Hong Kong's Article 23, a year of restraint but what about broader impact?
For Chan Po-ying of the League of Social Democrats, the immediate impact of Hong Kong's local version of the national security law when it came into force a year ago came like a punch to her gut.
Advertisement
With the passage of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance last March, she would have to wait 2¼ years longer before her husband 'Long Hair' Leung Kwok-hung, a former lawmaker, would be freed. He had been jailed for six years and nine months last November in a landmark sedition trial.
Chan, who spent 50 years advocating for the city's social equality and is currently the chairwoman of what was once deemed the radical wing of the pan-democratic camp, had thought Leung could be freed as early as 2027 after deducting his time in custody in the past four years as well as the discretionary one-third cut on his sentence for good conduct.
The new law, however, stipulates that a prisoner convicted of national security offences 'must not be granted remission' unless authorities are satisfied the move will not compromise national security. Some activists have already been blocked from such early release after the new national security law was enacted.
'We know we should not bear any hope of early release, or it will only leave behind more disappointment,' 69-year-old Chan said.
Advertisement
'All I care about is that his days behind bars can be more fulfilling,' she added, referring to her jailed husband who turns 69 on Thursday.
Meanwhile, new law or not, her party continues to be about the only opposition group that still stages protests outside government headquarters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
2 days ago
- HKFP
Nat. security case of wanted Hong Kong activist Anna Kwok's father adjourned until August
The case of wanted Hong Kong activist Anna Kwok's father, who stands accused of attempting to handle his daughter's funds, has been adjourned until August, pending the submission of insurance documents to the police. Kwok Yin-sang, 68, appeared before Chief Magistrate Victor So at the West Kowloon Magistrates' Courts on Friday afternoon for a mention of his case under the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance. He is the first person charged with 'attempting to deal with, directly or indirectly, any funds or other financial assets or economic resources belonging to, or owned or controlled by, a relevant absconder,' under the city's homegrown security law, also known as Article 23. He is also the first family member of a wanted activist to be prosecuted by Hong Kong authorities. The prosecution applied for an adjournment on Friday, citing that the insurance company involved in the case would need more time to prepare and submit relevant documents to the police. The defence also informed the court that they had requested witness statements from the police but had yet to receive them. The magistrate adjourned the case to August 6 and instructed both parties to keep the court informed of any updates relating to the case. Kwok Yin-sang was allowed to remain on bail under the same conditions granted by the High Court last month. Prosecutors alleged that Kwok Yin-sang had attempted earlier this year to obtain funds from an AIA International life and personal accident insurance policy, with Anna Kwok, based in the US, listed as the insured person. The Hong Kong government barred anyone from dealing with Anna Kwok's assets in the city after Secretary for Security Chris Tang declared her an 'absconder,' along with six other exiled activists, in December. The 28-year-old is among the first group of eight overseas Hong Kong activists wanted by the city's national security police. She is accused of colluding with foreign forces and requesting foreign countries to impose sanctions on Hong Kong and China. Separate from the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects' access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city's opposition-free legislature. The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and 'regressive.' Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to 'close loopholes' after the 2019 protests and unrest.
RTHK
2 days ago
- RTHK
Second policy statement coming soon on digital assets
Second policy statement coming soon on digital assets Finance chief Paul Chan says that the government will release the second edition of policy statement on the development of digital assets. Photo: RTHK Financial Secretary Paul Chan signalled on Friday that the government will soon release the second edition of the policy statement on the development of digital assets as part of efforts to capitalise on rising interest in such financial products. The policy statement will focus on the integration of financial services as well as innovation, he noted. Chan made the remarks at the Caixin Summer Summit 2025 in Admiralty, saying it is essential to explore ways of utilising digital finance to better support the development of the real economy, including in finance and cross-border financial services. "Financial innovation is where we must win to become a financial powerhouse," he told participants. "We have introduced the licensing system for digital asset trading platforms and stablecoin, and are advancing regulatory arrangements for custody and over-the-counter trading. "This month, we will release the second policy statement on the development of digital assets in Hong Kong, focusing on the integration of financial services and innovation, as well as the expansion of application scenarios for digital assets." Chan also said the Hong Kong interbank offered rate might remain low for a period of time – due to a surge in capital inflows to the city as global investors scale back on US dollar-denominated asset holdings and reallocate their investment portfolios. He said the city offers a stable environment for investors amid complicated geopolitical landscape, adding that the government is also proactively attracting more leading mainland enterprises to list in the SAR to support their overseas expansion plans.
