logo
'Well-connected people trying to stop solar park being built'

'Well-connected people trying to stop solar park being built'

BBC News29-01-2025

People living in some of Britain's most picturesque villages have been divided by plans for a one of the biggest solar parks in the country.Developers want to build solar panels on 2,000 acres of farmland near Malmesbury in the Cotswolds, producing enough energy for 115,000 homes.Rosie Clark is one of hundreds of local campaigners who believes it will "decimate the local area". But supporters of the scheme, including the former mayor of Malmesbury Lesley Bennett, accused opponents of being "well-connected people" whose leaflets are "full of mistakes". The government wants to quadruple the amount of solar power generated in the UK. But wherever developers propose new solar farms, opposition springs up.
Rosie Clark lives in a stone cottage surrounded by Cotswold fields and hedgerows in Wiltshire.She is worried there could be more than "a million panels which will be as high as a double-decker bus".The developers have not confirmed exact numbers, but have said it would be 'at least around 700,000 panels'.
"It will completely swamp nine local villages," Ms Clark said."We are in an area of outstanding national beauty. It will decimate the local area, which relies a lot on tourism."
Meanwhile, Lesley Bennett is one of a few people who will speak up for the solar scheme. "It's nimbyism, it's perfect nimbyism," she said."We need clean energy. We need to be energy independent."The campaign to Stop Lime Down is well organised. Hundreds of people have been signed up, leaflets printed, there are signs everywhere in these north Wiltshire villages.But Mrs Bennett thinks there are many silent solar supporters, who dare not speak up."It's a few well-connected rich people who've created a brilliant campaign," she says."But it's an illusion. This leaflet is full of mistakes."
Campaigners are well aware the odds are against them.Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has already approved several big solar schemes, just as big as Lime Down.Mr Miliband wants to quadruple the UK's solar power generation capacity, which he says will "make the UK a clean energy superpower".Ms Clark said she is "all for wind and solar energy", just not on farmland."We should not be using agricultural land and destroying our future food security for solar panels," she said.
Mrs Bennett highlighted that only half of the 2,000 acres (878 hectares) proposed for development would have solar panels or related buildings on.The developers, Island Green Power, have allocated 47% of the land for environmental purposes.Mrs Bennett said that solar fields have always worked alongside nature.She said: "You can have sheep on there, you can have wildlife on there, they put in beehives and ponds and all sorts."The company's first public consultation ran into serious opposition. Their own report found that 88% of local people were opposed to their plans.Now the developers, Island Green Power, said they have listened and learned.Will Threllfall, senior project development manager, said he was 'really grateful' to everyone who responded.
The new proposals they are now consulting on include changes, he said, which will make the solar panels less visible and less intrusive.But they remain committed to the basic plan, with 878 hectares ( 2170 acres) in the scheme, of which 53% is either solar panels or related infrastructure.Mr Threlfall said: "Projects like Lime Down Solar are vital to enabling the transition from fossil fuel to low carbon energy, and we're committed to delivering a scheme that makes a meaningful contribution to both local and national energy needs."The formal public consultation will run until 19 March 2025. After that, the company will submit a planning application which will in the end be decided by the Secretary of State. The scheme is considered too big to be judged by a local council alone.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour MSP's bid to criminalise wiping government WhatsApps
Labour MSP's bid to criminalise wiping government WhatsApps

The Herald Scotland

time4 days ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Labour MSP's bid to criminalise wiping government WhatsApps

Ms Clark's Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill would overhaul the country's two-decade-old FOI laws and introduce penalties for the destruction of material that could be subject to public scrutiny. READ MORE 'It is completely unacceptable for politicians and officials to wipe WhatsApps, texts and other messages about the work of government and public bodies,' the West of Scotland MSP said. 'Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney still have very serious questions to answer about the disappearance of all of their WhatsApp messages about the SNP's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Their explanations about the unavailability of these messages is simply not good enough given the lives lost and the catastrophic decision to admit infected patients into care homes at the height of the outbreak. "Nicola Sturgeon, in particular, has offered up remarkably similar excuses to Boris Johnson when failing to provide WhatsApp messages from her phone to the Covid public inquiry. " The Member's Bill proposes sweeping reforms, including the removal of the First Minister's power to override Freedom Of Information (FOI) rulings made by the Scottish Information Commissioner — a power that has never been used but has long been criticised by transparency campaigners. Ms Clark said her proposals would address what she claimed as a long-standing culture of secrecy in government, particularly under the SNP. The legislation would also make clear that deleting messages or documents that could be subject to FOI requests — even before a request is made — would be a criminal offence if done deliberately or recklessly. 'The SNP has spent nearly 20 years attempting to evade freedom of information requests from the public and journalists,' she said. 'Nicola Sturgeon's and John Swinney's disappearing WhatsApp messages speak volumes about their party's contempt for the public's right to know about what were quite literally life-and-death decisions made by the government. 'Scotland's freedom of information laws urgently need to be tightened up and extended to cover any area that involves the use of taxpayers' money.' David Hamilton, the Scottish Information Commissioner, welcomed the Bill and said it was time to modernise FOI for the digital age. 'In the 20 years since it was introduced, FOI has had a big impact, with more than 1.4 million requests made to Scotland's public bodies,' he said. 'After 20 years though, it is undoubtedly time for a refresh — not least because there have been massive changes in both the way we access information and the way public bodies deliver their services.' He said the current system had failed to keep pace with how decisions are made and information is shared — particularly when services are delivered by third parties or decisions are taken through informal communications such as WhatsApp. Nicola Sturgeon giving evidence to the Covid Inquiry (Image: PA) The inquiry into the Covid-19 pandemic heard how both Ms Sturgeon and Mr Swinney failed to retain messages that might have shed light on key decisions taken at the height of the crisis. Ms Sturgeon has said she had 'nothing to hide' but admitted under questioning that she had deleted the messages herself, citing long-standing advice not to retain informal communications on insecure devices. Appearing before the inquiry last year, she said: 'In line with the advice I'd always been given since my first day in government probably was not to retain conversations like that on a phone that could be lost or stolen and therefore not secure.' Asked directly whether she had deleted her WhatsApp messages, she replied: 'Yes.' That was despite a commitment in 2021 that all correspondence would be handed over to any future inquiry, including WhatsApps and private emails. READ MORE Ken Thomson, who was director general for strategy and external affairs under Ms Sturgeon, was found to have written in a civil servant WhatsApp group: 'Just to remind you (seriously) this is discoverable under FOI. Know where the 'clear chat' button is.' He added: 'Plausible deniability are my middle names. Now clear it again.' In evidence to the inquiry, Mr Thomson denied that there had been a culture of evasion and insisted the remarks were light-hearted. A spokesperson for the Scottish Government said: 'Scotland has the most open and far-reaching Freedom of Information legislation in the UK. As this Member's Bill has now been introduced, it will be scrutinised by Parliament and we will consider its detail.'

