Oregon lawmakers push for new Columbia River bridge to curb Portland area traffic
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Two Oregon state lawmakers introduced a bill on Thursday to explore the possibility of building a new bridge across the Columbia River.
State Sen. Bruce Starr (R-Dundee) and Sen. Suzanne Weber (R-Tillamook) introduced Senate Bill 1201, which would direct the Oregon Department of Transportation to conduct a feasibility study to potentially build a new Columbia River bridge west of the Interstate 5 and 205 bridges.
The senators said the bill marks a first step to assess whether this investment could ease congestion in the Portland metro area.
'An additional bridge over the Columbia River connecting Washington and Columbia counties to Clark County and I-5 west of Vancouver is exactly the investment that needs a full review,' stated Sen. Starr, vice-chair of the Joint Transportation Committee. 'As leaders charged with developing transportation policy for the state, Senator Weber and I understand big challenges require forward thinking and addressing the future needs of our state. This bill is the first step in what will likely be a lengthy process.'
UnitedHealthcare, OHSU reach agreement that ensures patient access to care
'This bridge would not only ease traffic for millions of Oregonians, but it would provide a lasting, multi-generational solution that will benefit our families and economy for years to come,' said Sen. Weber, who also serves on the Joint Transportation Committee.
The bill requires ODOT to complete the feasibility study and submit a report to the Joint Committee on Transportation by September 15, 2026.
The new bridge would be an extension of State Route 127 (Cornelius Pass Road) across State Highway 30 and connect to I-5 in Washington, the senators said.
Following the bill's introduction on Thursday, SB 1201 has been referred to the Transportation Committee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon senators back bill combatting ban on transgender military members
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley are co-sponsoring a bill that would ban discrimination against transgender military members. would prohibit the Department of Defense from banning transgender service members from the military and would ban the department from listing gender identity as a qualification for service. Additionally, the bill would ban the department from denying necessary health care on the basis of gender identity and bans the department from discriminating against service members based on their gender identity. Oregon Sen. Merkley re-introduces Equality Act to ban LGBTQ+ discrimination The bill comes after President Trump signed an executive order in January, banning transgender people from joining or continuing to serve in the military. As a result, the senators say the Department of Defense forced active-duty service members to self-identify for voluntary separation by June 6, noting service members in the Reserves have until June 7. As the ban is being challenged in federal court, the Supreme Court has allowed the Department of Defense to implement the ban, which the senators say will threaten the careers of thousands of service members. Newberg vineyard workers arrested in targeted ICE raids: Salinas 'Service members sign up to protect our country with patriotism and bravery,' Sen. Merkley said. 'Banning highly-skilled transgender service members endangers the safety and security of our nation and takes us backward in our march towards equality.' 'Drumming out Americans from military service because of rank prejudice undermines our national defense and is a cruel slap in the face to transgender people,' Sen. Wyden added. 'This bill acts on the core principle that equal treatment of Americans based solely on their ability to do the job must guide the armed forces and any other walk of life.' The Fit to Serve Act was led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and co-sponsored by other senators, including Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon road workers urge passage of transportation bill, others warn of financial burden
