MTN hit by 'cybersecurity incident', customers details compromised
An unknown third-party claimed to have accessed data linked to parts of MTN's systems.
MTN said some customer details were compromised across cetain markets Picture: Moneyweb
Mobile network operator MTN has fallen prey to a 'cybersecurity incident' that resulted in 'unauthorised access to personal information' of some of its customers in 'certain markets'.
However, MTN late on Thursday said it found no evidence that any of its critical infrastructure platforms or services had been compromised.
Cyberattack
'Our core network, billing systems and financial services infrastructure remain secure and fully operational.
'An unknown third party has claimed to have accessed data linked to parts of our systems. At this stage, we do not have any information to suggest that customers' accounts and wallets have been directly compromised,' MTN said.
ALSO READ: WhatsApp account hacked? This is what you need and must do
Investigations
MTN added that it activated its cybersecurity response processes, including informing the South African Police Service (Saps) and the Hawks of the cyberattack.
'We also informed the relevant country authorities and will continue to update them on an ongoing basis while working closely with them and law enforcement agencies in supporting their investigations.'
Confined to SA?
MTN did not disclose which markets had been affected by the cyberattack. However, it may just be related to its South African operations.
'We are in the process of notifying affected customers in compliance with local legal and regulatory obligations'.
Precautions
MTN has urged customers to remain vigilant and follow regular security measures.
'To mitigate any fraudulent consequences, a fraud alert can be placed on an individual's credit report at any of the major credit bureaus. Keep MTN, MoMo and banking apps and devices updated.
'Use strong, unique passwords for accounts and change them regularly. Be cautious of unexpected messages and do not click on suspicious links,' MTN said.
MTN has also urged customers not to disclose information, such as passwords, PIN's, and OTP's, when asked to do so by phone, text message, or email. 'Where multifactor authentication is available, it should be activated,' the mobile network operator said.
ALSO READ: Pam Golding hacked: Real estate giant investigating data leak
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
R500 000 penalty for House of Natural Butters over contaminated peanut butter products
The National Consumer Tribunal has confirmed a settlement agreement between the National Consumer Commission and peanut butter manufacturer House of Natural Butters (Pty) Ltd, after several peanut butter products were found to contain dangerously high levels of aflatoxin, a toxic substance produced by certain moulds. Image: Supplied A peanut butter manufacturer has agreed to pay a R500 000 administrative penalty following a product safety investigation after several peanut butter products were found to contain high levels of aflatoxin, a toxic substance produced by certain moulds. The National Consumer Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the National Consumer Commission (NCC) and peanut butter manufacturer House of Natural Butters (Pty) Ltd, trading as Eden All Butters. According to the NCC, the supplier and the commission entered into the settlement agreement on February 25, 2025, which was subsequently referred to the Tribunal. On June 3, 2025, the Tribunal confirmed the agreement and made it a consent order in terms of section 74(1) of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The NCC said it had first been alerted to the issue in February 2024 through product recall notifications issued by Dischem and Pick 'n Pay. These recalls were prompted by elevated levels of aflatoxin in certain peanut butter products supplied by House of Natural Butters. 'The NCC established that the affected products had higher than legally acceptable levels of aflatoxin, as set out under R1145 Regulation Governing Tolerance of Fungus-Produced Toxins in Foodstuffs,' the commission had stated. Following discussions with the manufacturer, it emerged that House of Natural Butters also produced items for other suppliers. As a result, the company launched broader recalls starting on February 2, 2024. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading An NCC investigation found that between May 11, 2023 and November 6, 2023, House of Natural Butters had 'imported and supplied contaminated, decayed and impure peanuts, groundnuts and byproducts to South African consumers through various retailers.' In confirming the consent order, the Tribunal noted: 'The respondent imported the products from Malawi and Zambia using trucks and trailers, via land borders and port entries. The trucks and trailers did not have the requisite certificates of acceptability required for the transportation of food. Further laboratory test results from various accredited food testing laboratories established that the products were contaminated, decayed and impure.' The matter involving another peanut butter manufacturer implicated in the case is still ongoing. Acting Commissioner of the NCC, Hardin Ratshisusu, welcomed the outcome. 'The NCC welcomes this consent order as it brings this matter against House of Natural Butters to a finality. It is incumbent upon suppliers of food products in the South African market to ensure strict compliance with food safety regulations and the Consumer Protection Act.'