HKFP
3 days ago
- HKFP
4 Hong Kong activists fined up to HK$6,600 for fundraising and displaying posters without permit
Four Hong Kong pro-democracy activists have been fined up to HK$6,600 after being found guilty of raising funds and displaying posters in public without a permit in 2023. League of Social Democrats (LSD)'s chairperson Chan Po-ying, the group's vice-chairs Dickson Chau and Yu Wai-pan, and activist Lee Ying-chi were convicted on Thursday at the Eastern Magistrates' Courts. They were found guilty of 12 counts of collecting money in a public place without a permit and displaying bills or posters on government land without permission. Before the judge delivered the verdict, the four activists unfurled a banner outside the courthouse accusing authorities of 'suppressing freedom of expression.' The offences were linked to street booths the LSD set up on April 2, April 30, and May 28, 2023, in Causeway Bay and Wan Chai. According to the prosecution, they displayed a blank black cloth and handed out leaflets with QR codes for the party's donation link and its PayMe profile. During the trial earlier this year, the defendants challenged whether the black cloth should be considered a poster and therefore regulated under the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance. Magistrate Minnie Wat ruled on Thursday that the black cloth, approximately two metres long, had been displayed in an 'eye-catching spot' at the street booth. Referring to footage recorded by the police, Wat said the defendants had told the public that they hung a blank black cloth because they could be fined if any words were written on the banner. Wat sided with the prosecution, saying that the definition of a poster was 'broad' and that the purpose of the legislation was to impose 'appropriate rules to prevent chaos.' As the black cloth was used to 'spread ideas in public' and was displayed for around two hours each time at the street booths, it met the definition of a poster, she said. 'Although the black cloth had no words, it was displayed to express the defendants' political views and opinions about the government,' the magistrate said in Cantonese. Wat also rejected the defendants' argument that there was no evidence they were raising funds at the street booths. She said the court should not focus solely on whether the word 'fundraising' appeared on the leaflets. Even if the QR code was small, that did not mean the defendants were not soliciting donations. 'They could have removed the QR code and their bank account number if they had no intention of raising funds,' Wat said. During the trial, the defendants questioned why the police only filmed their street booths without taking any action. Wat responded that the legislation does not require police to issue a warning before enforcement. She added that the absence of a warning did not mean the acts were not in breach of the law. Chau, who represented himself, said during the trial that the QR code in fact did not work. At the time, the party's HSBC bank account had already been frozen, he said. Wat eventually convicted the four activists on all 12 charges and fined them between HK$1,000 and HK$1,200 per summons. Chan, who had six summonses, received a total fine of HK$6,600, while Chau, with two summonses, was fined HK$2,000. Lee had three summonses and was fined HK$3,000, and Yu was ordered to pay HK$1,000 for one summons. During mitigation, Chau said the LSD was the last activist group still organising street booths to voice their opinions. In response to the magistrate's remark that the legislation aimed to prevent people from 'fighting for space' to hold street demonstrations, Chau said the magistrate's 'aspiration' was 'far from reality.' 'We only want more people in society to express their views to the government. Unfortunately, the government's response is prosecution,' he said in Cantonese, adding that he had been an activist for over a decade and had not previously been prosecuted for carrying out similar acts. Yu, on the other hand, called the case 'political prosecution' and accused the authorities of 'weaponising' laws to suppress civic rights. 'Even if it is not the national security law but just summons, it is eroding our freedoms step by step, until we can no longer even organise a street booth,' he said in Cantonese. Speaking to reporters after the verdict, Chan said she believed they were innocent but was 'not surprised' by the court's ruling. She said the legislation concerning poster displays used to target banners or posters affixed to street barricades by politicians or political groups, rather than those displayed during a demonstration. She added the legislation contained many 'loopholes' and that their street booth should be regarded as a political activity held sporadically, and therefore should not be subject to regulation.
