New Study Finds What People Think Of Karma And Its Rewards
A majority of people believe that karma, the idea that good deeds are rewarded and bad actions are punished, works, a new study has found. About 59 per cent of the 2,000 people of religious and non-religious backgrounds part of the study claimed to have received rewards for their good deeds.
Speaking about others, a vast majority, 92 per cent, said cheating partners, indebted friends, bullies and coworkers were at the receiving end of the karma for their actions, according to a new study published by the American Psychological Association in the journal Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.
The 2,000 individuals, who took part in the study, were from the US, India, and Singapore, CNN reported.
According to the study, people believe doing good deeds raises the probability of better outcomes, while they fear the opposite for unkind, indifferent and negative behaviour.
Cindel White, the senior author of the study, explained that considering karma allowed people to feel proud and claim personal credit, even if the cause for the favourable result was uncertain or unknown.
She added that it also enabled individuals to view the suffering of others as justified retaliation.
Ms White noted the results offered insights into how our minds assessed ourselves and others.
According to the study, the tendency was a component of attribution bias. People often use this psychological pattern to defend their self-esteem by explaining occurrences in well-documented ways.
Patrick Heck, a psychologist with the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, noted that karma provided a convenient framework for people to feel good about themselves, something most people desired.
Cultural differences have also been incorporated into the study, enabling comparisons between the thought processes of individuals from Western countries, such as the United States, and those from countries like India and Singapore.
It concluded that Indians and Singaporeans were comparatively self-critical, but Americans displayed a larger self-enhancing attitude.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
How Family Aspirations Changed In India Over Decades? UN Report Tells Stories Of 3 Generations
Last Updated: Across India, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has plummeted from about 6 in 1960 to 2 today, as per the UNFPA report. India is moving from large, necessity-driven households to smaller, aspiration-led ones. The recent UNFPA's State of World Population 2025 report features a compelling story of three generations from a single family in Bihar, showcasing this journey of change and its broader implications Saraswati Devi, now 64, was married at just 16 in 1976. By age 30, she had five sons, reflecting a time when the average woman in India had six children, fewer than a quarter used contraception, and under half completed primary school. There was virtually no personal choice — childbearing was determined by tradition, utility, and family or community expectations. Schooling increased gradually and by the 1980s and '90s, more girls were finishing primary education and had slightly better access to contraception. But families still aimed for multiple children. Anita Devi, Saraswati's daughter-in-law, married at 18 in the late 1990s. She ended up having six children; four daughters and two sons. 'I initially wanted only one or two children, just one girl and one boy. We are poor, and raising a large family is difficult… But talking about family planning was not easy in my family, and my husband was against contraception," Anita was quoted as saying in the UNFPA report. But fertility rates began to decline, reflecting slow uptake of family planning and shifting norms. The UNFPA reports states that today, nearly 70 per cent of women use contraception, over 90 per cent complete secondary school, and the average fertility is around two children, down from six. A Story Echoed Across India – and the World This generational narrative is not isolated. Across India, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has plummeted from about 6 in 1960 to 2 today. The report links this shift to: A dramatic rise in female education (from less than 50 per cent primary completion in the 1960s to more than 90 per cent today) Contraceptive use climbing to nearly 70 per cent Women increasingly making independent decisions about their bodies and futures But the story isn't purely celebratory. The UNFPA warns it reflects a 'fertility aspirations crisis": one in three adult Indians (36 per cent) experience unintended pregnancies, and 30 per cent report having fewer — or more — children than they desired, with 23 per cent experiencing both. Why These Changes Matter India's TFR has fallen to 1.9–2.0, now below replacement level (2.1), placing it in the demographic trajectory of ageing nations. Replacement level is the average number of children a woman needs to have in order for a population to exactly replace itself from one generation to the next, without migration. The globally accepted replacement level is 2.1 children per woman. While nearly 68 per cent of the population is currently of working age — a potential economic boon — the window to harness this before an older population overtakes is closing. Reproductive autonomy vs structural support: Despite gains in choice, persistent economic burdens, gender inequality, and inadequate childcare or parental leave systems mean many cannot achieve their ideal family size — even if they want to, says the report. Turning Aspirations into Reality: A Policy