South Portland plans to lay off teachers, ed techs and administrators
Mar. 10—More than 20 South Portland school employees received layoff notices last week in anticipation of a $5 million shortfall in the 2025-26 budget, a move met with strong opposition by district staff and union members Monday night.
Employees learned Thursday that their positions would be eliminated at the end of the school year, although some were offered different jobs in the district.
Superintendent Timothy Matheney detailed the layoffs at a school board meeting attended by hundreds of teachers and staff Monday night. He announced this month that there would be a gap in next year's budget, necessitating cuts to the workforce. He said that because of increased needs for special education staff and declines in federal funding, the district would likely need to raise property taxes by 11% in order to maintain the current staffing and programming, an increase he worried taxpayers would not support.
Hundreds of union members, donning red shirts with "Our Voices Matter" written on the back, showed up at the school board meeting Monday night to oppose the cuts, filling the seats and aisles of South Portland High School's lecture hall.
Matheney unveiled his proposed $73 million budget at the meeting, a 5.98% increase over last year. It includes reductions that will impact all seven schools and dozens of other programs and departments. The layoffs include 11 teachers, seven educational technicians and several administrative staff or districtwide employees (including the director of curriculum). The budget also includes $800,000 in savings to offset the increase.
In recent years, Matheney said, the district has declined in enrollment but increased in special education students, multilingual learners, students of color and homeless students. At the same time, staffing has continued to rise. The district will need to fund more than 10 positions in special education and teaching that were previously supported by outside funding sources, and negotiate three new labor contracts.
The specific positions recommended for cuts include two English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) teachers, three social-emotional learning teachers, a social worker, a classroom teacher, a technology integrator, three library ed techs and two ESOL ed techs. Ed techs who were laid off were offered the option to take a different position in special education.
"That being said, we realize that these individuals were hired to do a particular job, a particular job they really cared about, and that they feel lost in not having that particular position they had a passion for," Matheney said. "And we acknowledge that that involves a sense of loss among the individuals listed in the school-based teaching staff positions, some of them have been offered a position already as well."
Matheney's budget is just a recommendation, and will still need approval from the school board, the city council and the voting public.
EMAIL NOTICE
A South Portland ed tech, who asked not to be named because of fears about jeopardizing future opportunities in the district, said the layoff process felt abrupt and impersonal.
All district staff received an email last week announcing that about 30 people would receive layoff notices the following day, and within 24 hours Matheney announced layoffs to individual employees via a round of emails sent last Thursday afternoon.
It informed employees that their position had been eliminated in the 2025-26 budget because of "budgetary constraints and necessary reductions."
The ed tech said being laid off through an email felt reminiscent of Elon Musk's approach to laying off federal employees through his Department of Government Efficiency, which has cut more than 30,000 federal employees since President Donald Trump's inauguration.
The ed tech said the layoff announcement has caused morale issues among staff, and will affect students. He's also worried about the quality of education as a parent with children in the district.
"Sadly, I think there will be other people that leave, or that retire early, just because it feels chaotic," he said. "And I worry that the impression now is that our district is sort of out of control."
'A TREMENDOUS IMAPCT'
The Maine Education Association, on behalf of South Portland's teaching and ed tech unions, encouraged union and community members to turn out for Monday's meeting and speak out against the layoffs.
"Union members in South Portland believe a layoff of this scale will not only impact the livelihoods and working conditions of educators during a very uncertain time for education, but it will also have a tremendous impact on student learning and outcomes for kids in South Portland," the statement said.
More than twenty educators testified in opposition to the cuts during the public comment period, and union leaders criticized a lack of transparency and information from the district regarding the workforce reduction process.
"Last week, when individuals found out about impacted positions, we as union leaders were met with many important and valid questions. While we didn't have all the answers at the time, it wasn't for lack of effort," said Abigail Anderson, a high school math teacher and vice president of the South Portland Teachers Association.
