France's budget talks close to collapse after Socialists pull out
PARIS, Jan 29 (Reuters) - French budget talks were on the verge of collapse on Wednesday, a day after Socialist party officials suspended their participation in protest over remarks about immigration by the prime minister.
In a television interview on Monday, Prime Minister Francois Bayrou referred to "a feeling of invasion" by immigrants.
"We suspended our negotiations because the words from the Prime Minister were not dignified," Philippe Brun, a Socialist lawmaker involved in the budget talks, said in an interview with Sud Radio on Wednesday.
He said he hoped the talks would resume.
Without the support of the Socialists, Bayrou may not have enough support to advance his budget and take steps to trim the deficit as called for by EU officials.
Bayrou was named prime minister in December and is seeking to avoid the fate of his predecessor Michel Barnier. Politicians from the left and right banded together to topple Barnier's government when he tried to pass a budget that lawmakers said went too far in a bid to cut spending.
While Barnier had sought support from the far-right National Rally, Bayrou has attempted to survive with the backing of the Socialists. He has agreed to reopen talks on pension reform, a key initiative of President Emmanuel Macron, and scrapped plans by his predecessor to cut thousands of teachers' jobs.
So far, Bayrou has survived one no-confidence vote after the Socialist party did not support it. However, Brun said Socialists would consider backing another no-confidence motion if they could not come to an agreement on the budget.
Laurent Baumel, another Socialist lawmaker, said in an interview with BFM TV that the government had not made enough concessions.
Brun said Socialists were pressing for an increase in the minimum wage and more investment in the green transition, among other things.
The government is seeking to pass the budget in both houses of Parliament by the end of next month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Thousands attend candle-lit vigil for Austrian school shooting victims in Graz
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Austrians held a candlelight vigil to mourn the country's deadliest mass shooting, which left eleven people dead. The country is reeling after yesterday, a former student of Borg Dreirschutzengasse Secondary School in Graz opened fire as students were taking exams. Eleven people have died so far from the shooting, with seven females and three males confirmed among the dead – the shooter killed himself in the bathroom. Yesterday evening, residents of Austria's second-largest city gathered in sombre silence to reflect. Thousands cried, prayed and stood watch over dozens of lit candles in the main town square. Attendee Felix Platzer told Reuters: 'When you hear about it, you have so much sympathy for the people, maybe you could have known someone. 'This is an example of solidarity, and you grieve together. Together it is easier to cope.' In a press conference after the shooting, Austrian Chancellor Christian Stocker said the country would enter three days of mourning, with the flag flown at half mast. 'That such a safe space was hit by such a violent act leaves us speechless,' he said. ''Today is about empathy. It's about cohesion, that we are there together for each other in a difficult hour.' Mario Kunasek, governor of Styria, said: 'Styria is mourning today, the green heart is crying. This is an unimaginable tragedy that happened this morning. 'This is so unfathomable. The lives of so many have changed dramatically today.' The shooter has been named as a 21-year-old man from Graz. Initial investigations have found he owned the guns legally. The suspect has not yet been named. More Trending Investigators found a farewell letter at the home of the suspected gunman, Austrian newspaper Krone has reported. Police reportedly raided his property yesterday afternoon and found the note, the contents of which are unknown. The suspect was a former student at the school and didn't finish his education there. He killed himself after committing the mass shooting. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Three gunmen on the loose in Philadelphia after two shot dead in mass shooting MORE: At least 11 injured after gunman opens fire during boat party MORE: Eurovision winner JJ leads calls for Israel to be banned from song contest
New Statesman
2 hours ago
- New Statesman
Los Angeles, Donald Trump and the moronic inferno
Photo by David Swanson/Reuters Just as Vladimir Putin hungers to occupy Ukraine, it seems that Donald Trump hungers to occupy America. At time of writing, the president has ordered 4,000 members of the National Guard along with 700 US marines to California to put down protests there against the random arrest of (possibly) undocumented immigrants. Cars ablaze, charging phalanxes of soldiers, protesters' bloody faces: Trump's actions seem likely to provoke the demonstrators to levels of violence not seen since the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020. Perhaps that is the intention. The effect is ominous. Trump's overruling of a state governor to deploy these troops is the first such presidential action since Lyndon Johnson sent federal soldiers into Alabama in 1965, and that was to protect civil rights protesters, not attack them. It appears no precedent, or lack of one, can constrain America's leader. Trump simply has nothing to lose from whatever he does. Not from the violence he is unleashing in California, and certainly not from his obsessively covered and commented-upon falling out with Elon Musk, Trump's adviser and patron until recently. Musk, the world's wealthiest man, runs no real risk, either. Worth nearly $400bn dollars, Musk might, if Trump cancels his federal contracts, lose some mere billions. In fact he lost far more after the value of his companies sank thanks to his alliance with Trump. This hasn't stopped the American media from milking their row for all the page views it is worth. The brouhaha is wearying. More consequential, especially in the light of Trump's actions in LA, is a lesser-noticed split between Trump and another former ally: Miles Taylor, the former homeland security official from Trump's first administration. In an anonymous 2018 op-ed in the New York Times, then in a book published anonymously, he questioned Trump's fitness to hold office (Taylor revealed his identity in 2020). In April, Trump publicly suggested that Taylor had committed treason, a crime punishable by death. Trump has directed the Justice Department to investigate Taylor, who, with his family, has been in