Illinois limits out-of-state police access to plate readers after Texas case
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WTVO) — Illinois will shut out-of-state police from accessing the state's network of license plate readers after a police department in Texas used the system to find a woman who came to Illinois for an abortion.
According to the , police in Mount Prospect shared license plate reader data upon a request from Texas police.
The incident occurred in May, when Texas authorities of nearly 83,000 license plate reader cameras to locate a woman who had a self-administered abortion.
Johnson County Sheriff Adam King said his agency had requested the data out of concern for the woman's safety, not 'to block her from leaving the state or whatever to get an abortion.'
'License plate readers can serve as an important tool for law enforcement, but these cameras must be regulated so they aren't abused for surveillance, tracking the data of innocent people or criminalizing lawful behavior,' said Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias said. 'No one seeking legal healthcare services in Illinois should face harassment or jail – period.'
Thousands of license plate readers have been installed throughout Illinois and other states to help law enforcement track suspects in crimes. The technology allows police to read thousands of license plate readers per minute and provide realtime information on vehicles' location.
Police departments using the network regularly request data from other law enforcement agencies to investigate crimes.
Following the reversal of Roe v. Wade, other states, including Texas, outlawed abortion and made the practice a prosecutable crime.
In 2024, Illinois passed a law that prohibits police departments from sharing data that would allow out-of-state authorities to pursue individuals due to their immigration status or seeking an abortion.
In response to the recent incident, Giannoulias has instructed Flock Safety, the company that operates the cameras, to shut off access for out-of-state authorities if they issue requests that violate Illinois laws.
Giannoulis also said his office has asked the Illinois Attorney General to conduct an audit to ensure Illinois police agencies don't violate state law.
The Secretary of State said between January 14 and April 30, there were 262 out-of-state searches for immigration related matters in Mount Prospect alone.
In December 2022, the reported that about a third of abortion patients in Illinois are now from out of state, after the U.S. Supreme Court abolished Roe v Wade last year.
Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Chicago-based Pro-Life Action League, said that Illinois has become 'the '
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Owner of Berks personal care agency sentenced to prison for Medicaid fraud
The owner of a Bally-based personal care agency has been sentenced to state prison for running a scheme that defrauded Medicaid. Gavin Mata, 36, of Bronx, N.Y., was sentenced Wednesday by Berks County Judge Thomas Parisi to one month in prison, followed by 22 months of parole and five years of probation. Mata was also ordered to pay $235,778 in restitution. Mata pleaded guilty in April to felony Medicaid fraud and perjury, as well as a separate count of Medicaid fraud on behalf of the company. He had been charged following an investigation by the state attorney general and a formal accusation of a crime made by the 47th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. According to officials from the attorney general's office: The investigation showed that between 2020 and 2022 Mata and his company, Part of Our Family Home Care Agency, submitted claims for Medicaid reimbursements using false information or claiming to have provided services that were never done. Some of the claims involved patients that never signed up for or received care from A Part of Our Family, while others regarded employees who were unaware Mata had submitted false claims for hours they allegedly worked. During the grand jury investigation, Mata also testified untruthfully about payroll records. In all, officials documented that Part of Our Family received over $488,349 from Medicaid for nonexistent services. 'The defendant went to great lengths to perpetrate this fraud scheme, falsifying records and reporting bogus hours for employees without their knowledge,' Attorney General David Sunday said in a statement Friday announcing Mata's sentencing. 'Medicaid fraud takes money and resources away from Pennsylvanians in need of care.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the fight over abortion in Kansas and Missouri isn't going away anytime soon
