Why you should eat more potatoes – and the healthiest ways to cook them
Boiled, mashed, fried or baked, potatoes have long been a beloved part of the British diet. From fish and chips to bangers and mash or perfectly crisped with a Sunday roast, they're the classic comfort food.
Ever since the 1500s, when they were first brought to Europe from South America, potatoes have been a favourite filling staple. But the once undisputed king of carbs is losing its place on British plates, edged out by rice and noodles. Vilified by the protein-loving, anti-carb brigade, blamed for everything from weight gain to blood-sugar spikes; it's no wonder the potato has lost its crown.
But the humble spud has does not deserve this bad rap.
'I often tell clients to consider swapping some of the rice or pasta that they eat each week for potatoes,' says Sophie Trotman, a nutritionist. 'Potatoes contain a lot of micronutrients, as well as a good amount of fibre and resistant starch, both of which are crucial to gut health and may help prevent bowel cancer.'
Here is why potatoes can be a health superhero – if eaten in the right way.
The health benefits
The drawbacks
How much potato should I eat?
The healthiest way to eat potatoes
Healthiest types of potatoes
Recipes
Potatoes have many health benefits, including:
High in vitamins and minerals
High in fibre and resistant starch
Packed with antioxidants
Can boost skin health and the immune system
Good for gut health
Low in calories
Super satiating
Potatoes contain a huge array of micronutrients: they are packed with large amounts of vitamins C and B6, potassium, folate and magnesium, along with some iron and phosphorus. A medium-sized russet potato contains around 17mg of phosphorous (which is good for bone and muscle health), nearly half the daily intake recommended by the NHS, and more potassium (which helps regulate fluids and blood pressure) than a banana. Both make potatoes excellent for the health of your skin and immune system.
'The vitamin B6 in potatoes plays an important role in supporting the nervous system,' says Rob Hobson, a nutritionist and the author of Unprocess Your Family Life. 'The potassium they contain contributes to blood pressure regulation and normal muscle function.' Magnesium, meanwhile, is important for healthy sleep.
Despite all of this, 'potatoes themselves are relatively low in calories – it's often what we do to them that makes the difference,' notes Hobson. Around 100g of plain potato contains around 80 calories, a meagre amount compared with the same serving of cooked white pasta, which can come in at up to 200 calories.
Then there are the antioxidants that come with potatoes. The root vegetable is rich in flavonoids, carotenoids and phenolic acids, all of which can be protective against cancer, diabetes and heart disease. 'Purple or orange-fleshed potatoes are higher in antioxidants because their colour indicates a higher level of polyphenols,' Hobson explains. 'But even white potatoes contain a good amount, which is one of the reasons they're such a nutritious food.'
The main reason nutritionists rave about the health benefits of potatoes, however, is their fibre content. 'A medium potato contains around 2g of insoluble fibre, which means that they are great for keeping you regular and also for balancing your blood sugar,' says Trotman.
White potatoes are a complex carbohydrate, meaning that they take more energy to digest and stay in your system for longer. This puts them 'more on par with brown rice or pasta health-wise than with white pasta, rice or bread, which are refined carbohydrates,' Trotman adds.
Potatoes that have been cooked and then cooled also contain resistant starch, a type of carbohydrate that can't be digested well by the small intestine, so instead ferments in the large intestine, 'acting as a prebiotic,' Trotman says. This fermentation process produces short-chain fatty acids that contribute to various health benefits, such as reduced inflammation and lower blood sugar.
Another score for potatoes: they are the most filling and satisfying food on the planet. Boiled potatoes top the satiety index, created in the 1990s by Australian researcher Dr Susanna Holt, which ranks different foods for their ability to quell hunger relative to their calorie content.
'Potatoes are naturally filling thanks to their water content, resistant starch, fibre, and overall bulk,' explains Hobson. By Holt's ranking, potatoes are twice as filling as wholemeal bread and three times as filling as white bread. 'You don't need to eat a huge amount to feel satisfied, which makes them a helpful food if you're looking to manage your weight,' Hobson says.
