
Man jailed for running 'unspeakable' child sex abuse website
A man has been jailed for helping run a website that hosted computer-generated child sex abuse material so graphic and 'unspeakable' a district court judge has suppressed the details of it.
Donald James Sarratt was charged in 2023 as part of Operation Dark Orchid, a joint operation between New Zealand police and US authorities.
That investigation centred on a website containing more than 85,000 computer-generated images, 30,000 being realistic images depicting the graphic sexual abuse and torture of children as young as infants.
A forensic examination of Sarratt's electronic devices also identified child sexual abuse material involving real children.
The Wellington District Court heard as one of the website's facilitators, the 35-year-old was involved in the website's upkeep, as well as assisting the almost 200,000 members with their log-ons and password issues.
He was also involved in the banning and unbanning of members. He held the role for nine years.
It was also revealed that Sarratt, who has no previous convictions, believed that by providing the computer-generated images it would stop people from offending in person.
In May 2023, a sample of images was taken to illustrate the website's content. These weren't available to the public but could be viewed by the site's members.
At yesterday's sentencing, Judge Noel Sainsbury suppressed the name of the website, which is part of an ongoing investigation.
He also suppressed the descriptions of the material that had been seized, saying there was no public interest in releasing details of the images.
But the judge broadly categorised the images as ranging from images of nude children, through to images of bestiality and sadism.
The judge noted the children in these images ranged in age from 3 to 13 years and 'involved the grossest depravity, representing sadism and torture for sexual gratification'.
'It is difficult to imagine images that would be worse,' the judge said.
As the website's facilitator, Judge Sainsbury noted Sarratt's role wasn't merely functionary but placed him at the highest level of the organisation. His actions had allowed the website to continue, he said.
Judge Sainsbury ruled that a person who was involved in distributing objectionable material containing real children generally faced a higher level of culpability than someone who was distributing objectionable material that had been computer-generated.
On that basis he reduced the starting point of 12 years, which the Crown had suggested, to nine years' jail.
But because some of the computer-generated images investigators had found were the worst of their kind, and went beyond what was usually possible, he added a year to the starting point.
Sarratt's lawyer Gretel Fairbrother submitted a psychiatric report suggesting Sarratt exhibited traits of autism spectrum disorder.
But Crown prosecutor Wilber Tupua said there was no nexus between Sarratt's undiagnosed personality issues and the offending, so he shouldn't receive any credit for it. Judge Sainsbury agreed.
The judge did agree with Fairbrother that Sarratt's guilty pleas and cooperation with the police, whose investigation is ongoing, warranted a discount. Sarratt's family 'bewildered'
Judge Sainsbury also referred to letters he'd received from Sarratt's family.
'It is clear that they are as bewildered as anyone that he is before the court. They speak to someone who, in their experience, is gentle, loyal, and caring towards family. They find it simply bewildering that he would be involved in anything involving harm to a child,' the judge said.
Judge Sainsbury said notwithstanding the offending, it was clear his family saw Sarratt's 'good aspects' and remained supportive of him.
'You are lucky to have that support,' the judge said.
Judge Sainsbury said while it was clear Sarratt held a genuine, but misguided belief, that by providing computer-generated images he was assisting those with a predilection for child sexual abuse material not to offend in person, that required more evidence than a statement at sentencing to carry any weight.
On charges of possessing and distributing objectionable child sexual abuse material, Sarratt was jailed for five years and six months. Police say images depict 'unspeakable' child abuse
Following Sarratt's sentencing police released a statement. The officer in charge of Operation Dark Orchid, Detective Sergeant Daniel Wright, said the sentence was a testament to the thorough investigation conducted by New Zealand Police and US law enforcement.
'This investigation, involving our law enforcement colleagues from the US, demonstrates our commitment to keeping our communities safe, and that we will use all resources available to us to hold to account those who prey on the vulnerability of children both in New Zealand and abroad,' he said.
Travis Pickard from the Department of Homeland Security Investigations said they worked with law enforcement partners from across the globe to stop those who produce and distribute child sexual abuse materials.
'The vast number of images uncovered in this joint investigation - many featuring disturbingly realistic computer-generated representations of unspeakable child sexual abuse - is unacceptable in any part of contemporary society.
'This sentence reinforces our dedication to protecting the innocence of our most vulnerable populations from such abhorrent child exploitation,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Gisborne-based fishing company fined $13,000 for prohibited fishing; boat and catch seized
A Gisborne-based fishing company and its skipper were fined $13,000 after fishing in a seasonally prohibited area. The Crown also seized the company's $250,000 fishing vessel and more than $16,000 worth of fish.


