
Congress's High-Stakes Gamble: Repealing California's Clean Car And Truck Programs
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 19: U.S. Senate Minority Whip Sen. John Thune (R-SD) speaks to members of ... More the press as Senate Minority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) (R) listens during a news briefing after a weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on December 19, 2023 in Washington, DC. Senate GOPs held a policy luncheon to discuss the Republican agenda. (Photo by)
The irony is as thick as the smog that used to choke America's cities.
Republicans in the 119th Congress, which have been the party to champion state rights, is using the Congressional Repeal Act (CRA) to strip away California's right to protect the health and welfare of its citizens – essentially forcing millions of Californians to breathe dirty air.
The state's first waiver to set stricter tailpipe pollution rules under the Clean Air Act was granted in 1968 by Republican President Richard Nixon, and it has received about 100 waivers from the federal government to cut air pollution since then.
This is the state with five of the ten cities in the country with the worst air quality. This is the state that represents the world's 4th largest economy, has a third of all electric vehicles (EV) in America, and the laboratory where many of the world's air pollution reduction technologies were pioneered. This is the state that has suffered some of the country's hardest economic hits from droughts, wildfires and storms.
But in an unprecedented and legally dubious action, the U.S. Senate today voted under the CRA to repeal U.S. Environmental Protection Agency waivers for California's clean car and truck programs. This action was taken even though the Senate Parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office have both declared that California waivers are not subject to CRA review, as they are not 'rules' but rather administrative decisions.
The CRA was established in 1996 to give Congress oversight of agency regulations. It allows Congress to review, and approve or repeal a new federal regulation within 60 days —not Agencies administrative decisions grounded in science and statutory interpretation with over 50 years of precedent.
By applying the CRA to California's waiver, Congress is choosing to steer America's government overreach into legally dangerous territory. If this tactic is allowed to stand, it opens the door for Congress to nullify any administrative decision—such as Department of Interior leases for oil and gas drilling, FDA drug approvals, Federal Trade Commission mergers and acquisitions, and countless other federal administrative actions. It risks turning the CRA into a blunt instrument for political interference in scientific and regulatory processes.
By any measure—legal precedent, public health, climate science, or economic competitiveness—the Senate's decision potential is a grave mistake. It not only violates the Clean Air Act's framework, but it would stall innovation, worsen air pollution, and undermine the American automaker's competitiveness against other national economies.
The EPA's waiver authority granted to California under Section 209 of the Clean Air Act is not a regulatory loophole—it is a cornerstone of U.S. environmental law. Since 1967, California has received waivers from Republican and Democratic administrations because of its 'compelling and extraordinary conditions,' including persistent smog and severe air pollution.
Before the Clean Air Act was signed, California's cities choked on air pollution so thick that residents wore gas masks outdoors to avoid choking smog and Los Angeles suffered through unhealthy levels of air pollution more than 200 days a year.
Fullerton, CA - April 10: The view of downtown Los Angeles is obscured by smog, heat and haze from ... More Panorama Nature Preserve in Fullerton Wednesday, April 10, 2024. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
Although California's car and truck emissions rules have been instrumental in reducing air pollution the state still needs urgent actions to meet clean air goals. The American Lung Association gave 26 of the state's 58 counties an 'F' grade for air pollution and 10 million Californians are breathing unhealthy air that can cause premature death from asthma and other respiratory illness.
The American Lung Association estimates that full implementation of the California clean car and truck standards by California and other adopting states could provide $150 billion in health benefits and save nearly 15,000 lives by 2050.
This repeal will not only hurt Americans' lungs, but it will hit consumers in their wallets. As EV rapidly approach price parity with gas-powered cars, they already save money on fuel and maintenance savings and while protecting drivers from pain at the pump by cutting exposure to volatile oil prices and global supply shocks.
Driving America's EV transition off a cliff will also set our economy back years against foreign competitors. The global auto industry is undergoing a transformation toward zero-emission vehicles. China and the European Union have already established strong policies to support the EV transition.
According to the International Energy Agency, China accounted for over two thirds of the 17 million EVs sold worldwide in 2024, exporting to emerging markets in Latin America and Asia while the U.S. falls further behind despite a hundred-billion dollar surge in domestic investment spurred by the Inflation Reduction Act.
California's leadership has been critical to driving this innovation. Automakers have already invested billions of dollars toward EV manufacturing and California's rules provide the long-term regulatory certainty that industry needs to scale clean technology and attract private investment. The 16 states that follow California's clean vehicle rules represent 40% of America's auto market.
Repealing the waiver now would disrupt billions in planned investments and send a chilling signal to clean tech companies that America cannot be counted on to maintain consistent climate policies. This will hinder job creation, reduce market certainty, and allow global competitors to outpace U.S. innovation.
At a time when climate risks are escalating, and economic opportunities in clean energy are booming, stripping California of its long-standing authority is irresponsible. This is not just about California—it is about the future we choose for every American.