Low in protein
Contain solanine, which can cause nausea
High glycaemic index
Being such a dense source of carbohydrates, potatoes lack both fat and protein. 'This is why I wouldn't recommend that people eat potatoes for three meals a day every day,' says Trotman. That said, 'usually people don't eat potatoes on their own. I'd just advise pairing them with a lean protein like fish or chicken.'
Further to this, potatoes are high on the glycemic index, a ranking of carbohydrate-based foods for their propensity to spike blood sugar, followed by blood sugar dips 'that can make people crave sugary or starchy foods more quickly,' Trotman explains. Foods that have a high glycemic index should be eaten carefully by people with prediabetes or diabetes for this reason.
'Getting through a lot of potatoes in one sitting can be a problem for your blood sugar and can potentially contribute to excess calorie consumption,' she adds. 'They're an excellent food to have as a regular part of your diet – you just need to be careful to eat them in moderation and be aware of the right portion sizes for your meals.'
'Potatoes belong to the nightshade family, along with tomatoes and aubergines,' Hobson explains. 'This means they contain solanine – a natural compound that can cause issues like nausea or abdominal pain for some people in large amounts. You'll mostly find it in sprouting or green potatoes, so just cut away any green or soft bits and sprouts before cooking.'
Potatoes are no more fattening than any other food, in and of themselves. 'Carbohydrates contain fewer calories per gram than fat — but it depends how you prepare them,' says Hobson. 'Adding butter, cheese, or cream to potatoes increases their calorie content significantly. Fat also makes food more palatable, which can lead to overeating.'
This goes a long way in explaining why chips, especially the triple-cooked sort, coming in at up to 250 calories per 100g, can quickly become fattening. 'It's very easy to get through a lot of chips in a sitting,' says Trotman. 'I think that this explains why potatoes have a reputation for causing weight gain.'
Boiled potatoes may top the satiety rankings, but fried, roasted, baked or mashed potatoes are less filling, as they lose some of their water content as they are cooked.
According to the NHS, starchy carbs like potatoes should make up around a third of your daily food intake. The official daily guideline intake of carbs for women is 230g per day, while men should aim for 300g per day, around a third of the daily calorie requirement for both sexes respectively.
'I wouldn't recommend that you get all of your carbohydrates from potatoes. As with anything, variety is important to a healthy diet and eating a wide range of carb sources helps you eat different types of meals,' says Trotman. That said, if you were to eat potatoes alone to meet your carb needs, you could eat around nine medium boiled potatoes every day if you were a woman, or twelve if you were a man.
Nutritional values are per 100g
86 calories, 0.1g fat
The potato that takes the crown as healthiest is unsurprising: 'boiled is best,' say both Hobson and Trotman, 'but obviously not if they're covered in butter,' Hobson points out.
A tablespoon of butter adds around 100 calories. If you must add fats, both Hobson and Trotman recommend olive oil. It is slightly more calorific per tablespoon, 'but better for your heart, and contains lots of polyphenols,' Trotman says.
'It can be helpful to add other flavourings like salt, black pepper, garlic or thyme, or milk instead of butter in the case of mash, so that you aren't tempted to load up with fat,' adds Trotman.
They are maximally satiating and easy to cook. 'I often add vegetables to potatoes; it's a simple way to tick off more nutrients in one go,' Hobson says.
93 calories, 0.1g fat
A plain baked potato contains slightly more calories per-gram, as it loses water during the baking process (and therefore some of its satiety too). But we all know that a baked potato is really a vessel for toppings, and that's where calories and fat can creep in. Fortunately 'there are lots of healthy options,' says Trotman. 'I like a tuna mayo, with lots of sweetcorn and Greek yogurt instead of full-fat mayonnaise.'
120 calories, 6g fat
They may be the nation's favourite, but a roast potato can quickly become super calorific. According to some recipes, where your handful of potatoes are to be brushed with minimal olive oil, they can be kept relatively low-calorie – but this is not what most of us look for in our roasties. A 100g serving of roast potatoes cooked in beef dripping or goose fat can come in at 160 calories, and that's if you can restrain yourself to the three or so chunks recommended.