NZ Herald
28-05-2025
- NZ Herald
Gang retribution: Comancheros member Patrick Langi pleads guilty to Auckland shootings
He is the second defendant to have pleaded guilty in as many weeks after the Crown agreed to drop a charge of attempted murder. Justice Mathew Downs set a sentencing date of August 19 alongside co-defendant Elijah Meyer, 23. The duo was due to stand trial next month. 'Targeted retribution' Court documents state Langi and Meyer, a Comancheros prospect, carried out the shootings in August 2023 after high-ranking patched member Khalid Slaimankhel said he wanted out. Slaimankhel is serving a six-year sentence in Ngāwha prison in Northland for his part in a Comanchero's methamphetamine distribution scheme. 'Mr Slaimankhel recently sought to leave the Comancheros and was ordered to pay his way out in order to leave the gang, which he did not do,' authorities said of the gang's new ill will towards the member. 'These events were a targeted retribution intended to deliver a message to Mr Slaimankhel.' On August 10, 2023 - just over two weeks before the shootings occurred - the Department of Corrections searched Unit 8 of Rimutaka Prison, where gang president Naufahu and fellow patched member Jalal Safi were housed. Comancheros MC president Pasilika Naufahu, pictured during a court appearance in 2021. Photo / NZME Officers seized notebooks from Safi's cell, as well as a mobile phone he was using when the search began. Authorities would later realise the phone had been used to search Google Maps for the same streets where the shootings would later occur. The notebooks also contained addresses on those streets, with notations such as 'mum' and 'brother older'. On August 15, 10 days before the shootings, Langi used his phone to screenshot maps of the same addresses. That same day, co-defendant Meyer was 'directed by unknown parties to conduct surveillance' on the addresses. He took notes and photos that were later recovered from his phone. Timeline of violence Langi and Meyer showed up at the first property, in Epsom, about 7pm on August 25, 2023. Meyer fired at least three shots while another unidentified man was armed but his gun appears to have jammed, documents state. 'One of the fired projectiles went through the wooden window frame of the master bedroom at the front of the house, causing the interior of the window frame to chip off,' court documents state. 'At the time of the shooting there were eight occupants within the house, including three young children playing in the master bedroom that was shot at.' Thirteen minutes later, after fleeing the scene, the stolen car used by the duo was torched. Meyer and Langi arrived at the next home, in Hillsborough, at 7.31pm in a second stolen vehicle. Khalid Naser Slaimankhel appears in the High Court at Auckland in 2015. Photo / Jason Oxenham Meyer got out of the vehicle and began knocking on the door aggressively. Langi did not go up to the door with him, but he was charged with the same offence for having aided or encouraged the crime. Those inside the home had been eating upstairs, and a man yelled that he was coming down. Meyer opened fire as the man opened the door, with the bullets lodging in the door as the victim attempted to shut it. 'Mr Meyer placed his foot in the door to attempt to keep it open but [the victim] managed to push the door closed, and locked it, before attempting to run up the stairs away from the defendant,' police noted in the summaries of facts for both men. Meyer then walked to the front entrance window and aimed three more shots at the fleeing man – one of them grazing him in the back. Less than 15 minutes later, the second stolen vehicle was set alight at nearby Nash Rd Reserve. Police caught up to Meyer and Langi at 8.07pm that day after spotting them in a third stolen vehicle near the reserve. Gunshot residue was found in the vehicle and on both men's clothing, authorities said. The family of Comancheros member Khalid Slaimankhel was targeted after he tried to leave the gang. 'The defendant Langi declined to comment to most questions, [but] when confronted with the gunshot residue evidence he stated that it was 'bullshit' and police must have made that up,' court documents state. The duo could face up to 14 years' imprisonment for arson and up to seven years for discharging a firearm with reckless disregard. 'The shooting and related arson of the getaway vehicle was part of a co-ordinated attack to target members of Mr Slaimankhel's wider family that Mr Meyer and Mr Langi were a key part of,' the summaries of facts state. Good family, tragic past Slaimankhel, formerly a Dunedin bodybuilder, was also found guilty in 2015 of kidnapping a fellow bodybuilder and perverting the course of justice. He came from a good family, his lawyer said at his 2022 Auckland District Court sentencing on drug trafficking charges. Lawyer Mark Ryan said at the time his client turned to drugs and gangs after his father was killed by a suicide bomber in Afghanistan. Khalid Naser Slaimankhel in a bodybuilding competition. Dr Hashem Slaimankhel had been a physician in Afghanistan and Pakistan before arriving in New Zealand in 1998 and taking on a role as a refugee health worker. His advocacy made enough of an impact in New Zealand that police publicly praised the 'dedicated and deeply respected community leader' after his death in January 2018. The elder Slaimankhel was among the nearly 100 people killed when an ambulance with a bomb inside detonated at a police checkpoint in Kabul. The Taliban claimed responsibility for the massacre. At his 2022 sentencing, the younger Slaimankhel told Judge Evangelos Thomas he wanted to leave gang life behind him. Prosecutors voiced some scepticism but acknowledged the goal was a worthy one if genuine. 