10kg hybrid ganja worth Rs nine crore seized in Thiruvananthapuram
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Two persons, including a woman, were arrested after the customs seized 10.3kg of hybrid ganja worth around Rs 9 crore on their arrival from Thailand at the Thiruvananthapuram airport on Sunday. Those arrested are Shahana, 23, and Shaheen, 21, hailing from Malappuram, sources said.
The two had gone to Thailand a few days ago on tourist visas. They allegedly procured the contraband while in that country and returned on a flight via Singapore. The drugs were concealed among 10 packets claimed to be food items. Sources said the customs officials, during baggage checking, came across the content which evoked suspicion.
They opened the bag, and after testing, found that the 'food' claim was wrong. The accused have been booked under the NDPS Act.
From Thailand?
The accused persons had gone to Thailand a few days ago on tourist visas. They allegedly procured the contraband while in that country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Cash-for-paper case: 4, including Wagholi college professor, held
A professor at an engineering college in Wagholi affiliated to the Savitribai Phule Pune University has been arrested for paying bribes in exchange for answer paper manipulation, along with three others. The professor allegedly took bribes from students to allow them to rewrite their 'Mathematics 2' paper that was conducted on June 2. A press note shared by the crime branch unit six of Pune city said that a whistleblower informed them on June 2 that the professor had taken bribes from students to allow them to enter the college at night and rewrite their answer papers. Based on this information, the unit conducted a raid at the college at 2 am on June 3 and recovered six bundles of written answer sheets, Rs 2,06,000 in cash, and a duplicate key of the room where the papers were kept. A total of eight first-year students had arrived at the college in the night. The said professor and his accomplices had allegedly spied on students struggling to pass the exams and charged Rs 10,000 to Rs 15,000 as bribes from each one of them to allow them to rewrite their paper. A statement shared by the officiating director of the Board of Examinations and Evaluation at Savitribai Phule Pune University, Professor Prabhakar Desai, said: 'The actions of a professor of Moze Engineering College, Wagholi is highly unethical and in violation of the university examination planning regulations. Savitribai Phule Pune University has immediately constituted a fact-finding committee in this regard and has asked this committee to submit its report within just 7 days. As soon as the report is received from this committee, strict action will be taken against the concerned persons by the Examination and Evaluation Board as per the University law. As examinations are very important events in the life of a student, its seriousness and sanctity should be preserved by everyone and the Examination and Evaluation Board of Savitribai Phule Pune University is very sensitive in this regard.'
India Gazette
34 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Land-for-jobs case: All applicants from one state, CBI questions recruitment pattern
New Delhi [India], June 3 (ANI): The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), presenting its arguements on framing charges in the land-for-job scam case on Monday, questioned how all applicants for Group D posts in some zones of Indian Railways could come from just one State. In this case, former Railway Minister and RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav, his family members, former public servants, and job aspirants are accused. Yadav is alleged to have granted railway jobs in exchange for land parcels from candidates or their relatives, either as gifts or at significantly reduced prices. The agency alleged that one lakh square feet of land was purchased for Rs 26 lakh. Special Judge Vishal Gogne heard the submissions of senior advocate and Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) DP Singh, who appeared on behalf of the CBI. The special judge on Tuesday listed the matter for hearing on Wednesday. It was submitted on behalf of the CBI that there was enormous pressure to clear the application. Multiple applications were cleared the same day. Why does it happen so quickly? SPP questioned. The process was so tedious, he added. The certificates were never verified. It was further submitted that there is sufficient evidence to show the cash transaction with the person whose land was sold directly or indirectly to Lalu Prasad Yadav at a discounted rate. The agency alleged that these people were appointed. The Delhi High Court has already rejected Lalu Prasad Yadav's plea seeking a stay on the trial court proceedings. On May 31, the Delhi HC dismissed his petition. Justice Ravinder Dudeja had ruled that Yadav remains free to present his arguments before the trial court at the charge consideration stage, stating there were no compelling reasons to halt proceedings. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, Yadav had sought to quash the FIR, arguing that the CBI failed to obtain mandatory prior approval before proceeding with its inquiry. He contended that while approval was secured for others, it was not obtained in his case. The CBI, opposing the petition on maintainability grounds, had argued that a sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act was not required. It further stated that while a sanction under Section 19 was necessary, it had already been obtained. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) are investigating former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, his family, and several others in connection with the land-for-jobs case. (ANI)
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Delhi High Court quashes Pocso FIR, directs accused to do community service
New Delhi: Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, but directed the accused to perform community service for a month at Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital. The man was accused of harassing and threatening a minor school-going girl. A single-judge bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula also ordered him to pay Rs 50,000 as costs, to be deposited towards Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties. "Having regard to the nature of allegations, this court finds it appropriate to direct the petitioner to undertake community service as a measure of accountability and reflection," the judge said, ordering community service from June 1 to 30, 2025. Initially, the court was not inclined to quash the FIR in a perfunctory manner. However, after a detailed and careful interaction with the complainant and her mother, the court noted that they consciously chose to move on. "They expressed that the complainant is currently exploring matrimonial prospects, and that the pendency of a criminal case may result as a serious impediment to her future opportunities and personal relationships," the bench said. "Her mother specifically submitted that ongoing criminal proceedings of this nature are likely to create social stigma and could undermine the family's efforts to secure a suitable match for the complainant," it added. The FIR was registered under sections 354 (assault or criminal force to woman to outrage her modesty), 354C (voyeurism), 506 (criminal intimidation), 509 (insulting modesty of a woman), 384 (extortion) and 34 (common intention) of Indian Penal Code and Section 12 (sexual harassment) of Pocso Act . A settlement deed was entered into between the parties, according to which the complainant voluntarily resolved all her disputes with the accused and agreed to give no objection to the quashing of the FIR. It was recorded that she neither received any monetary compensation from the accused nor intended to claim any. The court noted that ordinarily, allegations of such nature, particularly those involving the sexual harassment of a minor, would not merit quashing. However, it added that the law was equally cognisant of the survivor's right to privacy, dignity and closure. Observing that the allegations pertain to a deeply troubling pattern of coercion and intimidation directed at a school-going minor, including threats to publicly disseminate her private photographs in exchange for money, the bench said that such behaviour, if true, reflected a gross misuse of digital platforms and an alarming disregard for consent and personal dignity.
