
'I Humbly Beg Your Speedy Answer' by Mary Beth Horton: Should I marry someone I cannot love? Please advise...
'I Humbly Beg Your Speedy Answer': Letters on Love and Marriage from the World's First Personal Advice Column by Mary Beth Horton (Princeton University Press £20, 216pp)
It happens all over the world, where humans are perplexed and often made miserable by knotty problems thrown their way by life.
People in trouble fret and question, desperately hoping for answers. They lie awake at night, wondering what on earth to do. The lucky ones can confide in a good friend or family member, but what if there isn't one? What if the problem is embarrassing?
That's the moment men and women alike might think of writing to a total stranger – as they have done for generations.
You probably think that 'agony aunt' (or uncle) columns in newspapers and magazines are a modern invention. Not so.
The American historian Mary Beth Norton has unearthed an astonishing collection of 'letters on love and marriage from the world's first personal advice column' – written to a British periodical, dating all the way back to the end of the 17th century.
It was only 50 years after the English Civil War, William and Mary were on the throne, masked highwaymen were still a menace to travellers, upper-class men wore elaborate wigs…and people wrote to the very first personal advice column about sex, love, courtship and marriage.
It all began when a printer called John Dunton had a lightbulb moment – long before electricity was discovered. Why not publish a weekly paper that would answer questions sent in by the men who thronged London's coffee houses?
In The Athenian Mercury he and two male helpers would answer on a wide variety of subjects, such as nature and medicine.
Within a few weeks the first intimate questions began to arrive: 'Should a person marry someone they cannot love?' And 'Is a woman worse off in marriage than a man?'
Maybe those sturdy, bewigged chaps sipping their coffee were softer than they looked. They wanted advice.
Then came another unexpected development – a woman wrote asking 'whether her sex might not send us questions as well as men'. Quick off the mark, the canny Dunton promised they would 'answer all manner of questions sent to us by either sex'.
And they flooded in. When mocked or criticised for 'pitiful' letters, he and his colleagues staunchly defended personal advice: 'Many questions not only have an influence on the happiness of particular men and the peace of families, but even the good and welfare of larger societies…which consists of families and single persons.'
Hooray for that! After writing in the Saturday Mail for 18 years, I know that advice columns remain a force for good. It's obvious that people really need them – and the mixture of practical sense, kindness (and a few necessary kicks) they provide.
Does human nature change so very much over time? Reading through these letters from long-dead men and women I marvel at how much they echo my own postbag.
The world is full of young women taken in by men who didn't make their intentions clear. No wonder this one wrote to the Mercury: 'When a man courts us, how shall we know whether it's for marriage, or for diversion, or any other reason?'
They warn her that the only way to know for certain is if he actually marries her, so hurry to the chapel! Another lady 'in love' wants to know 'how she may decently convince' the man of her passion.
Dunton & Co are frank: 'To be plain with you we find men to be an ungrateful sort of animal in such cases' – a criticism many women who write to me would agree with. Again, the counsel is caution.
Then what of the passionate young man who can't restrain himself: 'Is interrupting repeated discourse by repeated kisses rude and unmannerly and more apt to create aversion than love?'
The reply is glorious: 'Not so hasty, good sir! The truth is, kissing is a luscious diet…He must therefore remember to feed cautiously, as if he were eating melons. Moderation is an excellent thing…Kiss as well as talk, with discretion.'
Wise, because when the kissing stops, conversation is essential.
A recurring theme is young men worried about being inflamed by their passions.
John Dunton expostulates: 'Lovers are ungovernable creatures!' No wonder he has to warn against 'ruin' – for in an age of dodgy birth control, unwanted pregnancy was an ever-present danger. Has there ever been an age when sex didn't cause great trouble?
An ordinary young woman worries that the richer 'gentleman' who 'pretends great kindness' is only after one thing: 'If I consent…I'm sure he'd expect some greater favour than I should be willing to grant before marriage.' In other words, 'impure freedoms'.
The reply is sharp and true: 'If women generally think their lot is hard by reason of their subjection to their husbands…how much harder must be theirs who depend for their bread on the lust of any man, his absolute will and pleasure…'
The lengthy answer shows a knowledge of the ways of the world that's frankly feminist in tone.
One woman calls herself 'an old maid' at 30, and it's also a shock to read the frankness of this lady – 'I am a virgin (at least I pass for such)' – who now wants a 'platonic passion'.
Women looking for husbands were as common then as, in fact, they are now, and to one such, Dunton gives pragmatic advice: 'Don't be too picky in your choice, lest you should get none at all.' Pick an honest man, is his usual counsel.
Of marriage, he advises 'both sides must make allowances', and he tells a man unsure of which woman to choose: 'You must base [passion] chiefly on such of her qualifications as time can never efface, not on beauty which is but a flash, but on prudence, generosity and sweetness of disposition.' Such good sense.
Today nobody would ask advice about the financial prospects of a suitor, nor would young people be expected to defer to their parents, as they were then.
