logo
Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'

Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'

The former minister also criticised comments Mr Ewing made last weekend that independence should be put "on the back burner" for a decade while the Scottish Government focused on improving public services.
In a wide ranging interview, the MSP for the Highlands and Islands, 27, who was the youngest MSP to be elected in 2021, also spoke about how she responded to being on a "hit list" of female SNP MSPs some in the party reportedly wanted to oust.
READ MORE:
And she described how she felt after being sacked as equalities minister by First Minister John Swinney and her hopes for a return to government one day.
Mr Ewing, a former rural affairs secretary and the son of the late SNP trailblazer Winnie Ewing, shocked the world of Scottish politics last week, when he announced he would be standing against the SNP as an independent candidate in his seat of Inverness and Nairn at the Holyrood election next year.
The 67-year-old, who now sits as an independent MSP, has pointed to his prominent role and personal support in the constituency in his bid for re-election.
But speaking to The Herald Ms Roddick cast doubt on whether Mr Ewing's personal support in the constituency would help him win as she underlined her optimism she would retake the seat for the SNP.
READ MORE:
"What we have in Inverness is not a party built around any one person. It's a fantastic group of grassroots-led local activists which believes in a vision of an independent Scotland where we treat everybody more fairly, and the Highlands gets an equal say in national issues and policy decisions. So I will be relying on that campaign and we can win in the way we have won every election since 1999," she said.
"What is more important than any one person is what you are standing for. My message and the SNP's message has always been clear about what we are trying to do and I believe I can get that message across."
She was asked if she was concerned that a pro-UK party could win the seat with the pro-independence vote split by both the SNP and Mr Ewing.
She said: "I will certainly be making it very clear to SNP supporters that that's what we want to avoid. If they do vote on the basis of seeking Scotland's independence or even greater powers for the Highlands it needs to be the SNP and me who they go for."
SNP MSP Emma Roddick speaks to The Herald's Kathleen Nutt (Image: GordonTerris/Herald&Times) She was asked if she agreed with Mr Ewing's comments that independence should be put on the backburner for a decade.
"Absolutely not," she said arguing that independence "shouldn't be seen as an alternative to dealing with a crisis or immediate issues. Because the reason why we are not able to react in the way we want to to things like the Covid pandemic, the cost of living crisis, Brexit, is because we do not have full powers.
"I expect there will be events and crises in the next session, whether that is related to growing tensions in the world, the UK's part in those tensions, artificial intelligence, climate change, global challenges that we have and as a country we react to.
"It's very likely that we are going to face other situations, where we would want greater powers at our disposal to react. For me having independence as these things continue to come up is vital."
Ms Roddick highlighted differences between her and Mr Ewing's views on social and equality issues, and on fox hunting.
(Image: Gordon Terris) She is a strong advocate for equal marriage and supported the Scottish Government's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which was designed to make the process easier for transgender people to obtain a gender recognition certificate.
Mr Ewing voted against both equal marriage and gender recognition reform, and opposed an outright ban on fox hunting in 2001 whilst a member of the rural development committee.
"I know this doesn't come across in descriptions of me online but I have never prioritised talking about social issues. For me it's quite a fundamental issue in the same way that independence is," she said.
"I just believe in equality for everyone, that Scotland should have its own say in decisions that are made for the country.
"I accept that I am very closely aligned to a lot of these issues that Fergus is on the absolute opposite [side] of. Being a member of the LGBTQ+ community I just will always stick up for others in that community, especially in the face of hate crime and attempts to remove rights."
She added: "I am not keen on fox hunting. I am happy with equal marriage ... he is happy with fox hunting."
Ms Roddick was highly critical of the SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn's decision to stand as a candidate for Aberdeen South and North Kincardine at the Holyrood election next year while holding onto his Aberdeen South seat until the next general election. He made his intention public in a newspaper interview in November last year. (Mr Flynn later backed down saying he will step down as an MP to become an MSP.)
Months after her criticism, in February this year, Ms Roddick appeared on a 'hit list' of female SNP MSPs. It had been reportedly drawn up by allies of Mr Flynn who wanted the five women listed to be replaced with ex-SNP MPs. Senior SNP figures denied Mr Flynn drew up such a list.
But Ms Roddick believed the list existed and that she was on it.
She said: "It wasn't surprised in the slightest. I am on a lot of lists. I experience a lot of misogyny in this role."
She pointed out she had criticised the former Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross for being both an MP and an MP and couldn't say "nothing" when someone in her party was "then trying to do the same."
She was asked how she would get on with Mr Flynn if they are both elected to Holyrood next year, she said: "I've just spent four years in a group with Fergus Ewing, I'm sure I'll cope. I will more than happily chat to him. I have good relationships with MSPs in every party in this place. It is harder when criticism comes from your own party."
Ms Roddick was appointed equalities minister by First Minister Humza Yousaf in 2023 but ceased to continue in the post under his successor Mr Swinney.
The Herald pointed out she was sacked as equalities minister when John Swinney became First Minister. At the time Patrick Harvie, the Scottish Greens co-leader, suggested her exit from government raised concerns over a potential watering down of equalities legislation.
"How did it feel being removed as a minister from a job you presumably much loved?" we asked.
"There were very mixed feelings around that at the time. I was excited to take on being a member of the rural affairs and islands committee," she said after a long pause.
"The week that I left government I joined the committee and was immediately immersed in the agriculture and rural communities bill."
Pressed if she was sad to leave the ministerial role, she said: "No I think I'm happy with what I achieved [as equalities minister] and since."
And asked if she would like to return to government? "If it were the right role," she said.
Mr Ewing said: "An answer to all of this would be almost as long as the A9 - which of course has not been dualled.
"Broken promises to the Highlands cannot be ignored; competent government must be restored; and the main parties must work together like non-politician grown-ups do if Scotland is to be a better place."
Mr Flynn was approached for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs
Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs

The Government's U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers around £2.5 billion by 2030, the Work and Pensions Secretary has told MPs as she laid out concessions to Labour rebels. Liz Kendall said the costs and savings of the Government's revised welfare package would be confirmed by the Office for Budget Responsibility at the budget in the autumn. But her statement to MPs on Monday suggested the measures would save less than half the £4.8 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. Ms Kendall's statement confirmed the concessions announced last week in an effort to head off a major rebellion by Labour backbenchers, including protecting people who claim personal independence payments from new eligibility criteria. Responding to claims this would create a 'two-tier' benefits system, Ms Kendall said: 'I would say to the House, including members opposite, that our benefits system often protects existing claimants from new rates or new rules, because lives have been built around that support, and it's often very hard for people to adjust.' Earlier, modelling from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggested the Government's proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been facing relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the DWP said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work.

Powys waiting on another £6m in Levelling Up Funding
Powys waiting on another £6m in Levelling Up Funding

Powys County Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Powys waiting on another £6m in Levelling Up Funding

POWYS Council is still waiting to find out if it will receive a further £6 million in UK Government Levelling Up Funding (LUF) – a senior councillor has revealed. Earlier this month (June) the county council said that it had received 'almost £11 million' from the UK Labour Government and that the authority will use this to: 'invest in capital projects aimed at promoting recreational tourism in the county through transport investment.' The council said that this funding would be used on projects that include resurfacing works, walking, and cycling schemes (active travel) and rights of way refurbishment. However, a question from Plaid Cymru group leader, Cllr Elwyn Vaughan to the cabinet has prompted the council to say that the allocation is much lower than what they wanted. Due to this a number of projects are on hold and will not be worked on this financial year while others will be partly funded and completed in the future once more money is found. Cllr Vaughan asked: 'Can you please (provide) a full list of the projects being supported by the £11 million LUF recently received towards roads and paths.' Cabinet member for highways, transport, and recycling Cllr Jackie Charlton (Liberal Democrat) said: 'The original LUF bid was for around £17 million plus match funding, but we only received just under £11 million this year. 'The rest of the bid is subject to the UK Government Spending Review which we are still awaiting news on this.' She explained that 'some flexibility' may be needed with the resurfacing scheme as they will be dependent on departmental budget under and overspends as well as 'changes in conditions' since the bid was sent to Westminster. All the projects with funding - and those without Walking/Cycling (Active Travel) projects: Tri-Town Cycle Route – phase one (Llandrindod-Howey) – part funded. Crickhowell – Llangattock – part funded. Brecon Promenade – fully funded. U1670 Llandrindod Lake – fully funded. Rights of Way bridge projects Fron Footbridge – not funded. Festival Footbridge – not funded. Black Bridge – not funded. Llangadfan Footbridge – not funded. Pont y Milgy – fully funded. Trans Cambrian Cycle Links Project (Monks Trod & Claerwen byways) – not funded. Infrastructure Refurbishment