'Deranged behavior': US National Guard deployment in Los Angeles draws sharp reaction from Gavin Newsom
After the arrest of 44 people in crackdowns conducted in Los Angeles by ICE authorities, protests sparked in the region, leading to the deployment of the US National Guard. This move came after police used tear gas on anti-ICE protesters in a move that has sent shockwaves throughout the US.
Deployment of the US National Guard has drawn sharp reaction from California Governor, Gavin Newsom, who called the potential deployment of US Marines in his state 'deranged'. Newsom took to X to say, 'The Secretary of Defense is now threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens. This is deranged behavior.'
It was Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump's hardline defense secretary, who floated the idea of deploying the US National Guard onto the streets of Los Angeles, which is a Democrat-run state. 'Under President Trump, violence & destruction against federal agents & federal facilities will NOT be tolerated. It's COMMON SENSE,' Hegseth wrote on X around the issue, triggering further shockwaves in the US political landscape.
It all started with a stand-off between border patrol personnel in tactical gear and gas masks and the incoming wave of protesters. As soon as things began escalating, police began deploying tear gas, and protesters also threw objects at them to retaliate. Even one car was reportedly set alight, according to The Guardian. This triggered Trump's call to send in the national guard, a move that has drawn concerns among critics that the United States is slowly moving towards authoritarianism and dictatorship.
'The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles – not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle. Don't give them one.' Newsom was also quoted as saying about the incident. Meanwhile, Trump praised the US National Guard for curbing the protests on Truth Social, saying, "Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Democracy without dissent a contradiction: Justice Surya Kant
Democracy without dissent is a contradiction and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity, Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant has asserted as he invoked India's constitutional ethos and the top court's role in defending civil liberties. Justice Kant, who is in line to take over as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in November this year, was speaking at the Washington Supreme Court as part of an international judicial exchange. In his address earlier this week that underscored the shared constitutional commitments of India and the United States, the judge said: 'Democracy without dissent is a contradiction, and that silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality, but complicity…These are not merely legal precedents; they are constitutional declarations.' Justice Kant highlighted that the right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the First Amendment in the US, has been 'zealously defended' by courts on both sides of the Atlantic. Drawing parallels with the US Supreme Court's protection of student protest in Tinker Vs Des Moines (1969), he recalled how India's top court, much earlier, had established the primacy of expression in Romesh Thappar and Brij Bhushan cases in 1950, ruling against pre-censorship and vague notions of public order. 'In both countries, the judiciary has consistently pushed back against the temptation to suppress dissent under misguided and deceptive notions that the executive may hold,' he noted. Reaffirming the foundational nature of constitutional supremacy in both democracies, Justice Kant highlighted that the basic structure doctrine in India that asserts Parliament cannot amend away core constitutional values mirrors the American principle that 'even the majoritarian will must bow' before foundational ideals like liberty, federalism, and equality. 'These doctrines reflect a shared understanding that tampering with these principles would cause a rift so immense that it would threaten the very heart of our existence,' he warned. ALSO READ | Free speech, democracy, and the epidemic of hurt feelings Justice Kant also spotlighted India's global leadership in using public interest litigation (PIL) as a judicial tool to redress collective harm. Citing the Vishaka judgment (1997) where the Indian Supreme Court laid down workplace sexual harassment guidelines in the absence of legislation, he said: 'Though structurally distinct, both approaches reflect a shared judicial philosophy: that justice must not be confined to individual litigants but must be responsive to collective harm and systemic failure.' In contrast, he acknowledged the role of class action lawsuits in the US, such as Lois Jenson Vs Eveleth Taconite Co (1993), where female workers collectively challenged workplace abuse. Addressing the evolution of due process jurisprudence, Justice Kant recalled how the Indian Constitution initially adopted 'procedure established by law' over the American-style 'due process,' but eventually evolved the latter through judicial interpretation. 'In the seminal Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Indian Supreme Court read into the phrase the requirements of justice, fairness, and reasonableness -- effectively harmonizing our doctrine with the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,' he added. Justice Kant concluded his address on a note of judicial kinship, stating: 'It is my firm belief that our countries, and our legal systems, share a kindred spirit rooted in the pursuit of justice, liberty, and the rule of law… The law must be a shield for the weak, not a sword for the powerful.'
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Biden 2.0 here we go: Internet mocks Trump after stumble on Air Force One steps
US President Donald Trump stumbled while climbing the stairs of Air Force One in New Jersey. A video of the incident quickly went viral on social media. Internet users have compared it to similar stumbles by former President Joe Biden during his time in incident occurred as Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were boarding Air Force One, heading to Camp David. Both men appeared to lose their footing briefly on the DOWN GOES DONALDTrump just stumbled and almost faceplanted boarding Air Force One. I've been telling you — he drags his legs and he's clearly not Biden stumbled, the media lost its mind and Tapper wrote an entire fake 'nonfiction' are they Chris D. Jackson (@ChrisDJackson) June 8, 2025advertisementSOCIAL MEDIA MOCKS TRUMP'S STUMBLETrump has often mocked Joe Biden for his public stumbles. However, this time, many on social media turned the joke on Trump himself. Here's how the internet users reacted:"When Biden did this it was wall to wall coverage for days on right wing media and set a narrative. What do you want to bet it won't be mentioned now that Trump has done the same. Human beings trip imagine that.""Biden 2.0 here we go.""It's time again for his cognitive and neurological fitness tests.""Lmao. Dude's 80 why is he president. He's too damn old."A user on X humorously noted, "Damn! We were that close to having a holiday."Earlier that day, Trump spoke to reporters in Hagerstown, Maryland, where he was asked about using the Insurrection Act in response to protests against immigration raids in Los replied, "Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection." When pressed if he believed an insurrection was happening, Trump said, "No, no, but you have violent people. And we're not going to let them get away with it." He added, "We're going to have troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden."
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Los Angeles riot: LAPD declares citywide tactical alert amid anti-ICE protests - What does it mean?
The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) declared a citywide tactical alert on Sunday in response to escalating anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid protests in the city. 'The City of Los Angeles is on Tactical Alert,' the LAPD said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. According to Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, a tactical alert 'is the preliminary step to personnel mobilization. It includes the controlled redistribution of on-duty personnel'. 'A Tactical Alert may be initiated in selected Stations/Units, all Stations or any Department facility,' the department adds. The alert ensures sufficient officer availability by extending shifts, canceling leaves, and prioritizing urgent calls (Code 2 and 3, involving lights/sirens or felonies), while non-urgent calls, like business disputes, are deferred. This comes a day after National Guard troops were deployed in LA as protestors marched against the ICE raids in the city. Several rioters confronted troops in front of the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles, where several of the newly arrived National Guard troops stood shoulder to shoulder behind plastic riot shields. Video showed uniformed officers shooting off the smoke-filled canisters as they advanced into the street, forcing protesters to retreat. The deployment followed two days of protests that began Friday. Governor Gavin Newsom accused Trump of a 'complete overreaction' designed to create a spectacle of force. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Trump told reporters as he prepared to board Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, Sunday: 'We're gonna have troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden.' He, however, didn't elaborate. 'If officials stay in the way of law and order, yeah, they will face charges,' Trump said.
