logo
Required hours for certain courses could soon be cut in some N.L. schools

Required hours for certain courses could soon be cut in some N.L. schools

Yahoo11-02-2025

Education Minister Krista Lynn Howell says students often lose interest in certain courses during junior high. (Julia Israel/CBC)
The Newfoundland and Labrador government is looking at making big changes to the public school curriculum, which could mean students in grades seven to nine have the option of taking fewer hours of instruction in music, social studies and French.
The Department of Education is looking to "modernize" the curriculum, which could make some courses fully or partially optional. It's part of a broader curriculum overhaul that is meant to improve outcomes in subjects like math and English and improve student engagement.
But Education Minister Krista Lynn Howell says students are still required to fulfil a minimum amount of hours in mandatory courses, such as social studies and religious education, to meet graduation requirements, but now they will have "a little bit more wiggle room."
"This was one thing that we figure would be a way to bring back some of that engagement and motivate students to continue to be in school," Howell said on Tuesday.
She said the new curriculum will still include essential lessons students would usually learn in a full course. Some social studies modules such as the Legacy of Confederation and Navigating Canadian Civics would still be mandatory, but modules like Echoes of War — Canada in WWI and WWII, would be optional.
Home economics, music and visual arts are among the courses that would become fully optional under the new curriculum.
The education minister also clarified that the possible cuts in instruction hours in certain courses doesn't mean the department needs less teachers.
"When we look at what the outcome should be, we want students who are well versed across all areas and have an opportunity to experience all different types of learning and different subject areas," said Howell.
"We want them to be able to pick things that are meaningful to them."
Trent Langdon, president of Newfoundland and Labrador's Teachers Association, says if some classes become optional then students will miss out on a 'fulsome' educational experience. (Arlette Lazarenko/CBC)
The province will start rolling out the changes in 14 schools in the 2025-26 school year.
Newfoundland and Labrador Teachers' Association (NLTA) president Trent Langdon said the proposed changes are well meaning, but they won't be a "silver bullet" to fix problems in the school system.
"Government's approach is ultimately — from what I've read and I've heard — that they want to increase student success. They want to increase engagement and motivation," Langdon told CBC Radio's The St. John's Morning Show.
However, if classes like social studies become optional, Langdon says there's a fear that students will lose a "fulsome" educational experience.
"There's so many valuable opportunities for learning outside of what is your typical math and reading-type approaches that gives the full experience, let alone the discussion around the arts and music and what that brings from a cultural perspective," he said.
LISTEN | CBC's Jen White chats with Trent Langdon on potential changes coming to the curriculum:
Those subjects help with brain development and help foster a greater understanding of what's happening in the world, he said.
"The more that we're aware of what's happening around the world, let alone south of the border right now, is essential to our learning," said Langdon.
Langdon says he approves of a curriculum "renewal," but teachers are dealing with other variables in the classroom, like students with mental health challenges, addictions or engrained absenteeism.
"Anytime you allow a young person the opportunity to, I guess, opt out or to take a certain path at a young age, are you ultimately limiting opportunities down the road? And that's the big question here," he said.
The education department is looking for feedback and a survey is open until Feb. 28 and a full list of proposed changes is available online.
French in the crosshairs
Some worry there will be further fallout if the new education plan goes ahead.
Maria Mayr is the head of Memorial University's department of modern languages, literatures and cultures. She says she was dismayed when she heard some French modules be become optional going forward.
Core French 7A and 7B will still be mandatory, but other learning modules will be optional.
Maria Mayr, head of Memorial University's department of modern languages, literatures and cultures, is worried students will miss out on learning French. (Jonny Hodder/CBC)
She's also worried that smaller schools in rural Newfoundland and Labrador could be harder hit by the change if it's brought in, since there are limited resources and teachers who could offer optional modules.
"What if only 10 students choose to do French? Will the school be able to actually choose to offer it?" said Mayr.
While the changes are meant to boost English and math skills, she said improving education should be done in a comprehensive manner.
Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump orders Marines to Los Angeles as protests escalate over immigration raids, demonstrating the president's power to deploy troops on US soil
Trump orders Marines to Los Angeles as protests escalate over immigration raids, demonstrating the president's power to deploy troops on US soil

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump orders Marines to Los Angeles as protests escalate over immigration raids, demonstrating the president's power to deploy troops on US soil

