logo
‘Leave our marshes alone'

‘Leave our marshes alone'

The Star04-06-2025

PLANS to drill for oil in the protected Mesopotamian marshes of southern Iraq have galvanised villagers and activists determined to save the mythical wetlands already battered by years of drought.
'We will never accept it,' marshes activist Murtada al-Janubi told a meeting, seeking to reassure anxious residents gathered in a traditional hall made of woven reeds from the wetlands, to discuss the government's plans for the Unesco-listed area that is their home.
Everyone nodded in approval.
If they fail to save the Huwaizah Marshes, 'a historical era... with its heritage and southern identity will vanish for ever,' Janubi, 33, said during a tour of the wetlands that straddle the Iraq-Iran border.
The millennia-old history of the marshes - the reputed home of the biblical Garden of Eden – 'would end with this oilfield', said the moustached, tanned activist.
In 2023, the oil-rich country awarded a Chinese firm the rights to explore the Huwaizah field.
A fisherman showing his catch. Plans to drill for oil in the protected Mesopotamian Marshes of southern Iraq have galvanised villagers and activists determined to save the mythical wetlands already battered by years of drought. — AFP
Several residents of Abu Khsaf, the village in Missan province where the meeting with activist Janubi was held, said that at the time they did not fully grasp the implications.
Only this year, when heavy machinery was brought in to conduct seismic studies and open a new road, did the residents say they recognised a 'threat' to the swamplands that have sustained their traditional way of life.
The government says that the oil and environment ministries are collaborating closely to avoid endangering the wetlands, and that any activity would occur near, not inside, the marshes.
Satellite images of the area from March, obtained from Planet Labs, show tracks left by heavy vehicles.
Wim Zwijnenburg of Dutch peace organisation PAX said the images point to the 'rapid' construction of 'a 1.3-kilometre-long dirt road in the vegetation of the marshes'.
Missan province already has several oilfields, including one just kilometres from the marshes.
Its emissions fill the sky with heavy grey smoke, and its gas flares can be seen from the fishing boats that roam the depleted marshes, suffering after years of harsh drought and dwindling water supplies.
Papyrus plants grown in Iraq's marshes of Huwaizah. — AFP
Nestled between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, the Mesopotamian marshes depend on rivers and tributaries originating in neighbouring Turkiye and Iran.
Sparse rainfall and reduced water flows blamed on climate change, upstream dams and government rationing have created shortages with severe impacts on the marsh ecosystem.
Residents expect the marshes to dry up in summer, hoping for a long-absent good rainy season to revive them.
The current water level in many areas is less than a metre deep.
Um al-Naaj lake, once teeming with fish, is now just 3m deep, compared with at least six before the drought.
Rowing his boat on the lake, fisherman Kazem Ali, 80, said that while the new project may create some jobs, 'we, the average people, will not benefit'.
'All we want is water,' he said.
Rasul al-Ghurabi, a 28-year-old buffalo farmer, said he would never quit 'the marshes and the freedom that comes with them' even if the oil company offered him a job.
One cool March morning, as he led his buffaloes to the marshes to graze, Ghurabi was surprised to see workers laying cables and drilling holes.
A cable caused one of his animals to stumble, he said.
The marshes contain a core area that serves as a habitat for numerous species, including migratory waterbirds, surrounded by a buffer zone for protection.
Environmental activists meeting with the indigenous people of Huwaizah. — AFP
Activists have accused authorities of conducting seismic studies within the core, which the state-owned Missan Oil Company denies, saying that the vehicles spotted in the area were carrying out work for a separate field nearby and had since left.
The Huwaizah oilfield was discovered in the 1970s, and Iraq shares it with Iran, which has been extracting oil for a long time.
The Missan Oil Company says that 300sq km of the field's area overlap with the marshes' buffer zone, but that the oilfield does not encroach on the core.
An environmental impact assessment concluded in 2024 would provide 'the baseline for work in the field', the company said, adding that exploration would take place 'without harming the natural habitat.'
According to environment ministry official Jassem Falahi, the protected status of the marshes does not bar development projects.
'But investment is subject to specific conditions and standards that must not disturb the core area... or affect the site and its biodiversity,' he said.
Iraqi activist Ahmed Saleh Neema, a vocal advocate for the protection of the marshes, expressed concerns that oil companies might not adhere to regulations and further drain the marshes.
A Unesco spokesman said that 'concerns have been raised in recent years' over the potential impact of oil-related activities on the marshes.
Across the border in Iran, local media have long warned against the environmental impact of oil projects.
In a report earlier this year, two decades into oil activities in the wetlands known in Iran as Hoor al-Azim, the Tasnim news agency said energy companies had obstructed water flows and drained areas to build infrastructure.
Tasnim also said that oilfields have polluted water resources.
Environmental activist Neema said authorities should strike 'a balance between two great resources: the oil and the marshes.'
Iraq is one of the world's largest oil producers, and crude sales account for 90% of state revenues.
But while oil is financially vital, the marshes represent the livelihood of its people and 'the heritage, the folklore, and the reputation of Iraq,' Neema said.
Back in the village of Abu Khsaf, Janubi said: 'Our region is already teeming with oilfields. Isn't that enough?'
'Leave our marshes alone.' — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huawei founder Ren remains optimistic despite US curbs
Huawei founder Ren remains optimistic despite US curbs

