German court dismisses Peruvian farmer's climate lawsuit against RWE
A German appeals court has dismissed the case of a Peruvian farmer suing the energy giant RWE for climate damages.
The upper regional court in Hamm rejected the argument by the farmer and mountain guide Saúl Luciano Lliuya that his home was at direct risk of being washed away by a glacial flood.
Lliuya initially filed a case against RWE in 2015, backed by the non-profit Germanwatch, to make the company contribute to local flood defences in line with its share of planet-heating pollution. The German electricity company is one of the world's biggest greenhouse gas polluters but has never operated in Peru.
Lliuya's case was at first thrown out by a lower court in Essen, where RWE is headquartered, but the appeals court in Hamm later found it to be 'admissible'. Climate campaigners hailed it as a development that would open the door for fossil fuel companies to be held liable in civil courts for global harms.
The court said it would not be possible for Lliuya to appeal against Wednesday's ruling.
Lliuya's home sits in the Andean town of Huaraz, large parts of which were wiped out in 1941 when Lake Palcacocha overflowed and triggered floods that killed thousands of people. A hearing in Hamm in March centred on the direct risk of a glacial lake outburst flood resulting in damage to Lliuya's property.
Climate campaigners have increasingly taken polluters to court for their role in heating the planet, several of which have resulted in courts ordering greater efforts to cut pollution.
Similar cases that are ongoing have been filed in Belgium by a cattle farmer targeting the French oil giant TotalEnergies, and in Switzerland by four Indonesians targeting the cement maker Holcim.
More details soon …
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Peru reinstates full protection of Nazca Lines reserve after controversial cutback
Peru's government has reversed its controversial decision to shrink the protected area surrounding the Nazca Lines, which had faced criticism for opening the area to informal miners. The country's culture ministry on Sunday nullified last week's resolution that had reinstated the boundary map set in 2004. The switch followed severe backlash after the government approved a 42% reduction in the zone — about 2,400 square kilometers (926 square miles) — and to allow miners to seek formal permits in previously restricted areas. The original protected zone — spanning 5,600 square kilometers (2,162 square miles) — will remain in effect. The ministry also ordered an update of the site's management plan within 10 days and the formation of a technical panel, which will include government representatives, academics, UNESCO, and civil society figures to define future use and conservation strategies. The area in question forms part of a UNESCO-recognized World Heritage Site, home to the Nazca Lines — massive geoglyphs etched into the desert over 1,500 years ago — and one of Peru's most fragile desert ecosystems. 'Thanks to the strong rejection by national and international public opinion, the government revoked the reduction of the area of the Nazca Archaeological Reserve,' Mariano Castro, Peru's former vice minister of the environment, told The Associated Press. Castro said the government justified its decision by saying it had not previously discussed its decision publicly. 'In other words, it (the government) does not go so far as to admit the measure was wrong, despite evidence of the presence of illegal mining, which seriously endangers and threatens the integrity of the Nazca Lines and petroglyphs,' he said. The ministry said a new government entity will be created to oversee the site's management, and technical studies will be published to ensure transparency and accountability. Peruvian environmental lawyer, César Ipenza, who follows the issue closely, welcomes the technical panel, which will include local authorities, but he still has concerns. 'The truth is that the local authority is actually the one that has been calling for the reduction of the boundaries of the Nazca Lines,' Ipenza told the AP. 'There will also be strong pressure from miners for this to go ahead." Ipenza is concerned that informal mining has been steadily expanding in the area, even though all mining activity is officially banned. 'The government hasn't taken action to remove these miners and as a result, there has been pressure to officially open the area to allow informal and illegal miners to become formalized,' he said. The AP contacted UNESCO for comment. The organization said it would aim to provide information on Tuesday, as Monday was a public holiday in France, where it is headquartered. —- The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Peru drops plan to shrink protected area around Nazca Lines archaeological site