Times change, certainly, yet this book offers ample proof that we do not change that much with them. The problematic marriages, the 'ghosting' of would-be lovers, the children born out of wedlock, the lonely longing for love…

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Children's books should reflect the diverse world they live in
Regarding gen Z parents not reading to their children (Letters, 5 June), we must also consider what children are offered to read. It's not just about reading more, but about stories that feel relevant, spark curiosity and reflect real lives. Many parents we work with say that books often feel repetitive, irrelevant or dominated by the same voices. When children and parents see themselves and their communities in stories, they enjoy reading more, which supports emotional development and academic success. Yet diversity in children's books is falling. The latest CLPE report shows that ethnic minority main characters dropped from 14% in 2022 to 7% in 2023, despite nearly 40% of schoolchildren in England being from those backgrounds. Our study with the University of Manchester, due to be published later this year, highlights how representation boosts Black children's confidence and enjoyment of reading. Diverse stories help children build empathy, understanding and emotional literacy. If we want families to read more, we need books that truly reflect the world we live Ehigie Founder, Imagine Me Stories, Dr Nicola Lester Lecturer in psychology, University of Manchester Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.


The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Kid rotting': why parents are letting their children go wild this summer
Name: Summer kid rotting. Age: The name is new, but long school summer holidays started spreading in the 1840s, thanks to the US educational reformer Horace Mann. Appearance: Laidback and a little messy. What's this Kid Rot then? Does Kid Rock have a brother? No, it's a 2025 way of describing 'letting your kids do nothing in the summer holidays', also known as a 'wild summer'. American parents are fighting back against (or giving up on) expensive, overscheduled summers of camps and activities for their offspring. 'What if, some are daring to wonder, my kid does nothing?' the New York Times reported. A return to the old ways, huh? When I was young, we were sent out with a penknife, a tin of pipe tobacco and a bottle of dandelion and burdock on the day school broke up. It was strongly suggested we should not return home until 1 September. No, you weren't. No, OK, we weren't. We spent six weeks bored out of our minds, watching TV and fighting. We'd have loved expensive, overscheduled summers! Well, some US parents are sick of paying through the nose to keep their kids out of trouble – one interviewed by the NYT spent $40,000 (£30,000) on occupying her three children for eight weeks. Inflation is making summer camps unaffordable for many: a survey found 30% of parents go into debt or defer payments. And while the situation isn't as bad in the UK, it's still a struggle for parents: research last year found UK summer childcare costs £1,000 a kid on average. Ouch! And kids don't even seem to enjoy organised summer stuff much: 'It was a fight every day to get them to go,' one parent told the NYT. 'He cried every single day at drop-off,' a journalist at the Cut said of her son's summer camp. Maybe a bit of boredom isn't so bad. Being bored is being rebranded as the better option for pushy parents. 'I tell them their kid will be more 'ahead' with their own experimentation,' a US educational consultant reassures her anxious clients. But 'their experimentation' will be whatever the algorithm decides – kids will be glued to YouTube, won't they? Yes, screen time is a concern, and if the little darlings manage to enable in-app purchases, your iPad could prove a more expensive babysitter than the fanciest camp. If they're going to be screen rotting all day every day, parents could at least put them to work - give them a bitcoin and a day-trading account and see how much money they can make by September. A bitcoin is currently worth 81 grand – you'd get a lot of fancy summer camps for that. Do say: 'We're having a wild summer.' Don't say: 'Yeah, we're going large at Glasto, microdosing in Mykonos, then an ayahuasca retreat in Peru. What are the kids doing? No idea.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Norwich meeting scheme for new fathers launched
A group to support new fathers hopes the sessions will enable dads to feel less isolated by connecting with others while also bonding with their Get Me Out The Four Walls (GMOTFW) charity, based at Mason Road, Norwich, is behind the new project which aims to help fathers maintain strong mental manager Carrie Dagraca said: "Quite often dads are a forgotten group."Blokes aren't quite as good about talking about their feelings, but it's very important for the wellbeing of the whole family that dads just don't suffer in silence." She added: "We know the mums need support, we know mums can suffer from mental health issues, both during and after their pregnancy and we do have a free peer support service for any mum or dad that is experiencing mental health issues."GMOTFW, which has been running for 10 years, said the meetings were focussed around the use of Lego and other modelling bricks, the idea being this activity will encourage all ages to more about why the "construction" idea was adopted, Eleanor Mason, chair of trustees for GMOTFW, said: "We've really tried over the years to appeal to dads and to get dads to come and see us, and we've found activities like coffee and a chat is not working."Dads do not want to come in, sit in a circle and talk about their feelings. So we figured, just do something a bit different, get the Lego out, they can sit down with their children, have a play, build a house, build a car, build whatever and have a chat."Then if they do decide they want to talk to somebody they can do that afterwards, but just coming along and having some fun, that's fine too." The new group's first session was on Saturday and will be run on a monthly sessions are open to fathers with children under the age of two, or dads-to-be who "may wish to come along to experience what it is like to have small children".Older siblings are also welcome, the charity said. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.