
The fate of California's emissions standards is now in the Senate's hands
WASHINGTON — Congress might plow ahead with its push to repeal California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards, even as the legality of the effort remains unclear.
The House passed resolutions this week to rescind federal waivers that allow California to set stricter vehicle emissions standards than the rest of the country, including requiring the sale of most gas-powered vehicles be phased out by 2035 as well as mandating reductions in nitrogen oxide and other emissions for trucks.
The Senate is now considering whether to take up the legislation.
California is the only state that can seek permission from the Environmental Protection Agency to establish emissions policies stricter than federal law, which means it often has the nation's most aggressive environmental policies. Other states can only pass similar policies once the federal government has approved California's, and automakers often build their vehicles to California's standards.
Congress is attempting to use a tool called the Congressional Review Act, which allows lawmakers to rescind federal agency actions with a majority vote — a much faster path than the administrative process, which can take a year or longer.
But Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough — an unelected, nonpartisan rules arbiter — determined April 4 that California's waivers weren't subject to the CRA. The Government Accountability Office, an independent agency that audits Congress, made a similar determination on the basis that the waivers are individual administration actions, not agency rules.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, said Republicans are 'exploring our options' about how they could vote to roll back the waivers. 'Because it's somewhat unprecedented, I think we're looking at all the implications around it to see what options are available,' he told Politico Monday.
'The Congressional Review Act was designed to provide a mechanism for congressional oversight of new rules by federal agencies — not for partisan attacks on duly-adopted state laws. Not only would the misuse of the CRA undermine the integrity of our democratic process, but it would also be unlawful,' Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement. 'We urge the U.S. Senate to abide by the determinations of the GAO and Senate Parliamentarian that these CRA resolutions should not proceed.'
Gov. Gavin Newsom said House Republicans are determined to 'make California smoggy again.'
Project 2025, the far-right blueprint for a second Trump presidency that was co-written by Russell Vought, who is now President Donald Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, called for revoking the waivers.
House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana told the Chronicle Wednesday he hadn't discussed the bills with the Senate.
Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Rocklin, said he hopes the Senate will take up the resolutions. 'It's an important issue and, clearly, it's a national policy,' he said. 'That's exactly what the CRA was designed for.'
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso of Wyoming and Senate Environment Committee Chair Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia each told Axios Thursday that they expect the Senate to take up the House-passed bills.
'We're trying to figure out the best strategy there,' Capito, who introduced the Senate companion resolutions and is also a member of Republican leadership, told Axios. Capito expects the Senate to take them up before June 1.
Congress can rescind recently published federal regulations using the Congressional Review Act, but only has a short window to do so. The window to rescind the rules will likely close in early June.
Capito and Sen. John Cornyn of Texas each characterized the possibility of ignoring the parliamentarian's ruling as an exception.
Republicans are already planning an end-run around MacDonough, however, to extend President Donald Trump's 2017 tax credits without the $4.6 trillion cost and securing 60 votes to pass it.
Four Senate Republicans — including Susan Collins of Maine, Cornyn, John Curtis of Utah and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — reportedly raised concerns about sidestepping MacDonough in the financial tally to extend those tax credits. Cornyn told reporters that the Senate wouldn't overrule the parliamentarian with regard to the tax credit package and that Republicans wouldn't have the votes to do so.
The Senate has overruled the parliamentarian only on rare occasions, including to remove the filibuster on presidential nominations in 2013 and Supreme Court nominations in 2017, or when Vice President Nelson Rockefeller overruled the parliamentarian in 1975.
Thune could also fire MacDonough, as Republicans did in 2001 when then-Parliamentarian Robert Dove ruled against them in a way that made it difficult to pass President George W. Bush's tax cuts.
California's waivers aren't opposed on a strictly partisan basis, however. Several House Democrats, including two Californians, crossed the aisle to support revoking the waivers.
Thirty-five Democrats, including Reps. Lou Correa of Santa Ana (Orange County) and George Whitesides of Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County), supported revoking the waiver that allows California to ban the sale of new gas vehicles by 2035. A spokesperson for Whitesides declined to comment.
'As a lawmaker, my primary job is to listen to my neighbors and respect their choices to do what is best for their families and their circumstances. That means protecting consumers' rights to drive whatever vehicle makes sense for them and their pocketbooks,' Correa said in a statement to the Chronicle.
About a dozen Democrats, none of whom represent California, supported revoking the other two waivers regulating truck emissions standards.
