logo
Congress's High-Stakes Gamble: Repealing California's Clean Car And Truck Programs

Congress's High-Stakes Gamble: Repealing California's Clean Car And Truck Programs

Forbes22-05-2025

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 19: U.S. Senate Minority Whip Sen. John Thune (R-SD) speaks to members of ... More the press as Senate Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) (R) listens during a news briefing after a weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on December 19, 2023 in Washington, DC. Senate GOPs held a policy luncheon to discuss the Republican agenda. (Photo by)
The irony is as thick as the smog that used to choke America's cities.
Republicans in the 119th Congress, which have been the party to champion state rights, is using the Congressional Repeal Act (CRA) to strip away California's right to protect the health and welfare of its citizens – essentially forcing millions of Californians to breathe dirty air.
The state's first waiver to set stricter tailpipe pollution rules under the Clean Air Act was granted in 1968 by Republican President Richard Nixon, and it has received about 100 waivers from the federal government to cut air pollution since then.
This is the state with five of the ten cities in the country with the worst air quality. This is the state that represents the world's 4th largest economy, has a third of all electric vehicles (EV) in America, and the laboratory where many of the world's air pollution reduction technologies were pioneered. This is the state that has suffered some of the country's hardest economic hits from droughts, wildfires and storms.
But in an unprecedented and legally dubious action, the U.S. Senate today voted under the CRA to repeal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency waivers for California's clean car and truck programs. This action was taken even though the Senate Parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office have both declared that California waivers are not subject to CRA review, as they are not 'rules' but rather administrative decisions.
The CRA was established in 1996 to give Congress oversight of agency regulations. It allows Congress to review, and approve or repeal a new federal regulation within 60 days —not Agencies administrative decisions grounded in science and statutory interpretation with over 50 years of precedent.
By applying the CRA to California's waiver, Congress is choosing to steer America's government overreach into legally dangerous territory. If this tactic is allowed to stand, it opens the door for Congress to nullify any administrative decision—such as Department of Interior leases for oil and gas drilling, FDA drug approvals, Federal Trade Commission mergers and acquisitions, and countless other federal administrative actions. It risks turning the CRA into a blunt instrument for political interference in scientific and regulatory processes.
By any measure—legal precedent, public health, climate science, or economic competitiveness—the Senate's decision potential is a grave mistake. It not only violates the Clean Air Act's framework, but it would stall innovation, worsen air pollution, and undermine the American automaker's competitiveness against other national economies.
The EPA's waiver authority granted to California under Section 209 of the Clean Air Act is not a regulatory loophole—it is a cornerstone of U.S. environmental law. Since 1967, California has received waivers from Republican and Democratic administrations because of its 'compelling and extraordinary conditions,' including persistent smog and severe air pollution.
Before the Clean Air Act was signed, California's cities choked on air pollution so thick that residents wore gas masks outdoors to avoid choking smog and Los Angeles suffered through unhealthy levels of air pollution more than 200 days a year.
Fullerton, CA - April 10: The view of downtown Los Angeles is obscured by smog, heat and haze from ... More Panorama Nature Preserve in Fullerton Wednesday, April 10, 2024. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
Although California's car and truck emissions rules have been instrumental in reducing air pollution the state still needs urgent actions to meet clean air goals. The American Lung Association gave 26 of the state's 58 counties an 'F' grade for air pollution and 10 million Californians are breathing unhealthy air that can cause premature death from asthma and other respiratory illness.
The American Lung Association estimates that full implementation of the California clean car and truck standards by California and other adopting states could provide $150 billion in health benefits and save nearly 15,000 lives by 2050.
This repeal will not only hurt Americans' lungs, but it will hit consumers in their wallets. As EV rapidly approach price parity with gas-powered cars, they already save money on fuel and maintenance savings and while protecting drivers from pain at the pump by cutting exposure to volatile oil prices and global supply shocks.
Driving America's EV transition off a cliff will also set our economy back years against foreign competitors. The global auto industry is undergoing a transformation toward zero-emission vehicles. China and the European Union have already established strong policies to support the EV transition.
According to the International Energy Agency, China accounted for over two thirds of the 17 million EVs sold worldwide in 2024, exporting to emerging markets in Latin America and Asia while the U.S. falls further behind despite a hundred-billion dollar surge in domestic investment spurred by the Inflation Reduction Act.
California's leadership has been critical to driving this innovation. Automakers have already invested billions of dollars toward EV manufacturing and California's rules provide the long-term regulatory certainty that industry needs to scale clean technology and attract private investment. The 16 states that follow California's clean vehicle rules represent 40% of America's auto market.
Repealing the waiver now would disrupt billions in planned investments and send a chilling signal to clean tech companies that America cannot be counted on to maintain consistent climate policies. This will hinder job creation, reduce market certainty, and allow global competitors to outpace U.S. innovation.
At a time when climate risks are escalating, and economic opportunities in clean energy are booming, stripping California of its long-standing authority is irresponsible. This is not just about California—it is about the future we choose for every American.
History has been unforgiving of governments and leaders that believe that they can ignore the rule of law. Waiver repeal will undoubtedly face legal challenges, but more than just clean air or economic competitiveness are at stake here – states' rights themselves are under attack. All Americans can breathe easier if California's waiver is preserved.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio
Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio

