
‘Controlling husband killed wife after tracking her to women's refuge'
A 'controlling' husband stabbed his wife to death after tracking her to a hostel where she was staying to escape him, a court has been told.
Habibur Masum, 26, launched a 'ferocious' knife attack on Kulsuma Akter, 27, while she pushed their baby in a pram, after confronting her on a street in Bradford, West Yorkshire.
A court heard Ms Akter had come to Bradford to be housed in a refuge 'to escape [Masum's] violence, jealousy and controlling behaviour'.
Jurors at Bradford Crown Court heard that Masum had previously threatened to kill Ms Akter and, at the time of the attack on April 6 last year, was subject to court bail conditions ordering him to keep away from her.
Opening the case on Monday, Steven Wood KC, prosecuting, said Masum tracked Ms Akter to Bradford and, in the days leading up to the attack, tried to trick her into leaving the hostel by pretending to be from a GP's surgery and offering her fake appointments.
The court heard that Ms Akter was walking with a friend on April 6 while pushing her seven-month-old son in a pram and was confronted by the defendant, who walked with her into a shop.
Mr Wood said she was shocked Masum was there as she believed he was in Spain.
The court was shown CCTV footage of Masum walking with Ms Akter until he stopped her, spinning her and the pram around before pulling a knife from his jacket.
Mr Wood said: 'He grabs Kulsuma and pushes her into a wall, stabbing her to the body. You will see that Kulsuma then goes to the ground only for the defendant to launch a ferocious and deadly attack.
'When the defendant had finished stabbing her, as a final act of sheer gratuitous violence, he kicks Kulsuma before moving away, but not before ensuring that he disposed of the knife.'
The court heard Ms Akter suffered multiple stab wounds to her body and face including a wound to the neck which partly cut her windpipe and severed her left jugular vein.
Mr Wood told jurors: 'The [prosecution] say this was cold-blooded, calculated, pre-meditated murder.
'Why would the defendant take a knife with him to meet his estranged wife unless he planned to use it?'
'Threats to kill her'
The court heard that by November 2023, Ms Akter and the defendant had been married for about 18 months.
Mr Wood said: 'Generally, the relationship had been good, but there were already warning signs.
'There were previous incidents of his making threats to kill her and in July 2023, she was staying with family members because of his controlling behaviour.'
Jurors heard that, on Nov 23, Masum became jealous over a 'completely innocuous' message she had received from a male colleague, grabbing her face, slapping her and pulling her hair.
'In what you may think was a chilling prediction of what he was to do in April of the following year, he told Kulsuma, 'I am going to murder you, and the police will be taking me',' Mr Wood said.
The next day, after coming home from work, he went into their bedroom carrying a knife and said: 'Tell me what your relationship is with him, or I will kill you,' jurors heard.
'Afraid that he would cut her throat'
Mr Wood said that Masum put the knife to Ms Akter's throat and 'she was so genuinely afraid that he would cut her throat, that she thought that the only way to stop him was to keep the baby on her lap'.
A female family member who was concerned for Ms Akter's safety called the police, and Masum was arrested that night, jurors heard.
In his interview at Ashton police station he denied using any violence towards his wife and 'just asked who the guy was'. He also told officers he had no mental health conditions.
The court heard Masum was charged with two offences of assault by beating and one offence of making a threat to kill.
Jurors heard Ms Akter told a social worker from Oldham Council she 'believed that one day her husband would kill her', asking if her son could stay with her sister-in-law and brother 'when this day comes'.
She was moved to accommodation in Bradford in January 2024.
Mr Wood said in March, Ms Akter told her social worker Masum had contacted her on Snapchat, threatening that if she did not go back to him by April 1 he would kill her brothers.
'Nobody will love you like I do'
The court heard the refuge contacted the police and, the next day, Masum sent Ms Akter a Snapchat video of the Bradford Interchange railway station with a message saying he had 'come to her town'.
He later sent her a photo of the refuge with a message saying: 'I know that you are living in this place. I knew from the first day you moved here.
'If I had any wish to kill you, I could have from the first day. You do not know what you have lost but one day you will understand. Nobody will love you like I do.'
The court heard Ms Akter's social worker arranged for her to be rehoused and she was due to move on April 8, but in the meantime she heard from one of Masum's relatives that he was in Spain, and 'felt safe to leave the refuge' on the day she was killed.
Masum denies murdering Ms Akter but has pleaded guilty to manslaughter and possession of a knife.