Imperative UNFPA asserts that the focus must shift from controlling fertility to unlocking reproductive agency, where individuals can freely and confidently decide if, when, and how many children to have. For India, this translates into scaling up affordable childcare and parental leave, promoting gender-equitable domestic norms, ensuring accessible reproductive healthcare and family planning and supporting economic security through jobs and housing. India's journey from 'as many as possible" to 'as few as desired" mirrors broader global demographic shifts. The tale of three generations — from Saraswati's five to Pooja's deliberate two — captures how deeply family aspirations have evolved. But tellingly, many still cannot align their reproductive lives with their desires. As UNFPA concludes, the real challenge of fertility lies not in how few children are born, but in whether people have the freedom and support to reach their desired family size. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 11, 2025, 14:14 IST News india How Family Aspirations Changed In India Over Decades? UN Report Tells Stories Of 3 Generations
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
A flawed attempt at delivering Gaza aid led to a wave of deaths
Israeli army officers and American military contractors looked on from their joint operations center late last month with concern. A new attempt to hand out food and other aid to thousands of hungry people in Gaza had just launched, and it was about to be overwhelmed. A crowd surged through the newly constructed gates at the site in Rafah. Chaos and looting quickly followed. Some 40 American contractors working for a private security company retreated. Outside the distribution center, Israeli troops opened fire to warn off the crowds. It was the beginning of a cycle of dysfunction and violence that would play out repeatedly over the following days, derailing the latest attempt to get food into the hands of the people who most need it. The events of May 27 exposed how the Israeli military and the new nongovernment group it is working with, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, were unprepared to deal with wide-scale hunger and desperation in the enclave after a year and a half of war. An Israeli military official said the American contractors made a mistake by withdrawing and allowing the Rafah site to be destroyed. It hasn't reopened since. A spokesperson from Safe Reach Solutions, a private U.S. company contracted by GHF to secure the aid, said that the retreat followed a protocol designed to safeguard lives. SRS is responsible for securing the aid sites, while the military secures the surrounding area, where the shootings have taken place. Both sides have complained privately of coordination problems. Two weeks on, the organizers still haven't fully figured out how to make the initiative work. At least five times last week, Israeli forces fired toward Gazans as they were heading to distribution sites, saying some people had deviated from an approved route and continued to approach troops. Gazan authorities say more than 100 Palestinians have been killed while trying to access aid. The Israeli military official said the military and the Americans are making improvements as they learn what works on the ground. Coordination and work with the American contractors is improving, the official said. The aid effort is run by the newly formed GHF, a foundation incorporated in Delaware in February. GHF came to the project without a lot of knowledge about Gaza, according to people familiar with the plan. It is currently led by Evangelical leader Johnnie Moore, a former Trump campaign adviser. GHF and SRS work closely together with the Israeli military in a handful of joint operation centers in southern Israel staffed by dozens of people at a time. The military shares intelligence with the Americans including details of military operations in the vicinity of the aid sites. The military and GHF had prepared for smaller crowds than the tens of thousands who have come to the sites, said an Israeli military officer involved in the aid effort. The officer said this expectation was based on Hamas's opposition to the aid plan and the distribution site's distance from al-Mawasi, a tent encampment housing much of Gaza's displaced population. GHF initially planned to open three sites in southern Gaza and one in central Gaza. SRS stationed a few dozen people at each location including local Gazans to distribute the aid. It wasn't enough—the food has run out quickly and there is often chaotic overcrowding at sites. On some days, only one of the four hubs has been operating. And when some sites do open, they usually do so for a limited period, sometimes for 45 minutes in total, before closing when supplies run out. Gazans who have visited aid sites in the past two weeks say they often try to arrive early at the sites to ensure they get aid before it runs out, even though it isn't permitted. The Israeli military, GHF and SRS said they had anticipated the size of the large crowds at the sites correctly. 