logo
Teens accused of vandalizing Mercer Island Middle School enter court-led diversion program

Teens accused of vandalizing Mercer Island Middle School enter court-led diversion program

Yahoo05-03-2025

The two teenagers accused of vandalizing a middle school on Mercer Island in January will enter a court-let diversion program rather than face hate crime charges. The two 16-year-olds wrote antisemitic and racist messages on Islander Middle School on January 1 and were caught by Mercer Island Police in mid-January.
'And I think for a lot of folks it felt like a punch in the gut,' Maxima Patashnik with the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle said.
The King County Prosecutors Office told KIRO 7 that based on the evidence of the case, they felt the diversion program would help these teenagers learn from their mistakes.
'The point of what we are doing here is to try to get these 16-year-olds to realize how hurtful the hateful actions were,' Casey McNerthney with KCPAO said.
McNerthney says they do not divert teenagers who have committed violent crimes, crimes involving bodily harm or crimes where a weapon was used to threaten people to diversion programs. King County's court diversion program has been around since 1978. According to King County, 192 cases were completed which is estimated at an 80% success rate. To go deeper into the numbers, 131 cases involved male offenders and 61 with female offenders.
'It is not something that is experimental. You know, court diversion has been around for years,' McNerthney said.
The KCPAO says they talked with Mercer Island Police, School District, as well as Jewish leaders within King County about their decision not to prosecute for now. Those within the Jewish community like Patashnik say while they understand the move by prosecutors, it still stings some.
'A diversion program doesn't feel good for folks who see hate crimes when they feel a hate crime,' Patashnik said.
But Patashnik hopes these teens truly learn by having those conversations with leaders and others within the Jewish community about the ramifications of their actions back in January.
'Accountability is really important and if this option is available to them and if the justice system does create opportunities for education,' Patashnik said. 'And that is going to be really critical. And if that doesn't happen, then there should be other measures of accountability,' she continued.
Prosecutors say if the two teenagers do not complete the diversion program, they will bring the case back into court.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ Sues California Coffee Shop for Allegedly Refusing to Serve Jews
DOJ Sues California Coffee Shop for Allegedly Refusing to Serve Jews

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

DOJ Sues California Coffee Shop for Allegedly Refusing to Serve Jews

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit against Jerusalem Coffee House in Oakland, California, and its owner, alleging that the shop had discriminated against Jewish customers, the agency said in a June 9 'It is illegal, intolerable, and reprehensible for any American business open to the public to refuse to serve Jewish customers,' said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

Greta Thunberg and ‘selfie yacht' pals refused to watch ‘horror film of the Oct. 7 massacre': Israel
Greta Thunberg and ‘selfie yacht' pals refused to watch ‘horror film of the Oct. 7 massacre': Israel

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Greta Thunberg and ‘selfie yacht' pals refused to watch ‘horror film of the Oct. 7 massacre': Israel

Greta Thunberg and other detained activists on her Gaza-bound 'selfie yacht' refused to watch a film detailing Hamas' slaughter of more than 1,000 people in Israel, according to officials. 'Greta and her flotilla companions were taken into a room upon their arrival for a screening of the horror film of the October 7 massacre,' Israel's defense minister, Israel Katz, said of the group's arrival in the port of Ashdod after they were detained about 125 miles off the coast Monday. But 'when they saw what it was about, they refused to continue watching,' Katz said, according to The Times of Israel. Advertisement 'The antisemitic flotilla members are turning a blind eye to the truth and have proven once again that they prefer the murderers to the murdered and continue to ignore the atrocities committed by Hamas against Jewish and Israeli women, adults and children,' Katz said.. 3 Thunberg was deported Tuesday after being detained aboard the Gaza-bound 'Madleen,' which Israel dismissed as a 'selfie yacht.' REUTERS 3 Thunberg smiled as she was detained by Israeli forces. Advertisement Thunberg agreed to be deported from Israel along with two other activists and a journalist, according to Adalah, a legal rights group representing the group. The 22-year-old was flown home to Sweden via France. Other activists who refused deportation were being held in detention, with their cases set to be heard. 3 Video from Oct. 7 showed Hamas terrorists kidnapping an bound and bloodied woman. The activists said they were protesting a humanitarian crisis in Gaza since the conflict began with Hamas' terror attack 20 months ago. Advertisement Israel has maintained that such ships violate its naval blockade of Gaza. Israel, for its part, dismissed the saga as a stunt, noting how the celebs onboard, including Irish actor Liam Cunningham, had posed smiling pictures for social media. 'The 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. The passengers are safe and were provided with sandwiches and water,' the ministry posted on X.

