USS Orleck celebrates the grand opening of the Jacksonville Naval Museum
The USS Orleck Naval Museum is now officially open for business after officials cut the ribbon Saturday morning on a project 18 months and countless hours in the making.
>>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<<
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
The museum honors an important piece of naval history, with over a dozen different exhibits displaying historical artifacts from throughout World War Two, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.
'It really goes back to the end of World War 2,' explained Navy veteran Tim Equels. 'And then in Korea, the ship was famous for its gunnery. They would call it the train buster. It would go up off the coast of North Korea and South Korea and shoot trains.'
Equels was a crew member on the USS Orleck over 40 years ago, serving first as a gunnery officer on board all the way back in 1977.
Equels told Action News Jax Saturday that being back on board certainly brings many memories, as well as excitement for the future of the ship ahead in Jacksonville's shipyards - serving as a much-needed remembrance to all who served aboard.
'There's a lot of people that spent a lot of time and sacrificed their whole, in some cases their life to defend our country,' Equels explained. 'So this is part of that.'
With MOSH set to find its home along Jacksonville's Northbank in the years to come, as well as the Jacksonville Fire Museum, this vital piece of naval history also serves as just a preview of what's to come, in the historic revitalization of downtown Jacksonville.
'Once they get the fire museum up, you'll see Jacksonville history from 1902 to the present, and then MOSH,' explained USS Orleck president Daniel Beam. 'MOSH can't get over here quick enough for us to get the shipyards really going to where it should be for a city of this size.'
More information on the museum's hours and ticket prices can be found HERE.
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
8 hours ago
- Atlantic
Being a Dad Is About More Than Being Around
In the summer of 1968, a few months after the Tet Offensive shook America's confidence in the Vietnam War, my father deployed for his second combat tour. He left behind six children and his wife of 21 years. Over the following year, he commanded an infantry brigade in combat, earned his third and fourth Silver Stars for valor, and all but secured his promotion to brigadier general. It was a career-defining tour. But for my siblings and me, 9,000 miles away, it was also a year without a dad at home. My mother carried the family with extraordinary strength. But we missed out on things: Dad wasn't around to watch baseball or coach basketball. The familiar figure renovating the old house my parents had bought after his first tour in Vietnam simply wasn't there. Parts of my father's life did not go smoothly. He made mistakes—as humans do. And if you assessed him strictly on his 'dad duties,' you may have found him lacking. Yet when he died at 89 and our family buried him at Arlington National Cemetery, I knew I'd had the best father I could have asked for. For as long as I can remember, I wanted to be like him. He was steady under pressure, humble in success, principled always. His example gave me something to aim for—even if I never quite hit the mark. This is what the best of dads do for us. They set the mark. Today we talk a lot about the importance of fathers taking on an equal role in parenting responsibilities, and that's a good thing. But we don't talk enough about the power of example. Fathers are more than disciplinarians, providers, or part-time coaches. They are living, breathing case studies in character, and whether they're physically present or not, their influence seeps into their children. Children are observant. Even when they don't have the words, they are watching. They see how we, as parents, treat people. They hear what we say when the person being discussed isn't in the room. They notice when our words don't match our behavior. And quietly, over the years, they begin to understand what character really looks like. We tend to default to simpler measures: Did you get to the game on time? Did you plan the vacation? Did you take the photo? Those things matter too, of course, but they are incomplete. If we want our children to understand courage, we must demonstrate it. If we want them to value humility, we must practice it. These aren't messages delivered in a single conversation. They're impressions formed over a lifetime. That's why the responsibilities of fatherhood extend far beyond the household. Who we are in our community, in our professions, under pressure—that's what counts. When our external behaviors contradict what we preach at home, we can't expect our children to absorb the better version. They will inherit the whole. This is not a permission slip to skip bedtime stories or miss first steps. The presence of a parent matters. But what matters more, and carries further, is the parent's character. Character is what follows our children when they are alone, unsure, or tested; it becomes the compass they refer to when we're not around to offer directions. As I reflect on my own failings as a dad, what I hope I offered most is not memories but modeling. I tried to live my values. I tried to be the same man in uniform as I was at home. That's what I learned from my own father. The day my dad died, he had four grandsons serving in Afghanistan. They weren't their grandfather, or their respective fathers, but each understood the sacrifice they were making. Their own children lost out on some things, but received the gift of example in return. This Father's Day, I propose a broader definition of what it means to celebrate fathers. Let's celebrate those who lead lives worth emulating, even when they're not in the room. We don't need perfect fathers. But we do need honest ones. Consistent ones. Men of character who, even in their absence, remain guiding stars.
Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
My father, so long ago
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Cancer took him when he was only 56 and I was in my first year of college. He never got to see me grow up and into myself, make my way in the world, or father my own children. He was also spared watching his good Catholic son grow long hair, protest the Vietnam War, take up the guitar, and God knows what else. The tectonic societal shifts and grinds of that era would likely have played out at our kitchen table with glass-rattling shouts and fist-pounding. He may even have disowned me but, then again, he may have related to and embraced me. I had learned from my mother, when I was much too young for such a revelation, that my father himself had a 'lost' period before they met. What did that entail? Again, I'll never know, but I like to think there was bacchanalian revelry, foolish chances taken, and at least one wild, decidedly ill-advised love affair. And I hope that if there was conflict with his own father, it was resolved. Related : Advertisement For years I had a recurring dream in which he would suddenly appear. He had been in a faraway sanitarium or a medical facility, alive all these years, and I, his oblivious, self-centered son, somehow failed to grasp this or reach out to him. I would wake feeling hollow, shaken, and ashamed. Advertisement I can only remember one piece of advice my father gave me: 'Slow down when approaching a curve, then accelerate through it.' I think of him every time I drive a mountain road, and his advice has been helpful as a metaphor as well. When life has thrown me a curve and I locked the brakes, it did not go well. I, like my father, learned to commit to a course and power through. And I, in reaction to my father's taciturn nature, learned to be forthcoming, perhaps overly so, and have passed down a surfeit of advice and anecdotes to my own children. They will be well equipped should they, one day, attempt to decipher and demystify me. One moment remains frozen in time from his last summer. I was soon to leave home for college, and he had just been diagnosed with terminal cancer. I was riding my first set of wheels — a beat-up, BSA 650 motorcycle — up Glenwood Way when I glanced over to see Dad standing on the porch of our 1960s ranch. His eyes met mine, and he flashed a rare smile at the sight of his middle son roaring off on that black beast towards a future he would not live to see. Advertisement
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
I served my country. Trump's military parade is horrifying for a specific reason.
When I was in seventh grade, Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, Iraq's tiny, oil-rich neighbor. In response, the U.S. assembled a coalition of 42 countries to eject his army with military force. Looking back, the success of Operation Desert Storm may have seemed inevitable. But at the time, to most Americans, the Gulf War was anything but a foregone conclusion. In fact, early 1991 was a white-knuckle period for a country still traumatized and reeling from the Vietnam War. That perception was only heightened living with a mother whose cousin had been killed at Long Khanh in 1969. I had a front row seat to all the buildup, as my family lived in Shreveport, Louisiana, just across the Red River from Barksdale Air Force Base and the 2nd Bomb Wing. Every week, if not every day, I watched B-52s on the horizon as pilots practiced touch-and-go landings. I know I wasn't the only person in Shreveport that winter suddenly filled with a mixture of pride and apprehensiveness. At the time, the U.S. hadn't used its military like this since the evacuation of Saigon. Not only had it been largely untested for nearly 20 years, but the all-volunteer force had never been mobilized on this scale. There was this fear — almost a complex — that any major war we attempted would end up the same. Of course, the fears were unfounded. Saddam's military fled Kuwait in a matter of weeks and President George W. Bush wisely chose not to press the effort by toppling the Iraqi government. Instead, tens of thousands of U.S. troops returned home that spring and summer to cheering crowds. There was a national sigh of relief. In Shreveport, my entire middle school flooded outside the morning the bombers returned. We'd been told they would fly directly over the city. And sure enough, they did. Low and slow, B-52 after B-52 cruised over the center of town. Thunderous cheers and applause rose as each aircraft passed by. That parade in the sky was cathartic for many people. It served a purpose. There was a perception that America was reclaiming a sense of pride, not only in its military, but in itself. Years later, I would join the military myself and serve in a conflict for which there was no neat ending and no parade. But what that day in Shreveport taught me was that there is a time and place for military parades and displays of martial power. They don't come around often, but they do come around. The ticker tape parades after World War II were another example, as was the Grand Review of the Armies held in Washington, D.C., after the Civil War. Now, 34 years after the Gulf War, America is holding another military parade. Only this time, instead of serving a purpose founded in genuine love of country, built on a celebration of communal sacrifice, we're faced with a president hosting tanks and planes for a martial display that, officially, is to mark the Army's birthday, but just so happens to fall on his birthday too. President Trump's military parade is, of course, troubling for its similarity to those that often take place in other countries like North Korea or Russia. In rare cases, such France's Bastille Day parade, they are something of a celebration of democracy. But far more frequently, they are shows of force and expressions of belligerence. It's arguable that they're signs of deep-seated insecurity on the part of weak autocrats who demand them. What is inarguable is that an endless parade of tanks and missiles is often the calling card of fascists. And that's where we now find ourselves. This use of the U.S. military is horrifying for a specific reason. It's not simply because he's showing off the hardware. It's horrifying because the parade serves as a mirror, reflecting where we are as a nation. The worst possibilities we could infer from Saturday's unwarranted, Kremlin-style parade are now flying low and slow in the parade of headlines across our news feeds. To counter peaceful protests, the Trump administration has federalized thousands of California National Guard troops in opposition to the governor — something that hasn't been done in 60 years. On Thursday, a U.S. district judge deemed the federalization 'illegal' and returned control of the guardsmen to the state, though an appeals court temporarily halted the order after the Trump administration appealed. The president also ordered 700 active duty Marines into Los Angeles. One doesn't need a law degree to reach the same conclusion as California officials: that this is an egregious violation of the Posse Comitatus Act — the law which severely limits how the federal government can use military personnel to enforce domestic policies. Earlier in the week, Trump's Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress, 'We're entering another phase ... where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland.' Taking it still further, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Thursday, 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' When Sen. Alex Padilla rose to question that antidemocratic view, Secret Service agents forcibly removed him from the room. It's unclear where this country goes from here, but U.S. political and military leaders need to make a choice, and they need to make it now. Are we going to slip further into authoritarianism, where laws are imposed by fiat and enforced with military might, or will we fight with everything we have for the republic? This article was originally published on
