logo
Miniature dachshund that would ‘never leave' owner's side found alive 16 months after being lost in wilderness

Miniature dachshund that would ‘never leave' owner's side found alive 16 months after being lost in wilderness

Yahoo26-03-2025

When a miniature dachshund went missing in November 2023 on a South Australian island, her distressed owner cried for days while trying to track her down as the dog had never once left her side and had a slim chance of surviving on her own in the wild.
But 16 months after she disappeared, Valerie has been spotted alive on the Kangaroo Island in South Australia, to the surprise of wildlife experts.
Valerie went missing while on holiday with her owners, Georgia Gardner and Josh Fishlock. Though they searched the island for a week with local help, she wasn't seen again until recent months.
'We spent probably five days of the rest of our trip looking for her, but without any luck unfortunately,' Mr Fishlock told Nine News' Today. After futile attempts to find Valeria, they left the island to return to their lives.
But he said that in the months following Valerie's disappearance, there have been reported sightings of her on the Kangaroo Island.
'She never left my side. She was not a very outside, rough-and-tough dog. To think that she even went one night outside in the rain, oh my gosh. To think that she's gone a year and a half is incredible,' Ms Gardner was quoted as saying by The Guardian.
The dog, whose precise age was not available, continues to evade capture despite efforts by volunteers and wildlife experts.
The Kangala Wildlife Rescue confirmed her survival through video evidence and set traps with cameras to try to catch her. On their Facebook page, the organisation wrote: 'Based on first-hand accounts and video evidence we now know that Valerie is alive. She runs at the first sign of humans or vehicles and despite the best efforts of dedicated Island locals, Valerie has been impossible to catch.'
Mr Fishlock told Nine News: 'We were initially a bit sceptical of all the sightings, then only probably three weeks ago, we received a photo from one of the locals and that sparked a lot of hope in us. It's given us nearly 100 per cent certainty that she's still alive.'
However, she reportedly becomes skittish when someone tries to approach her and quickly flees again.
Despite being a 'princess' and not suited for the wild, Valerie's remarkable resilience has surprised her rescuers.
Ms Gardner said: 'We thought, instead of her surviving out in the wild, maybe someone had kind of adopted her or she was hanging out with some other dogs and getting their food, because she was an absolute little princess.'
'I remember on the first day I was just covered in tears. We barely ate anything,' she told The Adelaide Advertiser. 'My whole world just crumbled. When we left the island without her, I cried for days.'
Kangala wrote on their Instagram: 'We are using surveillance and various trapping and luring methods in the area she was last seen to try and bring her home. This is a tiny dog in a huge area, and we will need help from the public to report any sightings and a lot of luck.'
Experts are amazed by the dog's survival, speculating that she may have eaten roadkill, dam water, or possibly received help from locals. Paul McGreevy of the University of Sydney's veterinary school said that like all dogs, dachshunds were 'extremely resourceful'. He said: 'Dogs are the greatest opportunists in the animal kingdom: that's one of their core skills.'
On Kangala's Facebook page, one user wrote: 'Please put down the owner's unwashed clothing down at sighting locations. Ask people who see her to sit down and not make eye contact. Putting out food with liquid smoke trails with trail cameras will help but the clothes are essential. Her owners need to be there asap.
'They need to walk around but not call out to her as she won't be able to recognise them at first. Dachshunds tend to hide against surfaces to seek comfort.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are Children Losing the Ability to Read?
Are Children Losing the Ability to Read?

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are Children Losing the Ability to Read?

Parents are increasingly disinterested in reading to their kids — and it's majorly hurting the young ones' literacy skills down the line. In interviews with The Guardian, childhood literacy experts expressed concerns about shrinking rates of at-home reading, which occurs as the prevalence of so-called "screen time," or time using tablets or smartphones, balloons ever higher. Spencer Russell, a Texas-based former elementary school teacher turned literacy coach and influencer, told the website that gen Z-aged parents, or those born after 1997, particularly seem to have difficulty reading to their kids — perhaps because they were raised on such screens themselves. "I don't think we can divorce the role of technology influencing gen Z parents and their kids with the decline in reading out loud," he explained. "Screen time is replacing one-on-one, quality interactions between parent and child." "We see children who can sit still and focus for hours on YouTube or Miss Rachel," he continued, "but when you sit them down with a book, they move, wiggle, or scream and run away." It's well known that too much screen time can harm a child's cognitive development, and that effect may well be compounded by dropping rates in at-home reading. A recent HarperCollins survey, which found less than half of parents surveyed said that reading to their kids was "fun," may help explain that downward trend. The impacts of replacing reading with screen time has long-term educational impacts, too. "Books are a really rich source of learning new words, and if kids don't have that experience reading at home, they're likely to come to school knowing less vocabulary," Dawna Duff, a speech language pathology associate professor at SUNY Binghamton University in New York State, told the Guardian. According to a 2019 study, parents who read one single picture book per day with their kids provide them access to a whopping 78,000 new words per year. In the five years before those children enter school, that number jumps to a whopping 1.4 million words. Parents who don't read to their kids are, in essence, taking all those words away — and with jarring studies suggesting up to two-thirds of American 4th graders lack the skills to read fluently, it seems highly unlikely that the two are unrelated. A specialist in vocabulary education, Duff told the Guardian that learning words early "makes a big difference in how successful you're going to be throughout school" — and emphasized that parents needn't be perfectionists when trying to teach their kids new words when reading at home. "You shouldn't feel like you need to read every word on the page," she said, "or even any words on the page." Ultimately, any type of reading at home appears to be more helpful than not, and tailoring reading time to kids' specific interest is, per Duff, the best way to go about it. "We know one of the most helpful ways to read books is by having a conversation with children about what they're interested in," she continued. "Follow their lead." Add all this to the disastrous situation in classrooms, where fed-up teachers are confronting a deluge of AI slop from students who can barely read, and you have all the makings of an educational and intellectual crisis. More on reading: Business Insider Did Something So Stupid With AI That We're Reeling