"Even as a humanities teacher, it is hard to find the exact word to capture the feeling of anxiety, fear and confusion, knowing that some of us, but not which of us, would soon receive the disheartening news," said sixth grade teacher James Kim.
Many, including several parents, criticized the way that the layoff announcements were handled.
"Please don't ever send an email laying people off again. It was callous," said parent Eleni Richardson. "There is a pretty clear roadmap for how to do that, and you failed our teachers and staff miserably."
Many who spoke called on the district to go back to the drawing board on the budget, and said there had been process failures.
Teachers also spoke to the negative impacts of losing positions in ESOL, social emotional learning, social studies and libraries.
Kara Kralik, an ESOL teacher, said the reduction in four staff members was hitting the department hard.
"Although the board members have emphasized our commitment to diversity, and the mission of equality of learning for all, these reductions will have a big impact on our multilingual students," Kralik said.
Jen Fletcher, a middle school band teacher, said the loss of two of the 10 members of the music department would negatively impact the students.
"School music programs are one of the cornerstones of a well-rounded education, K-12, and even more so here in South Portland," Fletcher said. "In a world where kids are being told who to be, what to think and how to feel, it is the music rooms where kids are able to be their authentic selves without judgment."
Third grade teacher Sarah Dillon critiqued cuts to the curriculum director position and to social emotional learning (SEL) teachers.
"We know that you know how a student enters our classroom and is available to learn is a huge indicator of whether or not they're going to improve in math and literacy and all the other aspects that we care about. So if we're not prioritizing SEL learning as a special, how are we expecting students to be ready to learn in our classroom?"
Matheney answered some questions from the public later in the meeting.
"I think this is part of a values clarification process for the board, as we go through this month of making really tough decisions, of facing the reality that we have," Matheney said. He also addressed the feedback on the district's approach to announcing the layoffs, and said he may have missed the mark.
In response to the lengthy public comment and turnout, Matheney said he was pleased to see the advocacy, because nothing in the budget is final.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Yahoo
Starmer says migrants should speak English – but all of the UK's languages are important for integration
When Keir Starmer said: 'If you want to live in the UK, you should speak English', it laid bare an assumption – that English is the only language that counts in the UK. This view not only overlooks the UK's rich linguistic diversity, but also runs counter to the language policies being developed across the devolved nations. While the UK government's latest proposals on immigration treat English proficiency as the main pathway to integration, governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are taking different approaches. Immigration is a matter controlled by Westminster. But integration, including language education, is devolved. That means each UK nation sets its own direction. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Despite frequent political emphasis on English language learning and testing as key to integration, England does not have a national strategy for migrant or refugee integration. It also does not have an England-wide policy for teaching English for speakers of other languages (Esol). Instead, decisions about language classes are made locally but provision is uneven. In some areas, support is well-organised and accessible. In others, it's barely there. Despite the lack of national leadership, the Esol sector in England has long benefited from grassroots activism. Organisations like the National Association for Teaching English and Community Languages to Adults and English for Action have been vocal in campaigning for better funding. Researchers and teachers also continue to call for a joined-up strategy for migrant and refugee integration. By contrast, the Welsh government has made language education a core part of its progressive integration policies. Its ambition to become the world's first 'nation of sanctuary' is backed up by practical measures. This includes a dedicated language education policy for migrants, focused primarily on Esol – the only one of its kind in the UK. The first national Esol strategy was published in 2014, revised in 2018, and will be updated this year following a review. The introduction of Welsh as an element of migrant language education is helping to build a more inclusive, multicultural society too. It shows learners that all languages, including their mother tongue, have a role to play in a modern, multilingual nation. Since 2014, Scotland has implemented three refugee integration strategies. The new Scots refugee integration strategy has been internationally recognised as a model of good practice. It adopts a multilingual, intercultural approach, emphasising that language learning should include home languages and the language or languages of the new community, which may include Gaelic, Scots and English. Scotland had two successive adult Esol strategies from 2007 to 2020. These were developed in consultation with Esol learners and detailed clear progression routes into further training, education and employment. But they were discontinued in favour of a broader