Confusion reigns over US grant freeze
HIGH POINT — High Point-area nonprofit representatives, like their counterparts across the country, are struggling to figure out how a possible freeze on federal grants will affect them and the services they provide to people in need.
Among them is Ryan Ross, executive director for Open Door Ministries, who said a federal grant freeze could affect $300,000 allocated annually for a program that offers long-term housing to homeless people with chronic mental health issues or physical disabilities. Open Door Ministries currently has 25 people in the program supported by federal funding through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Amid the confusion, the administration of President Donald Trump on Wednesday offered conflicting messages on the proposal to freeze most federal grants loans, including grants to nonprofit organizations.
At the first of the week, the administration announced the freeze so that federal administrators could review programs for liberal or politically correct biases that run askew of Trump's recent barrage of executive orders.
The order meant that no money provided by federal grants of any kind could be spent, potentially shutting down many services. Organizations such as Meals on Wheels, which receives federal money to deliver food to the elderly, were worried about getting cut off. Even temporary interruptions in funding could cause layoffs or delays in services.
A federal judge late Tuesday afternoon issued a minute stay on the grant freeze and scheduled a hearing for this coming Monday.
The White House faced a backlash across the country from advocates for nonprofits and pressure from elected officials besieged by upset constituents, The Associated Press reports, and on Wednesday formally rescinded the memorandum that ordered the freeze.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday that the reviews of spending will go ahead in any case in all agencies and departments.
A statement from the legislative office of state Rep. Cecil Brockman, D-Guilford, who works regularly with nonprofit groups locally, said the consequences of a federal grant freeze could be dire.
'We will be working with local stakeholders and other entities to ensure continued service to our vulnerable communities until this crisis is resolved, and we call upon our GOP colleagues to demand an end to this crisis at once,' the statement said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Comptroller confirms property assessor errors; county mayor calls for resignation
The state will correct Rutherford Property Assessor Rob Mitchell's inacurate appraisals because he "was unable or unwilling to comply" with Tennessee law, a state June 2 letter said. The letter came from Bryan Kinsey, the director of Division of Property Assessments for the Tennessee Comptroller's Office. Kinsey's letter sent to Mitchell and other Rutherford County officials follows the State Board of Equalization decision March 4 giving Mitchell 60 days to correct the appraisal records. "The board required the county to review a total of 22,180 properties with suspected errors," Kinsley's letter to Mitchell said. "The Division's 10% sample contained 2,223 properties. At the conclusion of the review on May 29, 2025, the division determined that the county erred in its determinations and corrective action for 251 properties, culminating in an 11.3% error rate." Rutherford County Mayor Joe Carr suggested that Mitchell should resign over recent state findings of inaccurate appraisals. "I am committed to ensuring that our county's property taxpayers are treated fairly and equitably," Carr said in a June 4 press release sent to The Daily News Journal. "I would not think it strange if Mr. Mitchell wanted to submit his resignation." Government accountability: State board gives Rutherford property assessor 60 days to comply with law to correct appraisals Mitchell emailed a press release to The Daily News Journal June 5 in response to the mayor suggesting that he consider resigning. "I want to be clear about the structure and independence of the assessor's office," Mitchell's release said. "As an independently-elected constitutional officer, the assessor's office does not take directives from the county mayor. The Tennessee Constitution establishes the assessor as an independent office, elected directly by the people of Rutherford County to serve their interests in property assessment matters. "This matter is not something that should be litigated in the court of public opinion. Complex legal and administrative issues require proper channels and due process, not public spectacle or political theater. "I have full faith and trust in our judiciary and administrative officials at both the state and local levels. I am happy to follow any directives that the appropriate state offices provide through proper legal channels. The citizens of Rutherford County deserve to have these matters handled professionally and according to established legal procedures. "I remain committed to serving the taxpayers of Rutherford County with integrity and will continue to fulfill the duties of the office to which I was elected." 