Jay Tcath: The phrase ‘Free Palestine' is freeing no one, but it is killing some of us
Jay Tcath: The phrase ‘Free Palestine' is freeing no one, but it is killing some of us

Chicago Tribune

time7 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Jay Tcath: The phrase ‘Free Palestine' is freeing no one, but it is killing some of us

Twice in a recent two-week period, two men were arrested for terrorist attacks while invoking 'Free Palestine.' For them, the phrase served as a rallying cry sanctioning violence. Their targets were, in the deadly Washington, D.C., attack outside the Jewish Museum, a young couple, and in Boulder, Colorado, people attending a vigil for the 58 hostages held by Hamas. For the two suspects — neither of whom is Palestinian — the phrase 'Free Palestine' was a license to kill. They are not the only ones who understand it that way. It was just two months ago when the official residence of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro was set ablaze after a Passover Seder event. The perpetrator, who has confessed, cited the governor's views on Palestine. Another 'Free Palestine' chanter struck and killed an elderly California Jewish man with a bullhorn in November 2023. Not all 'Free Palestine' chanters understand it as a call to violence. Yet the phrase's intentional lack of specificity is a big part of its utility: What the user means is left to the audience's interpretation. There are several prevalent understandings, ranging from noble to murderous. 'Free Palestine' can mean the justified yearning for Palestinians to enjoy the full freedoms, prosperity and security to which all people are entitled. It can be a desperate plea for new, elected leaders. Hamas has governed Gaza with an iron fist — and no elections — since 2007, and the West Bank hasn't voted since 2006. This indifference to basic democracy does not portend well for what freedom would look like in a free Palestine. For others invoking it, the phrase's imprecision is precisely the point. 'Free Palestine' can be exploited for misleading purposes. The lack of specificity avoids answering the most revealing question: Would a free Palestine be alongside Israel or instead of Israel? Of course, Hamas and many of its global advocates shamelessly reject the 'alongside' option. In Gaza and elsewhere, they threaten anyone willing to accept such a peaceful compromise. Other 'Free Palestine' supporters are unwilling to pay the negative public relations cost of acknowledging that 'instead of' is their nonnegotiable option. Why? Because their 'instead of' option can only be realized with the annihilation of a sovereign United Nations member country populated by 10 million Jews, Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Druze and others. Editorial: We mourn the slayings of two young Israeli Embassy workers, and the crime's Chicago tiesThe 'instead of' option glorifies killing Jews, be it on Oct. 7, 2023, in Israel; in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; in Washington; in Boulder; and God knows where next. While we don't know where the next 'Free Palestine'-inspired attack will happen, we do know, tragically, it isn't a matter of whether it will happen. It is simply a matter of when. In most instances, 'Free Palestine' is protected free speech in the United States. But after this most recent series of 'Free Palestine'-motivated attacks and with an accompanying deafening silence of condemnation from most pro-Palestinian groups, is it so unreasonable to ask that those promulgating it own up to what it does and doesn't mean to them? And for us Jews. The murderers do not indulge the lie of most pro-Palestinian advocates that there is a distinction between Jews and Zionists. Neither the California, Washington, Harrisburg or Boulder offenders bothered to inquire about their victims' identities or ideologies before attacking. Whether the victims were even Jewish or Zionist, or how they understood 'Free Palestine,' was irrelevant. Politicalized catchphrases are proliferating. While many may seem innocuous, they can be dog whistles that are understood differently by different audiences. Our business, civic, educational, faith, media and political leaders have learned how to navigate these linguistic minefields. They now need to tune their antennas to the violent impact that 'Free Palestine' and the demonization of Zionists are having on American Jews. Those of us yearning for both Israeli-Palestinian peace and Jewish safety worldwide understandably want to know what 'Free Palestine' means to those in our midst. The Boulder attacker planned his violence for a year, authorities say. There are undoubtedly others right now planning their own attacks to 'Free Palestine.' Such would-be assailants should know whether their attacks are endorsed or opposed by the 'Free Palestine' campaign they have adopted. We already know how two people over the last three weeks understood the phrase's imprecision. And we have seen and heard all too many applauding this resistance. Attempting to define the meaning of another group's self-understanding is likely to evoke accusations of mansplaining. But in the absence of a widely embraced peaceful definition of 'Free Palestine,' being accused of insensitivity is easy to bear. We Jews are just trying to freely celebrate a Seder, visit a museum and rally for hostages. That yearning involves no duplicity or threats to others. Jay Tcath is executive vice president of the Jewish United Fund.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store