An Aussie ute driver could be hit with massive fine after they were spotted with a load of wood in a national park
Australians have been warned it is illegal to remove dead trees from national parks as a Queensland authority cracked down on an unsuspecting ute driver.
Queensland National parks posted the warning over the weekend, having captured images of a ute filling with wood from a wildlife camera inside a park.
'We speak for the trees when we say everything within a national park and state forest is protected in Queensland,' the department said in a social media post.
'Whether it was a live tree like this one, or a dead one, they all play an important part in the protected ecosystem and should never be firewood sources — and penalties do apply.'
The department said dead trees and branches still serve as vital habitat for animals and other plants.
Removing dead wood can interrupt the natural decomposition processes and the construction of shelter and food sources for other animals.
In Queensland, taking wood from national parks and state forests can attract on-the-spot fines of up $1,378.
Serious breaches can be prosecuted in the courts to the tune of $137,850 for a first offence, and $413,550 for repeat offenders.
Senior Ranger Compliance Luke Male previously said 'people unlawfully collecting firewood have a total disregard for the forest and other forest users'.
'They are impacting native species through the removal of habitat, introducing weeds and other pests to the environment or damaging waterways.
'Forest officers can seize firewood and timber, conduct vehicle searches as well as seize vehicles and equipment such as chainsaws used in committing the offence.'
'The department has a zero-tolerance approach to the unlawful collection of firewood and other items in our State forests and timber reserves, and people caught breaking the law can expect a fine or prosecution.'
One man was fined $1,437 at Pinnacles Reserve near Townsville after being caught cutting timber in a protected area.
In another case, a person was fined $30,000 in New South Wales for collecting firewood from the Murrumbidgee Valley.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER VAN ONSELEN: This is the REAL absurdity at the heart of Antoinette Lattouf's court victory over the ABC - as public broadcaster wastes $1.1million of YOUR money on a spat with the casual radio presenter
By any measure, sacking someone with just two shifts to go on a five-day contract is absurd. Doing so in the middle of a political firestorm, triggering a courtroom circus that dragged in the broadcaster's top brass and cost over a million dollars in legal fees, defies belief. But that is what the ABC did to Antoinette Lattouf, who has 'won' her legal case against the public broadcaster. And for what? A $70,000 payout with a finding that the ABC breached the Fair Work Act. She'll declare victory and claim vindication - and Lattouf is now skirting around the fringes of media, hiring the same PR team as Abbie Chatfield and launching a 'media literacy and critique' venture. For the ABC's part, it could have simply let her finish her shifts, distanced itself from her views in the meantime and never hired her again. All without the consequences we've now seen play out. Or it could have never hired her in the first place for that five-day contract and none of this would have happened. For a public broadcaster, clinging to an annual budget of over one billion dollars of taxpayers' money, this was bureaucratic buffoonery of the highest order. Let's be clear: this isn't about whether Lattouf should have kept her gig. It's not about free speech, race, or even social media boundaries for journalists, although all those themes were trotted out during the saga. It's about proportionality, common sense and the sort of managerial judgement you'd hope for from an adult organisation. She had two shifts left. Two! What was to be gained by cutting her mid-week and mid-contract? Even if you thought Lattouf's posts were tone-deaf, inappropriate or politically fraught, surely the smarter play was to let her quietly finish the week and then, behind closed doors, make sure she was never invited back again. That's how any competent employer deals with a short-term casual arrangement. Instead, the ABC turned a temporary contract into a federal case, literally. Now it's facing the consequences. The court found the ABC breached the Fair Work Act by terminating her, in part, over her political views on the Israel-Gaza conflict. The claim that she was discriminated against based on her race didn't hold up -- those allegations were rejected outright. But the finding on political opinion was enough to trigger a payout. And let's not forget, this all comes after $1.1 million of public money was ultimately wasted on external legal fees. Over a fill-in radio host, no less. Even Lattouf, for all her victory-lap commentary to come, must wonder whether the whole thing was worth it. No matter the outcome, she's now a lightning rod in media circles, a name entangled with internal ABC politics and Middle Eastern geopolitics. Perhaps she will be happy with that - who knows. But the real embarrassment belongs to the ABC. It overreacted and got caught trying to manage its image, rather than manage its staff, and