Whatever you do, don't buy bags of frozen roast potatoes. Shop-bought frozen roasties 'usually contain a lot of UPFs, which make them worse for your health,' says Trotman. Hobson suggests that you 'boil them first, then rough them up to get that crispy texture. Drizzle with a little oil before roasting.'
187 calories, 9.4g fat
Like baked potatoes, mashed potato loses its water content but also its fibre, if stripped of its skin. The pulpy texture of mash also makes it easier for your body to break down, and therefore it becomes less filling.
'Mash can still be healthy,' says Hobson, 'but be mindful of what you're mixing in. A splash of semi-skimmed milk gives creaminess with far fewer calories than cream.' Around 100ml of single cream introduces nearly 200 calories to your potatoes. The same measure of semi-skimmed milk, on the other hand, comes with around 50 calories.
It might be unconventional, but if you must add fat, then you're better off making it olive oil rather than butter, Hobson adds. 'If you're adding fat, olive oil is a better option than butter,' he recommends. 'And keep the skin on — that's where most of the fibre and nutrients are.'
202 calories, 7.1g fat
They may be less calorific than mash, but chips are usually worse for your health. Shop-bought chips vary widely in calorie content, but some of the most popular name brands come in at around 200 calories per 100g serving, 'with a lot of less healthy oils that are bad for your heart,' Trotman says – such as rapeseed and sunflower oil – along with preservatives and stabilisers, which come with the same health risks as shop-bought roast potatoes. 'They're also not usually made of whole potato, another sign of unnecessary processing that strips them of fibre,' Trotman adds.
'If you're making chips at home, leave the skin on. It's an easy win for fibre and nutrients,' says Hobson. A 100g serving of homemade chips cooked in a drizzle of olive oil would come in at about the same calorie content as healthier homemade roast potatoes. Chip shop chips meanwhile, fried multiple times in oils that have been left to go rancid and served with copious amounts of salt, are likely worst of all for your heart and waistline alike.
Sweet potato has a reputation as a health food. But white potatoes are almost as good, says Trotman. 'What you get with sweet potatoes is more antioxidants and vitamins, as you can see from their colour,' she explains. Sweet potatoes also contain slightly more fibre, at 2.1g versus 1.6g per 100g, respectively. The idea that sweet potatoes 'have half the calories' is myth, however – 'and if you load them up with salt, they are going to become unhealthy quickly too'.
'When it comes to white potato varieties – Charlotte, Russet, Maris Piper, Yukon Gold, King Edward – they're all fairly similar nutritionally,' says Hobson. 'Yukon Gold might be better for mash thanks to its creamy texture, which might mean you need less added fat.'
Trotman notes that Russet potatoes have a slightly higher glycaemic index score compared with other varieties, while Charlotte potatoes are lower on the scale, 'but nutritionally they're very similar,' she agrees.
By Sophie Trotman
'No,' says Hobson. 'The skin holds most of the fibre and many nutrients. Just wash them well and leave the skin on, even for mash.'
'Yes, just cut out the green and soft parts and any sprouts,' says Trotman.
'They contain solanine, but as long as you don't eat a lot of them, they're safe,' Trotman says.