President Donald Trump ordered a contingent of about 700 Marines to Los Angeles on June 9, 2025, in response to what Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth described as 'increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings.' This dramatic escalation of the military presence in Los Angeles followed Trump's June 7 order to send about 2,000 National Guard troops into the city. Both measures were Trump's response to what he called 'numerous incidents of violence and disorder' by those protesting his administration's actions rounding up and deporting immigrants in the Los Angeles area. State and local officials decried Trump's actions, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom calling the move 'purposefully inflammatory,' as well as 'an illegal act.' California sued the Trump administration on June 9 to block its deployment of National Guard members. Other critics of Trump's actions said the scale and character of the protests did not warrant such extreme measures. Amy Lieberman, a politics and society editor at The Conversation U.S., spoke with William C. Banks, a scholar of the role of the military in domestic affairs, to understand the extent of a president's power to send American troops to Los Angeles. Can American troops be used inside the country? They can, but it is an extraordinary exercise of authority to use troops domestically. It has rarely been done in the U.S. as a way of responding to a civil disturbance. Congress has delegated that authority of deploying American troops domestically to the president in limited circumstances. Otherwise, the only authority is exercised by governors, who have control of the National Guard. Why was American law set up this way? The U.S. was founded in response to heavy-handed English use of the military by King George to interfere with the civil liberties and rights of the colonists in the lead-up to the American Revolution. So, when the founders created the U.S. Constitution, they were very careful to insert roadblocks that would make it difficult for the government to use troops to carry out its own programs. The country's framers also understood there might be occasions when it would be necessary to use the military domestically. They did a couple of things to control the exercise of military authority. One was to ensure that the commander in chief of the military was a civilian. Second, they gave the authority to call up the National Guard, what was known as the 'militia' in those days, to Congress, not to the president, in order to create a separation of powers. Under what circumstances can the president deploy troops to an American city? Under the Insurrection Act, which was signed into law in 1807, a president can deploy troops during what is called an insurrection, simply meaning when all hell breaks loose. The president can decide that it is 'impracticable,' according to the Insurrection Act, to enforce the laws of the U.S. in a given city, and he may call forth the military or the National Guard to help restore law and order. In order to invoke the Insurrection Act, the president first has to make a proclamation to those he calls the insurrectionists to cease and desist. Unless the alleged insurrectionists immediately do what the president says, the president then has the authority to deploy forces. Trump has repeatedly called the protesters in Los Angeles 'insurrectionists,' but has also walked those remarks back and hasn't made any kind of formal proclamation yet. When Trump ordered California's National Guard members to deploy to Los Angeles on June 7, he did so on a narrow statutory authority to protect federal buildings, properties and personnel that were trying to enforce immigration laws. What is the Posse Comitatus Act and how does it apply to the current situation in Los Angeles? Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878. This act's name derives from an arcane Latin term that means 'the power of the county.' This law establishes a legal presumption in the U.S. that the military, if it is deployed domestically, should not engage in law enforcement. This act is an important part of American law. It means that the military and National Guard are trained on this principle that they are not to engage in domestic law enforcement activities. Those are reserved for police, sheriffs and marshals. Invoking the Insurrection Act is the principal exception to this law. So the Insurrection Act allows the military to act as law enforcement officials? That's right. By invoking the Insurrection Act the military could act as cops and have the right to arrest, investigate and detain civilians, with only the Constitution as a check on its power. This is not a situation that California National Guard members have trained for. They are trained to fight actual wildfires, but this is something entirely different. Are there any legal roadblocks that could curb the president's authority to send U.S. troops to Los Angeles? The short answer to this question is no. Can state governors or other elected officials prevent U.S. troops from being sent to their cities? In many ways that is the main question right now. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, has said that the state doen't need these military forces. Newsom's June 9 lawsuit against the Trump administration argues that the authority over the National Guard is reserved for states, 'unless the State requests or consents to federal control.' That has not happened in this case. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: William C. Banks, Syracuse University Read more: From Kent State to Los Angeles, using armed forces to police civilians is a high-risk strategy Debates over presidential power to suspend habeas corpus resurface in Trump administration In a new era of campus upheaval, the 1970 Kent State shootings show the danger of deploying troops to crush legal protests William C. Banks does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Pasco graduation disrupted by student yelling ‘should have started with English'
Pasco graduation disrupted by student yelling ‘should have started with English'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Pasco graduation disrupted by student yelling ‘should have started with English'

A Pasco High School graduate and his family will be meeting with administrators this week after he disrupted the school's commencement ceremony with comments that criticized the principal's use of Spanish. As Bulldogs from the class of 2025 were handed their diplomas Saturday at Edgar Brown Memorial Stadium, one student reportedly spoke into a microphone, 'This is America. You should've started with English.' His comments appeared to be in reference to Principal Veronica Machado's welcome speech, which was given first in Spanish and then in English. The school and broader community have a large Spanish-speaking population. More than 80% of the school's population come from Hispanic and Latino backgrounds, and more than half of Pasco residents overall speak a language other than English at home. The district appears to have edited out the student's comments from the livestream on Sunday, and on Monday took the video down to add edits to clarify students' names. The interruption was caught by audience members and has been shared thousands of times across social media. 'We are disappointed and saddened that a Pasco High School student chose to disrupt the graduation ceremony on Saturday, June 7, 2025, by making a personal statement that does not reflect the values of our school district,' Pasco School District administrators said in a statement. 'Before participating in graduation ceremonies, all students are required to sign an agreement to uphold standards of appropriate conduct. The student's decision to move into the personal space of the name readers and speak over their microphone was a clear departure from that agreement and selfishly took attention away from the achievements of all graduates being celebrated. The district will take steps to prevent disruption of speakers on stage at all future events,' the statement continued. An administrator reportedly addressed the disruption on stage and after the ceremony. The district plans to hold a series of meetings and listening sessions this week with students, staff and families who were impacted. While district and school admin plan to meet with the student and his family, it's unclear if he will face any discipline or repercussions. School Board President Amanda Brown said in a statement on her personal social media account that it's important all students and families know they belong in their schools, that their languages and cultures are valued, and that Pasco continues to strive toward an inclusive environment. 'While every student is entitled to their voice and lived experience, I do not condone the manner or message in which this moment unfolded,' Brown said. 'I believe it is important to reaffirm that Pasco is a diverse and inclusive community, and our schools should reflect and celebrate that diversity. Language is a powerful expression of identity, and the use of Spanish during the ceremony was a meaningful way to honor our bilingual students, families and staff,' she continued. The school district is home to the state's largest dual language program, educating more than 2,000 multi-lingual students with instruction in Spanish and Russian in addition to English. The district says this program promotes bilingualism, biliteracy, socio-economic competency and high academic achievement. About 509 students graduated from Pasco High School over the weekend.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store