-4, which states that the university 'does not control or accept responsibility for the activities nor endorse the programs of student organizations,' including sororities and fraternities. The university maintains it has been and is in compliance with Title IX, but will fully comply with the federal investigation. The Independent Women's Forum, a right-wing policy group, supported the move by the federal education department in a Monday news release. Its affiliate, the Independent Women's Law Center, involved one of its lead attorneys, May Mailman, in the original lawsuit field by the sorority sisters. "Women deserve single-sex spaces where their privacy and safety are respected, and universities must be held accountable when those protections are compromised," stated Beth Parlato, senior legal advisor for IWLC, in the news release. "This investigation is a necessary step to ensure that federal policies meant to protect women are being properly enforced and not undermined in the name of political ideology." The lawsuit In 2023, six sorority sisters filed a lawsuit against KKG for admitting a transgender sorority member. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in August 2023 by U.S. District Court Judge Alan B. Johnson. Johnson gave the sorority sisters an option to amend their complaint and refile the lawsuit. Instead, the plaintiffs appealed their lawsuit in the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. Last June, Judge Carolyn B. McHugh found the case was not appealable without a final order from Johnson. She gave the plaintiffs two options: stand on their existing complaint and seek a final decision from the Wyoming judge, or amend their complaint and continue their case at the federal district court level. It's been nearly a year since the sorority sisters' appealed case was dismissed by the 10th Circuit. In early May, Johnson gave the appellants 30 days to submit their amended complaint, or have the case dismissed permanently. The sorority sisters have until June 9 to submit their amended complaint.

Los Angeles Times
11 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump shows that loyalty is all that matters to him
Last week, the Court of International Trade delivered a blow to Donald Trump's global trade war. It found that the worldwide tariffs Trump unveiled on 'Liberation Day' as well his earlier tariffs pretextually aimed at stopping fentanyl coming in from Mexico and Canada (as if) were beyond his authority. The three-judge panel was surely right about the Liberation Day tariffs and probably right about the fentanyl tariffs, but there's a better case that, while bad policy, the fentanyl tariffs were not unlawful. Please forgive a lengthy excerpt of Trump's response on Truth Social, but it speaks volumes: 'How is it possible for [the CIT judges] to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?' What other reason could it be? I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. … In any event, Leo left The Federalist Society to do his own 'thing.' I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten!' Let's begin with the fact that Trump cannot conceive of a good explanation for an inconvenient court ruling other than Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's irrelevant that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law the administration invoked to impose the relevant tariffs, does not even mention the word 'tariff' or that Congress never envisioned the IEEPA as a tool for launching a trade war with every nation in the world, the 'Penguin Islands' included. Also disregard the fact that the decision was unanimous and only one of the three judges was appointed by Trump (the other two were Reagan and Obama appointees). (The decision has been paused by an appeals court.) Trump is the foremost practitioner of what I call Critical Trump Theory — anything bad for Trump is unfair, illegitimate and proof that sinister forces are rigging the system against him. No wonder then that Trump thinks Leonard Leo, formerly a guiding light at the Federalist Society, the premier conservative legal organization, is a 'sleazebag' and 'bad person.' Note: Leo is neither of those things. But Trump's broadsides at Leo and the Federalist Society are portentous. Because Congress is AWOL, refusing to take the lead on trade (and many other things) as the Constitution envisions, it's fallen to the courts to restrain Trump's multifront efforts to exceed his authority. That's why the White House is cynically denouncing 'unelected' and 'rogue' judges on an almost daily basis and why Trump's political henchman, Stephen Miller, is incessantly ranting about a 'judicial coup.' The supreme, and sometimes seemingly sole, qualification for appointments to the Trump administration has been servile loyalty to Trump. But that ethos is not reserved for the executive branch. Law firms, elite universities and media outlets are being forced to kneel before the president. Why should judges be any different? Trump has a history of suggesting 'my judges' — i.e., his appointees — should be loyal to him. That's why he recently nominated Emil Bove, his former personal criminal lawyer turned political enforcer at the Department of Justice, for a federal judgeship. The significance of Trump's attack on the Federalist Society and Leo, for conservatives, cannot be exaggerated. The legal movement spearheaded by the Federalist Society has been the most successful domestic conservative project of the last century. Scholarly, civic-minded and principled, the Federalist Society spent decades developing ideas and arguments for re-centering the Constitution in American law. But now Trump has issued a fatwah that it, too, must bend the knee and its principles to the needs of one man. The law be damned, ruling against Trump is ingratitude in his mind. Speaking of ingratitude, the irony is that the Federalist Society deserves a lot of credit — or blame — for Trump being elected in the first place. In 2016, the death of Antonin Scalia left a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Many conservatives did not trust Trump to replace him. To reassure them, Trump agreed to pick from a list of potential replacements crafted by the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society. That decision arguably convinced many reluctant conservatives to vote for him. In the decade since, the Heritage Foundation has dutifully reinvented itself in Trump's image. The Federalist Society stayed loyal to its principles, and that's why the Federalist Society is in Trump's crosshairs. @JonahDispatch
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's factory activity cools in May as US tariffs hit
BEIJING (Reuters) - China's factory activity in May shrank for the first time in eight months, a private-sector survey showed on Tuesday, indicating U.S. tariffs are now starting to directly hurt the manufacturing superpower. The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI fell to 48.3 in May from 50.4 in April, missing analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll and marking the first contraction since September last year. It was also the lowest reading in 32 months. The 50-mark separates growth from contraction. The result is broadly in line with China's official PMI released on Saturday that showed factory activity fell for a second month. A federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the most sweeping U.S. tariffs, a day after a trade court ruled that President Donald Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and ordered an immediate block on them. Two weeks after breakthrough negotiations that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday the talks are "a bit stalled". China's Premier Li Qiang last week said the country is mulling new policy tools, including some "unconventional measures", which will be launched as the situation evolves. According to the Caixin survey, new export orders shrank for the second straight month in May and at the fastest pace since July 2023. Producers said the U.S. tariffs restrained global demand. That dragged down overall new orders to the lowest since September 2022. Factory output meanwhile contracted for the first time since October 2023. Employment in the manufacturing sector declined at the sharpest pace since the start of this year, as producers cut headcount. Output prices have fallen for six straight months due to intense market competition. In the auto industry, for example, an intensifying price war in China has stoked fears of a long-anticipated shake-out in the world's largest car market. Robin Xing, Chief China Economist at Morgan Stanley, said this underscores how supply-demand imbalances continue to fuel deflation. "There is growing rhetoric about the need for rebalancing, but recent developments suggest the old supply-driven model remains intact. Thus, reflation is likely to remain elusive." Surprisingly, export charges rose for the first time in nine months, marking the fastest growth since July 2024, as companies cited rising logistics costs and tariffs. Overall, business optimism improved in terms of future output, as they expect the trade environment to improve with market expansion.