Compensation may increase if any omission on part of Air India staff is established
New Delhi: Amid the nationwide mourning over the deaths in the Ahmedabad air crash, all eyes will be on the findings of the inquiry, as any "omission" on the part of the airline may have huge implications on the subsequent award of compensation.
The Carriage by Air Act 1972 is the guiding statute on the compensation that the victims and their kin get in the event of injury or death, and the final relief amount would be higher than the limited liability of the carrier if any "omission" on its part is proved.
A clause related to limited liability of an airline stipulates a maximum amount (francs 2,50,000) that the carrier is supposed to pay to a victim under Rules 17 and 22 of the Second Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act 1972.
Rule 17 of the Act says, "The carrier is liable for damage sustained in the event of the death or wounding of a passenger or any other bodily injury suffered by a passenger, if the accident which caused the damage so sustained took place on board the aircraft or in the course of any of the operations of embarking or disembarking."
However, the maximum amount of compensation allowed under Rule 17 is rendered inapplicable if the victim or his kin manage to prove, in court, recklessness on the part of the airline or its employees.
The compensation amount can be higher than the stipulated limited liability amount if it is proved that the damage resulted from an act or omission of the airline done recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result, to render the limit of liability inapplicable.
Rule 25 of the Second Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act, 1972, says, "The limits of liability specified in Rule 22 shall not apply if it is proved that the damage resulted from an act or omission of the carrier, his servants or agents, done with intent to cause damage or recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result; provided that, in the case of such act or omission of a servant or agent, it is also proved that he was acting within the scope of his employment."
India is a signatory to the Warsaw Convention 1929, and the Warsaw Convention as amended by the Hague Protocol 1955, which forms the foundation of an international legal regime governing the liability of air carriers for injury or death of passengers. The two were given effect by the Carriage by Air Act 1972.
In the 1988 air crash at Ahmedabad that killed 133 people, the family members of the deceased were involved in a protracted legal battle for higher compensation that ended in their favour in 2009, after a wait of over two decades.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Meghalaya to strengthen resident safety law in wake of Sohra honeymoon murder
Shillong, In the wake of the sensational honeymoon murder in Sohra, the Meghalaya government on Friday decided to strengthen an existing legislation aimed at ensuring the safety of state residents and curbing the entry of criminal elements posing as tourists. The move comes weeks after the gruesome murder of Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi, who was killed during a honeymoon trip to Sohra, in a plot orchestrated by his wife and her lover. "The cabinet today decided to revisit the Meghalaya Resident Safety and Security Act , 2016, an existing state legislation, to add more teeth to this Act to minimise the possibility of criminal elements entering Meghalaya in the guise of tourists," Cabinet spokesperson Paul Lyngdoh said after the cabinet meeting here. "The government will soon come up with a formal proposal to further strengthen the MRSSA," he said. The 2016 Act was originally introduced to enhance the security of Meghalaya residents through the vetting of tenants and tourists. It allows for identity verification through a tourism-specific app and has provisions similar to those under the Inner Line Permit system, which the state has long been seeking from the Centre. According to Lyngdoh, the Assembly had adopted a resolution demanding implementation of the Inner Line Permit in Meghalaya. "The matter is pending before the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. There were several queries from the Ministry which the state government had addressed," he said, adding that the Union Ministry had expressed concern since Meghalaya is a transit state to other parts of the North East. The Cabinet minister also informed that the MRSSA is already a very effective legislation, which will need a little bit of "upscale" as of now. The urgency to revisit the Act was triggered by the case involving Sonam, the wife of murdered businessman Raja. She had allegedly conspired to kill her husband along with her lover and his friends, and entered Meghalaya under the guise of a tourist. According to Lyngdoh, the Cabinet placed on record its gratitude to the entire police department for cracking this case in record time and arresting all the accused, saving the state from a "bad name".
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Offence under Atrocities Act registered against AIMIM leader Imtiaz Jaleel
(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A case has been registered against AIMIM leader Imtiaz Jaleel in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly using the term ' Harijan ', police First Information Report was registered at the Kranti Chowk police station here on Thursday after a Republican Party of India (Athawale) worker lodged a complaint against Jaleel, a former MP and present state unit head of the All India Majlis E Ittehadul Muslimeen, said an at a press conference on June 11, had made allegations against social justice minister Sanjay Shirsat regarding a land minister belongs to an SC community and Jaleel used the word 'Harijan' repeatedly and thus 'disrespected' the community, the complaint FIR was registered under section 3 (1) (r) of the SC, ST Act for allegedly 'insulting or intimidating a member of a scheduled caste or scheduled tribe with an intent to humiliate, within a public view,' said the police official.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh HC upholds 5 year RI for man in sexual assault of 2-year-old; conviction based on eyewitness testimony
Chhattisgarh HC RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh high court has upheld the conviction and sentence of a 30-year-old man in a case involving the sexual assault of a two-year-ten-month-old child. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha, in a judgment, dismissed the appeal filed by the convict and affirmed the trial court's decision. The court noted, 'The 'sterling witness' should be of a very high quality and calibre whose version should, therefore, be unassailable. The Court considering the version of such witness should be in a position to accept it for its face value without any hesitation.' The man, who was 26 years old at the time of the incident, was convicted under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 9(m)(u) read with Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. He was sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs 1,000 for each offence. The sentences will run concurrently. The incident took place on 28 November 2021 in Dhodha village, Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai district. The victim's mother filed a complaint at Gandai police station, alleging that the accused had taken her daughter, who was playing at her aunt's house, and attempted an inappropriate act after removing their clothes. The victim's grandfather, an eyewitness, testified that he saw the convict with his trousers partially lowered and the victim's clothes also pulled down. He immediately intervened and brought the child home. The victim's mother sucported this statement, saying her sister-in-law had seen the accused taking the child. The defence argued that there was no conclusive evidence and that the man had been falsely implicated. They also pointed out the absence of a medical report to confirm any outrage to the victim's modesty. The convict has been in jail since 1 December 2021, having served around three years and six months. The state counsel countered that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, relying on eyewitness testimony. Chief Justice Sinha observed that the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that the sole testimony of a victim, if found reliable, can be sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases. Considering the statements of the eyewitnesses and Supreme Court precedents, the High Court concluded that the Special Additional Sessions Judge, Khairagarh, had rightly convicted the man. The high court also noted the strong objection raised by the victim's mother, who appeared through the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA). The court dismissed the criminal appeal, stating that the prosecution had successfully proved its case beyond all reasonable doubt. The convict will now serve the sentence as ordered by the trial court. (The victim's identity has not been revealed to protect her privacy as per Supreme court directives on cases related to sexual assault) Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