C2040 Back Lane, Criggion – fully funded. C2040 Cross Road, Criggion – fully funded. NCN81 Cycle path Garreg Ddu reservoir to forestry entrance – fully funded. Llangorse lake – fully funded. U0176 / Llangorse Lake including access road – fully funded. C2089 Pennant Melangell Church – fully funded C2143 Montgomery Hill Road – fully funded. U2122 Cynhinfa Caravan Park – fully funded U2642 / C2051 /U2646 Dolforwyn Castle – fully funded B4381 Leighton Road – fully funded C2022 Llanidloes Dol Llys towards Caersws – fully funded C2025 Stepaside – fully funded B4395 Llanerfyl (more works to be identified) – fully funded. B4393 Llanfiangel (more works to be identified) – fully funded. C2 Abergwesyn to Devils Staircase – fully funded. U1135 Moelfre City to Newhouse Farm – fully funded. Newbridge to Builth cycle route – fully funded. C0060 – Llaneglwys – Road to forestry – fully funded. C0079 – Hay Bluff – fully funded. C0162 -Brecon Beacons Mountain Centre Visitor Attraction access route – fully funded. C0193 – Road to Pontmelin Waterfalls Coelbren – fully funded. C0194 – Road to Henrhyd Waterfalls Coelbren – fully funded. U0223 / Fennifach Road leading to Promenade second Car park – fully funded. U0305 – C50 junction to Pontarysgir via werngof to U0304 junction – fully funded. U0306 – U0306 junction to green lane – fully funded. Ystradgynlais various routes – fully funded U4231 / U4244 Lon Cerddyn Trehafren, Park Lane – fully funded. U2856 Husky Hill – fully funded B4389 Bettws – Aberbechan – part funded C2005 Red Lane – Powis Castle – part funded C1206 Elan Valley – part funded.

'A farce' and 'absolutely ridiculous' - Fans react to Uefa's delay
'A farce' and 'absolutely ridiculous' - Fans react to Uefa's delay

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'A farce' and 'absolutely ridiculous' - Fans react to Uefa's delay

We asked you how you feel after the decision on whether Crystal Palace will play in the Europa League next season has been delayed by Uefa. Here are some of your comments:Andy: It's a farce that needs sorting quickly. It could have grave consequences on our summer transfer activity and whether our top players stay or go. I see no connection with Lyon whatsoever. Yet our fate seems to rest with their appeal. It's all This is unfair. Palace have clearly demonstrated that Textor had no controlling interest in the club and has even now sold his shares anyway. The delay will have a major effect on the club's transfer dealings unless resolved quickly but there seems to be no timeline here. Unbelievable bureaucratic nonsense typical of Uefa when everybody can see there is no case to They wouldn't treat one of the so called 'big clubs' like this. It's obvious to everyone that Textor doesn't have, and has never had a significant influence on Palace's football Palace have dealt with the perceived issue and keeping Palace waiting puts them at a massive disadvantage in the transfer market. I hope they get on with the appeal and get to grips with what looks like a very easy decision taking everything into If this was black and white against us; the decision would have been both made and announced weeks ago. The delay can only be positive with efforts being made to afford us our earned and well deserved European tour . . . surely!Karim: The delay is absolutely ridiculous. Not just for the fan unrest but also from a wider club perspective. How are we supposed to implement a transfer policy for this summer? Having no idea whether we can attract players towards a European project means we have to wait until a decision is made before we can sign players. And even if the decision goes in our favour, most of the players who would have wanted the project of European football would have gone to other clubs by that point.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store