logo
George Floyd Mural Destroyed in Houston is a Sign of a 'Project of Erasure,' Historian Says

George Floyd Mural Destroyed in Houston is a Sign of a 'Project of Erasure,' Historian Says

A mural of George Floyd in Houston's Ennis art block was destroyed as a result of demolition, sparking concerns amongst members of the community regarding the erasure of history.
Demolition efforts conducted in the Third Ward this week have destroyed pieces of community artwork, including a mural of George Floyd painted in 2020 after his death sparked nationwide protests. Members of the community have expressed outrage at the destruction of the mural, which attracted a variety of visitors to Elgin and Ennis, KHOU reported.
"I was ready to cry," Naomi Carrier, a local historian who has worked in the Third Ward for over three decades, told the outlet. "Because as a preservationist, what's left to say what this community once looked like."
Carrier described how about 35 artists all collaborated on the murals that had been painted onto the building as a community project. The project allowed art students to create on a large canvas they otherwise would not have had access to.
"It's a project of erasure," Carrier told the outlet. "Give me two years and that'll be two or three to four-story condo on this block."
She also shared her concerns with how, a few days ago, private demolition crews began tearing down the old Riverside Negro Hospital building. Carrier acknowledged the communities worries about what is set to replace the building.
"Dedicate some funding to the preservation of the history of this community before it all goes up in smoke, down in rubble," Carrier said.
The removal of the George Floyd mural comes after other works of art erected during the 2020 protests have been removed or called into question. Back in March, Washington D.C. tore up its "Black Lives Matter" street mural following an ultimatum from the White House to remove it.
Originally published on Latin Times

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Lawmaker Insists His Party is 'Stuck' Trying to Pass Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Despite Being Against Raising the Deficit
Republican Lawmaker Insists His Party is 'Stuck' Trying to Pass Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Despite Being Against Raising the Deficit

Int'l Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Republican Lawmaker Insists His Party is 'Stuck' Trying to Pass Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Despite Being Against Raising the Deficit

Texas Rep. Pete Sessions said Republicans are "stuck" trying to pass President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" even though many in the party oppose increasing the national deficit. Republican lawmakers are pushing forward a sweeping reconciliation package backed by Trump, despite internal disagreements over its fiscal implications. The bill, touted by Trump as a major legislative win, has faced resistance from some GOP members who warn that it could balloon the federal deficit. Still, the party has largely rallied behind it due to Trump's continued influence over the Republican base and leadership. During an appearance on CNN, Sessions was pressed on the bill's merits and struggled to defend the legislation's contents. He admitted that it wasn't ideal for deficit-conscious Republicans, saying "it is not a perfect world" and that the GOP is navigating pressure to support Trump's priorities. The Texas congressman conceded that the legislation contains "spending items" he wouldn't typically back but insisted it was a compromise his party felt obligated to pursue. "It's going to go through the Senate and we're going to find out what the Senate wants to do and then we're going to take the final vote," Sessions said. "I don't want to have any deficit spending, but what I'm trying to suggest to you is that we're stuck in a paradigm where we have to pass this ourselves." The bill's path forward remains uncertain as Republicans try to balance loyalty to Trump with concerns about spending. Sessions' remarks have added to the perception that Trump continues to steer the GOP's agenda—even when it clashes with the party's core messaging. Originally published on Latin Times

GOP Lawmaker Mocked for Insisting Autopen Use Could 'Get Rid of' Biden's Executive Orders: 'I Want Proof Trump Signed 1,500 Pardons'
GOP Lawmaker Mocked for Insisting Autopen Use Could 'Get Rid of' Biden's Executive Orders: 'I Want Proof Trump Signed 1,500 Pardons'

Int'l Business Times

timea day ago

  • Int'l Business Times

GOP Lawmaker Mocked for Insisting Autopen Use Could 'Get Rid of' Biden's Executive Orders: 'I Want Proof Trump Signed 1,500 Pardons'

