From natural disasters to humanitarian emergencies
On 12th January 2010, Haiti was hit by a powerful earthquake with the epicentre about 25 km from the capital Port-au-Prince. The death toll was well over a 100,000 people, and some estimates put the number to be above 300,000.
During the rebuilding phase, and to maintain law and order, the UN deployed peacekeeping forces that were in addition to the existing UN mission in the country. In late October, a group of peacekeepers arrived from Nepal. In Nepal, these peacekeepers were exposed to cholera and some were suffering from it (but probably not showing any symptoms). No tests were done before or after their arrival in Haiti, even though such a test would have cost less than three dollars per person and were widely available. In Haiti, these peacekeepers from Nepal were housed in poorly constructed facilities, and soon one of the sewage reservoirs burst and entered one of the main waterways in Haiti. An outbreak of cholera soon engulfed the country to the extent that over 2,000 people died in just the first month alone.
Before 2010, Haiti had never had a cholera outbreak in its entire history, and there was no local knowledge or infrastructure to contain the disease. This was also the time when the country was still suffering from the aftermath of the devastating earthquake. The cholera outbreak continued unabated and caused immense suffering in the country. By July 2011, the rate of spread of the disease was about one person getting infected every minute. Over the course of the next few years, more than ten thousand people had died and more than half a million had gotten sick. The UN continued to deflect blame for nearly a decade, and even when it offered a weak apology (after there was irrefutable genomic evidence), there was no compensation for the victims. It pledged $400 million for rebuilding, but even after a decade since the outbreak only 5% of the total amount had been raised, and less than 1% ($3 million) had been spent on rebuilding. Countless families still bear those scars. Yet, most countries that champion care and concern for the poor of the world on paper have moved on. Cholera in Haiti is no longer on their radar.
Late last month, a terrifying earthquake hit Myanmar. The death toll is already in several thousands, but analysts fear that it will continue to rise. The final number may never be known. Here, a different dynamic is playing out. The military junta that is in power, and locked in a bloody civil war, has a terrible record of weaponising aid. In previous natural disasters such as Cyclone Mocha in 2023 and Typhoon Yagi in 2024, the military allowed aid to reach only the areas it controlled, while blocking it in parts that it no longer had control over. There is fear that the same story may play out again, thereby creating a painful and long-term humanitarian crisis for millions of poor people on the heels of a natural disaster.
The situations in Haiti and the evolving situation in Myanmar are different in many ways, and those differences need to be recognised. But there are also important similarities that should trouble us. In both cases, the affected community suffers not just because of a natural disaster, but because how aid is managed, delivered and denied. People end paying a price not just because of the catastrophic event, but because those in power, or with power, fail to see the humanity and suffering of people that do not care about. The evolution of a natural disaster into a chronic humanitarian emergency is neither automatic nor inevitable. It is shepherded by decisions and decision-makers. It is built on decisions around who is worthy of support and who is dispensable.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
UN says malnutrition rate among Gaza children triples
A boy in Gaza is fed with food from a community kitchen at the Muwasi camp for displaced Palestinians in Khan Younis on 18 May. PHOTO: AP The rate of children suffering from acute malnutrition in Gaza has nearly tripled since a ceasefire earlier this year when aid flowed more freely, according to data collected by humanitarian groups and released by the UN on Thursday. The report was issued at a time when aid distribution in the Palestinian enclave is under intense scrutiny because of deadly shootings close to the operations of a new US-backed system. After the two-month ceasefire broke down in March, Israel blockaded aid supplies into Gaza for 11 weeks. Israel, which has only partially lifted the blockade since, vets all aid into Gaza and accuses Hamas of stealing some of it – something the group denies. Around 5.8% out of nearly 50,000 children under five who were screened in the second half of May were diagnosed with acute malnutrition. This was up from 4.7% in early May and nearly three times the rate in February during a pause in fighting in the 20-month war between Israel and Hamas, an analysis by a group of UN and other aid agencies known as the nutrition cluster showed. The analysis also reported an increase in severe acute malnutrition cases among childrena life-threatening condition that compromises the immune system. A Palestinian minister reported 29 starvation-related deaths among the children and elderly in just a few days last month. The report stated that the centres to support medical complications from severe cases in north Gaza and Rafah in the south of the enclave have been forced to close, leaving children without access to lifesaving treatment


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
US-backed Gaza aid group says resumes food distribution
GAZA CITY: The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund said Thursday it had resumed food distribution in the war-torn Palestinian territory, after pausing operations for a day following reports of deadly shootings. 'GHF can confirm that we were open for distribution today,' the group said in an email to AFP, adding it had delivered 1.4 million meals at two sites on Thursday and 8.4 million meals since opening a little over a week ago. The group shut down its distribution centres on Wednesday for what it called 'reorganisation' in an effort to improve its work, after its first week of operations was marred by global criticism. Reports from Gaza that dozens were killed over the course of three days as they attempted to reach the aid centres drew sharp condemnation from the United Nations. The UN and major aid organisations have refused to cooperate with the GHF, citing concerns that it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. US vetoes UN Security Council demand for Gaza ceasefire Israel's military has maintained it does not prevent Gazans from collecting aid. But army spokesperson Effie Defrin said on Tuesday that soldiers had fired towards suspects who 'were approaching in a way that endangered' the troops, adding the incident was being investigated. The GHF, officially a private effort with opaque funding, began operations last week after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months amid a breakdown in negotiations for a ceasefire with Palestinian group Hamas. For decades, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA had spearheaded aid distribution in Gaza, with dozens of other organisations participating in efforts to assist the population.


Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at Security Council
UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, a measure expected to fail due to a US veto. It is the 15-member body's first vote on the subject since November, when the United States – a key Israeli ally – also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. The new resolution, seen by AFP, 'demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties.' It also calls for the 'immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Underlining a 'catastrophic humanitarian situation' in the Palestinian territory, the resolution additionally demands the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. US-backed Gaza aid group to halt distribution on Wednesday, UN to vote on ceasefire demand It will be put to vote at 4:00 pm Wednesday (2000 GMT), but several diplomats indicated to AFP that they expected the United States to wield its veto power. They added that the representatives from the 10 elected members of the Council, who will introduce the text, tried in vain to negotiate with the American side. The veto, if applied, would be the first by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations said that was not enough to meet the humanitarian needs. A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also come under criticism for going against long-standing aid principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent. Israeli bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in the Gaza Strip, including 12 in a single strike on a tent housing displaced people, the Palestinian territory's civil defense agency told AFP. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, on Tuesday urged the Council to act. 'All of us will be judged by history as to how much have we done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people,' he said. Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon lambasted the draft text. 'This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas,' he was to tell the council, according to remarks released by his office. 'It ignores the one party still endangering civilians in Gaza: Hamas.'