Gina Ortiz Jones, a lesbian and military veteran who served in President Joe Biden's administration, has been elected mayor of San Antonio, the second-largest city in Texas and seventh-largest in the U.S. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Jones beat Rolando Pablos, a former Texas secretary of state, in a runoff election Saturday. The margin was 54.3 percent to 45.7 percent, according to Ballotpedia. They advanced to the runoff because no candidate out of 27 in the May 3 general election received a majority of the vote. In the general election, Jones led with 27.2 percent and Pablos came in second with 16.6 percent. The current mayor, Ron Nirenberg, could not run again due to term limits. Races for mayor and other city positions in San Antonio are officially nonpartisan, but this election was partisan in practice. Jones emphasized her affiliation with the Democratic Party, while Pablos, who was elected secretary of state as a Republican, highlighted his ties to leading Republicans such as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. RELATED: Jones was undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration; she was the first lesbian, second member of the LGBTQ+ community, and first woman of color (she's Filipina American) to serve in the post. She twice ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. House as a Democrat. She was an intelligence officer in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq during the war there, serving under 'don't ask, don't tell.' After leaving the Air Force, she worked for the federal government as an adviser on intelligence and trade, with agencies including the Defense Intelligence Agency and Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. She left government service six months into Donald Trump's first term. In the mayoral race, 'she campaigned on her plans to expand early-childhood education to more children and increase affordable housing and work programs for unskilled workers,' The New York Times reports. 'San Antonio showed up and showed out,' she told supporters Saturday night after the results came in. 'We reminded them that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind. … So I look forward to being a mayor for all.' RELATED: Lesbian Gina Ortiz Jones Wants to Be Texas's First Out Congress Member Two other cities among the largest 10 in the nation have had LGBTQ+, specifically lesbian, mayors. Annise Parker was mayor of Texas's largest city, Houston, from 2010 to 2016. Until recently, she was president and CEO of the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund. Houston is the fourth-largest city in the U.S. Another lesbian, Lori Lightfoot, was mayor of Chicago, the third-largest, from 2019 to 2023. Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson hailed Jones's victory, releasing this statement: 'Every one of us deserves leaders who value equality and will fight to ensure that we can live freely without fear of discrimination. Gina Ortiz Jones is that leader. That's why HRC was proud to make calls and knock doors to help mobilize Equality Voters in San Antonio and put her over the finish line. Her win isn't just exciting, it's historic; as the first ever openly LGBTQ+ mayor of San Antonio during a time of ceaseless attacks on our community, Gina is emblematic of the resilience, strength, and joy that our community has already used to thrive in challenging times. We can't wait to see her get to work tackling the problems that are impacting our neighbors, families and coworkers and standing up for the rights and safety of every San Antonian.' Evan Low, president and CEO of LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, which endorsed Jones, issued this statement: 'Gina Ortiz-Jones is LGBTQ+ Victory Fund family, and we are proud to see her rise to lead America's seventh-largest city as mayor. As a veteran, her service reflects the estimated 1 million LGBTQ+ veterans who have contributed to our nation with honor, distinction, and an unyielding warrior spirit. San Antonio voters made the right call by sending Gina to City Hall, not only making history but selecting a candidate who is driven to make lives better in her hometown.' Jones will be sworn in June 18 for a four-year term.