'Keep them in a cool, dark place, but not in the fridge. And don't store them near onions, as that can speed up spoilage,' Hobson advises.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
NHS Confederation and Beamtree launch data analytics platform for NHS trusts
The UK's National Health Service (NHS) Confederation has partnered with health technology company Beamtree to introduce The Evolve Collaborative, which aims to enhance the use of operational data at NHS trusts in England. The initiative is focused on offering acute care services, enhancing patient outcomes and increasing efficiency. It combines Beamtree's analytics platform with the NHS Confederation's expertise in convening and improvement, with the aim to benchmark performance, understand variations and apply data-driven enhancements to processes. NHS Confederation chief executive Matthew Taylor said: 'The Evolve Collaborative seeks to empower clinicians, boards and operations leaders with the data they need. 'The collaborative will be a driven by our members and will encourage them to be curious about who else is doing things differently, and to ask 'why'. 'By combining predictive analytics with peer learning, we're giving NHS leaders the tools and support they need to drive real, measurable improvement." The Evolve Collaborative's analytics platform uses AI and machine learning to predict future trends. This will allow NHS trusts to identify challenges and assess the potential impact of different interventions. The platform is supported by tailored dashboards and tools designed for various roles within the NHS. A key component of the partnership is the formation of peer-to-peer learning communities, which are facilitated by experts in improvement. These aim to provide a secure environment for members to exchange best practices and jointly develop solutions to common challenges. Evolve Collaborative membership is currently available to NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts providing acute services in England. Beamtree chief executive Marek Stepniak said: 'Our experience with Health Roundtable in Australia and New Zealand has delivered measurable improvements in healthcare delivery. 'These insights have already helped providers on the other side of the world achieve tangible outcomes and we look forward to bringing this proven model of learning and collaboration to the UK." "NHS Confederation and Beamtree launch data analytics platform for NHS trusts" was originally created and published by Hospital Management, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Churchill documents reveal D-Day landings boosted by import of ‘wonder drug' from America
Newly unearthed documents have revealed that the D-Day landings received a boost from the import of a "wonder drug" from America. Despite its discovery in London in 1928 by Sir Alexander Fleming, large-scale production of the antibiotic penicillin had struggled to take hold in Britain. Attempts to produce substantial quantities of medicine from the bacteria-killing mould had not been achieved by the start of the Second World War. Then prime minister Sir Winston Churchill became increasingly frustrated that Britain had not been able to produce enough penicillin in the preparations for the Normandy landings in 1944. Official papers released by the National Archive – containing handwritten notes by Sir Winston – highlight efforts to boost quantities of the antibiotic, with Britain eventually forced to import it from America. The documents were released ahead of the 81st anniversary of D-Day, the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. In one report on February 19, after the issue had been raised in the House of Commons, Sir Winston scrawled in red ink on a Ministry of Supply report noting the Americans were producing greater quantities: 'I am sorry we can't produce more.' On another paper, he complained: 'Your report on penicillin showing that we are only to get about one tenth of the expected output this year, is very disappointing.' Elsewhere in the same file he instructs: 'Let me have proposals for a more abundant supply from Great Britain.' With preparations for D-Day ramped up, efforts to deliver enough American-made penicillin for frontline military personnel soon became a matter of urgency. Decisions needed to be made on the quantities of antibiotic imported, how much to administer to individual patients, and how to get medical staff trained in time. Most British doctors did not know how to issue penicillin – until this point, doctors had nothing available to treat infections like pneumonia and many people died of blood poisoning after minor injuries because no drug existed that could cure them. Early in January 1944, Prof FR Fraser, the Ministry of Health's adviser on the organisation of wartime hospitals, wrote that 50,000-100,000 wounded could be expected from the Second Front. He proposed the Emergency Medical Services might need as many as five billion units of penicillin per month for this. Further documents show discussions on whether the antibiotic should be supplied as calcium or sodium salts, or in tablet form. Ultimately, it was agreed powdered calcium salts would be issued for superficial wounds and sodium salts for use in deep wounds. On May 24 1944, less than a fortnight before D-Day, Prof Fraser reported: 'Sufficient supplies of penicillin are now available for the treatment of battle casualties in EMS hospitals, but not for ordinary civilian patients.' Plans were made for casualties from the frontline in France to be brought back to coastal hospitals in Britain for treatment. A week before D-Day, on May 30 1944, hospitals were instructed to treat battlefield patients en route: 'In an endeavour to prevent the development of gas gangrene and sepsis in wounds the War Office have arranged for the treatment of selected cases by penicillin to be commenced as soon after injury as possible.' Injections of penicillin were to be given to them at intervals of not more than five hours and patients would be wearing a yellow label with the letters 'PEN'. The time and size of penicillin doses should be written on it, they were told. Dr Jessamy Carlson, modern records specialist at the National Archives, said: 'File MH 76/184 gives a glimpse into the extraordinary levels of preparation undertaken in advance of the D-Day landings. 