Peru's government has abandoned a plan that reduced the size of a protected area around the country's ancient Nazca Lines, after criticism the change made them vulnerable to the impact of informal mining operations. Peru's culture ministry said on Sunday that it was reinstating with immediate effect the protected area covering 5,600 square kilometers (2,200 square miles), that in late May had been cut back to 3,200 sq km. The government said at the time the decision was based on studies that had more precisely demarcated areas with 'real patrimonial value'. The remote Nazca region located roughly 400km (250 miles) south of Lima contains hundreds of pre-Hispanic artefacts and its plateau is famous for the Nazca Lines, where more than 800 giant desert etchings of animals, plants and geometric figures were created more than 1,500 years ago. Unesco declared them a World Heritage site in 1994. A technical panel of government representatives, archaeologists, academics and members of international organisations, including Unesco, will work together to build consensus on a future proposal for zoning and land use in the area, the culture ministry's statement said. Critics of the proposed change had said it would weaken decades of environmental protection and open up the Nazca Archaeological Reserve to informal and illegal mining, just as international gold prices peak. According to figures from the Peruvian ministry of energy and mines, 362 small-scale gold miners operate in the Nazca district under a program to regularize their status. Authorities have previously conducted operations against illegal mining in the area. Luis Jaime Castillo, a former culture minister and an archaeologist who has studied the geoglyphs, said the protected area was already 'infested with illegal mining and mineral processing plants'.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Locals fear Britain's biggest solar farm will 'spoil views of the Malvern Hills' if plans for huge 271-acre development go ahead
Britain's biggest solar farm could spoil views of the Malvern Hills, protesters have claimed as they marched in an attempt to halt plans for the 271-acre development. Opponents to the proposals by RWE Renewables UK Solar & Storage Ltd near Powick in Worcestershire claim it will destroy the landscape and could pose a fire risk. The group from Preserve Powick Landscape and Nature (PPLAN) marched through parts of the proposed site yesterday having already erected signs around the area. They are worried that the solar farm will disrupt views of the Malvern Hills, cause harm to local wildlife and present a fire risk from batteries used to store energy. Powick resident Steve Lloyd, who lives across from the proposed entrance to the site, told how he was also concerned about increased traffic and noise in the area. He said: 'It's mainly the size of it. I'm a farmer - and it's so close to my house and my farm. I'm just thinking about what could go wrong. 'Apparently they can catch fire from the battery storage system. People are worried about the fire risk, and the wildlife. There's also the glare from it - and just the actual size of it. Traffic is also very much a concern - it's on a single track lane.' The site would be bigger than that current largest scheme in the UK, which is found at Shotwick Solar Park in Deeside, North Wales, which covers 250 acres. PPLAN leader Peter Loader, who lives adjacent to the proposed development, is concerned about fire risks and traffic disruptions which could last seven months. He said: 'The reason I've been coordinating these events that have taken place in opposition to the solar farm is primarily the impact on the landscape. 'There are a lot of people who won't be able to walk through that area - and the Malvern Hills is an area of outstanding natural beauty. 'Both the Malvern Hills Trust and the National Landscape people have objected because the view from the Malvern Hills would clearly be impacted by this site. 'The A449 has more than 20,000 vehicles a day going along it - and that is pretty much the capacity for a single carriageway A-road. 'Because they need to lay a cable from this side to the nearest substation, they're proposing putting roadworks up for seven months - and that's pretty serious.' Mr Loader said the construction would 'affect people's day to day lives' with taking children to school, but could also impact ambulances. He continued: 'Many residents are concerned about the fire risk - when they catch fire, they can't be put out. When that happens, there's a toxic vapour cloud that forms, and the fairly large housing estate is downwind.' Fellow campaigner and resident Andrea Trickett-Born told BBC News: 'I do think there is a better place for solar panels. 'It's on roofs, it's on public buildings, it's on schools, it's on warehouses, on car parks - anywhere else that's not just taking up available, usable farmland.' But Bente Klein, from RWE Renewables UK Solar & Storage Ltd, told the BBC that the site was near the National Grid and it was therefore the 'best and most suitable' location. She added that trees and hedges meant there would be no major effects on views. Malvern Hills District Council told the BBC it could not comment on the project during the planning process, but confirmed that the application was submitted in January.