adult learning strategy in 2022 which covers all adult learners rather than just the needs of migrants. It was a decision criticised by some due to concerns about losing focus on the specific needs of Esol learners, and reducing the voice of Esol learners and teachers in Scotland. In Northern Ireland, there is no dedicated migrant language policy yet. But its draft refugee integration strategy does at least acknowledge the importance of language in helping migrants feel 'valued and respected'. In 2022, the Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Act granted official status to the Irish language, and to Ulster-Scots as a minority language. Nevertheless, the Northern Ireland refugee integration strategy focuses solely on English language classes as the primary language education provision. What all UK nations share, however, is chronic underfunding. Adult education, where Esol funding sits across all four nations, now faces yet more cuts meaning many language learners will continue to face long waiting lists for classes. But how language education for migrants, especially migrants seeking sanctuary in the UK is perceived, organised and provided is critical to fostering inclusion, promoting integration and bestowing a sense of belonging. Developing competency in the dominant language or languages of the host nation can enable migrants to navigate health, housing or social security systems. It can help them cope with the needs of daily life and to use their skills and knowledge to enter work or education. Read more: Many people seeking sanctuary have experienced trauma from undergoing forced migration. This makes it vital that language provision is trauma-informed and recognises a learner's existing multilingual skills. It's also important that it is shaped around their needs, not just on externally imposed assessments of English proficiency. Multilingual education is more than just a nice thing to have. There is growing evidence that valuing the languages refugees already speak, and recognising their linguistic skills as assets, improves wellbeing, builds confidence and enhances social inclusion. Too often in the UK, language learning is treated as a condition for acceptance, rather than a right that can enable belonging. That risks undermining the very integration that policymakers claim to support. If the UK is serious about being a modern, inclusive and multicultural state, it must embrace the reality that it is also multilingual, and that different nations may choose different routes to welcome those seeking sanctuary. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The authors wish to thank their respective universities for the support they have received in researching this issue. They would also like to thank their co-researchers Sylvia Warnecke and Mel Engman and their co-authors on their recently published policy briefing. Gwennan Higham and Sarah Cox do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
18-04-2025
- Yahoo
I'm A Teacher. Here's The Shocking Truth About The "Woke" Indoctrination Of Students That Terrifies Conservatives.
I'm a bit of a masochist. I can't help but read the comments whenever the local news posts anything political on social media — especially when it's related to public education. I've spent most of my life building a career as a public educator who emphatically embraces and promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion, and I live in Florida, where public education is very much on the chopping block and our pouty, petulant goblin of a governor has made the classroom the front line of his culture war. In recent years, whenever I read the comment section of these stories, there are scores of MAGA folks screeching in chorus about evil liberal teachers indoctrinating kids with vegan transgender socialism. 'Their [sic] teaching are [sic] kids CRT [critical race theory]!' insists one commenter. 'They want white kids to feel guilty about their race!' cries another. On and on they go — affirming, commiserating and spreading their noxious grievances. And almost none of what they claim is true. Although I'm in public higher education now, I was a public high school teacher for over a decade. I worked at three radically different schools in three radically different counties. Most of my social circle is made up of teachers. If indoctrination were occurring at scale, I'd know about it. It's just not happening. Almost every teacher I've ever met (and that number is in the high hundreds at this point) is exceedingly careful not to discuss politics or religion while at school — even with other adults, even in the relative privacy of the break room, even one-on-one in their own classrooms during lunch or planning. It's a simple matter of self-preservation — if a single student were to hear you say, 'God, I hate Gov. Ron DeSantis,' they'd tell their friends, those friends would pass it on, and by the end of the day, you'd be in the principal's office explaining that no, you do not, in fact, have a 'Fuck DeSantis' tattoo on your chest. There are exceptions, of course. In the 13 years I spent teaching high school, a handful of teachers have been openly political. I was helping a fresh-out-of-college teacher set up his classroom in 2014 when he asked me, 'Can you believe they let these Muslim kids wear their habibs [sic] in class?' This was within 15 minutes of meeting him for the first time. 