2024 election results: Property Assessor Rob Mitchell captures GOP primary for reelection over opponent Mitchell through his attorney Bud Carman, a former director of the comptroller's division of property assessments, filed a legal challenge to the board of equalization's decision on correcting property appraisals. "Mayor Joe Carr has used half-truth to convict an honorable man without due process," Carman said in a statement emailed June 5 to The Daily News Journal. "Abraham Lincoln is quoted as saying, a half-truth is often the biggest lie of all.' The effect of a 'half-truth public statement' by a county mayor with a political agenda, is at issue as to an ethical consideration." Carman on behalf of Mitchell filed the legal challenge to the comptroller's office's actions in Davidson County Chancery Court. "The finding of non-compliance by the State Board of Equalization by law is subject to a petition for judicial review," Carman said. Comptroller's spokesman John Dunn said his office has no comment about the legal challenge. "We have been advised to not answer any questions," Dunn said. "The (Tennessee) Attorney General's Office is representing us in that matter." Regulating the government: TN Comptroller chastises Rutherford Property Assessor about improper appraisal practices Rutherford Mayor Carr responded to a request for comment from The Daily News Journal through a June 4 press release from the county government spokeswoman Lisa Kaye about the issue with Mitchell's office. Carr was notified by whistleblowers in the summer of 2023 of "possible malfeasance and irregularities" in the property assessor's office. Due to the mayor's legal obligation in state law, Tenn. Code Annotated 8-4-503(a), Carr was required to report the whistleblower concerns to the comptroller's office, according to the press release. Whistle blower issue: Complaint filed against property assessor raises 'ethical, moral and legal concerns' "It is frustrating that it has taken so long to move forward, but an issue of this magnitude must be undertaken carefully," Carr said in the press release. "The assessor's office staff are more than competent; some really good people are there. This is a dereliction of duty and a failure of Rob Mitchell's leadership. For a number of years, he has violated the basic equity application of the law regarding the assessment of property values in this county." The press release from the mayor's office suggested the inaccurate property appraisals violates public trust for a community that deserves better. Another whistleblower: 2nd complaint outlines 'conflict of interest' in Rutherford Co. Property Assessor Office Based on the error rate of 11.3% and the fact that there are over 130,000 parcels in Rutherford County, there could be over 15,000 parcels that are incorrectly assessed, and should be addressed and rectified immediately, the press release from the mayor's office said. "My office has been cooperating with the comptroller's office and will continue to do so," Carr said in the press release. The press release also said the mayor thanks the officials with the comptroller's division of property assessments officials and commends them and Mitchell's employees for their diligence "in trying to uncover the wrongs, so that confidence can be restored to the Rutherford County Property Assessor's Office." Response to ethics complaint: Ethics Committee asks DA, TN Comptroller to investigate Rutherford Property Assessor Rob Mitchell The error rate of property appraisal records exceeded the 5% rate established by the board of equalization in directing the comptroller's staff to take steps to bring Rutherford into compliance of state law, according to the letter from Kinsey, the director of the division of property assessments. "The division will promptly notify the assessor of the error rate and begin making corrections in accordance with the law," the letter said. "Furthermore, the division will maintain records of the costs incurred pursuant to this action and invoice thecounty at the conclusion of the compliance effort." Dunn, the comptroller's spokesman, said the division of property assessments is unsure how long the corrections will take or what the estimated costs will be to Rutherford. "Our office will work to ensure we make the necessary corrections in the most efficient and responsible way possible," Dunn said. This is a developing story. More government accountability: TN official accuses property assessor of assessments that are 'contrary to state law' Reach reporter Scott Broden with news tips or questions by emailing him at sbroden@ To support his work with The Daily News Journal, sign up for a digital subscription. This article originally appeared on Murfreesboro Daily News Journal: TN Comptroller: Rutherford property assessor has unlawful appraisals
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' includes 5-year investment in kids
(NewsNation) — President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has touched on several facets he feels will help the American people presently and in the future, including investing in the country's youth. Trump on Monday plans to highlight the 'Trump Account,' in which the federal government would make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred, low-cost index fund account that will track the overall stock market to every U.S. citizen born between Jan. 1, 2024, and Jan. 1, 2029. The accounts will be private property controlled by the child's guardians. Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama The accounts will begin at $1,000 per child, with the opportunity to contribute an additional $5,000 yearly throughout the child's life. Several business leaders — including those from Dell, Uber and Goldman Sachs — have announced billions of dollars in collective investments into 'Trump Accounts' for the children of their employees. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump Could Use The Insurrection Act To Deploy Troops In LA