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Monday, 9 June 2025
A bundle of newspapers on the table. Image: The South African/CANVA Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Monday, 9 June 2025. The New York Times front page reported that Russia's spies have a name for China: 'the enemy'. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that police and LA protesters clashed after Trump mobilised the National Guard. The Hindustan Times' front page reported that Manipur was rocked by more violence and that a curfew had been imposed. China Daily's front page reported that trade in services among nations is accelerating. Daily Mail's front page reported on a visa scam that makes a mockery of the Prime Minister's pledge on migration. The Guardian front page reported that Trump had deployed the National Guard on the streets of Los Angeles in a dramatic escalation. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
NPA's Leadership Crisis: Eroding Legal Integrity in Favour of Political Expediency
Calls intensify for National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi's removal as the NPA faces accusations of incompetence and strategic missteps in the wake of a deepening crisis in the criminal justice system. Image: Henk Kruger/ Independent Newspapers Clyde N.S. Ramalaine On 3 June 2025, the Free State High Court in Bloemfontein ruled that the extradition of Moroadi Cholota from the United States to South Africa was unlawful. This landmark judgment has not only released the state's key figure in the high-profile R255 million asbestos corruption case but also cleared the way for the prosecution of others involved. Still, it has also exposed deep procedural and constitutional failings within South Africa's prosecutorial regime. Her unlawful extradition from the United States and subsequent release by the Free State High Court reveal more than just procedural oversight, they expose systemic dysfunction, a repurposing of primary objectives of the NPA as articulated in its strategic ethos within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and unravels the credibility of South Africa's anti-corruption drive. The Ruling A Blow to Prosecutorial Credibility Presiding over the matter, Judge Phillip Loubser was unequivocal: "The prosecution has not found reasonable doubt, or at all, that there was a valid or lawful request from South Africa for the extradition of Ms Cholota from the United States. It follows that if there was no valid extradition request, then the extradition itself was without any basis and, therefore, unlawful." The National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) failure to adhere to the legally mandated process in the extradition request of Moroadi Cholota reveals not merely a procedural blunder, but an institutional failing. By initiating the extradition request instead of the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, as explicitly required by law, the NPA not only invalidated its case but compromised the integrity of South Africa's justice system on the international stage. The NPA will contend that this is not the first time it has led to extradition cases and that this is the first instance in which a case has been registered in this regard. It will furthermore argue that it is appealing the Schultz case, which constitutes a legal precedent. Notwithstanding this counter, the NPA cannot deny that this deviation from legal protocol suggests either gross incompetence or a willful disregard for constitutional processes, raising serious ethical questions about accountability within the NPA. Moreover, by allegedly providing misleading or incomplete information to U.S. authorities, the South African state stands accused of deception — a charge that, if substantiated, undermines its moral authority and diplomatic credibility, and reveals a prosecutorial body more concerned with performance politics than with the pursuit of justice. The unlawful handling of Cholota's extradition reflects a disturbing pattern in which the state weaponises legal instruments while bypassing constitutional safeguards. This erosion of legal integrity in favour of political expediency suggests the NPA, whether by design or acquiescence, has become a tool in internal power struggles rather than a guardian of justice. In failing to uphold the rule of law and misleading an international partner in the process, the NPA exposes a justice system teetering between institutional collapse and captured governance. The court's ruling on the lack of jurisdiction underscores a foundational pillar of constitutional and international law, that the legitimacy of a trial is inseparable from the legality of the accused's presence before the court. In Moroadi Cholota's case, the unlawful initiation of the extradition process rendered her transfer to South Africa constitutionally defective, thereby stripping the court of jurisdiction to try her. Any attempt to prosecute her under such conditions would not only violate Section 35 of the Constitution, which guarantees fair trial rights and due process but also contravene international legal norms governing extradition and state sovereignty. This ruling affirms that procedural integrity is not merely a technicality, but a substantive requirement of justice; the state cannot bypass