'I guess the dress code doesn't apply to them. I don't know why we bend the rules for them,' he continued. He had no idea if I was Muslim. He also didn't know if I was an immigrant — even though I'm visibly Hispanic — before he then went on a rant about 'the ESOL kids,' aka students in an English for Speakers of Other Languages program, who were 'probably illegal.' Another teacher I worked with at least had the patience to ratchet his way up to vocal bigotry. He started off slow, talking about the kids with 'crazy hair colors,' and later, 'the alphabet kids,' his way of labeling students who identified as LGBTQ+. Within a few weeks, he had started complaining about 'how sick and stupid' pronouns are. 'They can call themselves whatever they want,' he said, 'just don't expect me to play pretend too.' Those two cases are essentially the extent of educators expressing their personal beliefs at work that I ever encountered. Most teachers simply don't want to risk termination by talking about potentially contentious topics at work. To this day, aside from teachers who I've befriended and spoken with outside of work, I don't know the political or religious affiliation of nearly any of my former colleagues. Teachers are that averse to potentially career-ending conflict. Of course, that's my experience with teachers interacting with other teachers. But what about inside the classroom? I couldn't possibly know what happens in every other class while I'm busy teaching my own, right? Wrong. Students talk a lot about what their teachers do and say — and they particularly love to focus on the bad stuff. Is some of it rumor, hearsay or even deliberate lies? Sure. But when you hear the same things about the same teachers week after week, year after year, from different students — including trustworthy ones — you learn to separate fact from fiction. Students told me about exactly two instances of deliberate classroom indoctrination. The biggest repeat offender was an unassuming social studies teacher. Socially, she was reserved but kind, unerringly courteous and wholly nonconfrontational. Yet in her classroom, she focused intensely on the War of Northern Aggression and the idea that it was based on 'states' rights,' but specifically not slavery. Another offender — one I mentioned earlier — routinely ridiculed the idea of pronouns and gender identity in class, refusing to acknowledge students' gender identities. He eventually lost his position because of this behavior. Despite how all of this might sound, I am honestly not claiming that scores of conservative teachers are indoctrinating our students in the classroom. Over the course of my 13 years of personal observation and dozens of discussions (outside of work) with teacher friends, those are the only two instances that I have personally encountered. The fact that these two teachers held right-wing views appears purely coincidental to me. The bigger takeaway is that like in-person voter fraud, political indoctrination in public schools is incredibly rare. And there's a good reason why it's so vanishingly infrequent ... and it honestly might shock you. It's because almost every teacher out there is spending every ounce of their energy and patience trying to get their students to read just one paragraph without looking at their phones. They're too busy trying to get students to complete just one math problem without saying, 'This is too hard.' To write just one essay without using ChatGPT. To turn in just one assignment on time. And that's when they're not revising their lesson plans to align with the state's new Best-Ever Evidence-Based Data-Driven Standards That Are Guaranteed To Promote Mastery and Cultivate a Growth Mindset This Time. (Note: These will be deemed outdated and obsolete within two to four years, and replaced with Even-Better Standards, which will be functionally indistinguishable.) These revisions, of course, have to be scheduled around their student data chats, individualized education program meetings, professional learning communities, parent-teacher conferences, morning duty, hall duty and afternoon duty, all of which occur outside of mandatory faculty meetings (that always could have been emails). Of course, rational people know that there isn't rampant classroom indoctrination, but 'liberal teacher indoctrinating your children' has been a favorite bogeyman of the right for at least as long as I've been alive — part of a decades-long fight against public education that so many people have been sounding alarm bells over — and now I worry it's too goddamn late. Too many voters believed that schools are chopping off kids' genitals during recess. Too many voters believed that schools have litter boxes for kids who identify as cats. Too many voters believed that teachers promote feelings over facts. The most gullible among us voted for Donald Trump (he's a good businessman, after all!), and now the Department of Education is dead, graduate schools can no longer afford to bring in the next generation of scientists, doctors, engineers, lawyers and journalists, middle-class people are seeing their student loan monthly payments double, triple, or quadruple, and state and local public education funds are being gleefully snatched from public schools and funneled into for-profit corporate charter 'schools.' The generation of children and young adults whose education was already heavily disrupted by the pandemic is now left with far fewer, far worse post-secondary options than any generation before them in the modern age. And that's aside from rising unemployment, rising inflation and a housing market that is outrageously unaffordable. But hey, at least eggs are cheap now. Oh, wait... Marco Vanserra is the pseudonym of a professional educator and public school advocate. He specializes in making mathematics relevant and accessible to underserved communities in Florida. This article originally appeared on HuffPost in April 2025.