'Only six weeks before, penicillin is just reaching our shores in quantities which will allow it to play a major role in improving the outcomes for service personnel wounded in action.' As Allied forces made inroads into Europe, restrictions on the use of penicillin for civilians began to relax, but only in special cases. In July 1944, Ronald Christie, professor of medicine, wrote to Prof Fraser to tell him: 'The War Office approves of American penicillin being used for medical conditions in service patients and for air raid casualties among civilians.' On the home front, demand for the new 'wonder' drug began to increase, according the National Archives. It was decided that penicillin for civilians should only be supplied to larger hospitals where the staff had been properly trained to administer it. Only in 1946 did it become fully available for the general public.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear
Until very recently, Health Secretary Wes Streeting tried to market himself as a radical health reformer, who is not afraid to poke sacred cows. While his reform-minded rhetoric always remained at a highly-abstract and general level, Streeting deserved some credit for it, because he did not have to do this. He had the courage to say things which he knew would rub some people up the wrong way, not least the Corbynite wing of his own party. Sadly, that brief period of NHS candour is now officially over. Streeting, the self-styled reformer, is no more. He and his colleagues have fully retreated into their comfort zone. During the recent local election campaign, Labour distributed a leaflet that showed a mock medical bill, and a doctor holding up a credit card reader. The message was clear: vote for us, because this is what the other lot want to do to you. On Twitter/X, Labour are now frequently posting dire warnings about the alleged evils of insurance-based healthcare systems. This is exactly that old-school NHS cultism which Streeting used to disavow until five minutes ago. It may work for him. The NHS may be falling apart, but the cult around is still going strong. In the eyes of its keenest defenders, the NHS can do no wrong. They have quietly dropped the old cliché about the NHS being 'the envy of the word', and replaced it with a slightly more subtle version, which goes something like this: Once upon a time, the NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world. But then, from 2010 on, it was systematically defunded. It was deliberately run into the ground, so that it can be privatised more easily. A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor. None of these claims are true. Let's have a look at each of them in turn. The NHS was never the best healthcare system in the world. The idea that it ever was can be traced back to a ranking compiled by the Commonwealth Fund, an American healthcare think tank, which relies on a very unusual methodology, in which medical outcomes only account for a fifth of the total score. This matters, because on medical outcomes, the NHS has always been one of the worst-performing healthcare systems in the developed world – as even the Commonwealth Fund study shows. There is no turning point after which the NHS's performance suddenly deteriorated. It was just never good in the first place. At the end of the 2010s, age-adjusted real NHS spending per capita was only marginally higher than it had been in the beginning of the decade. Put differently, the NHS budget only just about kept pace with population growth, population ageing, and inflation. This clearly constituted a slowdown in spending increases compared to the previous decade. But it does not constitute a 'defunding'. In any case: that period of relative spending restraint is already over again. The NHS budget was given a massive boost during the pandemic, which has only been partially reversed. Public healthcare spending in the UK stands at just under 9% of GDP: one of the highest levels in the world. Conspiracy theories about secret plans to privatise the NHS have been around for decades. I wrote a report on this three years ago, for which I went through the news archives, and I found warnings about the NHS's imminent demise from every year since 1980. But somehow, it never happens. The NHS remains an unusually state-centred system. Most healthcare systems, including tax-funded ones, use a mix of public, private for-profit and private non-profit providers. There are no plans – secret or otherwise – to privatise the NHS. More's the pity. Because there is nothing wrong with private healthcare systems. There are good examples of private, insurance-based healthcare systems, most notably in the Netherlands and Switzerland, which are nothing like the dreaded system of the US. These systems cover everybody: poor people are exempt from health insurance premiums and co-payments. Under these systems, rich and poor alike get faster access to medical treatment, and better medical outcomes, than they would on the NHS. The only thing these people don't get is a naff feel-good mythology around their health systems. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.