Aerial view of the Interstate 5 bridge connecting Portland and Vancouver. (Oregon Department of Transportation/Flickr) Rural and urban transportation workers pleaded with the Oregon Legislature's Joint Transportation Committee to pass a massive funding package that Democrats say would solve the Oregon Department of Transportation's budget shortfalls and stabilize the state's deteriorating road infrastructure. In a three-hour hearing on House Bill 2025 Thursday evening — the last of four hearings for the much anticipated transportation package published Monday — workers shared stories about responding to floods, wildfires, fatal accidents and suicide attempts without adequate staff and resources. 'We are operating on a skeleton crew at best,' Bend-based transportation worker Justin Iverson told the committee. 'We have been dwindling down over the last 10 years, to the point that we can barely maintain the roads now.' During the wintertime, when ice and snow pile up on roads, Iverson said just four to five people cover a 300-mile area in Central Oregon. 'We are the first, and oftentimes the only, people to respond during the wintertime,' he told lawmakers. 'The public relies on us to be there. We need to be there for them, so we ask that you fund this so that we can continue serving our communities.' A vote on House Bill 2025 has not yet been scheduled. House Bill 2025 would increase ODOT revenue by creating dozens of new fees and taxes, including a 15-cent raise to the state gas tax over the next three years and almost tripling registration fees for passenger vehicles. State officials estimate they need to raise $1.8 billion each year to pay for transportation services across the state. About $205 million of that is needed just to keep road maintenance funding at its current level. The transportation department said it will run out of money needed for state highway maintenance after mid-2025. Without an increase in funding for this work, ODOT would have to lay off up to 1,000 workers, the Oregonian reported. Revenue from the bill would also fund infrastructure projects such as the Interstate 5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project in Portland's Albina neighborhood, upgrading the Abernethy Bridge and widening Interstate 205 in the Portland metro, improving the Newberg-Dundee bypass in Yamhill County, and upgrading a Salem bridge off Center Street and State Highway 22 to make it strong enough to endure earthquakes. Oregonians from around the state, as well as city and county officials — including the mayors of Bend, Portland, Beaverton and rural Oakridge and Toledo — also spoke in favor of the bill. However, Republican lawmakers and some Oregonians who testified against the bill said low- and middle-income drivers would bear the brunt of new taxes and transportation fee spikes. Some drove hundreds of miles to give testimony Thursday, or tuned in virtually, to oppose the bill. They cited existing financial strain from inflation, high housing costs and rising utility bills. Amy Reiner, a resident from Clackamas County, spoke in opposition to the bill, saying she believes the new taxes and fees would financially strain Oregon families — particularly low- and middle-income ones. 'People are already leaving Oregon,' she said. 'We shouldn't be creating policies that make Oregon harder to live in. We should be focused on making it affordable and inclusive.' Greg Remensperger, the executive vice president of the Oregon Auto Dealers Association, opposed the transfer tax portion of the bill, or a tax on used and new sold cars. He said it would burden car purchasers already dealing with a car loan at a time when those loan delinquencies are at a record high. 'Let's be honest, a 2% transfer tax really needs to be termed what it is,' he told the committee. 'It's a sales tax. Oregon residents have fought down sales taxes on multiple occasions, and they will object to this too.' Several Republicans, including state House Minority Leader Christine Drazan, R-Canby, and state Rep. Shelly Boshart Davis, R-Albany, have criticized the bill, saying it was crafted by Democrats behind closed doors and rushed, without having a financial analysis prepared showing how much revenue it would raise. Bill sponsor state Sen. Chris Gorsek, D-Troutdale, said during an informational hearing on Monday that he thinks the bill would generate at least $1 billion in revenue. 'The public is being asked to testify without knowing what the bill will actually cost them,' Drazan said on Thursday. 'That is unacceptable.' Republicans on Monday introduced an alternative transportation package, House Bill 3982, which avoids taxes and instead redirects funding from climate initiatives, public transit and passenger rail services, bicycle programs and payroll tax allocations. The bill does not yet have a scheduled hearing in either chamber of the Legislature. A gas tax increase from $0.40 to $0.55 per gallon, starting with a 10-cent increase in January 2026 and additional 5-cent increase in 2028. Diesel would also be taxed at the same rate as regular gasoline. Vehicle registration fees would rise from $43 to $113 for passenger vehicles; $44 to $110 for mopeds and motorcycles; $63 to $129 for low-speed vehicles; and $63 to $129 for medium-speed electric vehicles. Title fees would increase from $77 to $182 for new titles, and from $27 to $44 for salvage titles. A new transfer tax on cars 10,000 pounds or less, and sold for more than $10,000, would be taxed at 2% if new, or 1% if used. Increased payroll tax for transit from 0.1% to 0.18% starting in 2026, then increased to 0.25% in 2028 and 0.3% in 2030. Increased privilege tax and commensurate use tax from 0.5% to 1% percent of the sales price of a vehicle. A privilege tax is a tax for the privilege of selling vehicles in Oregon, and the use tax applies to vehicles purchased from dealers outside of Oregon that are required to be registered and titled in Oregon. A new $340 yearly fee for electric vehicle drivers to participate in the Road Usage Charge Program. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon lawmakers pass bill allowing striking workers to receive unemployment benefits