History has been unforgiving of governments and leaders that believe that they can ignore the rule of law. Waiver repeal will undoubtedly face legal challenges, but more than just clean air or economic competitiveness are at stake here – states' rights themselves are under attack. All Americans can breathe easier if California's waiver is preserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Dallas Police Chief Daniel Comeaux clarifies immigration stance amid criticism
Dallas Police Chief Daniel Comeaux is taking on criticism following comments made during a recent interview about his department's stance on immigration enforcement. It was last week that Comeaux was seen and heard on a Fox News interview saying, "Pick another city. Don't come to Dallas, you are not welcome." While he was asked about immigration enforcement earlier in the interview, he said those words weren't aimed directly at immigrants in the country illegally, as many were led to believe. During a news conference late last week, the city's top cop addressed those comments. "That message is for all the felon warrants out there," said Comeaux. "That's who that message was to." He clarified his stance on immigration and working with federal law enforcement partners. "Our stance hasn't changed since I've been here," Comeaux said. "I've said the exact same thing every time about immigration. We're going to do the right thing. We're going to do our jobs, and we will not be searching for immigrants. We have no special programs where we are searching for immigrants." He did say Dallas police would be willing to assist all federal agencies that request help, including immigration authorities. "If DEA, FBI, ATF, HSI, ERO needs our assistance as a law enforcement partner, we will be there to help them," said Comeaux. It's the same stance that has been taken with previous Dallas police chiefs. Former interim Dallas police chief emphasized community with immigration enforcement policy In February, then-interim chief Michael Igo highlighted the importance of trust between law enforcement and the community for public safety, telling the community that officers will not inquire about immigration status unless necessary for specific investigations. "Trust between law enforcement and the communities we serve is essential to public safety," Igo said. "All persons should know that they should never hesitate to report crimes, seek help, or cooperate with police." He emphasized the department's priorities, including investigating crimes, responding to emergencies, reducing violent crimes, and protecting constitutional rights. He reiterated that Dallas PD will not participate in immigration enforcement efforts but will assist in the arrest of individuals wanted for criminal offenses, regardless of their immigration status. Igo also said that arrests and raids would not be carried out in churches, schools or hospitals, but said that illegal immigrants with outstanding warrants were at risk of deportation. Afterward, Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation and issued a formal request for records concerning the Department's "refusal to comply with state and federal immigration laws." Trump's evolving immigration policies In January, Trump signed off on local law enforcement assisting Immigration and Customs Enforcement to enforce federal immigration laws. He also threatened to withhold federal funding from "sanctuary cities." As the Trump administration implements new strategies to reshape U.S. immigration policies, conditions for undocumented migrants, including those attending court hearings for legal status, have become more hostile, prompting some asylum-seekers to reconsider continuing their cases or to leave voluntarily. ICE agents arrest immigrants at Dallas courthouse At the Dallas federal courthouse and federal courthouses around the country, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been arresting immigrants who show up for their scheduled hearings. According to attorneys, this is part of a new tactic by the Trump administration to fast-track the removal of migrants who arrived in the U.S. in the past two years. With millions caught in the backlog, it can normally take years for those seeking relief to go through the immigration court process. Under the direction of the Department of Homeland Security, ICE attorneys are dropping cases against some migrants, removing their temporary protected status, and making them immediately eligible for arrest and deportation. This is happening during what's called a master calendar docket, a check-in early in the immigration case process. DHS defends immigration policy shift In an emailed statement to CBS News Texas, the Department of Homeland Security wrote: "Secretary Noem is reversing Biden's catch-and-release policy that allowed millions of unvetted illegal aliens to be let loose on American streets. This administration is once again implementing the rule of law. "Most aliens who illegally entered the United States within the past two years are subject to expedited removals. Biden ignored this legal fact and chose to release millions of illegal aliens, including violent criminals, into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge. ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been.


CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Airlines offering vouchers, new flights for passengers impacted by airport delays during Army parade in DC
Passengers flying through Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on Saturday will experience delays as the Army celebrates its 250th birthday with a parade and flyover in Washington, DC. The celebration, which coincides with President Donald Trump's birthday, will impact vehicle and airline traffic. The Federal Aviation Administration said it will issue temporary flight restrictions for the Washington area during the celebration, which begins with a parade at 6:30 p.m. and ends with fireworks at 9:45 p.m. From 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday, 65 flights are scheduled to arrive at Reagan airport in Northern Virginia and 39 are scheduled to depart, according to Cirium, an aviation analytics firm. The airport is accommodating for the military flyovers along the parade route and a fireworks display, according to its website. The FAA is working with the Department of Defense to finalize a flyover plan, which will detail the aircraft involved. 'The FAA will implement traffic management initiatives at DCA before, during, and after the event to ensure safety and will facilitate a return to normal operations once the event concludes,' the agency said in a statement. 'During the peak of the celebration, the TMI stops all arrivals and departures.' United Airlines told CNN it is offering a travel waiver for Reagan flyers and is adding two additional departures and two arrivals at Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia as an alternative. Delta Air Lines has a fare-difference waiver for passengers who want to move their booked travel to another day. Southwest Airlines said passengers on the approximately 20 scheduled flights can anticipate some delays, but it is planning for no cancellations. There is also a travel waiver in place for Southwest flyers. Alaska Airlines' exposure is fairly limited during the celebration window, and the airline canceled one flight to San Francisco International Airport and rebooked it to Dulles. It estimates the three flights scheduled during the time frame to be delayed for an hour. The hold on airport traffic comes after the January midair collision between an American Airlines regional jet and an Army Black Hawk military helicopter. The crash, which killed 67 people, led to a ban on helicopter traffic on a four-mile stretch over the Potomac River.


CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Fetterman calls out Democrats for not condemning LA protest violence. Lawmakers respond.
US Sen. Chris Murphy and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez push back on Sen. John Fetterman's criticism of his fellow Democrats for not condemning the violence associated with the LA protests. Posting on 'X,' he said that his party 'loses the moral high ground."