Northamptonshire food and drink sector 'thriving' amid challenges
A leading figure in a county's food and drink industry has said the sector is "thriving" despite rising costs and financial pressures.Rachel Mallows, director of the Northamptonshire Food and Drink Awards, highlighted how increased food and energy prices, along with the anticipated rise in National Insurance, are testing the industry's resilience.The awards event, now its 17th year, will celebrate chefs, cafes, pubs, restaurants and local produce across a variety of categories at the annual awards ceremony in October. Speaking at the launch of the awards at Northampton College, Ms Mallows said: "The food and drink sector is thriving and everyone is doing their best under difficult circumstances."
The awards, set to take place in October, celebrate chefs, cafes, pubs, restaurants, and local produce across multiple categories. Last year's winners were recognised for achievements in areas such as artisan drinks, vegetarian and vegan products, gastro pubs, and world cuisine.Chloe Smith, from the Althorp Coaching Inn, which won Gold in the Gastropub of the Year category, acknowledged the pressures on businesses."The pub is doing well but with margin restraints, living wage going up, National Insurance going up, it has put a harden on us and it's just one of those round robins," she said.Ms Smith also explained how rising supplier costs mean pubs and restaurants often face the most direct impact: "Everything has gone up with [our suppliers] and as a pub, we bear the brunt of it because we're the face of it. So we have had to make changes in the pub but nothing that [the public] would notice", she added.Despite the challenges, Ms Mallows remains optimistic about the sector's future."There will be a deeper understanding of sustainability and a more refined audience who understand food waste and food miles, so I have huge optimism for the future," she said.The Northamptonshire Food and Drink Awards will take place at the Royal and Derngate theatre in Northampton on 16 October.
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Darts star Rob Cross receives five year ban as director over £450k unpaid taxes
Rob Cross, who won the PDC World Darts Championship in 2018, has been disqualified as a director for five years after his company went into liquidation with a tax debt of £450,000 Rob Cross has been handed a five-year disqualification from serving as a director, after his company, Rob Cross Darts Limited, failed to settle a £450,000 tax debt. The firm owed a hefty sum to HMRC alongside other creditors when it was wound up. The former world darts champion is now banned from becoming a director until June 2030. His company was created eight years ago to receive his earnings and prize money. Cross, 34, withdrew more than £300,000 from the company between March 2020 and November 2023, money that should have been paid to HMRC and other creditors. Last year, in an attempt to settle some of the arrears, Cross entered into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA), with repayments set to fluctuate based on his future darts winnings. As November 2023 rolled around and liquidation hit, the accounts revealed an outstanding £403,896 corporation tax bill, £49,071 VAT, and £12,436 owing for PAYE and National Insurance contributions. Just £41,936 had found its way to HMRC in the period from March 2020 until the time of liquidation. Cross has admitted that withdrawing £306,403 from the business was "to the risk and ultimate detriment of HMRC", reports the Express. Insolvency Service Chief Investigator, Kevin Read, said: "When directors fail to pay the correct amount of tax, it directly impacts the government's ability to fund vital public services such as the NHS, schools, transport infrastructure and our national defence. "Rob Cross's firm was in the red for over £400,000 in corporation tax alone when it went bust. For more than three years, he siphoned off funds from the company that were due to HMRC and other creditors. "This case demonstrates that we will pursue action against directors who deprive the public purse of much-needed funds. The rules apply equally to everyone in business, and we expect all company directors to comply with their legal responsibilities. "Enforcing these rules consistently is crucial in maintaining a level playing field and preventing companies from gaining an unfair competitive advantage over compliant businesses that properly fulfil their tax obligations." Rob Cross Darts Limited came into being in May 2017, with Cross taking up the director's mantle on the very day it was established. Insolvency Service probes revealed that the company raked in just over £1 million from Cross's earnings from early March 2020 until its collapse in November 2023. Sponsorships brought in £169,500, while £261,901 flowed in from his management company. Besides the £306,403 Cross withdrew, another £665,419 found its way into the personal account of someone linked to him. It remains unclear if this was Cross himself. His disqualification bars him from engaging in the promotion, formation or management of a company, without court approval.