Rescinding the waivers was a serious concern to Rep. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Antioch, who told the Chronicle in December that he was worried the incoming administration would attempt to revoke them. 'There is a financial interest in keeping California at the forefront of new energy. And because of the way the Clean Air Act is written, no other state can do that without us showing leadership,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats fend off GOP in San Antonio mayor runoff election
Former Biden administration official Gina Ortiz Jones has won a runoff election in San Antonio's mayoral race, fending off a Republican opponent that the GOP hoped could pull off an upset, Decision Desk HQ projects. Jones defeated former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos in an officially nonpartisan election that still in practice played out as a partisan election as Jones is a registered Democrat and Pablos is a registered Republican. The two candidates had advanced from the first round of the election in which many competed on the same ballot. Since no candidate received a majority of the vote in that round last month, the top two performing candidates advanced to face each other in the runoff. The city of San Antonio hasn't elected a Republican mayor in more than 20 years, and the past two elections for outgoing Mayor Ron Nirenberg, who has served since 2017, haven't been close. Nirenberg is term-limited from running again after serving four two-year terms. But Republicans had hope that they could notch a win with Pablos, who served as secretary of state for about two years under Gov. Greg Abbott (R). The GOP made some gains in the city in November after three presidential races in a row in which the city swung toward Democrats, though former Vice President Harris still comfortably won the area. Pablos also had a significant fundraising advantage, outraising Jones by a margin of 1.5 to 1, while outside spending from PACs contributed more than triple the amount in favor of Pablos compared to Jones, according to DDHQ. That includes a PAC with ties to Abbott and San Antonio's police union, The Texas Tribune reported. Pablos also picked up an endorsement from the editorial board of the San Antonio Express-News, uncommon for a Republican. But Jones was still the favorite in the Democratic-leaning city, even despite the gains that President Trump and the GOP has made with Hispanic voters recently. She finished first in the first round of voting in May, receiving 27.2 percent of the vote in a crowded field to Pablos's 16.6 percent. Jones previously served as undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration from 2021 to 2023. Before that, she was the Democratic nominee for the House seat in Texas's 23rd Congressional District in 2018 and 2020, losing narrowly both times. She will be San Antonio's third female mayor and the first person to serve a four-year term after voters in the city approved a measure in November extending the mayor's term from two years to four. She will also be the city's first openly lesbian mayor.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Issues Jaw-Dropping Authoritarian Threat to Elon Musk
As President Donald Trump works through the seven stages of grief that come with a big break-up, he's embracing anger—and directing at it his former ally Elon Musk. After two days of snapping at each other online, a historic public feud that pitted two of the world's most powerful men against each other, Trump decided to turn up the heat Saturday. Speaking with NBC News' Kristen Welker, he promised 'serious consequences' if Tesla billionaire Musk were to fund Democratic candidates in attempts to sabotage Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The threat came after Musk begged Congress to vote down the legislation, which is estimated to add some $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit, calling it 'ugly' and 'pork filled.' 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News in a phone interview. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences.' Musk, the world's richest man, claimed Thursday that he was the reason for Trump's re-election, having donating $288 million to his presidential campaign. He called the president out for 'such ingratitude.' The intense clash escalated so much that the former 'First Buddy' dropped a bombshell alleging that Trump 'is in the Epstein files.' He has since scrubbed the post from his page, although it originally told readers: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' (Trump dismissed the allegations about his connection with the now-deceased Jeffrey Epstein. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said on Saturday. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.') But while Musk's move to delete the post could be a sign that he'd consider backing off, Trump has decided instead to launch a new assault. Trump told NBC that he had no desire to repair his relationship with Musk. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' he said, adding, 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' And when asked if the four-month bromance was completely over, a sullen Trump said: 'I would assume so, yeah.' Trump had previously suggested that his once-close adviser had developed 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot,' he said at the time. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it.' On Saturday Trump told NBC that Musk was 'disrespectful to the office of the President.' 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' he added. Trump's ominous suggestion of 'serious consequences' isn't the first threat he's launched against Musk. On Thursday he warned that he was contemplating cutting the SpaceX CEO's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' he posted on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' On Saturday, he said that the move was still on the table: 'I'd be allowed to do that,' he said, 'but I have, I haven't given it any thought.' Trump also suggested that it was Musk who was reeling from the toxic breakup. 'I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken,' he said.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Right-wing Colombian presidential candidate, senator shot during campaign rally
Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe was shot in Bogota on Saturday, according to the government and his party, and local media reported that he was in a local hospital in serious condition. The 39-year-old senator, who is running for the presidency in 2026, is a member of the opposition conservative Democratic Center party founded by former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. The two men are not related. Senator Miguel Uribe looks on after the Senate voted against the government labor reform referendum promoted by Colombia's President Gustavo Petro in Bogota on May 14, 2025. AFP via Getty Images According to a party statement condemning the attack, the senator was hosting a campaign event in a public park in the Fontibon neighborhood in the capital on Saturday when 'armed subjects shot him in the back.' The party described the attack as serious, but did not disclose further details on Uribe's condition. Colombia's Defense Minister Pedro Sanchez said a suspect had been arrested in the shooting and that authorities were investigating whether others were involved. Sanchez said he had visited the hospital where Uribe was being treated. Police officers cordon off the area where Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay of the opposition Democratic Center party, was shot during a campaign event, in Bogota, Colombia, June 7, 2025. REUTERS Colombia's presidency issued a statement saying the government 'categorically and forcefully' rejected the violent attack, and called for a thorough investigation into the events that took place. Uribe is from a prominent family in Colombia, with links to the country's Liberal Party. His father was a businessman and union leader. His mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was kidnapped in 1990 by an armed group under the command of the late cartel leader Pablo Escobar. She was killed during a rescue operation.