U.S. Rep. James Comer (R-KY) arrives for a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on November 19, 2024 in Washington, DC. Latin Times Republican Rep. James Comer is being widely mocked online after claiming Joe Biden's executive orders could be overturned in court, because they may have been signed with an autopen. During a recent Fox Business interview, Comer suggested the Trump administration could invalidate many of Biden's executive orders if they were "authorized by staff" and signed via autopen. "If these executive orders were just done and authorized by staff, and Joe Biden's signature was forged on the autopen, as some would believe," Comer said, "then I think the Trump administration is gonna have a pretty good standing in court to get rid of a lot of these executive orders." Comer: "If these executive orders were just done and authorized by staff, and Joe Biden's signature was forged on the autopen as some would believe, then I think the Trump administration is gonna have a pretty good standing in court to get rid of a lot of these executive orders." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 4, 2025 The Kentucky congressman did not cite legal precedent to support the claim. Autopen signatures, mechanically reproduced versions of a president's real signature, have been used by multiple administrations, including Trump's, for routine authorizations and urgent orders. Federal law permits the use of autopen with the president's prior approval, and the method has long been considered legally binding. Nevertheless, Comer insisted in his interview that the use of autopen could raise "serious constitutional questions" about the legitimacy of Biden's executive actions. Comer's comments quickly backfired. On social media, users flooded platforms like X with memes and jokes, blasting Comer's theory as unserious and conspiratorial. I'm so tired of hearing about this. Does anyone actually think that trump signed over 1500 j6 pardons himself? There's no way. Not with the way he signs his name. His hand would fall off 🤦🏼‍♀️🤷🏼‍♀️🙄 — abortion is healthcare 🌊💙 (@DebbiePatrizi) June 4, 2025 So if the President signs and authorizes electronically, as we have all done, you want disqualify the signature. But if Trump is signing in person, even though he hasn't read or have any idea what he is signing, as we saw last week, that's just fine and dandy. Right? — Laura Townsend ⚖️☮️🇺🇦🌻🇺🇸 (@goaloa) June 4, 2025 "I want video proof that trump personally signed 1,500 pardons," one user joked. Another quipped, "Has Comer proved anything, about anything, ever?" I want video proof that trump personally signed 1,500 pardons — Laura Di Bella 💙💜🧡 (@LauraDiBella19) June 4, 2025 Has Comer proved anything, about anything, ever??? — Artie Vandelay (@ArtieVandelay1) June 4, 2025 A third added: "Comer is now a synonym for waste of time." Comer is now a synonym for waste of time — melsthe1 (@melsthe11) June 4, 2025 Legal experts have dismissed Comer's comments, noting that autopen use has never been successfully challenged in court when authorized by a sitting president. For now, Comer's claims appear to have more viral value than legal weight. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Didn't Read Trump Spending Bill: 'I'm Being Very Honest'
Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Didn't Read Trump Spending Bill: 'I'm Being Very Honest'

Int'l Business Times

timea day ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Didn't Read Trump Spending Bill: 'I'm Being Very Honest'

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) admitted she voted for President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" without realizing it contained a provision she "adamantly opposes" — because she didn't read it before voting. On Tuesday, Greene came out against a controversial provision in the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" (OBBB) that places a 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence, despite voting in favor of the legislation. "We don't get the full bill text until very close to the time to vote for it," Greene claimed in her defense. "So that was one section that was two pages that I didn't see. And I'm being very transparent and honest about it with everyone." When she discovered the provision, which bars states from enforcing any law that limits or regulates AI systems in interstate commerce for a decade, Greene took her outrage to X. "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278–279," Greene wrote. "I am adamantly OPPOSED to this... I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there." Greene added that she would not support the bill if the provision remained intact when it returns to the House after Senate revisions, calling it a "violation of state rights" and warning about the dangers of unchecked AI development. The admission renewed scrutiny over lawmakers' handling of sprawling legislation with varied and far-reaching implications. Originally published on Latin Times AI Artificial intelligence

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store