Metro
17 hours ago
- Metro
Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are
You could soon need to show a card on an app to get a job or rent a house under a proposed universal digital identity scheme. A 'BritCard' would be a free, mandatory electronic credential stored on a person's smartphone on the planned Wallet app. Employers, immigration, banks and landlords could use a verifier app to conduct checks. The card was proposed today in a policy paper by Labour Together handed to Number 10, with a poll conducted by the influential think-tank finding 80% of Britons would support a digital identity card. The government are examining the proposals, which Labour Together said would also help reduce visa overstayers and benefit fraud. Mockups show that the document would show whether the holder has the right to work or rent. Their driving licence would also be on the app, with hopes that the app could be used to order a passport, access NHS services or display your National Insurance number. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here. People would be required to show their online ID when renting a property or applying for a new job, as a system would check their official records. Landlords rarely face fines for not checking tenants' migration status, Labour Together said, while employers face complex right-to-work rules that vary drastically between groups of people. The paper also said it could help curb visa overstayers, with 63,000 non-EU nationals recorded as not leaving the country before their documents expired in the four years to March 2020, or fewer than 4%. Britain is the only country in Europe without an ID card, with those in the EU able to travel around the bloc with one instead of a passport. Sir Tony Blair attempted to introduce compulsory ID cards in 2006 after the September 11 and 7/7 bombings, only for it to be scrapped. Labour Together estimated it would cost £400million to build the e-ID system and £10million to run the free-to-use phone app. In the foreword, 'red wall' MPs Jake Richards and Adam Jogee said the BritCard 'should form an important part of Labour's enforcement strategy that does not compromise our principles and values'. They added: 'The Windrush scandal saw thousands of people wrongly targeted by immigration enforcement, including many legitimate British citizens who were unjustly detained or deported. More Trending 'We believe that a progressive government does not have to choose between dealing with these injustices. It must tackle them all head-on.' Morgan Wild, Labour Together's chief policy adviser, said: 'The state makes everyone, whether they are a British citizen or not, prove their right to work or rent. 'But we don't give everyone with the right to be here the ability to prove it. 'That leads to discrimination, unjust deportation and, as happened in the worst Windrush cases, dying in a country that is not your own. Through a national effort to provide everyone with proof of their right to be here, BritCard can stop that from ever happening again.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Full list of 12 countries on Donald Trump's travel ban MORE: Free school meals to be extended to 500,000 chilldren across the country MORE: Halving violence against women and girls will require more cash, watchdogs say
The Herald Scotland
21 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence
"An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. The decision landed against a backdrop of strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. President Donald Trump wants Mexico to do more to stop illegal drugs from flowing into the United States and Mexico wants to stop illegal arms from flowing south. Mexico has maintained tighter regulations on firearms than its neighbor to the north. The case was also the first time the Supreme Court ruled on a 2005 law that shields gunmakers from liability for crimes committed by third parties. An exception in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act allows suits if a gunmaker is accused of knowingly violating a state or federal law. Attorneys representing Mexico argued that gun companies are "aiding and abetting" the trafficking of hundreds of thousands of high-powered firearms into Mexico through deliberate design, marketing and distribution choices. That includes doing business with dealers who repeatedly sell large quantities of guns to cartel traffickers, Mexico's counsel alleged. Firearms makers, led by Smith & Wesson Brands, said the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes after being sold, transported, and used to commit crime in Mexico involves too many steps to blame the industry. Guns made in the United States are sold to federally licensed distributors who sell them to federally licensed dealers - some of whom knowingly or negligently sell them to criminals who smuggle them into Mexico, where they end up in the hands of cartel members. Mexico's attorneys stressed that the suit was in its early stages and said Mexico should be allowed a chance to prove its allegations in court. A federal judge in Massachusetts dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. But the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the challenge met an exception in the law and could move forward. Mexico, it said, had adequately alleged the gunmakers "aided and abetted the knowingly unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns into Mexico." Mexico was seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages, estimated in the range of $10 billion, and a court order requiring gun companies to change their practices. Lawyers for gun rights groups told the Supreme Court that Mexico's suit is an attempt to bankrupt the American firearms industry and undermine the Second Amendment. Gun violence prevention groups worried the case could make it harder to bring domestic lawsuits against the gun industry. The case is Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
