‘US Mail not for sale:' Dayton postal workers voice privatization concerns
DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) — Local American Postal Workers Union members gathered outside of a United States Postal Service location in Dayton to make their voices heard.
Don Adams, president of the local APWU, said members met outside of the USPS location on East Fifth Street in Dayton to protest possible cutbacks and closures of post office locations.
According to Adams, postal employees are not in the job to make a profit, but rather to provide a service to the people. The USPS generates revenue from stamps and service fees rather than tax dollars.
'We actually fall beneath the Congressional action that allows and created the Post Office, and we shouldn't be allowed to be just privatized at the whim of anybody,' said Adams. 'We should be allowed to continue our service that we have.'
Adams believes that changing USPS could negatively impact jobs and service delivery times, such as a delay of five to six times the speed mail currently arrives.
When WDTN.com reached out to USPS for comment on the gathering, we received the following statement:
We respect our employees' rights to express their opinions and participate in informational picketing while off the clock.'
USPS spokesperson
Adams recommended individuals who want to stand with them should contact their Congressional representative and tell them to 'keep the USPS the way it is.'
The APWU said more than 250 gatherings were held Thursday across the nation.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Congress ‘making America bankrupt,' says Elon Musk — blasting ‘disgusting' Trump bill he says burdens citizens
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has a stark warning for Americans. 'Congress is making America bankrupt,' he wrote in a June 3 post on X. The comment came as Musk reposted a chart from X account World of Statistics, showing U.S. budget deficits from 2000 to 2024 — and the numbers are sobering. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) In fiscal 2000, the federal government posted a $236 billion surplus, followed by a $128 billion surplus in 2001. (The chart didn't distinguish between deficits and surpluses, but those two years were surpluses, according to Federal Reserve data.) Unfortunately, that was the last time Washington ran a budget in the black. By 2002, the U.S. had fallen into a $158 billion deficit — spending more than it collected in revenue. The gap only widened in the years that followed, reaching $1.29 trillion in 2010 and ballooning to $3.13 trillion in 2020. For fiscal 2024, the U.S. government spent $6.75 trillion while taking in $4.92 trillion, resulting in a $1.83 trillion deficit. Musk has long criticized excess government spending, and he recently took aim at President Donald Trump's signature budget bill. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: You know you did wrong.' He also warned that the bill could push the federal deficit to $2.5 trillion and saddle Americans with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' Years of deficit spending have added up: U.S. national debt now stands at more than $36 trillion — and continues to climb. Whether America can technically go bankrupt is a complicated question because the federal government cannot file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. Instead, Congress would have to decide to let the federal government default on its debt, otherwise it can keep borrowing as long as there is demand from investors for government bonds. 'Technically speaking, the government can't go bankrupt because it only promised to hand over a certain number of dollars; it didn't promise what the value of those dollars would be. Because the value of the dollars was never specified, the government can print enough to render the dollars nearly worthless. To the rest of us, the effect is the same as the government going bankrupt,' wrote the co-hosts of podcast Words & Numbers back in 2016. In other words, printing money to stay afloat has significant consequences, as inflation erodes the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar. Ray Dalio, founder of the world's largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, echoed this concern earlier this year. 'There won't be a default — the central bank will come in, and we'll print the money and buy it,' he told CNBC in February. 'And that's where there's the depreciation of money.' For many Americans, the sting of inflation still lingers. Although headline CPI has eased from its 40-year peak of 9.1% in June 2022, everyday essentials — like food and housing — remain stubbornly expensive. While warning that U.S. debt is spiraling out of control, Dalio points to a tried-and-true safeguard: gold. 'People don't have, typically, an adequate amount of gold in their portfolio,' he said. 'When bad times come, gold is a very effective diversifier.' Gold has long served as a hedge against inflation. Unlike fiat currencies, it can't be printed in unlimited quantities by central banks — a feature that makes it especially appealing when governments ramp up spending. It's also considered a classic safe haven. Because gold isn't tied to the fate of any single country or currency, it often sees inflows during periods of economic distress or geopolitical uncertainty — pushing prices higher. Over the past 12 months, gold prices have surged by more than 40%. One way to invest in gold that also provides significant tax advantages is to open a gold IRA with the help of Priority Gold. Gold IRAs allow investors to hold physical gold or gold-related assets within a retirement account, thereby combining the tax advantages of an IRA with the protective benefits of investing in gold, making it an option for those looking to help shield their retirement funds against economic uncertainties. When you make a qualifying purchase with Priority Gold, you can receive up to $10,000 in silver for free. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — Gold isn't the only asset investors turn to during inflationary times. Real estate has also proven to be a powerful hedge. When inflation rises, property values often increase as well, reflecting the higher costs of materials, labor and land. At the same time, rental income tends to go up, providing landlords with a revenue stream that adjusts for inflation. Over the past five years, the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price NSA Index has jumped by more than 50%, reflecting strong demand and limited housing supply. Of course, high home prices can make buying a home more challenging, especially with mortgage rates still elevated. And being a landlord isn't exactly hands-off work. Managing tenants, maintenance and repairs can quickly eat into your time (and returns). The good news? You don't need to buy a property outright — or deal with leaky faucets — to invest in real estate today. Crowdfunding platforms like Arrived offer an easier way to get exposure to this income-generating asset class. Backed by world class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of rental homes with as little as $100, all without the hassle of mowing lawns, fixing leaky faucets or handling difficult tenants. The process is simple: Browse a curated selection of homes that have been vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Once you find a property you like, select the number of shares you'd like to purchase, and then sit back as you start receiving any positive rental income distributions from your investment. Another option is Homeshares, which gives accredited investors access to the $35 trillion U.S. home equity market — a space that's historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, this approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now Access to this $22.5 trillion asset class has traditionally been limited to elite investors — until now. Here's how to become the landlord of Walmart or Whole Foods without lifting a finger This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bernie Sanders And Elon Musk Unlikely Agree On One Thing: Trump's Tax Bill Is A 'Disgusting Abomination'—'Let's Defeat This'
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and billionaire Elon Musk don't agree on much. But this week, they found common ground in their fierce opposition to President Donald Trump's latest tax and spending bill. On June 3, Musk posted on X, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination' and slammed it for adding to the U.S. budget deficit. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.'Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Sanders quickly echoed the sentiment. 'Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination',' he posted. 'We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination.' The bill in question is a central component of Trump's second-term agenda and was passed by the House last month. It extends tax cuts from his first term, boosts defense spending, phases out electric vehicle subsidies, and raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. It's now in the hands of the Senate, where divisions are growing. When asked about Musk's comments about the bill, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the proposal, saying that 'the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill.' Trending: House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed disappointment over Musk's criticism, despite a 20-minute call the two had just the day before. 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the one big beautiful bill,' Johnson told reporters. He said Musk had understood the bill's merits during their conversation and added, 'I just deeply regret that he's made this mistake.' Johnson insisted the legislation reflects conservative priorities and emphasized that it would make Trump-era tax cuts permanent and slash government spending by $1.6 trillion, which he called 'the most amount of money that any government has ever saved on planet Earth in a piece of legislation ever.' But critics across the spectrum say the bill would result in massive deficits and harm lower-income Americans. Musk warned it would raise the budget shortfall to $2.5 trillion and burden citizens with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' The bill has exposed fractures in the Republican Party. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said he won't support any legislation that raises the debt ceiling. Trump, in response, called Paul's ideas 'actually crazy' on Truth Social. Musk's break with Trump is especially notable given their recent collaboration. Until last week, Musk worked with the administration's Department of Government Efficiency. He had praised parts of Trump's agenda before, and the president had lauded Musk's contributions, writing, 'he will, always, be with us.' The alliance now appears to be straining. Musk hinted at political retaliation, writing, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion –UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Bernie Sanders And Elon Musk Unlikely Agree On One Thing: Trump's Tax Bill Is A 'Disgusting Abomination'—'Let's Defeat This' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
an hour ago
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
WASHINGTON -- Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month.