Senior police officer who wrote the Met's drugs strategy fired for second time after refusing to take drugs test
Senior police officer who wrote the Met's drugs strategy fired for second time after refusing to take drugs test

Scottish Sun

time5 days ago

  • Scottish Sun

Senior police officer who wrote the Met's drugs strategy fired for second time after refusing to take drugs test

Commander Bennett had previously refused to provide a urine sample in 2020 TEST SHUNNED Senior police officer who wrote the Met's drugs strategy fired for second time after refusing to take drugs test A SENIOR police officer has been fired for a second time after refusing to take a drugs test. Commander Julian Bennett last year successfully appealed against his initial dismissal in 2023. The Met then ordered a fresh misconduct hearing for his refusal to provide a urine sample in 2020. It again found him guilty of gross misconduct. The cop, on the force since 1976, had been suspended on full pay throughout the process. Met Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said: 'I am enormously concerned that almost five years since this incident happened we have only now been able to dismiss Commander Bennett. 'This should have been a simple matter. Commander Bennett has never disputed he refused a lawful order to take a drugs test. 'As a senior officer who had chaired misconduct hearings, Commander Bennett was highly experienced and knew full well what was required of him, yet he made a choice not to co-operate. 'He has been suspended on full pay for an extraordinary length of time. I am sure Londoners will be as outraged as we are at the utter waste of public funds spent paying a senior officer to sit at home suspended and not work.' Mr Bennett wrote the Met's drugs strategy for 2017-21, titled Dealing With The Impact Of Drugs On Communities.

Senior Met officer sacked for second time over refusing drugs test
Senior Met officer sacked for second time over refusing drugs test

South Wales Guardian

time5 days ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Senior Met officer sacked for second time over refusing drugs test

Commander Julian Bennett was initially dismissed by a misconduct panel in October 2023 over the incident, but took his case to the Police Appeals Tribunal (PAT) in July last year and had his sacking overturned. He was found to have committed gross misconduct by failing to provide a urine sample for a drugs test on July 21 2020, which led to his suspension shortly afterwards. A panel found he had breached professional standards when he refused to provide the sample after being called in to do so in the presence of an assistant commissioner, instead offering to resign on the spot and asking for a meeting with then-commissioner Dame Cressida Dick. Following the PAT's decision to revoke the dismissal, the Met considered a legal challenge by way of a Judicial Review but decided that Mr Bennett should face a fresh misconduct hearing last September. The allegation proven against Mr Bennett was again found at the level of gross misconduct at the latest hearing. The officer, who served in the force from 1976, had remained suspended throughout the process and will now be added to the College of Policing's barred list. Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said: 'I am enormously concerned that almost five years since this incident happened we have only now been able to dismiss Commander Bennett. 'This should have been a simple matter. Commander Bennett has never disputed he refused a lawful order to take a drugs test. 'As a senior officer who had chaired misconduct hearings, Commander Bennett was highly experienced and knew full well what was required of him, yet he made a choice not to co-operate. 'He has been suspended on full pay for an extraordinary length of time. I am sure Londoners will be as outraged as we are at the utter waste of public funds spent paying a senior officer to sit at home suspended and not work.' Mr Twist said that 'while the Met is not responsible for all the delays in Commander Bennett's matter, we are also working hard to expedite cases and cut bureaucracy', adding: 'I am confident a situation like Commander Bennett's prolonged case would not happen again.' Mr Bennett wrote the Met's drugs strategy for 2017-21 as a commander for territorial policing. The document, called Dealing With The Impact Of Drugs On Communities, set up plans to raise 'awareness of the impact of drug misuse'. He chaired misconduct panels over several years and freedom of information requests showed he presided over 74 misconduct hearings involving 90 officers between June 2010 and February 2012, leading to 56 officers being dismissed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store