Prince Harry Apparently Wants Archie and Lilibet to Have the Option of Becoming Working Royals
Prince Harry Apparently Wants Archie and Lilibet to Have the Option of Becoming Working Royals

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Prince Harry Apparently Wants Archie and Lilibet to Have the Option of Becoming Working Royals

Prince Harry apparently wants to leave the door open for his kids, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, to possibly be working royals someday, should they choose to do so. A new report explores Harry and Meghan Markle's decision to use Archie and Lilibet's prince and princess titles and HRH statuses. It also explains that their U.K. passports may have been delayed amid a reluctance to put their HRH titles and Sussex surname on years after stepping back as working members of the royal family, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle still retain their HRH titles (shorthand for His or Her Royal Highness), and, while they don't use them publicly, have used them privately, as came out earlier this year. Harry and Meghan's kids, 6-year-old Prince Archie and 4-year-old Princess Lilibet, also have HRH titles, and, according to Town & Country, the Duke of Sussex wants to leave the option open for his kids to become working royals themselves someday, should they choose to do so. A new report in The Guardian details Harry's efforts to get U.K. passports for Archie and Lilibet, with the surname Sussex (as Meghan has expressed the desire to use for herself, as well) and the HRH titles as well. Archie's passport, for example, was originally issued as Archie Mountbatten-Windsor (the surname the larger royal family uses) upon his birth in 2019, but after Archie's grandfather King Charles took the throne in 2022, he and Lilibet became entitled to use prince and princess titles. Harry and Meghan first expressed their intent to use said titles in March 2023, six months after Charles became King, on the occasion of Lilibet's christening. 'The children's titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch,' a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said at the time. There was a delay in issuing U.K. passports for Archie and Lilibet and 'There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids,' a source 'close to the Sussexes' told The Guardian, with the insider adding that 'the King hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names.' The Guardian reported that Harry 'wants to keep the HRH titles for his children so that when they grow older they can decide for themselves whether they want to become working royals or stay out of public life.' As far back as the volatile Sandringham Summit in early 2020, Buckingham Palace said that 'The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the royal family.' That said, at least Meghan still uses her HRH title in a private capacity. The Guardian also reported that Harry and Meghan considered changing their surname to Spencer before landing on Sussex, which the outlet said stemmed from 'sheer exasperation' on Harry's part. After speaking about the matter with his uncle Earl Charles Spencer—Princess Diana's younger brother—though he was 'enthusiastic and supportive of the name change,' he advised against doing so because of legal reasons, and Harry and Meghan chose Sussex instead, reflective of their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles given to them by Queen Elizabeth on the occasion of their 2018 wedding. 'Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months,' a source speaking to The Guardian said. Per People, the passports for Archie and Lilibet eventually arrived nearly six months after the initial application; for context, standard processing time is typically around three weeks. The passports arrived 'shortly after the Sussexes' lawyers wrote to the U.K. Home Office, threatening to file a data subject access request—a legal move that could have revealed internal discussions or decisions behind the delay,' People reported. Read the original article on InStyle

Brazil charges man with killings of UK journalist, activist
Brazil charges man with killings of UK journalist, activist

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Brazil charges man with killings of UK journalist, activist

Brazilian prosecutors on Thursday charged the suspected mastermind of the 2022 murders of Indigenous rights activist Bruno Pereira and British journalist Dom Phillips over the killings, which caused international outcry. Pereira and Phillips, who freelanced for outlets including The Guardian and The Washington Post, were shot dead in the Amazon rainforest on June 5, 2022. A Brazilian federal police probe concluded they were killed because of Pereira's monitoring of poaching and other illegal activities going on in the vast Amazon. Three years to the day after the murders, a prosecutor from Amazonas state indicted the suspected mastermind, the state prosecutor's office said in a statement. The suspect was not named, but the police had previously said they believed Ruben Dario da Silva Villar, a Colombian suspected drug trafficker who has been in custody since late 2022, of ordering the hits. Pereira was a senior official with Brazil's indigenous affairs agency, and disappeared along with Phillips while they were traveling through a remote Indigenous reserve in the Amazon, close to the borders of Colombia and Peru. Their hacked-up bodies were found and identified days later, after an alleged accomplice confessed to burying them. Autopsies showed they had been shot with shells used for hunting. Phillips, 57, was shot in the chest, while Pereira, 41, sustained three gunshot wounds, one of them to the head. The killings became a symbol in Brazil and abroad of the corruption and lawlessness fueling the destruction of the Amazon and the dangers faced by journalists and Indigenous experts who probe the issues. So far, eight suspects have been charged over their role in the murders and/or concealment of the victims' remains. In its final report into the killings in November 2024, the police said that mastermind "supplied the cartridges for the crime, financially sponsored its organization, and intervened to coordinate the concealment of the bodies." ffb/app/cb/sla

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store