As protests continue to flare in Los Angeles over the Trump administration carrying out immigration raids and deploying National Guard troops to the area, President Donald Trump has floated the idea of invoking the Insurrection Act over objections from California's governor and the mayor of LA. Invoking the Insurrection Act, which generally gives the president the authority to quell rebellion or unrest by deploying the military, would be an escalation of the administration's actions so far in California. On Saturday, Trump deployed at least 300 National Guard troops to downtown Los Angeles after thousands of protesters took to the streets. They largely concentrated themselves in the city's garment district, where federal agents had started conducting raids for undocumented workers on Friday. According to the Department of Homeland Security, rioters assaulted multiple ICE officers, 'slashed tires, defaced buildings and taxpayer funded property,' the agency said in a statement on Saturday. (The agency also singled out several Democratic lawmakers, accusing them of 'villainizing and demonizing' ICE agents.) Local news station KTLA reported Monday that at least five LAPD officers have been injured, requiring medical care. Six other officers experienced minor injuries that did require hospitalization. Many protesters were not violent nor particularly destructive, but some individuals lobbed rocks and fireworks at police, or set driverless cars on fire. Los Angeles police made roughly 150 arrests on Sunday, according to The New York Times. Law enforcement used flash-bangs and rubber bullets against protesters. During a live broadcast on Sunday, police hit a journalist in the leg with a rubber bullet. Trump signed a proclamation late Saturday that mobilized the Guard to respond to protests against the raids, claiming the demonstrations interfered with the 'faithful execution of federal immigration laws.' As tensions escalated on Sunday, the Pentagon said it was prepared to send in at least 500 active U.S. Marines to Los Angeles. Trump's proclamation is not an invocation of the Insurrection Act but instead relies on Title 10, or 10 USC 12406, a federal code that allows him to wield his authority as president to federalize the National Guard but only under very limited circumstances. Those circumstances include: an actual foreign invasion or the threat of a foreign invasion, an actual or threatened rebellion against 'the authority of the government of the United States,' or when the president is unable to executive the nation's laws with 'regular forces.' Before boarding Air Force One on Sunday, Trump was asked by reporters whether he intended to invoke the Insurrection Act outright. 'Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection,' he said, adding that he wouldn't let protesters 'get away with it.' 'We're not going to let them get away with it. We're going to have troops everywhere, we're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart,' Trump said. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have objected to the White House's use of the National Guard, and Newsom has said he intends to sue the administration. Newsom called the move by Trump to federalize California's National Guard 'purposefully inflammatory.' Typically, it is a state's governor who has control over that state's Guard, not the federal government. And notably, within Trump's proclamation is language that appears to clarify this. Under Title 10, the president is allowed to call the Guard into federal service in any state but 'orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States.' The Insurrection Act of 1807 — which is a bit of a misnomer since it is actually a combination of several statutes enacted by Congress from 1792 to 1871 — is a federal law that gives the president the power to deploy the military or National Guard to put down domestic rebellions, uprisings or other fits of civil unrest. The act uses Congress' constitutional authority to 'provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.' When the Insurrection Act is invoked, it suspends the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids the military from getting involved in local or state law enforcement. Invoking the law is rare; it has occurred just 30 times in history. The last time was in 1992 as riots gripped Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers accused of viciously beating Rodney King and California's governor called on then-President George H.W. Bush for help. Trump floated the idea of invoking the Insurrection Act in 2020 after the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis sparked a wave of nationwide protests, most of which were peaceful. Martial law and the Insurrection Act are not one and the same. The Insurrection Act is invoked, typically, to have the military assist civilian law enforcement. Martial law refers to when the military becomes enforcers of local and state laws. The Supreme Court has never ruled on whether the president can unilaterally declare martial law or whether he would need Congress to approve the declaration. A president can use the Insurrection Act in a number of ways. For example, its provisions state that troops can be deployed under the act regardless of whether a state asks for them to be sent there. And the law cites various reasons presidents may send them. Troops can be deployed to quell violent unrest or to simply enforce federal law in a given locality. (The latest president to invoke the Insurrection Act against a state's will was Lyndon Johnson when he federalized the Alabama National Guard to protect civil rights protesters that marched from Selma to Montgomery.) The president does not need congressional approval to invoke the Insurrection Act, though he is required to at least issue a proclamation first that demands anyone causing unrest leave that area before troops are sent in. Many provisions built into the Insurrection Act are vague. One statute gives the president the right to suppress rebellion, domestic violence or some 'unlawful combination or conspiracy' in any state impeding U.S. law. Conspiracy is not defined in this Insurrection Act statute, meaning, as the Brennan Center for Justice notes, this provision under the Insurrection Act umbrella could be interpreted to mean that the president can use military force against any two people he thinks are conspiring to break the law. Trump Sets National Guard On Los Angeles As Protesters Counter Immigration Raids: Live Updates California Governor Plans To File Lawsuit Against Trump Over National Guard Deployment To Protests 'Arrest Me, Let's Go': Newsom Punches Back At Trump Border Czar Kamala Harris Torches Trump Over 'Cruel, Calculated' Move Targeting Los Angeles Trump Deploys National Guard As Los Angeles Protests Against Immigration Agents Continue