'We knew the need was overwhelming, and we prepared accordingly, expecting turnout beyond what we could service," a spokesperson for SRS said. Gazans describe chaotic scenes at aid sites, with violence sometimes breaking out over who gets food. An initial plan to employ biometric specialists conducting facial recognition screenings was dropped for the moment as it has proved unfeasible given the large crowds, said one person involved in the operation. GHF has said it is working to improve its effectiveness. It is piloting a program that will distribute aid directly to communities, rather than making Gazans travel to one of its distribution centers. It is also aiming to open more distribution sites and has created a special lane for accessing aid for women and children. To date, the group says it has distributed approximately 232,800 boxes of aid. In recent weeks, hundreds of American contractors, many of them former special forces, have arrived in Israel. They are receiving around $1,000 a day, including on days off, according to people familiar with the matter. They are housed in several hotels in southern Israel, many sporting arm and leg tattoos, baseball caps and sunglasses. At a hotel in the city of Ashkelon in southern Israel last week, some contractors could be seen carrying mini fridges and rice cookers to their rooms. Gazans complain of poor communication from GHF and the Israeli military. Operating hours are often changed and announced at the last minute on GHF's Facebook page, which launched on May 28. In comments on the Facebook page and an official GHF WhatsApp group, Gazans criticize the unfairness of the distribution method, discuss looting by thieves and say they are confused by opening hours. 'Credibility is 0%. This morning you said Netzarim at 6 a.m. Then at 4:30 you said distribution was over," reads one of two dozen angry comments in Arabic on GHF's Facebook page on Monday. 'At times they tell us to return, and that there will be no aid today. And then two hours later they open," said Abdullah Jouda, 24, who has visited aid sites in Rafah in recent days. He said he was fired on as he made his way to an aid site in Rafah on June 1 and watched a person next to him die. Internal wrangling has been a problem, too. GHF's chief executive stepped down on the day it was supposed to launch, saying he couldn't abandon the humanitarian community's principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. Boston Consulting Group, which had helped advise on the plan, said last week that it was cutting ties with the initiative and fired two partners after an internal investigation, saying they carried out unauthorized work. Humanitarian groups have refused to join the initiative, saying it puts Palestinians in too much danger by requiring them to travel through a war zone for food and that Israeli military presence near aid sites is dangerous. Other problems abound. GHF says Hamas has threatened Gazans on the ground who collaborate with the initiative. Israel says efforts by Hamas to disrupt the plan show how Israel is successfully cutting off the ability of the U.S. designated terrorist group to steal aid and sell it to fund its war effort. Hamas denies it steals aid. The military contractors have at times grown frustrated. SRS was initially hired by the U.S. and Qatar to guard an Israeli-constructed corridor in Gaza called Netzarim during a cease-fire starting in January. But staff contracts weren't extended as expected after Israel resumed fighting in the enclave in mid-March. This left the company in limbo for weeks, leading many hires to return to the U.S., according to one SRS hire. By the time SRS learned in the spring that a new contract would start, this time with GHF, they only had a few weeks to hire enough people for the operation, according to the SRS hire. The company had to work fast and launched a LinkedIn hiring campaign for roles such as 'video analyst." More than 20 countries as well as the European Union and United Nations have criticized the aid plan, saying it unnecessarily puts civilians at risk. Food and humanitarian goods had entered Gaza since the start of the war via aid groups and the United Nations, which delivered to hundreds of distribution centers throughout the enclave. The Israeli government has repeatedly denounced Hamas for looting U.N. aid shipments, but the U.N. denies the claims. On the ground in Gaza, meanwhile, many Palestinians are torn between their desperation for food and their concern for their safety as they make their way to distribution sites. Samaher Abu Audeh, 40, says she worries each morning when her husband, Issa, leaves their tent in al-Mawasi and heads to a distribution center in Rafah. She sometimes asks him not to go, but he insists as he must feed their five children. On Monday morning she prayed again he would return safely. 'May God ease his way and bring him back safely today," she said. 'Maybe he'll bring flour, so I can bake for the kids. Hunger is killing them." Write to Anat Peled at
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
ASBM holds doctoral research seminar
Bhubaneswar: The School of Accountancy, ASBM University, Bhubaneswar, organised a Doctoral Research Seminar on Saturday. Biswajeet Pattanayak, Founder and President of the University, inaugurated the programme. Speaking on the occasion, Pattanayak made a comparative analysis on the conduction, interpretation and application of research in the Eastern and Western worlds. He also said there is a need to revisit the ontological and epistemological assumptions and revise them 'for our context.' ASBM University Vice Chancellor Ranjan Kumar Bal took a session on research reporting. Many scholars from various universities and higher education institutes of Odisha and neighboring States participated in the seminar and presented their scholarly work. The best paper presented in the seminar was awarded to Auroshikha Mohanty, a researcher from National Law University, Odisha. Padmanava Mohapatra, the Dean of the School of Accountancy, coordinated this programme. Prarthana Mishra, Co-coordinator of the seminar, gave a vote of thanks.