now gets to wear the badge of 'Fair Work violator'. It gets worse when you see the internal chatter dragged into the daylight. Former chair Ita Buttrose was joking in emails about Lattouf calling in sick to avoid embarrassment. The managing director was texting about an 'Antoinette problem'. Not exactly the kind of cool-headed leadership one expects in a crisis. The ABC seemed more interested in damage control than employment law compliance, that's for sure. At the centre of the case was a Human Rights Watch post Lattouf shared accusing Israel of using starvation as a weapon of war. The fact is, it didn't happen on air. There was no live rant, no breach of ABC editorial guidelines in the studio. The offending posts were external and the ABC's own evidence about whether she'd been clearly told not to post was at best a murky mess of suggestions, warnings and 'we'd rather you didn't do it' nudges. In the end, the ABC was hoisted by its own indecision. If they'd simply handled the matter with some quiet professionalism, finishing her contract, documenting concerns and moving on, they wouldn't be writing a cheque with your money after today's decision. Instead, they manufactured a high-profile debacle over a contract that would've expired naturally within 48 hours.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Australia mushroom trial live: judge's charge to Erin Patterson jury continues on day 37
Update: Date: 2025-06-25T01:26:03.000Z Title: Welcome to day 37 Content: of Erin Patterson's triple murder trial. Justice Christopher Beale will continue instructing the jurors this morning before they begin their deliberations later this week. Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to a beef wellington lunch she served at her house in Leongatha, in regional Victoria, on 29 July 2023. She is accused of murdering her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, and her estranged husband's aunt, Heather Wilkinson. The attempted murder charge relates to Heather's husband, Ian. She has pleaded not guilty to the charges. The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately poisoned her lunch guests with 'murderous intent', but her lawyers say the poisoning was a tragic accident.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Mum's fury after her two-year-old son was locked in a storeroom at daycare
A mother whose two-year-old son Ezra was accidentally locked in a storeroom at daycare says the traumatising event has left him unable to sleep. Meryl, whose son attended Little Zak's Academy in Austral, western Sydney, shared her ordeal with Ben Fordham on 2GB radio on Wednesday. She said Ezra was locked in a storeroom for an unaccounted period of time on January 6 before he was found by a parent who had come to pick up their child. 'He's struggling a little bit,' she said. 'He says he doesn't want to be in dark spaces and he says he's scared. He wakes up in the middle of the night and he struggles to go back to sleep. 'He wets himself all through the night, all his clothes are soaked.' Meryl described breaking down in tears when she saw CCTV of the incident. 'It was (an accident). Apparently, the educator had walked into the storeroom and she didn't close the door behind her,' she said. 'She exited the storeroom and didn't look around for any children and just closed the door. There's no sound on the video but I saw him pointing so I think he must have been crying.' Meryl alleged the footage appeared to be doctored, with a blank space cutting in 'out of the blue' and a woman suddenly appearing in shot, suggesting it had been spliced. 'This was confirmed by the centre director. She admitted the video was doctored,' she told the Sydney radio station. Meryl said a man could be seen pointing to the storeroom and he is the one who opened the door, letting Ezra out. 'My son just walked out. It just shattered me,' she said. 'No-one even comforted him when he walked out. Nobody even hugged him or consoled him, he was just standing there.' The mother said she reached out to the NSW Department of Education in February but is yet to receive a response. Daily Mail Australia has contacted the department and Little Zak's Academy for comment. In a statement to 2GB, Zak's Academy apologised for the incident and said it issued formal warnings to staff involved. 'We are deeply sorry about what happened at our Austral centre... when a two-year-old child was accidentally left in a children's play and equipment storeroom for almost 13 minutes,' it said. The daycare said several children had followed a staff member into the room but were told to leave. It said the educator did not realise Ezra remained inside when the door closed. 'We immediately contacted the child's family, told them what happened, and apologised. We understand how frightening this must have been for both the child and the parents,' the statement continued. The daycare said it reported the incident to the early childhood education and care directorate of New South Wales and is fully cooperating with their investigation. 'We've taken comprehensive action, including formal warnings for the staff involved, mandatory retraining for all educators, updated supervision policies, new safety checks when exiting storerooms, and additional signage reminders,' it said.