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Huawei founder Ren remains optimistic despite US curbs

Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei. — Bloomberg BEIJING: The United States' restrictive policies against China are ironically catalysing China's technological advancements, say industry insiders, referring to the chip breakthroughs achieved by Huawei Technologies and the recent remarks of its founder Ren Zhengfei, who downplayed the impact of US export controls. In an interview with People's Daily that was published on Tuesday on the front page of the newspaper, Ren said that Huawei has no need to worry about chip challenges. In the face of external blockades and suppression, 'there is no need to think too much about difficulties; just take action and move forward step by step', he said. Ren outlined his company's pragmatic strategy for overcoming US technology restrictions, emphasising investment in and relentless execution of theoretical research. Addressing Washington's warnings about using Huawei's Ascend AI chips, he said: 'Many Chinese chip firms perform well. Huawei is just one of them. The United States overstates our achievements – we're still one generation behind in single-chip performance.' Ren made the remarks after Jensen Huang, CEO of US semiconductor company Nvidia, told Bloomberg in a recent interview that Huawei's AI chip technology, including the CloudMatrix cluster and Ascend 910C chip, now competes with Nvidia's high-end offerings such as Grace Blackwell and H200. Xiang Ligang, director-general of the Zhongguancun modern information consumer application industry technology alliance, a telecom industry association, said Huawei's achievements have demonstrated how the US restrictions are accelerating China's progress in chip technology. 'China's semiconductor industry, tempered by years of US sanctions, now boasts stronger prowess,' Xiang said. According to Huawei's founder Ren, the software-related challenges that China faces are manageable. 'Software is built on mathematical symbols, codes and layers of cutting-edge algorithms. There are no shackles here,' he said. 'The real challenge lies in our education system and talent development. In the future, China will have hundreds, or even thousands, of operating systems supporting its progress across industry, agriculture, healthcare and beyond,' he added. — China Daily/ANN

Wall Street dips as investors focus on Middle East tension
Wall Street dips as investors focus on Middle East tension

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Wall Street dips as investors focus on Middle East tension

Wall Street dipped on Wednesday, with investors spooked by Middle East tensions, while a tame inflation report calmed concerns around tariff-driven price pressures and traders awaited more details on China-US trade talks. The S&P 500 erased modest gains after a US source said the US embassy in Iraq was preparing for evacuation due to heightened security risks in the region. A senior Iranian official said earlier that Tehran will strike US bases in the region if nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises with the United States. Data showed consumer prices increased only marginally in May, while economists expect inflation to accelerate in the coming months due to the Trump administration's import tariffs. Annually, headline inflation stood at 2.4 per cent, lower than the 2.5 per cent rise estimated by economists polled by Reuters. "There's still concern about Trump's tariffs being inflationary but this report was better than expected and it fuels hope that the Federal Reserve will be able to step in with rate cuts later on this year," said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth. Traders project a 70 per cent chance that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates by its September policy meeting, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool. A day after officials from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework to put their tariff truce back on track, President Donald Trump said the US deal with China was done, with Beijing to supply magnets and rare earth minerals. With investors betting the United States will reach trade agreements that reduce Trump's steep trade barriers, the S&P 500 is now trading just below its February record high. "The worst-case scenario is probably behind us. There's a little bit of face-saving for both sides," said John Praveen, managing director at Paleo Leon in Princeton, New Jersey. "They got an agreement. The question is whether it will be implemented." According to a White House official, the agreement with China allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods, including a 10 per cent baseline "reciprocal" tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs. China will charge a 10 per cent tariff on US imports, the official said. The US stock market has rallied in recent weeks, recovering from a slump in April sparked by Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs. The S&P 500 was down 0.34 per cent at 6,018.27 points. The Nasdaq declined 0.56 per cent to 19,605.32 points, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.02 per cent at 42,857.30 points. Of the 11 S&P 500 sector indexes, eight declined, led lower by consumer discretionary, down 1.06 per cent, followed by a 0.94 per cent loss in materials. "Stable inflation, range-bound interest rates and rising earnings provide valuation support and - in our view - a basis for stocks to trend higher," said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at US Bank Wealth Management. Nine of the 11 major S&P 500 sub-sectors rose, led by a 0.4 per cent gain in information technology shares. Tesla was up 0.5 per cent after CEO Elon Musk said he regretted some of the negative social media posts he made last week about Trump as they had gone "too far". Software development platform provider GitLab lost 6 per cent after its quarterly results disappointed investors. Shares of videogame retailer GameStop fell 3.9 per cent after it reported a decline in first-quarter revenue. Declining stocks outnumbered rising ones within the S&P 500 by a 1.9-to-one ratio. The S&P 500 posted 10 new highs and 2 new lows; the Nasdaq recorded 77 new highs and 34 new lows.