Yahoo
18-04-2025
- Yahoo
I'm A Teacher. Here's The Shocking Truth About The "Woke" Indoctrination Of Students That Terrifies Conservatives.
I'm a bit of a masochist. I can't help but read the comments whenever the local news posts anything political on social media — especially when it's related to public education. I've spent most of my life building a career as a public educator who emphatically embraces and promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion, and I live in Florida, where public education is very much on the chopping block and our pouty, petulant goblin of a governor has made the classroom the front line of his culture war. In recent years, whenever I read the comment section of these stories, there are scores of MAGA folks screeching in chorus about evil liberal teachers indoctrinating kids with vegan transgender socialism. 'Their [sic] teaching are [sic] kids CRT [critical race theory]!' insists one commenter. 'They want white kids to feel guilty about their race!' cries another. On and on they go — affirming, commiserating and spreading their noxious grievances. And almost none of what they claim is true. Although I'm in public higher education now, I was a public high school teacher for over a decade. I worked at three radically different schools in three radically different counties. Most of my social circle is made up of teachers. If indoctrination were occurring at scale, I'd know about it. It's just not happening. Almost every teacher I've ever met (and that number is in the high hundreds at this point) is exceedingly careful not to discuss politics or religion while at school — even with other adults, even in the relative privacy of the break room, even one-on-one in their own classrooms during lunch or planning. It's a simple matter of self-preservation — if a single student were to hear you say, 'God, I hate Gov. Ron DeSantis,' they'd tell their friends, those friends would pass it on, and by the end of the day, you'd be in the principal's office explaining that no, you do not, in fact, have a 'Fuck DeSantis' tattoo on your chest. There are exceptions, of course. In the 13 years I spent teaching high school, a handful of teachers have been openly political. I was helping a fresh-out-of-college teacher set up his classroom in 2014 when he asked me, 'Can you believe they let these Muslim kids wear their habibs [sic] in class?' This was within 15 minutes of meeting him for the first time. 'I guess the dress code doesn't apply to them. I don't know why we bend the rules for them,' he continued. He had no idea if I was Muslim. He also didn't know if I was an immigrant — even though I'm visibly Hispanic — before he then went on a rant about 'the ESOL kids,' aka students in an English for Speakers of Other Languages program, who were 'probably illegal.' Another teacher I worked with at least had the patience to ratchet his way up to vocal bigotry. He started off slow, talking about the kids with 'crazy hair colors,' and later, 'the alphabet kids,' his way of labeling students who identified as LGBTQ+. Within a few weeks, he had started complaining about 'how sick and stupid' pronouns are. 'They can call themselves whatever they want,' he said, 'just don't expect me to play pretend too.' Those two cases are essentially the extent of educators expressing their personal beliefs at work that I ever encountered. Most teachers simply don't want to risk termination by talking about potentially contentious topics at work. To this day, aside from teachers who I've befriended and spoken with outside of work, I don't know the political or religious affiliation of nearly any of my former colleagues. Teachers are that averse to potentially career-ending conflict. Of course, that's my experience with teachers interacting with other teachers. But what about inside the classroom? I couldn't possibly know what happens in every other class while I'm busy teaching my own, right? Wrong. Students talk a lot about what their teachers do and say — and they particularly love to focus on the bad stuff. Is some of it rumor, hearsay or even deliberate lies? Sure. But when you hear the same things about the same teachers week after week, year