lawful channels to secure an accused and still claim the authority to prosecute. To do so would be to legitimise executive overreach, dismantle legal safeguards, and invite the erosion of the rule of law under the guise of criminal justice. Moroadi Cholota giving evidence at the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture. Last week the Bloemfontein High Court ruled that her extradition from the United States was unlawful. Image: Independent Newspapers archive Systemic Indictment of the NPA The judgment handed down by the Free State High Court should not be read in isolation; it must be understood as a judicial demand for accountability, procedural discipline, and institutional humility. The NPA's failed prosecution of Ms Moroadi Cholota is, regrettably, not an isolated mishap. In a 2023 article co-authored with Paul M. Ngobeni (available at: " we called for the NPA leadership to be held accountable as we critically examined eight high-profile cases pursued by the NPA under the rubric of its 'state capture' prosecutions. Our analysis revealed a pattern of endemic institutional failures, particularly under the leadership of the current National Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Shamila Batohi. Among the most pressing concerns were the following: Politicisation of Prosecutions The NPA's alignment with factional battles in the ANC undermines its credibility. Its selective use of the Zondo Commission's findings, non-binding and inadmissible in court, has raised alarms about the weaponisation of commissions of inquiry to serve political ends. Strategic Misuse of Evidence The collapse of cases like the Estina Dairy Farm prosecution revealed the dangers of substituting public rhetoric for admissible evidence. The NPA has repeatedly stumbled in converting politically sensational findings into courtroom success. Selective Disclosure and Narrative Framing The NPA has routinely withheld countervailing evidence, especially in asset forfeiture cases such as Optimum Coal, to curate a prosecutorial narrative while undermining procedural fairness. Civil society organisations such as Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch have raised repeated concerns about this trend. Institutional Inefficiencies Structural deficiencies, ranging from poor leadership and resource mismanagement to political interference, continue to plague the NPA's capacity to lead credible prosecutions. These points not only relate to individual accountability but also to the need for institutional redesign. The location of the NPA under executive control remains a structural vulnerability. Lack of Accountability and Transparency The NPA has consistently deflected public criticism, painting itself as the victim of attacks rather than accepting legitimate concerns about its performance. This erodes public confidence and corrodes prosecutorial independence. Calls for an independent oversight body to scrutinise prosecutorial decisions have gained renewed urgency. NPA's Compulsive Overreliance on Appeals – Default Mechanism As expected, the NPA informed South Africa that it intends to appeal the court's findings. While the doctrine of appeal is a constitutional provision, it is important to appreciate the context and primary intentions of the state in pursuing such an appeal. A fundamental yet under-examined pathology within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is its compulsive reliance on appeals, not as a last resort for justice, but as a default mechanism to shield prosecutorial ineptitude. At the heart of this phenomenon lies a psychology unmoored from accountability: senior prosecutors and executive leadership pursue prolonged legal contests not at their own personal or professional expense, but through the seemingly bottomless reservoir of the public fiscus. This distance between institutional action and individual consequence fosters a culture of indifference towards both fiscal prudence and judicial efficacy. The decision to appeal, often against the weight of legal reasoning and precedent, is thus less a matter of legal necessity than a strategic deflection—an effort to postpone institutional reckoning, preserve internal reputations, and obscure prosecutorial failures. There appears to be little regard for the economic burden imposed on the state, the rights of the accused whose lives are held in indefinite legal limbo, or the broader erosion of public trust in the justice system. In the Cholota case, this is strikingly evident: despite the court's scathing findings, the NPA has signalled its intention to appeal, oblivious to the potential litigation costs should the state be sued for unlawful detention or rights infringements. This illustrates a prosecutorial psychology that prioritises institutional face-saving over constitutional integrity, emboldened by the knowledge that the price of legal misadventure will not be borne by those who authorise it. In the final analysis, the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, can no longer be exempt from the dismal performance of the NPA. She, together with her senior executive team, must be held accountable for the institution's persistent failures, including the frivolous pursuit of appeals and plausible wasteful expenditure incurred in cases that consistently collapse in court.