The US, China are talking again. Don't call it a reset
The US, China are talking again. Don't call it a reset

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

The US, China are talking again. Don't call it a reset

TRADE negotiations between the United States and China in London mark a cautious step toward easing tensions, but not a new beginning. It's a short-term strategy to avoid further deterioration – a fragile truce that could be reversed at any moment. At the core is a deeper issue: National security. Both sides now view trade through that lens, and handshakes won't fix it. Washington must recognise that Beijing seeks respect and won't accept a one-sided, long-term deal. China, for its part, needs to understand that it won't be business as usual – and that the United States will expect more concessions and market access to the world's second-largest economy. The alternative is continued hostility, which will make for a more chaotic global trade environment, and a more dangerous world. The London climbdown is positive, but precarious. Rapprochement has turned into recrimination before. After the initial euphoria of a trade-war ceasefire agreed in Geneva in May, both sides accused the other of reneging on a deal to temporarily lower tariffs that had climbed well above 100%. Now negotiators say they've reached an agreement in principle on a framework to de-escalate trade tensions, based on the consensus forged in Geneva. Delegations from both sides will take the proposal back to their respective leaders, following nearly 20 hours of talks over two days. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. The full details of the accord weren't immediately available, but US officials said they 'absolutely expect' that issues around shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets will be resolved. There are no winners or losers coming out of this, notes Steve Okun, founder and chief executive officer of AC Advisors. The fundamental questions are much larger than any round of talks. 'The Trump administration needs to decide whether it views Beijing as a strategic competitor, or an existential threat,' he told me. 'Washington can take the economic hit from a trade war, but politically, Xi Jinping can suffer the hit for longer than Trump can. So one side has economic leverage, and the other political leverage – that's a standstill, for now.' The Chinese president is biding his time, despite a sluggish economy. In the most recent sign of how the trade war is hurting, exports rose less than expected last month. The worst drop in US-bound shipments since February 2020 – the outbreak of the pandemic – counteracted strong demand from elsewhere. Still, sales to other markets are providing much-needed support for an economy stuck in deflation and struggling with weak domestic demand. There is a pathway to peaceful coexistence, but compromises are required, notes Ryan Hass of the Brookings Institution. To break through with Xi, Trump will need to acknowledge that both countries are major powers. Neither can dictate terms to the other. Both would be hurt by high tariffs on each other's goods – but on their own, they're not enough to force capitulation. The United States public has no appetite for a broader conflict with Beijing and the top priority is still to avoid war. Americans are clear in their desire to manage competition without that escalating into open conflict. For that to happen, Washington must recognise that Beijing craves respect. The United States would be wise to pay heed to the Chinese concept of mianzi or 'face' – Xi will only agree to a long-term deal that he can pitch at home and abroad as a win. Beijing has taken lessons from Trump's first trade war, and judged that agreement to be one-sided in favour of Washington. It won't make that mistake again. China doesn't always like reciprocating face, but officials would be wise to give some to Trump, too. His tariffs have been outlandish, but his supporters also demand that he show strength, not concession. Beijing should be able to understand what happens when politicians need to cater to public pressure. Neither side has the upper hand to make the other come away an obvious loser. At the most, the London talks might have achieved just enough to help shape the future on a less-hostile basis. That in itself is progress – but it would be a mistake to call this moment a reset. — Bloomberg Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. The views expressed here are the writer's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store