About 700 Marines being mobilized in response to LA protests
About 700 Marines being mobilized in response to LA protests

CNN

time36 minutes ago

  • CNN

About 700 Marines being mobilized in response to LA protests

More than 700 Marines based out of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California have been mobilized to respond to the protests in Los Angeles, and the troops will join the thousands of National Guard members who were activated by President Donald Trump over the weekend without the consent of California's governor or LA's mayor. The deployment of the full Marine battalion marks a significant escalation in Trump's use of the military as a show of force against protesters, but it is still unclear what their specific task will be once in LA, sources told CNN. Like the National Guard troops, they are prohibited from conducting law enforcement activity such as making arrests unless Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, which permits the president to use the military to end an insurrection or rebellion of federal power. The Marines being activated are with 2nd battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine division, according to US Northern Command. The activation is 'intended to provide Task Force 51 with adequate numbers of forces to provide continuous coverage of the area in support of the lead federal agency,' NORTHCOM said in statement, referring to US Army north's contingency command post. One of the people familiar with the Marine mobilization said they will be augmenting the guard presence on the ground in LA. Over 2,000 members of the California National Guard have been activated by the president, but only about 300 have been deployed to the streets of LA so far. Those initial 300 people were on a routine National Guard drill weekend when they were mobilized, which is why they were able to arrive so quickly, the person familiar said; it can take up to 72 hours for other guardsmen to be mobilized. The Marines are expected to bolster some of the guard members who have been deployed to LA in the last two days, this person said. And while the person familiar stressed that the Marines were being deployed only to augment the forces already there, the image of US Marines mobilizing inside the United States will stand in contrast to National Guardsmen who more routinely respond to domestic issues. While some Marines have been assisting in border security at the southern border, one US official said Marines have not been mobilized within the US like they are in California now since the 1992 riots in Los Angeles. While the Marines' tasks have not been specified publicly, they could include assignments like crowd control or establishing perimeter security. Lawyers within the Defense Department are also still finalizing language around the use-of-force guidelines for the troops being mobilized, but the person familiar said it will likely mirror the military's standing rules of the use of force. California Gov. Gavin Newsom described the involvement of Marines as 'unwarranted' and 'unprecedented.' 'The level of escalation is completely unwarranted, uncalled for, and unprecedented — mobilizing the best in class branch of the U.S. military against its own citizens,' Newsom said in a statement linking to a news story about the Marines mobilizing. Newsom disputed the characterization as a 'deployment,' which the governor described as different from mobilization. US Northern Command said in their statement, however, that the Marines will 'seamlessly integrate' with National Guard forces 'protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area.' Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell called for 'open and continuous lines of communication' between all agencies responding to protests in the city ahead of the deployment of US Marines. McDonell said in a statement that his agency and other partner agencies have experience dealing with large-scale demonstrations and safety remains a top priority for them. That communication will 'prevent confusion, avoid escalation, and ensure a coordinated, lawful, and orderly response during this critical time,' McDonnell stressed. This story and headline have been updated with additional developments.

Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts
Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts

Axios

time38 minutes ago

  • Axios

Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts

Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) will hold a "shadow hearing" Thursday to draw a direct link between President Trump's plans to cut foreign assistance and the farmers that sell their crops to the programs. Why it matters: Democrats are looking for ways to make Trump's DOGE and budget plans uncomfortable for farm state Republicans and want to appeal directly to their constituents. The Trump administration has called for deep spending reductions for international food programs run by the United States Agency for International Development and the Department of Agriculture. Those programs buy agricultural products from U.S. farmers to the tune of $2 billion a year, according to Shaheen. Some farm state Republicans have questioned administration st officials about programs like Food for Peace. Zoom out: Democrats are trying to broaden their case against the Trump administration's budget, which will receive its first official vote this week, when the House brings up Trump's rescissions package, which cuts funding for NPR, PBS and USAID. Zoom in: On Thursday, Shaheen, the ranking member on the foreign relations committee, and Klobuchar, the ranking member of the agriculture subcommittee on nutrition and forestry will host a group of experts to detail the effect of the cuts to foreign aid on U.S. farmers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store