High Court Notice To Swiggy, Zepto Over Access To Visually Impaired Users
New Delhi:
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued a notice to food delivery companies Swiggy and Zepto, as well as the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, over allegations that their mobile apps are inaccessible to visually impaired users.
The court's move comes after a petition was filed by NGO Mission Accessibility, which claimed that the apps' inaccessibility violates the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and the Constitution of India.
Justice Sachin Datta directed Swiggy, Zepto, and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to respond to the petition within four weeks. The next hearing is scheduled for May 28.
The notice has been issued on a petition filed by NGO Mission Accessibility through advocate Sarah and Taha Bin Tasneem.
Advocate Rahul Bajaj appeared for the petitioner. The petition highlights several issues with the apps, including a lack of accessible features, unlabeled interactive elements, the absence of essential product details, and the inability of visually impaired users to position their device cameras for necessary transactions.
The apps are not compatible with screen-reader software, making it difficult for visually impaired users to navigate and use the services independently. The inaccessibility of the apps allegedly denies visually impaired users their fundamental rights to equality, dignity, and freedom of expression.
Petitioner has submitted that these mobile apps failed to comply with the requirements under Sections 40 and 46 of the Rights of People with Disabilities (RPwD) Act and Rule 15 of the RPwD Rules, 2017.
It is further stated that the inaccessibility of these applications violates fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and the Rules.
The inaction of the Respondent Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology in enforcing these standards further exacerbates the issue, the plea added.
The petitioner seeks directions to: A detailed accessibility audit to identify existing barriers faced by persons with disabilities' Ensure full compliance with digital accessibility standards and make platforms screen-reader friendly; Offer alternative mechanisms for inaccessible elements and integrate essential features like voice-guided camera positioning and hold non-compliant entities accountable under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act under Sections 89 & 90 of the RPwD Act, 2016.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Big challenge for Zomato, Swiggy, Blinkit and Zepto as Ratan Tata's Bigbasket aims to launch...
Ratan Tata's BigBasket Big challenge for Zomato, Swiggy, Blinkit and Zepto: In a massive development for India's quick-commerce market, Ratan Tata's BigBasket is planning to launch 10-minute minute food delivery services nationwide by the end of fiscal 2026. Taking on established players such as Zomato, Swiggy's Snacc, Blinkit's Bistro and Zepto Cafe, Ratan Tata's Bigbasket aims to increase its dark store count from about 700 currently to 1,000-1,200 by the end of 2025. The management of Noel Tata's Tata Group BigBasket told Reuters that BigBasket is targeting customers of the existing food delivery firms such as Zomato and Swiggy while also unlocking a new pool of customers. Readers should note that Zomato, Swiggy's Snacc, Blinkit's Bistro and Zepto Cafe have already started 10-minute food delivery and Ratan Tata's Bigbasket will be big challenge for them. India's quick commerce market to $57 billion by 2030 In a significant Riding on a surge in online orders in smaller cities and towns, India is likely to see its quick commerce (QC) total addressable market (TAM) reach $57 billion by 2030, according to a new report. Morgan Stanley has updated its forecast from earlier $42 billion, as quick commerce adoption rises across the country. The global brokerage has also raised its gross order value (GOV) estimates for the quick commerce segment in India by 9-11 per cent for FY26–28. Quick commerce business In the recent years, quick commerce operators, including Blinkit, Instamart, Zepto and Flipkart Minutes have continued to expand and have achieved massive progress. Growth of E-commerce and quick commerce in India As per a report by IANS news agency, E-commerce and quick commerce have grown 2–3 times faster in value than traditional and modern trade channels, diminishing the need for an extensive traditional trade network to enter the market. Digital payments are also gaining popularity, with 45 per cent of Internet users adopting them for transactions, said a Bain & Company report in April. (With inputs from agencies)
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Rapido will cross-utilise fleet to compete with Zomato, Swiggy's dedicated riders
BENGALURU: Ride-hailing platform Rapido, which has forayed into food delivery, will cross-utilise its fleet to compete with Zomato/Swiggy's dedicated riders. The recent shift in volumes to less than 30-minute deliveries demand a stronger grip over rider availability and servicing, observes Elara Capital. The platform will cross-utilise its 4 million-rider network at zero incremental capex. "The commission model is flat at 8-15% (Zomato-Swiggy's 21-22%), which could elevate rider earnings and trim overall cost. However, the absence of a dedicated fleet may compromise the delivery experience, especially with rising lesser than 30-minute delivery propositions," it said. Zomato and Swiggy are two dominant players in this food delivery space and Rapido's initial pilot in Bengaluru will disrupt these two players, apart from Dunzo. Zepto too introduced its 10-minute fresh food delivery app Zepto Cafe last year.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Things just got juicy': Rapido's entry into food delivery sparks buzz on Zomato-Swiggy 'duopoly'
Rapido is stepping into the food delivery sector with a new platform that proposes charging restaurants a fixed fee per order, according to a proposal seen by Reuters on Monday. The Indian ride-hailing company is aiming to take on industry giants Swiggy and Eternal's Zomato with this alternative pricing model. (Also read: Chandigarh Rapido driver loses 4 days' earnings after being conned by customer: 'Vanished in a minute') As per the proposal reviewed by the outlet, Rapido plans to charge restaurants a flat ₹25 delivery fee per order above ₹100. The moment the news broke, social media—particularly platform X—lit up with reactions. Many users viewed it as a much-needed disruption in a space long dominated by just two major players. 'This is the best thing that could happen to the food delivery space,' one user wrote. 'Rapido may or may not succeed, but I see Zomato and Swiggy's revenues taking a hit. Interesting times ahead!' Others welcomed the increased competition with enthusiasm. 'Rapido entering food delivery = more competition = better prices for us. India's food tech space is getting juicy again,' another user posted. Some were pleasantly surprised by the potential cost savings. 'Whoa! Rapido's food delivery could be up to 48% cheaper than Swiggy or Zomato. Things are about to get spicy…' one user noted, highlighting a possible pricing edge. Another comment read, 'I like rapido man. First it broke ola-uber duopoly and now it will break swiggy-zomato duopoly.' 'Rapido is expected to show the same price as the restaurant's menu card. If true, this alone would be a game changer—and a money saver for all Indians,' another user remarked. Check out the posts here: According to Reuters, the high commission structures of food delivery platforms have compelled many restaurants to increase their online menu prices, thereby widening the gap between digital listings and in-store rates. (Also read: 'Such a jolly person': Delhi woman lauds female Rapido driver for her cheerful spirit, company responds) Rapido has also proposed a nominal delivery charge for orders below ₹100, although the exact amount has not yet been specified.