He also denies two charges of assault, one count of making threats to kill and one charge of stalking.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body
Legal aid lawyers are facing 'administrative chaos' in the aftermath of a cyber attack amid fears more providers will leave the sector, a representative body has said. The Legal Aid Agency's (LAA) digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, were taken offline following the data breach in April. Payments for the publicly funded work initially stopped and legal aid applications are not able to be formally granted at the moment. This has left legal aid law firms, often small businesses, to decide whether to take on the risk of cases and hope they will be approved and paid retrospectively. Chris Minnoch, chief executive of Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG), said that lawyers have called the representative body 'in tears' having 'sleepless nights' waiting on news and payments coming through from legal aid because of the cyber attack. 'They've been on the verge of collapse because they hadn't had payments for one or two weeks,' he told the PA news agency. 'What a cyber attack like this brings to the front of your mind is that the legal aid scheme is teetering on the precipice of collapse. 'If it goes and if lawyers just say, 'I can't do this anymore', it has profound consequences for almost every aspect of society, because we are talking about the law of everyday life.' Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in care proceedings or at risk of homelessness, as well as people accused of criminal offences. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) previously said a 'significant amount of personal data' of people who applied to the LAA since 2010, including criminal records, was accessed and downloaded in the cyber attack. The Government became aware of the hack on April 23, but realised on May 16 that it was more extensive than originally thought, and took the system offline. Mr Minnoch said it was 'unforgivable' for an organisation of that size to not have a business continuity plan that anticipated this sort of fallout. 'You'll have a number of providers that, by the end of this digital disaster we're dealing with, won't be there anymore because they just couldn't afford to, and a number of others that just say, 'I just I can't take this anymore',' he said. 'Every time there is some sort of crisis that befalls the legal aid scheme, you end up with fewer lawyers willing to do it at the end of it.' An MoJ source had put the breach down to the 'neglect and mismanagement' of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA's systems have been known for many years. The attack happened as the MoJ was working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks. At the end of May, the LAA brought in a scheme for civil legal aid providers to be able to receive payments based on their average billing until the system is back online, when lawyers will then submit specific bills and applications. On June 4, payments were sent to more than 1,700 solicitors and barristers who took up the offer. Payments for criminal legal aid cases separately have also resumed, the MoJ said. Mr Minnoch added that while the civil legal aid payments should have been done two weeks earlier, they were an important step forward, effectively loaning providers cash while they cannot claim money owed to them. 'I think one of the ways they need to mitigate this is by being as flexible as possible with providers, once the situation is restored to some sort of business as usual, because they're going to be punch drunk by the end of this, they're already punch drunk,' he said. There are also concerns the move will create a backlog of providers trying to push through all their cases that need to be claimed in a short period of time when the system is back up and running, to effectively gain the income to repay the loan as quickly as possible. Jenny Beck KC, co-chair of the LAPG, said: 'There's administrative chaos in an already beleaguered and fragile supplier base. 'Nobody does it because it's a very sensible business proposition. People do it because they genuinely care about vulnerable people and they want to help them.' Ms Beck, who runs a family law practice, said her firm's workload is 60% legal aid work helping extremely vulnerable people such as domestic abuse survivors who need protection orders. She told PA a 'good proportion' of clients are reliant on legal aid to access their rights which is a 'massive access to justice issue'. Of the legal aid work, Ms Beck, who is also a member of the Law Society's access to justice committee, added: 'We'll have to supplement it with private income sources, because it's anxiety provoking to be working at risk on cases that we haven't an absolute guarantee that we're going to be paid.' 'I am going to continue to work at risk because I cannot leave my clients vulnerable. 'But I know that many other firms are very concerned about taking that risk.' Nicola Jones-King, Law Society council member for legal aid, said that while taking the risk for certain types of cases is 'okay' when it is known legal aid will be granted, there is more concern for means and merit tested applications for legal aid such as in housing or cases against police action. 'If it's a slightly more challenging or unusual case, or it's a case where you need to assess merits and means, that's more problematic obviously for the solicitor to take that on that risk,' she said. The risk also applies in cases that already have legal aid granted, but then need further approval to continue the funding at different stages in the proceedings. Stuart Nolan, managing director at DPP Law Ltd and chairman of the Law Society's criminal law committee, said his firm's criminal law department is made up of about 95% of legal aid cases and could sustain the current situation 'at a cost' for a couple of months before feeling the pinch. 'The impact is so far reaching, clogged criminal justice system, this is prospect of more delays,' he said. 'The quicker it's sorted out, the better for everyone.' A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'We understand the challenges this situation presents for legal aid providers – we are working as fast as possible to restore our online systems and have put in place contingencies to allow legal aid work to continue safely with confidence. 'These measures include setting up an average payment scheme for civil legal aid cases, resuming payments on criminal legal aid cases, putting in place processes for urgent civil application approvals and confirming that criminal applications made in this time will be backdated.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Missiles thrown at police as violence breaks out in NI
Missiles were hurled at police officers and houses set on fire following a protest over an alleged sexual assault case in Northern Ireland. The streets of Ballymena town centre, located about 30 miles from Belfast, turned into chaos on Monday night as masked youths attacked police vehicles and threw projectiles at officers, some setting buildings alight and smashing in windows. Footage of the violent scenes captured houses up in flames. In one video, a masked man was seen throwing an object at police vans as a crowd looked on. PSNI riot officers swarmed the streets near Clonavon Terrace to bring the disorder under control, blocking off the area. Local media reported that paint and masonry had been thrown at PSNI Land Rovers. 'A number of missiles have been thrown towards police with damage reported to a number of properties,' a PSNI spokesman said. 'Officers are in attendance to ensure the safety of everyone involved. They will remain in the area tonight to continue to monitor the situation.' The disorder comes after hundreds of protesters gathered in the town centre, following a case involving two teenage boys who appeared before Coleraine Magistrates' Court earlier in the day, accused of sexually assaulting a teenage girl in the County Antrim town. Irish media outlet RTE News reported that the teenagers, who are Romanian and spoke through an interpreter, cannot be identified because of their ages. A separate police statement from Sunday said two teenage boys had been charged with attempted rape in connection with a serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in Ballymena on Saturday evening. People have been told to avoid the Clonavon Road area until further notice. In a statement, Chief Superintendent Sue Steen urged for locals to 'remain calm and to act responsibly'. 'Violence and disorder will only place people at greater risk,' she said. 'Our priority is to keep the community safe, and I would appeal to everyone to work with us to bring calm to the area as quickly as possible.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
With five failed suicide bombers on the loose, the cop asked an explosives officer what would happen if one detonated a bomb when we raided the flat. 'We won't know much about it, Tony' came the reply... The 7/7 bombings, 20 years on
Park-keeper Jackie Whitcombe was picking up litter in Little Wormwood Scrubs Park, West London when he came across a plastic container in the bushes. Bending down, he grabbed it in his gloved hand and suddenly spotted dozens of screws, washers, nuts and bolts taped around the outside. He knew instantly what it was – a makeshift bomb designed to kill and maim.