'It's going to take an awful amount of work to make sure that is carried through,' Crown prosecutor Jacob Barry said. The judge agreed, turning to Slaimankhel's family and supporters, who filled the courtroom gallery, after the defendant was led away to begin serving his sentence. He encouraged them to continue supporting him. 'If people aren't working hard around him, he's going to be straight into that [gang] environment,' the judge said. 'This work is really only beginning now.' Craig Kapitan is an Auckland-based journalist covering courts and justice. He joined the Herald in 2021 and has reported on courts since 2002 in three newsrooms in the US and New Zealand. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


NZ Herald
26-05-2025
- NZ Herald
Hung jury in St Patrick's Day rape trial
The matter has now been put to an administrative hearing, where it is expected a date will be set for a retrial. A fast connection A man, who was based in Whakatāne at the time but is from overseas, was accused of raping a woman he'd met on March 17, 2023, at a pub. He told the court he and the woman formed a fast connection during St Patrick's Day festivities. Despite him learning she was engaged, and drawing her attention to the ring on her finger, he said she'd continued to flirt with him, touching his chest and arms in public view of his friends, and her fiance. The Crown said he'd misinterpreted her open and friendly manner, and formed sexual desires for her. He admitted he'd been interested in having sex, but did not agree he'd misinterpreted her attention. The after party The Crown says the main question, however, was not about how she'd behaved at the pub; it was about what happened when they got back to the flat she shared with her fiance, and others, for an 'after party'. Once there, the Crown says it became clear his hopes of a consensual sexual encounter were dashed. The woman vomited in front of the man and the fiance and shortly after 'put herself to bed and went to sleep'. In his closing address, Richard Jenson said the woman became overwhelmed by 'tiredness and alcohol'. Her fiance said in evidence that after she said she was going to shower, he instead found her asleep in bed, vomit still in her hair. He told the court she'd been as drunk as he'd ever seen, so he checked her breathing and that she was lying on her side. The Crown case is from that point on she was asleep, and unable to consent when sex took place. Jenson suggested the man's evidence of the vomiting incident was 'crucial' in the jury's assessment of his credibility. The man said it was self-induced, and not because of her intoxication, but as though she was bloated with 'too much fizzy drink'. Jenson suggested in closing that the man 'appreciates the significance of the fact he saw her vomit' and has constructed his account to suit. 'If she simply wanted to vomit, she would have tied up her hair and taken herself discreetly to the toilet,' Jenson said. This aspect, 'despite [the man's] composure and smooth manner', had pushed 'his credibility to breaking point'. The man's lawyer said his client was articulate, educated, used to 'speaking to people', and 'able to describe what happened that night'. His well-spoken manner and education shouldn't be held against him, Mitchell told the jury. Why didn't he use protection? The Crown claimed because the man hadn't used a condom he was carrying that night, it suggested the sex was quick, opportunistic, and hadn't been consensual. If it had happened as he'd described, with foreplay and build-up, he'd have had 'ample' time to put on a condom. However, Mitchell said 'drunk unprotected sex' happened 'all the time'. If it had been a 'carefully planned sexual attack', the jury might logically think he would have used a condom. 'There would be no forensic evidence that anything had happened as far as semen inside her vagina.' The judge summed up the case saying the case was all about 'credibility and veracity'. The Crown attacked the man's credibility on the basis it was too polished, rehearsed, and lacking in concessions. A previous rape complaint The defence said the woman had a tendency to lie, pointing to a previous false rape complaint which the woman had admitted she'd made. The woman said the complaint from a decade ago, was made when she was young, and she had been caught up in the lie. She said 'the word rape was used', once police turned up after a call from her boyfriend, who'd got the wrong idea about her being made 'uncomfortable' by a taxi driver, and she 'went along with it'. Mitchell suggested that was the same scenario as the current complaint. Her fiance, when confronted by her having sex with another man, was left with two choices. If she was having consensual sex with the good-looking man she'd been flirting with all night, his 'whole world would be turned upside down'. Mitchell said the fiance had chosen to believe she was being raped, and she'd gone along with it, and 'played dead' after the sexual encounter to make it appear she'd been asleep during it. The Crown said the situation was obvious to all who'd witnessed the woman after the sexual encounter. Both those who knew her best, and experienced police officers who'd come to the house after the alleged attack, could see the woman was heavily intoxicated. It had been clear to her fiance that she was asleep when he walked in, the Crown said.