hiding since 2020. Now the family are trying to raise money for a legal defence. No American president has ever had an American investigated for committing treason for merely criticising the government, let alone publicly slandered them as a traitor. The New York Times glancingly mentioned Trump's accusation of espionage against Taylor in just one article, which covered several subjects of the president's vindictive rage. Yet at one point, the paper had no fewer than ten stories about the spat between Trump and Musk at the top of its homepage. The usually more sober, though Trump-whispering, Wall Street Journal had five up top. Meanwhile Gaza and Ukraine burn, China and Russia gloat, Europeans move so far away from America that it will take another Columbus to rediscover the place, and Trump's wanton slaughter of American institutions and values rolls forward. The world's most powerful man breaking with the world's richest man is newsworthy. But the idea – as pundits have said, again and again – that in the light of the rift American politics will change profoundly is absurd. Trump's persecution of one of his critics as a traitor is what will change American politics profoundly. Musk, who is unpopular, lacks the stature to stand the political order on its head. His threat to form a third party is as toothless as it is standard for an embittered rival to make. For all his wealth, he could not even get a Trump-supported judge elected in Wisconsin in April. And rather than the two men emerging as losers from their quarrel, they both come out smelling like roses. Trump was glad to have the chainsaw-wielding Musk serve as his fall-guy for the unpopular gutting of vital American agencies. Musk was happy to have the opportunity to move bureaucrats who were attempting to regulate his businesses out of the way. The limited and short-lived repercussions of Musk's antagonism with Trump are nothing compared to the ongoing consequences of their collaboration. As for the much-touted break between Maga and tech, Trump recently signed a mammoth contract with Palantir, the data analysis and technology company co-founded by Peter Thiel. This is not to say that the Trump-Musk rift does not offer an illumination. At its heart, it is an encounter between two present-day American archetypes: Musk, a digitally formed persona who seems lacking in emotional intelligence; and Trump, an old-fashioned analogue figure who makes up for what he lacks in knowledge and intellect with his preternatural ability to grasp people and what they fundamentally want. Consider his actions in Los Angeles: a level of policing brutality that plays up to the 'law and order' fever dreams of parts of the American public. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe After all, it is Trump's emotional canniness that has allowed him for decades to play the media like a farmed salmon. As the all-consuming uproar over his break with Musk showed, his strongest talent is to create smoke and mirrors in order to obscure the reality of his actions. His sweet spot is to rivet attention. The media's sweet spot is also to rivet attention. This is what lends such a fatal momentum to every spectacle Trump creates. The more the media conscientiously portrays Trump's cruelty in LA, the more his followers thrill to his power. It is Greek tragedy: every motion of American freedom now has the effect of turning freedom in America in on itself. [See also: Trump's nuclear test] Related
Daily Record
3 hours ago
- Daily Record
Guantanamo Bay: Brits among 9,000 undocumented migrants 'to be sent to notorious camp'
At least 9,000 undocumented migrants, including British citizens, are set to be transferred to Guantanamo Bay in the coming days, according to reports in the United States Thousands of undocumented migrants, including Brits, are reportedly on the brink of being detained at Guantanamo Bay as part of Donald Trump's renewed immigration crackdown, according to The Telegraph. Reports from the United States suggest that at least 9,000 migrants, some hailing from Europe, will be transferred to the infamous detention camp within days. This move marks the first large-scale use of the facility for this purpose since Trump's announcement in January that it could hold up to 30,000 people. Guantanamo Bay, situated in Cuba, was previously utilised to incarcerate combatants captured during George W. Bush's "war on terror" following the 9/11 attacks. Now, it seems the contentious site is being reactivated to temporarily house undocumented migrants before they are deported back to their home countries. Documents viewed by Politico indicate that those transferred are intended to be held for a brief period. At present, Guantanamo houses around 500 individuals, reports the Express. The White House claims this move is designed to alleviate overcrowding in U.S. detention centres as the administration aims for a daily target of 3,000 immigration-related arrests. However, critics argue the real motive is to deter potential migrants. "The message is to shock and horrify people, to upset people," one State Department official told Politico. Reports claim around 800 Europeans are due to be transferred, including British and French nationals, in a move that has sparked concern among European diplomats who typically collaborate closely with the US on migrant repatriations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is contesting the policy in court, stating that detainees face "dire conditions" within the camp, including rodent infestations, inadequate food, and no regular change of clothes. In its writ, the ACLU accuses the administration of utilising Guantanamo "to frighten immigrants, deter future migration, induce self-deportation, and coerce people in detention to give up claims against removal and accept deportation elsewhere". The US Justice Department has denied the allegations, maintaining that the camp is merely being used as a temporary staging post. The State Department has confirmed that "illegal aliens" are being sent to Guantanamo "as a temporary measure", but declined to comment on whether specific governments, including the UK's, had been consulted about the move. This is not the first instance of Britons being detained at Guantanamo Bay, as nine UK citizens were held there in the early 2000s, with five returning home in March 2004, while another nine UK residents without citizenship were also detained at the facility. The unexpected decision to use Guantanamo as part of the immigration crackdown is already causing diplomatic tensions and legal challenges, with increasing pressure on the White House to justify this move as more details come to light.