after year, from different students — including trustworthy ones — you learn to separate fact from fiction. Students told me about exactly two instances of deliberate classroom indoctrination. The biggest repeat offender was an unassuming social studies teacher. Socially, she was reserved but kind, unerringly courteous and wholly nonconfrontational. Yet in her classroom, she focused intensely on the War of Northern Aggression and the idea that it was based on 'states' rights,' but specifically not slavery. Another offender — one I mentioned earlier — routinely ridiculed the idea of pronouns and gender identity in class, refusing to acknowledge students' gender identities. He eventually lost his position because of this behavior. Despite how all of this might sound, I am honestly not claiming that scores of conservative teachers are indoctrinating our students in the classroom. Over the course of my 13 years of personal observation and dozens of discussions (outside of work) with teacher friends, those are the only two instances that I have personally encountered. The fact that these two teachers held right-wing views appears purely coincidental to me. The bigger takeaway is that like in-person voter fraud, political indoctrination in public schools is incredibly rare. And there's a good reason why it's so vanishingly infrequent ... and it honestly might shock you. It's because almost every teacher out there is spending every ounce of their energy and patience trying to get their students to read just one paragraph without looking at their phones. They're too busy trying to get students to complete just one math problem without saying, 'This is too hard.' To write just one essay without using ChatGPT. To turn in just one assignment on time. And that's when they're not revising their lesson plans to align with the state's new Best-Ever Evidence-Based Data-Driven Standards That Are Guaranteed To Promote Mastery and Cultivate a Growth Mindset This Time. (Note: These will be deemed outdated and obsolete within two to four years, and replaced with Even-Better Standards, which will be functionally indistinguishable.) These revisions, of course, have to be scheduled around their student data chats, individualized education program meetings, professional learning communities, parent-teacher conferences, morning duty, hall duty and afternoon duty, all of which occur outside of mandatory faculty meetings (that always could have been emails). Of course, rational people know that there isn't rampant classroom indoctrination, but 'liberal teacher indoctrinating your children' has been a favorite bogeyman of the right for at least as long as I've been alive — part of a decades-long fight against public education that so many people have been sounding alarm bells over — and now I worry it's too goddamn late. Too many voters believed that schools are chopping off kids' genitals during recess. Too many voters believed that schools have litter boxes for kids who identify as cats. Too many voters believed that teachers promote feelings over facts. The most gullible among us voted for Donald Trump (he's a good businessman, after all!), and now the Department of Education is dead, graduate schools can no longer afford to bring in the next generation of scientists, doctors, engineers, lawyers and journalists, middle-class people are seeing their student loan monthly payments double, triple, or quadruple, and state and local public education funds are being gleefully snatched from public schools and funneled into for-profit corporate charter 'schools.' The generation of children and young adults whose education was already heavily disrupted by the pandemic is now left with far fewer, far worse post-secondary options than any generation before them in the modern age. And that's aside from rising unemployment, rising inflation and a housing market that is outrageously unaffordable. But hey, at least eggs are cheap now. Oh, wait... Marco Vanserra is the pseudonym of a professional educator and public school advocate. He specializes in making mathematics relevant and accessible to underserved communities in Florida. This article originally appeared on HuffPost in April 2025.