Kansas and Missouri voters have spoken on abortion. But nearly three years after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal right to the procedure, sending the issue back to the states, abortion continues to dominate politics on both sides of the state line. And it's now clear that the situation will continue for at least two more years, if not longer. Missouri voters in November by a slim margin approved Amendment 3, enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution. In 2022, Kansas voters soundly rejected an amendment that would have overturned a state Supreme Court decision that affirmed a right to end a pregnancy. Yet developments in both states this spring, and even in the past few weeks, demonstrate that abortion remains far from a settled matter. Collectively, they show why access to the procedure is poised to remain central to politics in both states through at least 2026. 'For the next, at least, couple election cycles, we're going to figure this out, and we're going to do it at the ballot box,' Missouri House Speaker Jonathan Patterson, a Lee's Summit Republican, said. The Missouri Supreme Court last month effectively reinstated a de facto ban on abortion when it overruled orders by a Jackson County judge that had allowed legal abortions to resume after the November vote. While the high court's decision was on procedural grounds, the practical consequences have been to pause access for potentially months despite the Missouri Constitution now containing a right to reproductive freedom. Kansas lawmakers this spring advanced a constitutional amendment that would provide for the election of state Supreme Court justices. Currently, the governor appoints justices from finalists chosen by a commission. But Republicans have been angry with the court for years over decisions on abortion and other issues. Voters will decide whether to approve the amendment next year, setting the stage for intense campaigning that's certain to center on the future of abortion rights in the state. Before that pivotal vote, a Johnson County jury will be asked to weigh the legality of a slew of Kansas abortion restrictions that providers are challenging. That trial is set to run between September and October. The Missouri General Assembly this spring approved a constitutional amendment that would overturn the amendment just approved by voters. The new amendment, set to be on the ballot in 2026, would allow abortions in medical emergencies and cases of fetal anomalies, such as birth defects. It would also allow the procedure in exceptionally rare cases of rape or incest within 12 weeks of gestational age. In addition to the abortion ban, the constitutional amendment would ban gender-affirming care for transgender residents under the age of 18. Those procedures, which include hormone therapy, are already banned under state law but became a rallying cry among abortion opponents who falsely claimed that Amendment 3 opened the door to legalizing them. 'There's a common theme on both sides of the state, which is that the legislatures don't believe the people of Kansas or the people of Missouri understand how their state processes work or what their votes mean and so they second-guess, again and again, what the people have asked for. In this case, of course, it's abortion rights,' said Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains. In Kansas, the proposal to allow for the election of state Supreme Court justices looms large and is seen by many observers as a proxy fight over abortion. The current amendment would allow justices to make political contributions, take part in political campaigns and hold office in political parties. In theory, a justice could simultaneously lead the state Republican or Democratic party while sitting on the court. For over half a century, the governor has chosen members of the court from a list of finalists curated by a nine-member nominating commission. The current system, instituted after a major political scandal in the 1950s, has over time shielded the court from partisan politics. On the nominating commission, each of the state's four congressional districts is represented by one lawyer and one non-lawyer. The lawyers are elected by other lawyers within their district, while the governor appoints the non-lawyer members. A chairperson is elected by lawyers statewide. The amendment would abolish the commission. The measure doesn't require partisan elections, but would allow the Legislature to set the rules of the elections. Even if lawmakers make the contests nominally nonpartisan, the wide leeway for political activity by justice candidates could effectively lead to Republican vs. Democratic races in all but name. Some supporters of electing justices say abortion doesn't figure into their position. Instead, they cast the current selection process as controlled by a small, select group of legal insiders. Kansas state Rep. Susan Humphries, a Wichita Republican who staunchly opposes abortion, said she wouldn't speak to whether she wants to see an elected court relitigate abortion rights. 'I mean, at the moment we have it, right? It is what it is,' Humphries said. 'They have said there's a right to an abortion in the Kansas Constitution, and so we work with that — even though I'm clearly pro-life.' It's unclear whether the outcome of the judicial selection vote would affect the ongoing Johnson County lawsuit over abortion restrictions currently in Kansas law. While a trial is set to start later this year, Johnson County District Court Judge K. Christopher Jayaram has already temporarily blocked many of the restrictions. Any final decision by Jayaram is almost certain to be appealed up to the Kansas Supreme Court. By the time the lawsuit goes to trial this fall, it might have a different judge presiding over it. The nominating commission has selected Jayaram as one of three finalists to replace Justice Evelyn Wilson when she resigns her Kansas Supreme Court seat on July 4. If Gov. Laura Kelly chooses Jayaram and voters approve next year's direct election ballot measure, he could be the last justice chosen under the system Kansas has used for more than 60 years. Opponents of altering the selection system say it protects the court against partisan politics. They say electing the justices risks expensive, bitterly partisan contests similar to what happens in other states like Wisconsin. In a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court election, the billionaire Elon Musk spent millions, though his favored candidate lost. 