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – The Oregon legislature passed a trimmed-down version of a bill on Thursday that would allow striking workers to receive unemployment benefits. Senate Bill 916 repeals a law that denies unemployment insurance benefits to unemployed Oregonians due to an active labor dispute, allowing striking workers who are otherwise eligible for UI to receive the benefits under the bill. The bill passed on Thursday after failing in the Senate. DON'T MISS: Oregon bill offering unemployment benefits to striking workers could 'destabilize' school services, superintendents warn Initially, the bill allowed striking workers to receive up to 26-weeks of benefits, except during a recession or as the economy recovers from a recession, when workers are less likely to strike. Lawmakers in the House passed the bill, however the legislation hit a snag in the Senate. On Tuesday, lawmakers held a Conference Committee hearing in a group made up of members of senators and representatives. There, the lawmakers discussed amendments to the bill. This included deductions in backpay for teachers who claim unemployment during a strike and trimming the initial 26-weeks of unemployment benefits to 10 weeks, which lawmakers passed on Thursday. During the Conference Committee hearing, Representative Dacia Grayber (D-SW Portland East Beaverton) said she felt the 10-week amendment is a 'massive compromise.' Newberg vineyard workers arrested in targeted ICE raids: Salinas 'It's not something I'm entirely thrilled with,' Grayber said. 'When unemployment insurance was developed in Oregon, I do believe that we were living in very different economic times in a very different political reality where we have over the last few decades watched systemic disenfranchisement.' Grayber, who was among chief sponsors of the bill, told KOIN 6 News in a statement on Friday, 'This is a historic win for the working people of Oregon. Nobody should starve or lose their health care while a fair contract is being bargained—and SB 916 was crafted to expedite ending strikes by bringing parties to the table with more urgency for a last, best, and final offer.' 'In addition to the previous House changes made to be responsive to the revenue forecast, protective of the UI fund, and streamline the process for schools, the changes adopted by the Conference Committee limit striking workers to receiving benefits for ten weeks, a sixteen-week reduction from the bill we passed out of the House last week. While I am disappointed with this reduction, it is a testament to the power of compromise, and the ability of legislators to bridge divides to secure policy wins for working Oregonians,' the representative added. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now During the Conference Committee hearing, Senator Daniel Bonham (R-The Dalles) voiced his opposition against the amendment or the underlying bill, decrying the bill's provision allowing both public and private sector employees to receive unemployment benefits while on strike. 'For me, it's too much to ask of the system and structure that we have in place,' Bonham said. ' We have a healthy fund today due in no small part because all the agreements over the years have been honored. It is a healthy enough (unemployment) fund that I don't know that this will be a massive draw on it but again, the kids will lose if teachers are incentivized to strike. We've always been able to negotiate for backpay but then the framework coming back from strike, incentivizing strikes in this way, in my opinion, you're decreasing the threshold for which someone wouldn't be burdened by a strike and thus I think you're incentivizing a strike.' Portland leaders address community ahead of weekend demonstrations Bonham issued a press release after the bill's passage, calling the bill a 'terrible idea.' 'Democrats just made it easier to strike against schools and public services—and stuck taxpayers with the bill. But the people who will suffer most are the kids, the ones without a lobbyist or a vote, whose school days will be lost so unions can cash in,' Bonham said. After passing the House and Senate, the bill heads to Oregon Governor Tina Kotek's desk for signature. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