'I'm glad that Kansas has listened to the people of Kansas so far — unlike Missouri, who you know, literally just voted and then they're putting it back on the ballot,' Kansas House Minority Leader Brandon Woodard, a Lenexa Democrat, said. 'And yet, I think that we all know that this move potentially to electing our Supreme Court justices is because of school funding and abortion.' Some Missouri GOP lawmakers have also floated the idea of electing state Supreme Court judges, but the idea has yet to advance in Jefferson City. Last year, Missouri Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O'Laughlin, a Shelbina Republican, said she wanted elected judges after the high court voted 4-3 to keep Amendment 3 on the November ballot. Sam Lee, a longtime anti-abortion lobbyist in Missouri, said the relationship between legislatures and the courts has grown more strained in the past three years since the end of the federal right to abortion. At the same time, state courts are increasingly having to wade into thorny questions of abortion access. 'We don't even know what the Missouri Supreme Court ultimately will decide is constitutional and what is not constitutional under Amendment 3,' Lee said. A Jackson County lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood immediately after the November vote sought to strike a range of abortion restrictions in Missouri law, citing the new constitutional protections for reproductive freedom. Circuit Court Judge Jerri Zhang issued two preliminary injunctions blocking many of the rules, and Planned Parenthood resumed providing abortions in February – the first time legal abortion had been available in the state since 2022. But the Missouri Supreme Court in late May ordered Zhang to vacate those rulings and reevaluate her decision, effectively pausing abortion access. Zhang's rulings had temporarily blocked a series of TRAP laws, or Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers, that providers said prevented them from restoring access to abortion. Those laws included a 72-hour waiting period and licensing requirements. Zhang could issue a new preliminary injunction allowing abortions to resume, but the underlying case will continue. A full trial over whether the restrictions should be permanently blocked was set for January. Whatever Zhang decides after the trial is certain to be appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court – something that might not happen until well into 2026. By then, voters will be preparing to cast their ballots on the new abortion amendment. If they approve it, the case will be rendered moot. 'The pro-life community, obviously, is focused on saving the life of each and every mother who's been affected by abortion and their unborn child,' said Missouri state Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican. 'Any single abortion that takes place is a travesty. So that's going to be really driving the fight to undo this abomination that is Amendment 3, which, by the way, isn't really just about abortion,' she said, adding that the amendment is 'sweepingly broad.' Missouri House Minority Leader Ashley Aune, a Kansas City Democrat, said the confusion over the status of abortion rights will make medical providers less likely to practice in Missouri. She said that if 'we can turn the tide' in the General Assembly, that's 'where change really starts.' Republicans hold a supermajority in the Missouri House and Senate. Aune said ending the supermajorities would allow lawmakers to focus on issues that matter to residents, such as child care and public education. 'This patchwork of laws,' Aune said, 'and these abortion bans and these court cases are causing some, you know, some of our most talented OBGYNs and medical providers to leave the state and practice somewhere where they are less likely to be convicted just for helping the patient and providing necessary medical care.' 'That's what people care about,' Aune said. 'People don't want their lawmakers screaming about abortion for the next eight years when there are actual problems to be solved.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sterling Police seek assistance in locating missing woman
STERLING, Ill. (WTVO) — Sterling Police have put out an alert for a missing woman, 22-year-old Adrieannah Carmona. According to police, Carmona was last seen on June 9th at 10:20 a.m. in the area of the 1000 block of 7th Avenue, Rock Falls. Police described Carmona as a Hispanic female, last seen wearing a plain black shirt, black knit shorts, and her brown hair pulled back in a ponytail. She was reported missing by her family, police said. Anyone with information on her whereabouts is asked to contact Sterling Police at 815-632-6640. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
